Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 263-286

  Donovan, Loretta ^a   Hartley, Kendall ^b   Strudler, Neal ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008756717     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2007.10782483     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2003). Mantua Elementary: A basic school powered by technology. Retrieved December 26, 2004 from www.edtechcases.info/schools/mantua/mantua.htm
2. Apple Computing Inc. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, and technology. Retrieved September 10, 2004, from http://images.apple.com/Education/kl2/leadership/acot/pdf/1Oyr.pdf
3. Apple Computing Inc. (2005). Research: What it says about 1 to 1 learning. Retrieved January 29, 2006 from: www.ubiqcomputing.org/Apple_l-to-l_ Research.pdf
4. CEO Forum (2001). School technology and readiness report. Retrieved November 28, 2004, from http://www.ceoforum.org/reports.html
5. Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Dobbs, R. L. (2005). An experimental study of the impact of training on faculty concern s. Journal of Industrial Technology, 21(1). Retrieved June 25, 2006, from http://nait.org/jait/Articles/dobbsO1605.pdf
7. Donovan, L. (2005). Exploring relationships between configurations of laptop me and student ojftask behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
8. Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2004). The impact of one-to- one computing on7th grade teachers and students at Roy Martin Middle School. Unpublished evaluation.
9. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Hall, G. E., George, A. A. & Rutherford, W. L. (1998). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use ofthe SoC questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
11. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
12. Heck, S., Stiegelbauer, S. M., Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1981). Measuring innovation configurations: Procedures and application. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
13. James, R. K., Lamb, C. E., Householder, D. L., & Bailey, M. A. (2000). Integrating science, mathematics, and technology in middle school technology- rich environments: A study of implementation and change. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 27-35.
14. Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development 5(3), 23-44.
15. Newhouse, C. P (2001). Applying the concerns-based adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5). Retrieved September 8, 2004, from http://www.iste.Org/jrte/33/5/newhouse.cfm
16. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2002). Learning for the 21st century. Retrieved August 1, 2004, from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/downloads/p21_Repcrt.pdf
17. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 325-348.
18. Richardson, V., & Placier, P (2001) Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
19. Rockman, et al. (1997). Report of a laptop pilot program. Retrieved August 2,2004 from http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/iaptopexec.htm
20. Rockman, et al. (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: Second year study of the laptop program. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/laptop2exec.htm
21. Rockman, et al. (2000). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://rockman.com/projects/laptop/laptop3exec.htm
22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
23. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Silvernail, D.L. & Lane, D. M. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students. (Research Report #1). Maine: University of Southern Maine, Maine Education Policy Research Institute.
25. Tyack, D. & Cuban, L. (2000). Teaching by machine. In Jossey-Bass (Ed.), Technology and Learning (pp. 247-254). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Wiersma W. (1991). Research methods in education: An introduction (5 ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
27. Windschid, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
28. Yang, C. (2002). Integration of laptops into a K-12 learning environment: A Case study of a science teacher in the middle school. World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Telecommunications, 2002(1), 2097-2102. Retrieved September 2, 2005, from http://dl.aace.org/10530
29. Zucker, A. A. & McGhee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary level in henrico county public schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved January 23, 2006 from http://ubiqcomputing.org/FinalReport.pdf.