One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools?

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 97-122

  Lei, Jing ^a   Zhao, Yong ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350335983     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.39.2.a     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. American Association of School Librarians Association for Educational Communications Technology. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.acrl.org/ala/aasl/ aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracy Standards-final.pdf
2. Bahrampour, T. (2006). For some, laptops don't compute. Washington Post, December 9, 2006.
3. Bartels, F. (2000). Reflections on the RCDS Laptop Program after one year. Retrieved on February 2, 2006 from www.learningwithlaptops.org/files/ Laptop%20Program%20Reflections.pdf
4. Bartels, F. (2002) Reflections on the RCDS Laptop Program after three years. Retrieved December 20, 2005 from http://www.learningwithlaptops.org/ files/3rd%20Year%20Laptop%20Prog.pdf
5. Bebell, D. (2005). Technology promoting student excellence: An investigation of the first year of 1:1 computing in New Hampshire middle schools. Retrieved December 3, 2007 from http://www.iste.org/Content/ NavigationMenu/Research/NECC-Research-Paper- Archives/NECC-2005/Bebell-Damian- NECC05.pdf
6. Bruce, B. C., Hogan, M. P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D., Labbo, R. D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology ( 269-281). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bruce, B. C., Levin, J. A. (1997). Educational technology: Media for inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(1), 79-102.
8. Burbules, N., Callister, T., Jr. (2000). Watch IT: The promises and risks of new information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9. Bustamante, C. (2007). Romoland schools will no longer give each sixth-grader a laptop. Hemet News, May 9, 2007. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.pe.com/localnews/hemet/stories/PE-News-Local-D-laptops09.3e9b4dc. html
10. Classroom For the Future. (2006). Classroom for the future. Retrieved October 14, 2007 from http://www.governor.state.pa/us/governor/lib/governor/ classrooms-pointsfaq.pdf
11. Committee on Information Technology Literacy National Research Council. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Conway, P. F. (2005). Laptops initiative for students with dyslexia or other reading and writing difficulties: Early implementation evaluation report. National Centre for Technology Education (NCTE), Ireland.
13. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Davis, D., Garas, N., Hopstock, P., Kellum, A., Stephenson, T. (2005). Henrico County Public Schools Ibook Survey Report. Development Associates, Arlington, VA.
15. Dewey, J. (1943). The child and the curriculum: The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., Heinecke, W. F. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(5), 440-452.
17. Dunsmoor, B. (2006). Learning with laptops. Retrieved on March 7, 2006 from http://www.keloland.com/News/NewsDetail5442.cfm?Id=0,44803
18. eSchool News. (2006a). State laptop plan prompts mixed reaction. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm? i=36749CFID=4218450 CFTOKEN=82756348. eSchool News. (2006b). Top 10 ed-tech stories of 2006: eSN counts down the ten most significant educational technology stories of the past year. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.eschoolnews. com/news/showStory.cfm?ArticleID=6743page=1
19. Fox, E. (2005). Tracking U.S. trends. Education Week. Retrieved June 4, 2008 from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2005/05/05/35tracking.h24.html
20. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave. Macmillan.
21. Gulek, J. C.,Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2
22. Harris, W. J., Smith, L. (2004). Laptop use by seventh grade students with disabilities: Perceptions of special education teachers. Orono, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Maine Office.
23. Hu, W. (2007). Seeing no progress, some schools drop laptops. The New York Times. Retrieved May 4, 2007 from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/04/ education/04laptop.html?-r=1oref=slogin
24. Jeroski, S. (2003). Wireless Writing Project. Research report: Phase II. School District #60-Peace River North. Retrieved in July 2004 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/Wireless-Writing-Program.html
25. Jeroski, S. (2004). Implementation of the Wireless Writing Program: Phase 3. 2003-2004 Retrieved in July 2006 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/WWP-Report04.pdf
26. Jeroski, S. (2005). Research Report: The Wireless Writing Program 2004-2005. Retrieved in July 2006 from http://www.pm.bc.ca/wwp2005.pdf
27. Johnstone, B. (2003). Never mind the laptops: Kids, computers, and the transformation of learning. iUniverse Inc: Lincoln, Nebraska.
28. Kerr, K. A., Pane, J. F., Barney, H. (2003). Quaker Valley Digital School District: Early effects and plans for future evaluation (Technical Report TR-107-EDU). Santa
29. Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical-reports/2004/RAND-TR107.pdf
30. Lei, J., Conway, P. Zhao, Y. (2007). The digital pencil: One-to-one computing for children. London and New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Lei, J., Zhao, Y. (2008). Computer uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers Education, 49(2), 284-296.
32. Lemke, C., Martin, C. (2003). One-to-one computing in Maine: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieve on February 2, 2006 from http://www.k12blueprint.com/k12/blueprint/cd/ME-Profile.pdf
33. Lemke C., Martin C. (2004a, March). One-to-one computing in Indiana-A state profile (preliminary report). Retrieved on February 2, 2006 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/INProfile.pdf
34. Lemke, C., Martin, C. (2004b). One-to-one computing in Michigan: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieved October 17, 2007 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/MIProfile.pdf
35. Lemke, C.,Martin, C. (2004c). One-to-one computing in Virginia: A state profile. Culver City, CA: Metiri Group. Retrieved October 17, 2007 from http://www.metiri.com/NSF-Study/VAProfile.pdf
36. Levin, J. A., Bruce, B. C. (2001). Technology as media: The learner centered perspective. Paper presented at the 2001 American Education Research Association Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington.
37. Markoff, J. (2006). For 150, third-world laptop stirs big debate New York Time, November 30, 2006. Retrieved on November 30, 2006 from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/technology/30laptop.html?-r=1oref=slogin
38. McFarlane, A. (1997). What are we and how did we get here? In A. McFarlane (Ed.), Information technology and authentic learning: Realizing the potential of computers in the primary classroom. London and New York: Routledge.
39. McMillan, K., Honey, M. (1993). Year one of project pulse: Pupils using laptops in science and English. A final report. New York: Bank Street College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 822.
40. NetDay. (2004). Voices and views of today's tech-savvy students. National report on Netday Speak Up Day for Students 2003. Retrieved on November 30, 2006 from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/VOICES%20AND%20VIEWS%20final.pdf
41. Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 329-348.
42. Penuel, W. R., Kim, D. Y., Michalchik, V., Lewis, S., Means, B., Murphy, B., et al. (2001). Using technology to enhance connections between home and school: A research synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
43. Prensky, M. (2006). "Don't bother me mom-I'm learning!" St. Paul, MN: Paragon House. Quality Education Data (QED). (2006). 2005-2006 National Technology Assessment http://www.qeddata.com/marketkno/researchreports/ nta.aspx
44. Quimby, B. (2007). Loving the Laptops. Portland Press Herald. Retrieved October 15, 2007 from http://www.maine.gov/mlte/articles/2007/pressherald/ Loving-the-Laptops-05-21-07.pdf
45. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., Roberts, D. F. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Washington, DC: A Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Available online at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/index.cfm
46. Rockman et al. (1997). Report of a laptop program pilot: A project for anytime anywhere learning by Microsoft corporation notebooks for schools by Toshiba American information systems. Retrieved June 6, 2005 from http://www.csd.toshiba.com/cgi-bin/tais/su/su-sc-home.jsp
47. Rockman et al. (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: Second year study of the laptop program. Retrieved June 2005, from http://rockman.com/projects/ laptop/laptop2exec.htm
48. Rockman et al. (1999). The laptop research study: Third year study of the laptop program [On-line]. Available http://www.microsoft.com/education/k12/aal
49. Rockman et al. (2000). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. The third in a series of research studies on Microsoft's Anytime Anywhere Learning Program. Retrieved on May 16, 2006 from http://cdgenp01.csd.toshiba.com/content/publicsector/edgov/ year-three-rockman- study.pdf
50. Rockman et al. (2004). Kamehameha Schools Maui Laptop Project: Findings from classroom observations and teacher interviews. Retrieved on December 16, 2007 from http://www.rockman.com/projects/129.pase.maui/maui-laptop1-final.pdf
51. Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260-272.
52. Ross, S. M., Strahl, J. D. (2005). Evaluation of Michigan's Freedom To Learn Program. Retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://www.techlearning.com/ techlearning/events/techforum06/LeslieWilson-MI- Evaluation-Brief.pdf
53. Russell, M., Bebell, D., Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Boston: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.
54. Russell, M., O'Dwyer, L., Bebell, D. (2005). Methodological and psychometric challenges to evaluating 1:1 technology programs. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting 2005, Montreal, Canada.
55. Shifrin, D. (2006). Effect of media on children and adolescents: It's about time. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Special Issue, Media and Children, 160, 448-450.
56. Silvernail, D. L.,Harris, W. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative: Teacher, student, and school perspectives mid-year evaluation report. Maine Education Policy Research Institute http://www.usm.maine.edu/ cepare/pdf/mlti/MLTI%20Mid%20Year%20Evaluation %20Report.pdf
57. Silvernail, D. L., Lane, D. M. (2004). The impact of Maine's one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students (Report #1). Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://mainegov-images.informe.org/mlte/articles/ research/MLTIPhaseOne EvaluationReport2004.pdf
58. South Dakota Department of Education. (2007). More high school students to get laptops. Retrieved on March 30, 2007 from http://doe.sd.gov/pressroom/ news.asp?ID-97
59. Stevenson, K. (1999). Evaluation report-Year 3 middle school laptop program. Retrieved March 30, 2006 from http://www.beaufort.k12.sc.us/district/ evalreport3.htm
60. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Technology Immersion Project (TIP). (n.d.). http://www.txtip.info/pages/ 2/index.htm
62. The Technology Immersion Project. (n.d.). Six components of technology immersion. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.txtip.info/aboutimmersion/ sixcomponents.html
63. Urban-Lurain, M., Zhao, Y. (2004). Freedom to learn evaluation report: 2003 project implementation. Retrieved June 2005, from www.hflcsd.org/ ftlsummary.pdf
64. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. (2006). Freedom to learn. Retrieved June 7, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/ list/os/technology/plan/2004/site/stories/edlite- Lansing.html#budget
65. Vascellaro, J. E. (2006). Saying no to school laptops. The Wall Street Journal, August 31, 2006.
66. Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York: Teacher's College Press.
67. Young, J. R. (2005). MIT researchers unveil a 100 laptop designed to benefit children worldwide. The Chronicle of Higher Education 11/25/2005.
68. Zucker, A., McGhee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in Henrico County public schools. Retrieved June 8, 2008 from http://www.ubiqcomputing.org/ FinalReport.pdf