Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 328-335.e2

  Tsirogiannis, Panagiotis ^a   Reissmann, Daniel R ^a   Heydecke, Guido ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERAMICS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; META ANALYSIS; PUBLICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOOTH; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STANDARDS; THERAPEUTIC USE;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS;

EID: 84962711435     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.028     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. 1 Takeichi, T., Katsoulis, J., Blatz, M.B., Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 110 (2013), 455–461.
2. 2 Conrad, H.J., Seong, W.J., Pesun, I.J., Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98 (2007), 389–404.
3. 3 Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38 (2010), 553–559.
4. 4 Kokubo, Y., Nagayama, Y., Tsumita, M., Ohkubo, C., Fukushima, S., Vult von Steyern, P., Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil 32 (2005), 753–758.
5. 5 Souza, R.O., Ozcan, M., Pavanelli, C.A., Buso, L., Lombardo, G.H., Michida, S.M., et al. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont 21 (2012), 94–100.
6. 6 Knoernschild, K.L., Campbell, S.D., Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 84 (2000), 492–498.
7. 7 Sailer, I., Feher, A., Filser, F., Gauckler, L.J., Luthy, H., Hammerle, C.H., Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20 (2007), 383–388.
8. 8 Wostmann, B., Rehmann, P., Trost, D., Balkenhol, M., Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns. J Dent 36 (2008), 508–512.
9. 9 Wostmann, B., Blosser, T., Gouentenoudis, M., Balkenhol, M., Ferger, P., Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients. J Dent 33 (2005), 611–618.
10. 10 Nissan, J., Rosner, O., Bukhari, M.A., Ghelfan, O., Pilo, R., Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 33 (2013), 37–42.
11. 11 Tsitrou, E.A., Northeast, S.E., van Noort, R., Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35 (2007), 68–73.
12. 12 Hamza, T.A., Ezzat, H.A., El-Hossary, M.M., Katamish, H.A., Shokry, T.E., Rosenstiel, S.F., Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 83–87.
13. 13 Levartovsky, S., Zalis, M., Pilo, R., Harel, N., Ganor, Y., Brosh, T., The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area. J Prosthodont 23 (2014), 124–133.
14. 14 Hamalian, T.A., Nasr, E., Chidiac, J.J., Impression materials in fixed prosthodontics: influence of choice on clinical procedure. J Prosthodont 20 (2011), 153–160.
15. 15 Anadioti, E., Aquilino, S.A., Gratton, D.G., Holloway, J.A., Denry, I., Thomas, G.W., et al. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 23 (2014), 610–617.
16. 16 Logozzo, S., Franceschini, G., Kilpelä, A., Caponi, M., Governi, L., Blois, L., A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology, 5, 2008.
17. 17 Guth, J.F., Keul, C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1201–1208.
18. 18 Scotti, R., Cardelli, P., Baldissara, P., Monaco, C., WITHDRAWN: Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent, 2011.
19. 19 Nakamura, T., Tanaka, H., Kinuta, S., Akao, T., Okamoto, K., Wakabayashi, K., et al. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater J 24 (2005), 456–459.
20. 20 Nakamura, T., Dei, N., Kojima, T., Wakabayashi, K., Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003), 244–248.
21. 21 Beschnidt, S.M., Strub, J.R., Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999), 582–593.
22. 22 Coli, P., Karlsson, S., Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004), 577–580.
23. 23 Bindl, A., Mormann, W.H., Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 32 (2005), 441–447.
24. 24 Sulaiman, F., Chai, J., Jameson, L.M., Wozniak, W.T., A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10 (1997), 478–484.
25. 25 Groten, M., Girthofer, S., Probster, L., Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 24 (1997), 871–881.
26. 26 Yeo, I.S., Yang, J.H., Lee, J.B., In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003), 459–464.
27. 27 Romeo, E., Iorio, M., Storelli, S., Camandona, M., Abati, S., Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method. Minerva Stomatologica 58 (2009), 61–72.
28. 28 McLean, J.W., von Fraunhofer, J.A., The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131 (1971), 107–111.
29. 29 Ng, J., Ruse, D., Wyatt, C., A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 555–560.
30. 30 An, S., Kim, S., Choi, H., Lee, J.H., Moon, H.S., Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1171–1175.
31. 31 Brawek, P.K., Wolfart, S., Endres, L., Kirsten, A., Reich, S., The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 2119–2125.
32. 32 Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., Chipponi, J., Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73 (2003), 712–716.
33. 33 Higgins, J.P., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J., Altman, D.G., Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327 (2003), 557–560.
34. 34 Schaefer, O., Kuepper, H., Sigusch, B.W., Thompson, G.A., Hefti, A.F., Guentsch, A., Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 41 (2013), 271–277.
35. 35 da Costa, J.B., Pelogia, F., Hagedorn, B., Ferracane, J.L., Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 35 (2010), 324–329.
36. 36 Reich, S., Botsis, O., Deligiannis, P., Mehl, A., Fit of surgical guides—manufactured by InLab 3D. Int J Comput Dent 10 (2007), 329–337.
37. 37 Eggbeer, D., Bibb, R., Williams, R., The computer-aided design and rapid prototyping fabrication of removable partial denture frameworks. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 219 (2005), 195–202.
38. 38 Runte, C., Dirksen, D., Delere, H., Thomas, C., Runte, B., Meyer, U., et al. Optical data acquisition for computer-assisted design of facial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002), 129–132.
39. 39 Keul, C., Stawarczyk, B., Erdelt, K.J., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Guth, J.F., Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30 (2014), 400–407.
40. 40 Schaefer, O., Decker, M., Wittstock, F., Kuepper, H., Guentsch, A., Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 42 (2014), 677–683.
41. 41 Nayyar, N., Yilmaz, B., McGlumphy, E., Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent 109 (2013), 210–215.
42. 42 Karl, M., Graef, F., Schubinski, P., Taylor, T., Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Quintessence Int 43 (2012), 555–562.
43. 43 Tahmaseb, A., van de Weijden, J.J., Mercelis, P., De Clerck, R., Wismeijer, D., Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25 (2010), 247–257.
44. 44 Ortorp, A., On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry. Swed Dent J Suppl, 2005, 3–88.
45. 45 Tan, K.B., The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: is there such a thing as passive fit?. Ann Acad Med Singapore 24 (1995), 138–157.
46. 46 Lee, C.Y., Wong, N., Ganz, S.D., Mursic, J., Suzuki, J.B., Use of an intraoral laser scanner during the prosthetic phase of implant dentistry: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol 41 (2015), 126–132.
47. 47 Kurtzman, G.M., Dompkowski, D.E., Using digital impressions and CAD/CAM in implant dentistry. Dent Today 33:114 (2014), 116–117.
48. 48 Ortorp, A., Jonsson, D., Mouhsen, A., Vult von Steyern, P., The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 27 (2011), 356–363.
49. 49 Pandita, A., Jain, T., Yadav, N.S., Feroz, S.M., Pradeep, Diwedi, A., Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 14 (2013), 265–268.
50. 50 Al Quran, F.A., Rashdan, B.A., Zomar, A.A., Weiner, S., Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques. Quintessence Int 43 (2012), 119–125.
51. 51 Stimmelmayr, M., Guth, J.F., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D., Beuer, F., Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 16 (2012), 851–856.
52. 52 Papaspyridakos, P., Benic, G.I., Hogsett, V.L., White, G.S., Lal, K., Gallucci, G.O., Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res 23 (2012), 676–681.
53. 53 Faria, J.C., Silva-Concilio, L.R., Neves, A.C., Miranda, M.E., Teixeira, M.L., Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants. Braz Oral Res 25 (2011), 163–167.
54. 54 Kang, A.H., Johnson, G.H., Lepe, X., Wataha, J.C., Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays. J Prosthet Dent 101 (2009), 332–341.
55. 55 Lee, Y.J., Heo, S.J., Koak, J.Y., Kim, S.K., Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 (2009), 823–830.
56. 56 Holst, S., Blatz, M.B., Bergler, M., Goellner, M., Wichmann, M., Influence of impression material and time on the 3-dimensional accuracy of implant impressions. Quintessence Int 38 (2007), 67–73.
57. 57 Vigolo, P., Majzoub, Z., Cordioli, G., Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003), 186–192.
58. 58 Parsell, D.E., Anderson, B.C., Livingston, H.M., Rudd, J.I., Tankersley, J.D., Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 12 (2000), 78–84.
59. 59 Rungruanganunt, P., Kelly, J.R., Adams, D.J., Two imaging techniques for 3D quantification of pre-cementation space for CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 38 (2010), 995–1000.
60. 60 Luthardt, R.G., Bornemann, G., Lemelson, S., Walter, M.H., Huls, A., An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004), 680–685.
61. 61 Kelly, J.R., Davis, S.H., Campbell, S.D., Nondestructive, three-dimensional internal fit mapping of fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989), 368–373.
62. 62 Vennerstrom, M., Fakhary, M., Von Steyern, P.V., The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems. Swed Dent J 38 (2014), 101–110.
63. 63 Nedelcu, R.G., Persson, A.S., Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112 (2014), 1461–1471.
64. 64 Gherlone, E., Mandelli, F., Cappare, P., Pantaleo, G., Traini, T., Ferrini, F., A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J Dent 42 (2014), 1151–1155.
65. 65 Wittneben, J.G., Wright, R.F., Weber, H.P., Gallucci, G.O., A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations. Int J Prosthodont 22 (2009), 466–471.
66. 66 Pradies, G., Zarauz, C., Valverde, A., Ferreiroa, A., Martinez-Rus, F., Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 43 (2015), 201–208.
67. 67 Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wostmann, B., Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17 (2013), 1759–1764.
68. 68 Baig, M.R., Tan, K.B., Nicholls, J.I., Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM) crown system. J Prosthet Dent 104 (2010), 216–227.