Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses

Quintessence International

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 555-562

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Graef, Friedrich ^a   Schubinski, Peter ^b   Taylor, Thomas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b 3M Deutschland GmbH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Impression; Passive fit; Strain development

Indexed keywords

ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PROSTHESIS FITTING; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84871693418     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Assuncao WG, Gomes EA, Rocha EP, Delben JA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 788-796.
2. Tagger Green N, Machtei EE, Horwitz J, Peled M. Fracture of dental implants: Literature review and report of a case. Implant Dent 2002;11: 137-143.
3. Sharkey S, Kelly A, Houston F, O’Sullivan M, Quinn F, O’Connell B. A radiographic analysis of implant component misfit. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 807-815.
4. Karl M, Graef F, Heckmann SM, Taylor T. A methodology to study the effects of prosthesis misfit over time: An in vivo model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 689-694.
5. Gomes EA, Assunção WG, Tabata LF, Barão VA, Delben JA, de Sousa EA. Effect of passive fit absence in the prosthesis/implant/retaining screw system:A two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20: 2000-2005.
6. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses:A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 506-515.
7. de Sousa SA, de Arruda Nobilo MA, Henriques GE, Mesquita MF. Passive fit of frameworks in titanium and palladium-silver alloy submitted the laser welding. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35: 123-127.
8. Hjalmarsson L, Örtorp A, Smedberg JI, Jemt T. Precision of fit to implants: A comparison of Cresco and Procera implant bridge frameworks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12: 271-280.
9. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennani V, Waddell N, Swain M. Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24: 207-220.
10. Karl M, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM, Krafft T. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23: 648-652.
11. Karl M, Taylor T. Effect of material selection on the passivity of fit of implant-supported restorations created with computer-aided design/computerassisted manufacture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 739-745.
12. Tahmaseb A, van de Weijden JJ, Mercelis P, De Clerck R, Wismeijer D. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: An in vitro study of a novel threedimensional force measurement-misfit method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25: 247-257.
13. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12: 11-28.
14. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte:In-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38: 323-330.
15. Garg AK. Cadent iTero’s digital system for dental impressions: The end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19: 1-4.
16. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: Innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31(spec no 4): 2-11.
17. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8: 283-294.
18. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions-An in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14: 11-21.
19. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010; 38: 553-559.
20. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28: 422-431.
21. Hegde R, Lemons JE, Broome JC, McCracken MS. Validation of strain gauges as a method of measuring precision of fit of implant bars. Implant Dent 2009;18: 151-161.
22. Abduo J, Lyons K, Waddell N, Bennani V, Swain M. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants (epub ahead of print). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 Mar 17 doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00334.x.
23. Paiva J, Givan DA, Broome JC, Lemons JE, McCracken MS. Comparison of the passivity between cast alloy and laser-welded titanium overdenture bars. J Prosthodont 2009;18: 656-662.
24. Pak HS, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yang JH. Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2: 33-38.
25. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117: 319-325.