A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Celton, Magalie ^a,b   Sanchez, Isabelle ^a   Goelzer, Anne ^b   Fromion, Vincent ^b   Camarasa, Carole ^a   Dequin, Sylvie ^a  

^a SPO   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2,3 BUTANEDIOL; ACETOIN; CARBON; CARBON 13; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE;

AMINO ACID SYNTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOMICS; CELL LEVEL; ENZYME MODIFICATION; FLUXOMICS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS CULTURE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE INDUCTION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC REGULATION; METABOLOMICS; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION STATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; UPREGULATION;

BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CARBON ISOTOPES; DOWN-REGULATION; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; NAD; NADP; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UP-REGULATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84865574629     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-317     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Nielsen J. It is all about metabolic fluxes. J Bacteriol 2003, 185:7031. 10.1128/JB.185.24.7031-7035.2003, 296266, 14645261.
2. Bro C, Regenberg B, Forster J, Nielsen J. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Metab Eng 2006, 8:102-111. 10.1016/j.ymben.2005.09.007, 16289778.
3. Heux S, Cadiere A, Dequin S. Glucose utilization of strains lacking PGI1 and expressing a transhydrogenase suggests differences in the pentose phosphate capacity among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:217-224. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00330.x, 18036177.
4. Michnick S, Roustan JL, Remize F, Barre P, Dequin S. Modulation of glycerol and ethanol yields during alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressed or disrupted for GPD1 encoding glycerol 3 phosphate dehydrogenase. Yeast 1997, 13:783-793. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199707)13:9<783::AID-YEA128>3.0.CO;2-W, 9234667.
5. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S. A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2012, 14:366-79. 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.03.008, 22709677.
6. Vaseghi S, Baumeister A, Rizzi M, Reuss M. In vivo dynamics of the pentose phosphate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 1999, 1:128-140. 10.1006/mben.1998.0110, 10935926.
7. Larochelle M, Drouin S, Robert F, Turcotte B. Oxidative stress-activated zinc cluster protein Stb5 has dual activator/repressor functions required for pentose phosphate pathway regulation and NADPH production. Mol Cell Biol 2006, 26:6690-6701. 10.1128/MCB.02450-05, 1592823, 16914749.
8. Akache B, Wu K, Turcotte B. Phenotypic analysis of genes encoding yeast zinc cluster proteins. Nucl Acids Res 2001, 29:2181. 10.1093/nar/29.10.2181, 55459, 11353088.
9. Hector RE, Bowman MJ, Skory CD, Cotta MA. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae YMR315W gene encodes an NADP(H)-specific oxidoreductase regulated by the transcription factor Stb5p in response to NADPH limitation. New biotechnol 2009, 26:171-180.
10. Matsufuji Y, Nakagawa T, Fujimura S, Tani A, Nakagawa J. Transcription factor Stb5p is essential for acetaldehyde tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Basic Microbiol 2010, 50:494-498. 10.1002/jobm.200900391, 20806246.
11. Cadière A, Galeote V, Dequin S. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc factor protein Stb5p is required as a basal regulator of the pentose phosphate pathway. FEMS Yeast Res 2010, 10:819-827. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00672.x, 20738406.
12. Regenberg B, Grotkjær T, Winther O, Fausbøll A, Åkesson M, Bro C, Hansen LK, Brunak S, Nielsen J. Growth-rate regulated genes have profound impact on interpretation of transcriptome profiling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 2006, 7:R107. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-r107, 1794586, 17105650.
13. De Smidt O, Du Preez JC, Albertyn J. The alcohol dehydrogenases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comprehensive review. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:967-978. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00387.x, 18479436.
14. Blomberg A. Metabolic surprises in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during adaptation to saline conditions: questions, some answers and a model. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 182:1-8. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08864.x, 10612722.
15. Clasquin MF, Melamud E, Singer A, Gooding JR, Xu X, Dong A, Cui H, Campagna SR, Savchenko A, Yakunin AF. Riboneogenesis in Yeast. Cell 2011, 145:969-980. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.022, 3163394, 21663798.
16. Vargas RC, Garcia-Salcedo R, Tenreiro S, Teixeira MC, Fernandes AR, Ramos J, Sa-Correia I. Saccharomyces cerevisiae multidrug resistance transporter Qdr2 is implicated in potassium uptake, providing a physiological advantage to quinidine-stressed cells. Euk Cell 2007, 6:134.
17. Larroy C, Parés X, Biosca JA. Characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae NADP(H)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (ADHVII), a member of the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase family. Eur J Biochem 2002, 269:5738-5745. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03296.x, 12423374.
18. Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U. Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxireductases. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:7631. 10.1128/AEM.01649-09, 2794096, 19854918.
19. Liu ZL, Moon J. A novel NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-12632 involved in the detoxification of aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Gene 2009, 446:1-10. 10.1016/j.gene.2009.06.018, 19577617.
20. Krüger A, Grüning NM, Wamelink MMC, Kerick M, Kirpy A, Parkhomchuk D, Bluemlein K, Schweiger MR, Soldatov A, Lehrach H. The pentose phosphate pathway is a metabolic redox sensor and regulates transcription during the anti-oxidant response. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011, 15:311-324. 10.1089/ars.2010.3797, 21348809.
21. Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Sauer U. Molecular basis for anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on xylose, investigated by global gene expression and metabolic flux analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70:2307. 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2307-2317.2004, 383160, 15066826.
22. Daran-Lapujade P, Jansen MLA, Daran JM, van Gulik W, de Winde JH, Pronk JT. Role of transcriptional regulation in controlling fluxes in central carbon metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:9125-9138. 10.1074/jbc.M309578200, 14630934.
23. Wessely F, Bartl M, Guthke R, Li P, Schuster S, Kaleta C. Optimal regulatory strategies for metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli depending on protein costs. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:515. 3159982, 21772263.
24. Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 25:117-124.
25. Kaiser P, Su NY, Yen J, Ouni I, Flick K. The yeast ubiquitin ligase SCFMet30: connecting environmental and intracellular conditions to cell division. Cell Div 2006, 1:16. 10.1186/1747-1028-1-16, 1579207, 16895602.
26. Thomas D, Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y. Identification of the structural gene for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in yeast. Inactivation leads to a nutritional requirement for organic sulfur. EMBO J 1991, 10:547. 452682, 2001672.
27. Hansen J, Johannesen PF. Cysteine is essential for transcriptional regulation of the sulfur assimilation genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 2000, 263:535-542. 10.1007/s004380051199, 10821189.
28. Slekar KH, Kosman DJ, Culotta VC. The yeast copper/zinc superoxide dismutase and the pentose phosphate pathway play overlapping roles in oxidative stress protection. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:28831. 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28831, 8910528.
29. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, Hannett NM, Tagne JB, Reynolds DB, Yoo J. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2004, 431:99. 10.1038/nature02800, 3006441, 15343339.
30. Albers E, Laizé V, Blomberg A, Hohmann S, Gustafsson L. Ser3p (Yer081wp) and Ser33p (Yil074cp) are phosphoglycerate dehydrogenases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:10264. 10.1074/jbc.M211692200, 12525494.
31. Verstrepen KJ, Moonjai N, Bauer FF, Derdelinckx G, Dufour JP, Winderickx J, Thevelein JM, Pretorius IS, Delvaux FR. Genetic regulation of ester synthesis in yeast: new facts, insights and implications for the brewer. Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance 2003, 234-248. Blackwell Science, Oxford, Smart K, 2.
32. Heux S, Cachon R, Dequin S. Cofactor engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Expression of a H2O-forming NADH oxidase and impact on redox metabolism. Met Eng 2006, 8:303-314.32.
33. Larsson C, Nilsson A, Blomberg A, Gustafsson L. Glycolytic flux is conditionally correlated with ATP concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a chemostat study under carbon-or nitrogen-limiting conditions. J Bacteriol 1997, 179:7243. 179672, 9393686.
34. Rossell S, Van Der Weijden CC, Lindenbergh A, Van Tuijl A, Francke C, Bakker BM, Westerhoff HV. Unraveling the complexity of flux regulation: a new method demonstrated for nutrient starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2006, 103:2166. 10.1073/pnas.0509831103, 1413710, 16467155.
35. Ambroset C, Petit M, Brion C, Sanchez I, Delobel P, Guérin C, Chiapello H, Nicolas P, Bigey F, Dequin S. Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3 2011, 1:263-281. 2011, 3276144, 22384338.
36. Ehsani M, Fernández MR, Biosca JA, Dequin S. Reversal of coenzyme specificity of 2, 3-butanediol dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisae and in vivo functional analysis. Biotech Bioeng 2009, 104:381-389.
37. Sablayrolles JM, Barre P, Grenier P. Design of a laboratory automatic system for studying alcoholic fermentations in anisothermal enological conditions. Biotechnol Tech 1987, 1:181-184.38.
38. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 1987, 162:156-159.
39. Le Berre V, Trévisiol E, Dagkessamanskaia A, Sokol S, Caminade AM, Majoral JP, Meunier B, François J. Dendrimeric coating of glass slides for sensitive DNA microarrays analysis. Nucl Acids Res 2003, 31:e88. 10.1093/nar/gng088, 169980, 12907740.
40. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL R-project.org.
41. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2067, 2005:21.
42. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Appl Gen Mol Biol 2004, 3:3.
43. Smyth GK, Speed T. Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 2003, 31:265-273. 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00155-5, 14597310.
44. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Res 2001, 125:289-300.
45. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Tan Q, Kir J, Liu D, Bryant D, Guo Y, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC. DAVID Bioinformatics Resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucl Acids Res 2007, 35(suppl2):W169. 1933169, 17576678.
46. Wu L, Mashego MR, van Dam JC, Proell AM, Vinke JL, Ras C, van Winden WA, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Quantitative analysis of the microbial metabolome by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using uniformly 13 C-labeled cell extracts as internal standards. Anal Biochem 2005, 336:164-171. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.09.001, 15620880.
47. Christensen B, Nielsen J. Isotopomer analysis using GC-MS. Met Eng 1999, 1:282-290.
48. Gombert AK, dos Moreira Santos M, Christensen B, Nielsen J. Network identification and flux quantification in the central metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different conditions of glucose repression. J Bacteriol 2001, 183:1441. 10.1128/JB.183.4.1441-1451.2001, 95019, 11157958.
49. Heux S. Ingénierie métabolique et analyse13C-flux du métabolisme central des levuresSaccharomyces cerevisiaeœnologiques.PhD Thesis 2006, University of Burgundy, Sciences de la vie et de la santé, 3423394, 22916295.