Evaluating the implementation fidelity of Technology Immersion and its relationship with student achievement

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1-69

  Shapley, Kelly S ^a   Sheehan, Daniel ^b   Maloney, Catherine ^b   Caranikas Walker, Fanny ^c  

^a Shapley Research Associates   (United States)

^b Texas Center for Educational Research   (United States)

^c TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949999033     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O'Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers' technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
2. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 8. Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
3. Borman, G.D. (2005). National efforts to bring reform to scale in high-poverty schools: Outcomes and implications: In L. Parker (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 29 (pp. 1-28). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4. Borman, G.D., Hewes, G.M., Overman, L.T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement. A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230.
5. Bradburn, F.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2007, March). Shared leadership makes an IMPACT in North Carolina. eSchool News. Retrieved from http:// www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=45744.
6. Burbules, N.C. (2007). E-lessons learned. In L. Smolin, K. Lawless, & N. C. Burbules (Eds.), Information and communication technologies: Considerations of current practice for teachers and teacher educators (pp. 207-216). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
7. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: A study of the implementation and effects of the Core Knowledge Sequence. Elementary School Journal, 101, 167-192.
9. Dede, C. (2007). Reinventing the role of information and communications technologies in education. In L. Smolin, K. Lawless, & N.C. Burbules (Eds.), Information and communication technologies: Considerations of current practice for teachers and teacher educators (pp. 11-38). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
10. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433-479.
11. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. New York: The Falmer Press.
12. Fullan, M.G., & Stieglbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers' College Press.
13. Garthwait, A., & Weller, H.G. (2005). A year in the life: Two seventh grade teachers implement one-to-one computing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 361-377.
14. Kurki, A., Aladjem, D.K., & Carter, K.R. (2005). Implementation: Measuring and explaining the fidelity of CSR implementation. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
15. Lane, D.M.M. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative impact on students and learning. Portland, ME: Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation, University of Southern Maine.
16. Light, D., McDermott, M., & Honey, M. (2002). Project Hiller: The impact of ubiquitous portable technology on an urban school. New York: Center for Children and Technology, Education Development Center.
17. Lowther, D., Ross, S., & Morrison, G. (2003). When each one has one: The influence on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. ETR&D, 51(3), 23-44.
18. McGrail, E. (2006). " It's a double-edged sword, this technology business" : Secondary English teachers' perspectives on a schoolwide laptop technology initiative. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://www.tcrecord.org/PrintContent.asp?ContentID=12517.
19. Neugent, L., & Fox, C. (2007, January). Peer coaches' spark technology integration. eSchool News. Retrieved from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/index.cfm?i=42086.
20. O'Dwyer, L., Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Seeley, K. (2008). Examining the relationship between students mathematics test scores and computer use at home and at school. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(5), 1-44.
21. O'Dwyer, L., Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Tucker-Seeley, K. R. (2005). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students' English/Language Arts test scores. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(3), 1-45.
22. Owen, A., Farsaii, S., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2005-06). It's not about laptops, it's about empowerment! Learning & Leading with Technology, 33(4), 12-16.
23. Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 320-348.
24. Pitler, H. (2005). McREL technology initiative: The development of a technology intervention program: Final report. (Report No. 2005-09). Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED486685)
25. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26. Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment. Retrieved October 15, 2005, from http://www/cs/wes/view/rs/619.
27. Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313-330.
28. Russell, M., Bebell, D., Cowan, J., & Corbelli, M. (2002). An AlphaSmart for each student: Does teaching and learning change with full access to word processors? Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
29. Shapley, K., Maloney, C., Caranikas-Walker, F., & Sheehan, D. (2008). Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot: Third-year (2006-07) traits of higher Technology Immersion schools and teachers. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
30. Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2009). Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot: Final outcomes for a four-year study (2004-05 to 2007-08). Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
31. Silvernail, D.L., & Harris, W.J. (2003). The Maine Learning Technology Initiative teacher, student, and school perspectives: Mid-year evaluation report. Portland, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
32. Silvernail, D.L., & Lane, D.M.M. (2004). The impact of Maine's one-to-one laptop program on middle school teachers and students: Phase one summary evidence. Portland, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
33. Vernez, G., Karam, R., Mariano, L.T., & DeMartini, C. (2006). Evaluating comprehensive school reform models at scale: Focus on implementation. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
34. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
35. Zucker, A. (2005, November). Starting school laptop programs: Lessons learned (Policy Brief No. 1). Menlo Park, CA: One-to-One Computing Evaluation Consortium.
36. Zucker, A.A., & McGhee, R. (2005). A study of one-to-one computer use in mathematics and science instruction at the secondary school level in Henrico County Public Schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.