Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: An in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 247-257

  Tahmaseb, Ali ^a   Van De Weijden, J J ^a,b   Mercelis, Peter ^c   De Clerck, Renaat ^d   Wismeijer, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Layerwise   (Belgium)

^d NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Guided surgery; Misfit; Superstructure

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STANDARD; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; CALCIUM SULFATE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TITANIUM; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77953273784     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallens RH. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:329-336.
2. Jemt T, Bäck T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:209-215.
3. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:30-37.
4. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw:1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:2-9.
5. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200.
6. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-577.
7. Sarment DP, Al-Shammari K, Kazor CE. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:287-295.
8. Tahmaseb A, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points and CAD/CAM technology. A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:541-546.
9. Schwenke H, Neuschaefer-Rube U, Pfeifer T, Kunzmann H. Optical methods for dimensional metrology in production engineering. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 2002;51:685-699.
10. Savio E, De Chiffre L, Schmitt R. Metrology of freeform shaped parts. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 2007;56:810-835.
11. Peng T, Gupta SK. Model and algorithms for point cloud construction using digital projection patterns. ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 2007;7:372-381.
12. Harper RJ, Nicholls JI. Distortions in indexing methods and investing media for soldering and remount procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:172-179.
13. Nicholls JI. The measurement of distortion: Theoretical considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1977;37:578-586.
14. Nicholls JI. The measurement of distortion: Mathematical considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1978;97:339-343.
15. Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys 2001;28:469-74.
16. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreais A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1558-1564.
17. Brooks RA, DiChiro G. Beam hardening in reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976;21:390-398.
18. Hsieh J, Molthen RC, Dawson CA, Johnson RH. An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. Med Phys 2000;27:23-29.
19. Loubele M, Van Assche AN, Carpentier K, et al. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:512-518.
20. Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Sanderink G. Accuracy of threedimensional measurements obtained from cone-beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analyses: Influence of patient scanning position. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:129-134.