The fit of crowns produced using digital impression systems

Swedish Dental Journal

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 101-110

  Vennerström, Micael ^a   Fakhary, Mobin ^a   Von Steyern, Pervult ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Internal fit; Intraoral scanning; Marginal fit

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; IPS E.MAX CAD LT; RESIN CEMENT; SILICONE DERIVATIVE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DEVICES; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84912080727     PISSN: 03479994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbate, MF, Tjan AH, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989 May; 61(5):527-31.
2. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006 May-Jun; 15(3):155-63.
3. Anusavice KJ. Dental Ceramics. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips'Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: W. B. Saunders; 2003. p. 655-719.
4. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008 Oct; 29(8):494, 496, 498-505.
5. Christensen CJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009 Oct; 140(10):1301-4.
6. Christensen GJ. The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 2008 Mar; 139(3):347-9.
7. Donovan TE. Chee WW. A reviewof contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2004 Apr; 48(2): vi-vii, 445-70.
8. Ender A. Mehl A. CEREC Basic Information 3.8 A Clinical Guide. Germany: Sirona Dental Systems GmbH; 20n.
9. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Macedo AP, Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res 2008 Oct-DeC; 22(4):293-8.
10. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Mar; 65(3):357-64.
11. Fransson B. Oilo G. Gjeitanger R. The fit of metalceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985 Oct; 1(5):197-9.
12. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-4.
13. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. J Prosthet Dent 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84.
14. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007 Aug; 28(8):422-4, 426-8, 430-1.
15. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989 Oct; 62(4):405-8.
16. Hunter AJ, Hunter AR. Gingival margins for crowns: a review and discussion. Part II: Discrepancies and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990 Dec; 64(6):636-42.
17. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Mar; 65(3):436-42.
18. Kious AR, Roberts HW, Brackett WW. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 2009 Mar; 101(3):189-92.
19. Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A. Vultvon Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera All ceram crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005 Jul; 32(7):526-30.
20. Larsson C. Madhoun SE. Wennerberg A. Vultvon Steyern P. Fracture strength of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals crowns with different design: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011 Jun. 2.
21. McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972 Jan 4; 132(1):9-15.
22. McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971 Aug. 3; 131(3):107-11.
23. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T. Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003 May-Jun; 16(3):244-8.
24. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult Von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011 Apr; 27(4):356-63.
25. Rahme HY, Adib SM, Zebouni EA, Bechara BB, Rifai KT. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin. Gen Dent 2009 Mar-Apr; 57(2):171-9.
26. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 2010 May 12.
27. Samet N, Shohat M, Livny A, Weiss EI. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7
28. Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2011 Oct. 17.
29. Shen C. Dental Cements. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials, 1th ed. St. Louis: W. B. Saunders; 2003. p. 443-94.
30. Shen C. Impression Materials. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips' Science of Dental Materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: W. B. Saunders; 2003. p. 205-54.
31. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; 1997
32. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9.
33. Tan K, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Chan ES. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 Dec; 15(6):654-66.
34. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 1995 Feb; 4o (1):17-21.
35. Vult Von Steyern P, Ebbesson S, Holmgren J, Haag P, Nilner K. Fracture strength of two oxide ceramic crown systems after cyclic pre-loading and thermocycling. J Oral Rehabil 2006 Sep; 33(9):682-89.
36. White SN, Yu Z. Film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992 Jun; 67(6):782-5.
37. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1994 May-Jun; 7(3):20-15.
38. Zhang Y, Li J, Xue XQ, Chen ZY, Li XJ. A comparison of three-dimensional marginal adaptation among three all-ceramic crown systems. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2011 Oct; 20(5):494-9.