Use of an intraoral laser scanner during the prosthetic phase of implant dentistry: A pilot study

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages e126-e132

  Lee, Cameron Y S ^a   Wong, Natalie ^b   Ganz, Scott D ^c   Mursic, Jonathan ^d   Suzuki, Jon B ^e  

^a Oral   (United States)

^b Implant Dentistry and Prosthodontics   (Canada)

^c Maxillofacial Prosthodontics   (United States)

^d 5 Axis Dental Design   (Canada)

^e TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; CAD CAM abutments and crowns; Digital impressions; Laser scanner; Optical impressions

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 84939560220     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00132     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136:343-346.
2. Christensen GJ. The challenge of conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:347-349.
3. Hack GD. In vitro evaluation of the iTero digital impression system. ADA Prof Prod Rev. 2011;6:6-10.
4. Ganz SD, Desai N, Weiner S. Marginal integrity of direct and indirect castings for implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21;593-598.
5. Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:22-32.
6. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140: 1301-1304.
7. Farah JW, Brown L. Comparison of the fit of crowns based on digital impressions with 3M ESPE Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. vs. traditional impressions. Dent Advis Res Rep. 2009;22:1-3.
8. Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J. Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:793-801.
9. Kerstein RB. Osorio J. Utilizing computer-generated duplicate titanium abutments to facilitate intraoral and laboratory implant prosthesis fabrication. Pract Peridont Aesthet Dent. 2003;15:311-314.
10. Lowe RA. CAD/CAM dentistry and chairside digital impression making. Dent Econ. 2009;204:505-511.
11. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56.
12. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD/CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117:715-720.
13. Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent. 1991;1:150-154.
14. Mormann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, et al. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int. 1989;20:329-339.
15. Mormann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137:7s-13s.
16. Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system. Gen Dent. 2004;52:234-235.
17. Kutulakos K. Steger E. A Theory of Specular and Refractive Shape by Light-path Triangulation. Washington DC: Optical Society of America; 2005.
18. Wilton T, Masters BR. Confocal microscopy: introduction to the feature issue. Appl Opt. 1994;33:565-566.
19. Marcel TJ. Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:666-668.
20. Peluso MJ, Josell SD, Levine SW, et al. Digital models: an introduction. Semin Orthod. 2004;10:226-239.
21. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43312.
22. Wilson T, Masters BR. Confocal microscopy: introduction to the feature issue. Appl Opt. 1994; 33:565-566.
23. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, et al. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-imlant bone loss: literature support. Implant Dent. 2005;14:108-116.
24. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132.
25. Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1:197-199.
26. Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA. Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;53:24-29.
27. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, et al. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:308-313.
28. Karlsson S. The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:129-134.
29. Sulainman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, et al. A comparison of the marginal fit in In-ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:478-484.
30. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent. 2007;35:68-73.
31. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, et al. Marginal fit of alumina and zirconia based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001;26:367-374.
32. McLaren E. Special report. CAD/CAM dental technology. Compendium. 2011;32:73-76.
33. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010; 38:553-559.
34. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Oct 21. Epub ahead of print.
35. Ganz SD. Finally, a "win-win" solution: increasing accuracy while saving time, money with computer-milled abutments. Dent Econ. 2005;80-86.