Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 324-329

  Da Costa, J B ^a,c   Pelogia, F ^b   Hagedorn, B ^a   Ferracane, J L ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COLLOID; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; POWDER; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CALCIUM SULFATE; COLLOIDS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; POLYVINYLS; POWDERS; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 77953432204     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/09-178-L     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mormann WH & Curilovic Z (1991) CEREC(R) CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. A case report after 5 years in place Acta Stomatolgica Croatica 25(1) 3-10.
2. Mormann W & Krejci I (1992) Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation Quintessence International 23(2) 109-115.
3. Apholt W, Bindl A, Luthy H & Mormann WH (2001) Flexural strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars Dental Materials 17(3) 260-267.
4. Mormann W (2000) The right step to Cerec 3 International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 3(1) 3-4.
5. Schneider W (2000) Cerec 3 International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 3(1) 33-40.
6. Masek R (2003) Designing in 3D-A more visual approach to Cerec correlation International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 6(1) 75-82.
7. Hembree JH Jr (1995) Comparison of fit of CAD/CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces Quintessence International 26(2) 145-147.
8. Parsell DE, Anderson BC, Livingston HM, Rudd JI & Tankersley JD (2000) Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 12(2) 78-84.
9. Limkangwalmongkol P, Chiche GJ & Blatz MB (2007) Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns Journal of Prosthodontics 16(4) 233-237.
10. Yeo IS, Yang JH & Lee JB (2003) In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 90(5) 459-464.
11. McLaren EA (1998) All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 19(3) 307-308.
12. Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S & Spiekermann H (2004) Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 7(1) 25-45.
13. Mehl A & Hickel R (1999) Current state of development and perspectives of machine-based production methods for dental restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 2(1) 9-35.
14. Beschnidt SM & Strub JR (1999) Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 26(7) 582-593.
15. Silness J (1970) Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges, III The relationship between the location of the crown margin and the periodontal condition Journal of Periodontal Research 5(3) 225.
16. Valderhaug J & Birkeland JM (1976) Periodontal conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prostheses Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 3(3) 237-243.
17. Valderhaug J & Heloe LA (1977) Oral hygiene in a group of supervised patients with fixed prostheses Journal of Periodontology 48(4) 221-224.
18. Janenko C & Smales RJ (1979) Anterior crowns and gingival health Australian Dental Journal 24(4) 225-230.
19. Kramer N, Lohbauer U & Frankenberger R (2000) Adhesive luting of indirect restorations American Journal of Dentistry 13(Spec No) 60D-76D.
20. Denissen H, Dozic A, van der Zel J& van Waas M (2000) Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84(5) 506-513.
21. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T & Wakabayashi K (2003) Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns Internal Journal of Prosthodontics 16(3) 244-248.
22. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE & van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM Journal of Dentistry 35(1) 68-73.
23. Wang WC, McDonald A, Pétrie A & Setchell D (2007) Interface dimensions of CEREC-3 MOD onlays European Journal of Prosthodontics & Restorative Dentistry 15(4) 183-189.
24. Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH & Kwon TY (2008) Marginal and internal fit of all ceramic crowns fabricated with different CAD/CAM systems Dental Materials Journal 27(3) 422-426.
25. Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch, Frankenberger R & Lohbauer (2008) Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype Operative Dentistry 33(6) 644-650.