Fermentation inhibitors in ethanol processes and different strategies to reduce their effects

Biofuels

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 287-311

  Taherzadeh, Mohammad J ^a   Karimi, Keikhosro ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

^b ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882478354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385099-7.00012-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (140)

1. Adler L., Blomberg A., Nilsson A. Glycerol metabolism and osmoregulation in the salt-tolerant yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. J. Bacteriol. 1985, 162:300-306.
2. Alén R., Sjöström E., Suominen S. Application of ion-exclusion chromatography to alkaline pulping liquors; separation of hydroxy carboxylic acids from inorganic solids. J. Chemical Technol. Biotechnol. 1991, 51:225-233.
3. Almeida J.R., Modig T., Petersson A., Hähn-Hägerdal B., Lidén G., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Chemical Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82:340-349.
4. Almeida J.R., Bertilsson M., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., Gorsich S., Liden G. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82:625-638.
5. Almeida J.R., Bertilsson M., Hahn-Hagerdal B., Liden G., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F. Carbon fluxes of xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains are affected differently by NADH and NADPH usage in HMF reduction. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84:751-761.
6. Alriksson B., Cavka A., Jonsson L.J. Improving the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolysates of lignocellulose through chemical in-situ detoxification with reducing agents. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1254-1263.
7. André L., Nilsson A., Adler L. The role of glycerol in osmotolerance of the yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1988, 134:669-677.
8. Arslan Y., Eken-Saracoglu N. Effects of pretreatment methods for hazelnut shell hydrolysate fermentation with Pichia stipitis to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8664-8670.
9. Azhar A.F., Bery M.K., Colcord A.R., Roberts R.S., Corbitt G.V. Factors affecting alcohol fermentation of wood acid hydrolyzate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1981, 11:293-300.
10. Azhar A.F., Bery M.K., Colcord A.R., Roberts R.S. Development of a yeast strain for the efficient ethanol fermentation of wood acid hydrolyzate. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1982, 23:351-360.
11. Baek S.W., Kim J.S., Park Y.K., Kim Y.S., Oh K.K. The effect of sugar decomposed on the ethanol fermentation and decomposition reactions of sugars. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2008, 13:332-341.
12. Banerjee N., Vishwanathan L. Effect of furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural on the growth and alcohol production by yeasts. Proc. Annu. Conv. Sugar Technol. Assoc. India 40 1974, G1-G4.
13. Banerjee N., Bhatnagar R., Viswanathan L. Development of resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae against inhibitory effects of Browning reaction products. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1981, 3:24-28.
14. Banerjee N., Bhatnagar R., Viswanathan L. Inhibition of glycolysis by furfural in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1981, 11:224-228.
15. Borole A.P., Mielenz J.R., Vishnivetskaya T.A., Hamilton C.Y. Controlling accumulation of fermentation inhibitors in biorefinery recycle water using microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2:1-14.
16. Bowman M.J., Jordan D.B., Vermillion K.E., Braker J.D., Moon J., Liu Z.L. Stereochemistry of furfural reduction by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae aldehyde reductase that contributes to in situ furfural detoxification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:4926-4932.
17. Brandberg T., Karimi K., Taherzadeh M.J., Franzen C.J., Gustafsson L. Continuous fermentation of wheat-supplemented lignocellulose hydrolysate with different types of cell retention. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98:80-90.
18. Breisha G.Z. Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose. Biomass Bioenerg. 2010, 34:1243-1249.
19. Brethauer S., Wyman C.E. Review: continuous hydrolysis and fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4862-4874.
20. Brovenko G., Gusel'nikova T. Chemical composition of wood hydrolyzates as a substrate for microbial protein synthesis. 1. Furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural. Gidroliz. Lesokhim. Prom-st. 1993, 1:6-10.
21. Canilha L., Carvalho W., Felipe M.G., Silva J.B., Giulietti M. Ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate using Pichia stipitis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 161:84-92.
22. Carvalho G.B.M., Mussatto S.I., Candido E.J., Silva J. Comparison of different procedures for the detoxification of eucalyptus hemicellulosic hydrolysate for use in fermentative processes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:152-157.
23. Castro G.A., Caicedo L.A., Almeciga-Diaz C.J., Sanchez O.F. Solvent extraction of organic acids from stillage for its re-use in ethanol production process. Waste Manag. Res. 2010, 28:533-538.
24. Chung I.S., Lee Y.Y. Ethanol fermentation of crude acid hydrolyzate of cellulose using high-level yeast inocula. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1985, 27:308-315.
25. Converti A., Dominguez J.M., Perego P., da Silva S.S., Zilli M. Wood hydrolysis and hydrolysate detoxification for subsequent xylitol production. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2000, 23:1013-1020.
26. Dake M.S., Jadhv J.P., Patil N.B. Variations of two pools of glycogen and carbohydrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown with various ethanol concentrations. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 37:701-706.
27. Daugulis A.J. Integrated fermentation and recovery processes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1994, 5:192-195.
28. Dehkhoda A., Brandberg T., Taherzadeh M.J. Comparison of vacuum and high pressure evaporated wood hydrolyzate for ethanol production by repeated fed-batch using flocculating Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Bioresources 2009, 4:309-320.
29. Deutscher J. The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11:87-93.
30. Devantier R., Scheithauer B., Villas-Boas S.G., Pedersen S., Olsson L. Metabolite profiling for analysis of yeast stress response during very high gravity ethanol fermentations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90:703-714.
31. Duarte L.C., Carvalheiro F., Neves I., Girio F.M. Effects of aliphatic acids, furfural, and phenolic compounds on Debaryomyces hansenii CCMI 941. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 121-124:413-425.
32. Escobar J.M., Rane K.D., Cheryan M. Ethanol production in a membrane bioreactor: pilot-scale trials in a corn wet mill. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2001, 91-93:283-296.
33. Fargues C., Lewandowski R., Lameloise M.L. Evaluation of ion-exchange and adsorbent resins for the detoxification of beet distillery effluents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:9248-9257.
34. Gancedo J.M. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62:334-361.
35. Ghose T.K., Roychoudhury P.K., Ghosh P. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of lignocellulosics to ethanol under vacuum cycling and step feeding. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984, 26:377-381.
36. Gibbons W.R., Westby C.A. Cofermentation of sweet sorghum juice and grain for production of fuel ethanol and distillers' wet grain. Biomass 1989, 18:43-57.
37. Gnansounou E., Dauriat A. Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4980-4991.
38. Gottschalk G. Control of product formation in anaerobes. Dechema Monographs 1987, 105:43-53.
39. Gough S., Brady D., Nigam P., Marchant R., McHale A.P. Production of ethanol from molasses at 45 °C using alginate-immobilized Kluyveromyces marxianus imb3. Bioprocess Eng. 1997, 16:389-392.
40. Guadalupe Medina V., Almering M.J., van Maris A.J., Pronk J.T. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:190-195.
41. Gutierrez T., Buszko M.L., Ingram L.O., Preston J.F. Reduction of furfural to furfuryl alcohol by ethanologenic strains of bacteria and its effect on ethanol production from xylose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 98-100:327-340.
42. Gutierrez T., Ingram L.O., Preston J.F. Purification and characterization of a furfural reductase (FFR) from Escherichia coli strain LYO1-an enzyme important in the detoxification of furfural during ethanol production. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 121:154-164.
43. Gutiérrez T., Ingram L.O., Preston J.F. Purification and characterization of a furfural reductase (FFR) from Escherichia coli strain LYO1-an enzyme important in the detoxification of furfural during ethanol production. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 121:154-164.
44. Heer D., Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial. Biotechnol. 2008, 6:497-506.
45. Heipieper H.J., Weber F.J., Sikkema J., Keweloh H., de Bont J.A.M. Mechanisms of resistance of whole cells to toxic organic solvents. Trends Biotechnol. 1994, 12:409-415.
46. Himmel M.E. Biomass Recalcitrance: Deconstructing the Plant Cell Wall for Bioenergy 2008, Blackwell, Oxford.
47. Horvath I.S., Taherzadeh M.J., Niklasson C., Liden G. Effects of furfural on anaerobic continuous cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 75:540-549.
48. Jayakody L.N., Hayashi N., Kitagaki H. Identification of glycolaldehyde as the key inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation by yeast and genome-wide analysis of its toxicity. Biotechnol. Lett 2011, 33:285-292.
49. Jeon Y.J., Xun Z., Rogers P.L. Comparative evaluations of cellulosic raw materials for second generation bioethanol production. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 51:518-524.
50. John E.H. Ethanol-induced water stress in yeast. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998, 85:125-137.
51. Jones R.P., Greenfield P.F. Role of water activity in ethanol fermentations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28:29-40.
52. Jönsson L.J., Palmqvist E., Nilvebrant N.O., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 49:691-697.
53. Kapucu H., Mehmetoglu U. Strategies for reducing solvent toxicity in extractive ethanol fermentation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1998, 75:205-214.
54. Karimi K., Brandberg T., Edebo L., Taherzadeh M.J. Fed-batch cultivation of Mucor indicus in dilute-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzate for ethanol production. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27:1395-1400.
55. Keating J.D., Panganiban C., Mansfield S.D. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 93:1196-1206.
56. Kelly C., Jones O., Barnhart C., Lajoie C. Effect of furfural, vanillin and syringaldehyde on Candida guilliermondii growth and xylitol biosynthesis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2008, 148:97-108.
57. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66:10-26.
58. Kuhad R.C., Gupta R., Khasa Y.P., Singh A. Bioethanol production from Lantanacamara (red sage): pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8348-8354.
59. Laadan B., Almeida J.R., Radstrom P., Hahn-Hagerdal B., Gorwa-Grauslund M. Identification of an NADH-dependent 5-hydroxymethylfurfural-reducing alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2008, 25:191-198.
60. Larsson M., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Recirculation of process water in the production of ethanol from softwood. Bioresour. Technol. 1997, 60:143-151.
61. Larsson S., Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B., Tengborg C., Stenberg K., Zacchi G., et al. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 24:151-159.
62. Larsson S., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N.O., Jonsson L.J. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1999, 77-9:91-103.
63. Lee W., Lee J., Park B., Kim M., Park S., Chang H. Continuous ethanol production from wood hydrolysate by chemostat and total cell retention culture. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 1996, 13:453-456.
64. Li H., Zhang X., Shen Y., Dong Y., Bao X. Inhibitors and their effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and relevant countermeasures in bioprocess of ethanol production from lignocellulose-a review. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2009, 25:1321-1328.
65. Liu Z.L., Moon J., Andersh B.J., Slininger P.J., Weber S. Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 81:743-753.
66. Lu P., Chen L.J., Li G.X., Shen S.H., Wang L.L., Jiang Q.Y., et al. Influence of furfural concentration on growth and ethanol yield of Saccharomyces kluyveri. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2007, 19:1528-1532.
67. Lynd L.R., Baskaran S., Casten S. Salt accumulation resulting from base added for pH control, and not ethanol, limits growth of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum HG-8 at elevated feed xylose concentrations in continuous culture. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17:118-125.
68. Maiorella B.L. Ethanol. Industrial Chemicals, Biochemicals and Fuels, V. 3, Comprehensive Biotechnology 1983, 861-914. Pergamon Press. M. Young (Ed.).
69. Maiorella B., Blanch H.W., Wilke C.R. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983, 25:103-121.
70. Maiorella B.L., Blanch H.W., Wilke C.R. Feed component inhibition in ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984, 26:1155-1166.
71. Martinez A., Rodriguez M.E., Wells M.L., York S.W., Preston J.F., Ingram L.O. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol. Prog. 2001, 17:287-293.
72. Millati R., Niklasson C., Taherzadeh M.J. Effect of pH, time and temperature of overliming on detoxification of dilute-acid hydrolyzates for fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Process Biochem. 2002, 38:515-522.
73. Miller E.N., Jarboe L.R., Turner P.C., Pharkya P., Yomano L.P., York S.W., et al. Furfural inhibits growth by limiting sulfur assimilation in ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain LY180. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:6132-6141.
74. Miller E.N., Jarboe L.R., Yomano L.P., York S.W., Shanmugam K.T., Ingram L.O. Silencing of NADPH-dependent oxidoreductase genes (yqhD and dkgA) in furfural-resistant ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:4315-4323.
75. Minier M., Goma G. Ethanol production by extractive fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1982, 24:1565-1579.
76. Mira N.P., Palma M., Guerreiro J.F., Sa-Correia I. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microb. Cell Fact. 2010, 9:79.
77. Modig T., Liden G., Taherzadeh M.J. Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 2002, 363:769-776.
78. Mori Y., Inaba T. Ethanol production from starch in a pervaporation membrane bioreactor using Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1990, 36:849-853.
79. Mussatto S.I., Roberto I.C. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:1-10.
80. Navarro A.R. Effects of furfural on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae-mathematical-models. Curr. Microbiol. 1994, 29:87-90.
81. Nemirovskii V., Kostenko V. Transformation of yeast growth inhibitors, which occurs during biochemical processing of wood hydrolyzates. Gidroliz. Lesokhim. Prom-st. 1991, 1:16-17.
82. Nemirovskii V.D., Gusarova L.A., Rakhmilevich Y.D., Sizov A.I., Kostenko V.G. Furfurol and hydroxymethylfurfurol transformation routes during culturing of nutrient yeasts. Biotekhnologiya 1989, 5:285-289.
83. Nichols N.N., Dien B.S., Cotta M.A. Fermentation of bioenergy crops into ethanol using biological abatement for removal of inhibitors. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:7545-7550.
84. Nigam J.N. Ethanol production from hardwood spent sulfite liquor using an adapted strain of Pichia stipitis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 26:145-150.
85. Nilsson A., Taherzadeh M.J., Lidén G. Use of dynamic step response for control of fed-batch conversion of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates to ethanol. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 89:41-53.
86. Nilvebrant N.O., Reimann A., Larsson S., Jonsson L.J. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates with ion-exchange resins. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2001, 91-3:35-49.
87. Ogawa Y., Nitta A., Uchiyama H., Imamura T., Shimoi H., Ito K. Tolerance mechanism of the ethanol-tolerant mutant of sake yeast. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90:313-320.
88. Ok T., Hashinaga F. Identification of sugar-tolerant yeasts isolated from high-sugar fermented vegetable extracts. J.Gen. Appl. Microb. 1997, 43:39-47.
89. Olsson L., HahnHagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 18:312-331.
90. Osho A. Ethanol and sugar tolerance of wine yeasts isolated from fermenting cashew apple juice. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4:660-662.
91. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:17-24.
92. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:25-33.
93. Palmqvist E., Almeida J., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 62:447-457.
94. Parajo J.C., Dominguez H., Dominguez J.M. Improved xylitol production with Debaryomyces hansenii Y-7426 from raw or detoxified wood hydrolysates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1997, 21:18-24.
95. Parawira W., Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31:20-31.
96. Park J., Chang H. Microencapsulation of microbial cells. Biotechnol. Adv. 2000, 18:303-319.
97. Petersson A., Almeida J.R., Modig T., Karhumaa K., Hahn-Hagerdal B., Gorwa-Grauslund M.F., et al. A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 2006, 23:455-464.
98. Pourbafrani M., Talebnia F., Niklasson C., Taherzadeh M.J. Protective effect of encapsulation in fermentation of limonene-contained media and orange peel hydrolyzate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8:777-787.
99. Purwadi R., Niklasson C., Taherzadeh M.J. Kinetic study of detoxification of dilute-acid hydrolyzates by Ca(OH)2. J. Biotechnol. 2004, 114:187-198.
100. Purwadi R., Brandberg T., Taherzadeh M.J. A possible industrial solution to ferment lignocellulosic hydrolyzate to ethanol: continuous cultivation with flocculating yeast. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8:920-932.
101. Ricci M., Martini S., Bonechi C., Trabalzini L., Santucci A., Rossi C. Inhibition effects of ethanol on the kinetics of glucose metabolism by S. cerevisiae: NMR and modelling study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 387:377-382.
102. Rivard C.J., Engel R.E., Hayward T.K., Nagle N.J., Hatzis C., Philippidis G.P. Measurement of the inhibitory potential and detoxification of biomass pretreatment hydrolysate for ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1996, 57-8:183-191.
103. Rodrigues R., Felipe M.G.A., Silva J., Vitolo M., Gomez P.V. The influence of pH, temperature and hydrolyzate concentration on the removal of volatile and nonvolatile compounds from sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolyzate treated with activated charcoal before or after vacuum evaporation. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 18:299-311.
104. Rose A.H. Composition of the envelope layers of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to flocculation and ethanol tolerance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1993, 74(Suppl.):110S-118S.
105. Rufian-Henares J.A., de la Cueva S.P. Assessment of hydroxymethylfurfural intake in the Spanish diet. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess 2008, 25:1306-1312.
106. Sanchez B., Bautista J. Effects of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on the fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and biomass production from Candida guilliermondii. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1988, 10:315-318.
107. Sanchez O.J., Cardona C.A. Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:5270-5295.
108. Sarvari Horvath I., Franzen C.J., Taherzadeh M.J., Niklasson C., Liden G. Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:4076-4086.
109. Schneider H. Selective removal of acetic acid from hardwood-spent sulfite liquor using a mutant yeast. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1996, 19:94-98.
110. Shabtai Y., Chaimovitz S., Freeman A., Katchalski-Katzir E., Linder C., Nemas M., et al. Continuous ethanol production by immobilized yeast reactor coupled with membrane pervaporation unit. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991, 38:869-876.
111. Silva C.J.S.M., Roberto I.e.C. Statistical screening method for selection of important variables on xylitol biosynthesis from rice straw hydrolysate by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037. Biotechnol. Techniques 1999, 13:743-747.
112. Slininger P.J., Gorsich S.W., Liu Z.L. Culture nutrition and physiology impact the inhibitor tolerance of the yeast Pichia stipitis NRRL Y-7124. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102:778-790.
113. Stulke J., Hillen W. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2:195-201.
114. Taherzadeh M.J. Ethanol from lignocellulose: physiological effects of inhibitors and fermentation strategies 1999, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, PhD Thesis.
115. Taherzadeh M.J., Karimi K. Enzymatic-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. Bioresources 2007, 2:707-738.
116. Taherzadeh M.J., Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9:1621-1651.
117. Taherzadeh M.J., Lidén G., Gustafsson L., Niklasson C. The effect of pantothenate deficiency and acetate addition on anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 46:176-182.
118. Taherzadeh M.J., Eklund R., Gustafsson L., Niklasson C., Lidén G. Characterization and fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates from wood. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36:4659-4665.
119. Taherzadeh M.J., Niklasson C., Lidén G. Acetic acid-friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae?. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52:2653-2659.
120. Taherzadeh M.J., Gustafsson L., Niklasson C., Liden G. Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 1999, 87:169-174.
121. Taherzadeh M.J., Niklasson C., Lidén G. Conversion of dilute-acid hydrolyzates of spruce and birch to ethanol by fed-batch fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 69:59-66.
122. Taherzadeh M.J., Gustafsson L., Niklasson C., Lidén G. Inhibition effects of furfural on aerobic batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growing on ethanol and/or acetic acid. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 90:374-380.
123. Taherzadeh M.J., Gustafsson L., Niklasson C., Lidén G. Physiological effects of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 53:701-708.
124. Taherzadeh M.J., Niklasson C., Liden G. On-line control of fed-batch fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 69:330-338.
125. Taherzadeh M.J., Adler L., Lidén G. Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of glycerol-a review. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 31:53-66.
126. Taherzadeh M.J., Fox M., Hjorth H., Edebo L. Production of mycelium biomass and ethanol from paper pulp sulfite liquor by Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 88:167-177.
127. Talebnia F., Taherzadeh M.J. In situ detoxification and continuous cultivation of dilute-acid hydrolyzate to ethanol by encapsulated S. cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 125:377-384.
128. Talebnia F., Taherzadeh M.J. Physiological and morphological study of encapsulated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 41:683-688.
129. Talebnia F., Niklasson C., Taherzadeh M.J. Ethanol production from glucose and dilute-acid hydrolyzates by encapsulated S. cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90:345-353.
130. Tauer A., Elss S., Frischmann M., Tellez P., Pischetsrieder M. Influence of thermally processed carbohydrate/amino acid mixtures on the fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52:2042-2046.
131. Tomas-Pejo E., Ballesteros M., Oliva J.M., Olsson L. Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 37:1211-1220.
132. Walton S., van Heiningen A., van Walsum P. Inhibition effects on fermentation of hardwood extracted hemicelluloses by acetic acid and sodium. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1935-1940.
133. Weber C., Farwick A., Benisch F., Brat D., Dietz H., Subtil T., et al. Trends and challenges in the microbial production of lignocellulosic bioalcohol fuels. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87:1303-1315.
134. Widmer W., Zhou W., Grohmann K. Pretreatment effects on orange processing waste for making ethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5242-5249.
135. Yan F., Bai F., Tian S., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Yang X. Strain construction for ethanol production from dilute-acid lignocellulosic hydrolysate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 157:473-482.
136. Zauner E., Bronn W.K., Dellweg H., Tressl R. Inhibitory activity of impurities of beet molasses and plant protectants on yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) respiration and fermentation. Branntweinwirtschaft 1979, 119:158-160. 163.
137. Zeitsch K.J. The Chemistry and Technology of Furfural and Its Many By-Products 2000, Elsevier. first ed.
138. Zhang J., Chu D., Yu Z., Zhang X., Deng H., Wang X., et al. Process strategy for ethanol production from lignocellulose feedstock under extremely low water usage and high solids loading conditions. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2011, 26:950-959.
139. Zhang J.G., Liu X.Y., He X.P., Guo X.N., Lu Y., Zhang B.R. Improvement of acetic acid tolerance and fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by disruption of the FPS1 aquaglyceroporin gene. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 33:277-284.
140. Zhu J.J., Yong Q., Xu Y., Yu S.Y. Comparative detoxification of vacuum evaporation/steam stripping combined with overliming on corn stover prehydrolyzate 2009, 240-243.