After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1-57

  Drayton, Brian ^a   Falk, Joni K ^a   Stroud, Rena ^a   Hobbs, Kathryn ^a   Hammerman, James ^a  

^a Center for School Reform at TERC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949995661     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S. (2003a). New Tech High School: A little school with big results. Draft report from the USA Exemplary Technology-supported Schooling Case Studies Project. Retrieved September 1, 2009, from http://www.edtechcases.info/schools/newtech/newtech.htm.
3. Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S. (2003b). The Mott Hall School: A laptop pioneer. Draft report from the USA Exemplary Technology-supported Schooling Case Studies Project. Retrieved September 1, 2009 from http://edtechcases.info/schools/motthall/The%20Mott%20Hall%20 School.pdf.
4. Beckett, L., & Boohan, R. (1996). Computer modeling for the young - and not so young - scientist. In R.F. Tinker (Ed.), Microcomputerbased labs: Educational research and standards (pp. 227-238). New York: Springer.
5. Brown, M., & Edelson, D.C. (1999). A lab by any other name: Integrating traditional labs and computer-supported collaborative investigations in science classrooms. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, Stanford University, Dec. 12-15, 1999.
6. Center for Digital Education (2008). A complete guide to one-to-one computing in the K-12 environment. Folsom, CA: Center for Digital Education.
7. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: the classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Cuban, L. (2001a). Why are most teachers infrequent and restrained users of computers in their classrooms? In. J. Woodward & L. Cuban (Eds.), Technology, curriculum, and professional development: Adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities (pp. 121-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
9. Cuban, L. (2001b). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Cuban, L. (2006). The laptop revolution has no clothes. Education Week. Retrieved October 25, 2009, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ articles/2006/10/18/08cuban.h26.html?print=1&print=1.
11. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the learning profession. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Davidson, J. (2003). A new role in facilitating school reform: The case of the educational technologist. Teachers College Record, 105, 729-752.
13. Davies, A. (2004). Finding proof of learning in a one-to-one computing classroom (2002-2003). Courtenay, B.C: Connections Publishing.
14. Drayton, B., & Falk, J. (2006). Dimensions that shape teacher-scientist collaborations for teacher enhancement. Science Education, 90, 734-761
15. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
16. Falk, J., Lee, S., & Drayton, B. (2005). Infusing Web-based digital resources into the middle school science classroom: Strategies and challenges. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting, April 11-15, 2005.
17. Fishman, B.J., Gomez, L.M., & Soloway, E. (2002). New technologies and the challenge for school leadership. Evanston, IL: Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools, LeTUS Report Series.
18. Fouts, J.T. (2000). Research on computers and education: past, present, and future. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
19. Gilbert, J.K. (2007). Visualization in science education. New York: Springer.
20. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
21. Hill, J.R., Reeves, T.C., & Heidemeier, H. (2000). Ubiquitous computing for teaching, learning, and communicating: Trends, issues, and recommendations. Athens, GA: Department of Instructional Technology, College of Education, The University of Georgia.
22. Hoffman, J.L., Wu, H., Krajcik, J.S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 323-346.
23. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J.W. Little and M.W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, contexts. New York, Teachers College Press.
24. Krajcik, J., Mamlok, R., & Hug, B. (2001). Modern content and the enterprise of science: Science education in the twentieth century. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume. One hundredth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 205-238). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Linn, M. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 43-264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Maehr, M.L. & C. Midgley (1999). Transforming school cultures. New York: Westview Press.
27. National Research Council (1996). The National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
28. National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
29. National Science Foundation (2004). Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, Va: National Science Foundation.
30. Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Report 6: Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems, and future directions. London: NESTA Futurelab.
31. Park, J. & Staresina, L.N. (2004). Tracking US trends. Global links: Lessons from the world. Education Week's Technology Counts, pp. 64-76.
32. PCAST (President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology) (1997). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 Education in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The White House.
33. Pea, R., Gomez, L., Edelson, D., Fishman, B., Gordin, D., & O'Neill, K. (1997).Science Education as Driver of Cyberspace Technology Development. In K. Cohen (Ed.), Internet Links for Science Education (pp. 189-220). New York: Springer.
34. Rakes, G.C., Flowers, B.F., Casey, H.B., & Santana, R. (1999). An analysis of instructional technology use and constructivist behaviors in K-12 Teachers. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1, 1-18.
35. Spillane, J.P., & Jennings, N.E. (1997). Aligned instructional policy and ambitious pedagogy: Exploring instructional reform from the classroom perspective. Teachers College Record, 98, 450-481.
36. nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Stroud, R. (2008). Working paper: Review of the state of literature on Wireless and 1:1 computing. Cambridge, MA: TERC, Inc.
38. Tinker, R.F. ed. (1996). Microcomputer-based labs: educational research and standards. New York: Springer.
39. Tinker, R., Galvis, A., & Zucker, A. (2007). 1:1 Computing in support of science and mathematics education: Recommendations for large-scale implementations. A Concord Consortium White Paper. Concord, MA: The Concord Consortium.
40. Wallace, R.M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 75-104.
41. Walker, L., Rockman, S., & Chessler, M. (2000). A more complex picture: Laptop use and impact in the context of changing home and school access. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.k12blueprint.com/k12/ blueprint/story_a_more_complex_picture.php.
42. Weir, S. (1987). Cultivating minds: A LOGO casebook. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
43. Windschitl. M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing Teachers' Use of Technology in a Laptop Computer School: The Interplay of Teacher Beliefs, Social Dynamics, and Institutional Culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165-205.
44. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J.L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104, 482-515.
45. Zucker, A.A. (2006). Working paper: Research on wireless laptops and high school science. Cambridge, MA: TERC, Inc.
46. Zucker, A.A. & Hug, S.T. (2008). Teaching and learning physics in a 1:1 laptop school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 37-47.
47. Zucker, A.A. & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323, 82-85.