Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 577-580

  Coli, Pierluigi ^a,b   Karlsson, Stig ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b BRÅNEMARK CLINIC   (Sweden)

^c Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; INSTRUMENTATION; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 5444219837     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Kappert HF. Dental materials: New ceramic systems. In: Academy of Dental Materials, Proceedings of Conference on "Clinically Appropriate Alternatives to Amalgam: Biophysical Factors in Restorative Decision-Making, " 30 Oct-2 Nov 1996, Munich, Germany. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:180-198.
2. Sjölin R, Sundh A, Bergman M. The Decim system for the production of dental restorations. Int J Comput Dent 1999;2:197-207.
3. Fransson B, Öilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985;1:197-199.
4. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-110.
5. Boening KW, Walter MH, Reppel PD. Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:281-287.
6. Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:129-134.
7. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenshlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:440-447.
8. Suárez MJ, de Villaumbrosia PG, Pradíes G, Lozano JFL. Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:229-232.
9. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587-592.
10. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244-248.
11. Coli P, Karlsson S. The fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium-dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:59-64.
12. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: The Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:394-404.
13. Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A, Sjögren G. Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro. J Dent 2002;30:53-58.
14. Abbate MF, Tjan AHL, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:527-531.
15. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-408.
16. Lin MT, Muñoz JS, Muñoz CA, Goodacre CJ, Naylor P. The effect of tooth preparation form on the fit of Procera copings. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:580-590.
17. Groten M, Axmann D, Pröbster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-49.
18. Back T. Assessment of Fit of Dental Crown Reconstructions: A Critical Analysis of Error Sources [thesis]. Göteborg, Sweden: Institute of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, 1993.