One-to-one technology in K-12 classrooms: A review of the literature from 2004 through 2014

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 129-142

  Harper, Ben ^a   Milman, Natalie B ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Laptops; One toone; Tablets; Technology implementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962486183     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2016.1146564     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. American Psychological Association. (n. d.). Literature review guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/men/literature-review-guidelines.aspx
2. Andersson, A., Hatakka, M., Grönlund, Å., & Wiklund, M. (2014). Reclaiming the students - Coping with social media in 1:1 schools. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 37-52.
3. Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K-12 education: Visions and vices. Computers in the Schools, 27(2), 121-131. doi:10.1080/07380561003801590
4. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2), 5-59.
5. Bjorkvall, A., & Engblom, C. (2010). Young children's exploration of semiotic resources during unofficial computer activities in the classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 271-293.
6. Cano, E., Garcia, M., & Sevillano, L. (2013). ICT strategies and tools for the improvement of instructional supervision: The virtual supervision. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 77-87.
7. Carr, J. (2012). Does math achievement h'APP'en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 269-286.
8. Clariana, R. (2009). Ubiquitous wireless laptops in upper elementary mathematics. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(1), 5-21.
9. Crichton, S., Pegler, K., & White, D. (2012). Personal devices in public settings: Lessons learned from an iPod Touch/iPad project. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 23-31.
10. Crook, S. J., Sharma, M. D., Wilson, R., & Muller, D. A. (2013). Seeing eye-to-eye on ICT: Science student and teacher perceptions of laptop use across 14 Australian schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 82-95.
11. Donovan, L., Green, T, & Hartley, K. (2010). An examination of one-to-one computing in the middle school: Does increased access bring about increased student engagement? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(4), 423-441.
12. Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263-286.
13. Drayton, B., Falk, J. K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(3), 1-57.
14. Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W F. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technologysupported teaching and learning?: 1:1 Laptop added value. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 440-452.
15. Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107-122.
16. Furio, D., Gonzalez-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C, Segui, I., & Costa, M. (2013). The effects of the size and weight of a mobile device on an educational game. Computers and Education, 64, 24-41.
17. Gilbertson, A. (2014, August 24). The LA iPad school scandal: What you need to know. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/ed/2014/08/27/343549939/the-l-a-school-ipad-scandal-what-you-need-to-know
18. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445.
19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20. Hu, W (2007, May 4). Seeing no progress, some schools drop laptops. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes. com/2007/05/04/education/04laptop. html
21. Hur, J. W, & Oh, J. (2012). Learning, engagement, and technology: Middle school students' three-year experience in pervasive technology environments in South Korea. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2), 295-312.
22. Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15-23.
23. Katcher, J. (2014). Chesterfield County Schools (VA) goes Google with 32, 000 Chromebooks [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2014/06/chesterfield-county-schools-va-goes.html
24. Keane, T, Lang, C, & Pilgrim, C. (2013). Pedagogy! iPadology! Netbookology! Learning with mobile devices. Australian Educational Computing, 27(2), 29-33.
25. Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139-147. doi: 10.3102/0013189x07299197
26. Klieger, A., Ben-Hur, Y., & Bar-Yossef, N. (2010). Integrating laptop computers into classroom: Attitudes, needs, and professional development of science teachers-A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 187-198.
27. Lan, Y J., Sung, Y T, Tan, N., Lin, C. P., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile-device-supported problem-based computational estimation instruction for elementary school students. Educational Technology and Society, 13(3), 55-69.
28. Larkin, K. (2012). You use! I use! We use! Questioning the orthodoxy of one-to-one computing in primary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 101-120.
29. Larkin, K., & Finger, G. (2011a). Informing one-to-one computing in primary schools: Student use of netbooks. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 514-530.
30. Larkin, K., & Finger, G. (2011b). Netbook computers as an appropriate solution for 1:1 computer use in primary schools. Australian Educational Computing, 26(1), 27-34.
31. Lei, J. (2010). Conditions for ubiquitous computing: What can be learned from a longitudinal study. Computers in the Schools, 27(1), 35-53.
32. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 97-122.
33. Lin, C. P., Shao, Y. J., Wong, L. H., Li, Y. J., & Niramitranon, J. (2011). The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children's geometric. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 250-258.
34. Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C, Ko, Y, & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K-12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325-372. doi:10.1080/15391523.2014.925681
35. Liu, T. C, Lin, Y. C, Tsai, M. J., & Paas, F. (2012). Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments. Computers and Education, 58(1), 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.007
36. Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1-30.
37. Maninger, R. M., & Holden, M. E. (2009). Put the textbooks away: Preparation and support for a middle school one-to-one laptop initiative. American Secondary Education, 38(1), 5-33.
38. Maxwell, J. A. (2006). Literature reviews of, and for, educational research: A commentary on Boote and Beile's "Scholars before researchers." Educational Researcher, 35(9), 28-31.
39. Milman, N. B., Carlson-Bancroft, A., & Vanden Boogart, A. (2014). Examining differentiation and utilization of iPads across content areas in an independent, PreK-4th grade elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 119-133. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.931776
40. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annulas of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
41. Mouza, C. (2008). Learning with laptops: Implementation and outcomes in an urban, under-privileged school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 447-472.
42. Penuel, W R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348.
43. Rosen, Y, & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the Time to Know program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(3), 225-241.
44. Rosen, Y, & Manny-Ikan, E. (2011). The social promise of the Time to Know program. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 150-161.
45. Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C, & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology Learning, and Assessment, 9(4), 1-69.
46. Shapley, K. S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C, & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011). Effects of technology immersion on middle school students' learning opportunities and achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 104(5), 299-315.
47. Storz, M. G., & Hoffman, A. R. (2013). Examining response to a one-to-one computer initiative: Student and teacher voices. Research in Middle Level Education, 36(6), 1-18.
48. Suhr, K. A., Hernandez, D. A., Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(5), 1-46.
49. Sultan, W H., Woods, P. C, & Koo, A. C. (2011). A constructivist approach for digital learning: Malaysian schools case study. Educational Technology and Society, 14(4), 149-163.
50. Urrea, C. (2010). El Silencio: A rural community of learners and media creators. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 115-124.
51. Ware, J., & Stein, S. (2014). Teachers' critical evaluations of dynamic geometry software implementation in 1:1 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 134-153. doi:10.1080/07380569.2014.931779
52. Warschauer, M., Zheng, B., Niiya, M., Cotten, S., & Farkas, G. (2014). Balancing the one-to-one equation: Equity and access in three laptop programs. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(1), 46-62. doi:10.1080/10665684.2014.866871
53. Zuber, E. N., & Anderson, J. (2013). The initial response of secondary mathematics teachers to a one-to-one laptop program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 279-298. doi:10.1007/s13394-012-0063-2
54. Zucker, A., & Hug, S. (2008). Teaching and learning physics in a 1:1 laptop school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 586-594.