Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 101, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 332-341

  Kang, Alex H ^a   Johnson, Glen H ^b   Lepe, Xavier ^b   Wataha, John C ^b  

^a Graduate Prosthodontics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL IMPRESSION; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; POLYVINYLS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SILOXANES;

EID: 65449138746     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60066-4     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wilson G., and Werrin S.R. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 49 (1983) 198-202
2. Davis R.D., and Schwartz R.S. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy. Am J Dent 4 (1991) 89-92
3. Idris B., Houston F., and Claffey N. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 74 (1995) 535-541
4. Breeding L.C., and Dixon D.L. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 84 (2000) 403-407
5. Ceyhan J.A., Johnson G.H., Lepe X., and Phillips K.M. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 228-234
6. Davis R., Schwartz R., and Hilton T. Marginal adaptation of castings made with dual-arch and custom trays. Am J Dent 5 (1992) 253-254
7. Parker M.H., Cameron S.M., Hughbanks J.C., and Reid D.E. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 255-259
8. Ceyhan J.A., Johnson G.H., and Lepe X. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 143-149
9. Johnson G.H., and Craig R.G. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 484-490
10. Johnson G.H., Lepe X., and Aw T.C. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 354-364
11. Lepe X., and Johnson G.H. Accuracy of polyether and addition silicone after long-term immersion disinfection. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 245-249
12. Wadhwani C.P., Johnson G.H., Lepe X., and Raigrodski A.J. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 93 (2005) 530-539
13. ANSI/ADA Specification 19/ISO 4823:2000. Dental elastomeric impression materials; Approved Apr 2004. Available at: https://siebel.ada.org/ecustomer_enu/start.swe?SWECmd=Start&SWEHo=si ebel.ada.org
14. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Elastomeric impression materials. ADA Professional Product Review 2 (2007) 9-15
15. Grajower R., Zuberi Y., and Lewinstein I. Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989) 555-563