Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1201-1208

  Güth, Jan Frederik ^a   Keul, Christine ^a   Stimmelmayr, Michael ^a   Beuer, Florian ^a   Edelhoff, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Direct data capturing; Indirect data capturing; Intraoral scanner; Matching; STL

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876426016     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y (2009) A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28: 44-56.
2. DIN 13995: 2010-02. Dentistry-Terminology of process-chain for CAD/CAM-Systems. (NADENT: NA 014-00-05-06 AK).
3. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204: 505-511.
4. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2007) Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 35: 903-908.
5. Rubel BS (2007) Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 51: 629-642.
6. Persson AS, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G (2008) Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent Mater 24: 1123-1130.
7. Haim M, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H, Koch R, Walter MH, Quaas S (2009) Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 22: 296-302.
8. Endo T, Finger WJ (2006) Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int 37: 47-51.
9. Christensen GJ (2008) The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 139: 347-349.
10. Al-Bakri IA, Hussey D, Al-Omari WM (2007) The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent 18: 29-33.
11. DIN ISO 5725-1: 1997-11. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results-Part 1: General prinicples and definitions (ISO 5725-1: 1994).
12. Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Detterbeck A, Funk C, Krumm M, Kasperl S, Holst A, Hirschfelder U (2011) Pilot study on accuracy and dimensional stability of impression materials using industrial CT technology. J Orofac Orthop 72: 111-124.
13. Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full-arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14: 11-21.
14. State of industry (2000) Lab Management Today 16: 9-15.
15. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12: 11-28.
16. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8: 283-294.
17. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139(6): 761-763.
18. Christensen GJ (2005) The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 343-346.
19. Güth JF, Keul C, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2011) Untersuchung zur Reproduzierbarkeit und Genauigkeit der 3D-Ausrichtung zum Vergleich von STL-Datensätzen. Oral presentation #33. DGPro-Jahrestagung, Hamburg, May 14.
20. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38: 553-559.