Examining Response to a One-to-One Computer Initiative: Student and Teacher Voices

RMLE Online

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1-18

  Storz, Mark G ^a   Hoffman, Amy R ^a  

^a JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945484701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19404476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2013.11462099     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bartell, C. A., (2001). Bridging the disconnect between policy and practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1), 189–198.
2. Cook-Sather, A., (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.
3. Darling-Hammond, L., (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N., (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263–286.
5. Dunleavy, M., Dextert, S., & Heinecket, W. F., (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 440–452.
6. Ferreira, M., & Bosworth, K., (2000). Context as a critical factor in young adolescents’ concepts of caring. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 117–128.
7. Garthwait, A., & Weller, H. G., (2005). A year in the life: Two seventh grade teachers implement one-to-one computing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37, 361–377.
8. Giroux, H., (1988). Schooling and the struggle for public life: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Glesne, C., (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York: Longman.
10. Gratch, A., (2000). Teacher voice, teacher education, teaching professionals. The High School Journal, 83(3), 43–54.
11. Hargreaves, A., (1996). Revisiting voice. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 12–19.
12. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F., (1994). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N., Denzin & Y., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 262–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Kaplan, G. P., (2000). Friends, foes, noncombatants: Notes from public education’s pressure groups. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(3), 1–12.
14. Kruse, S., (2000). Student voices: A report from focus group data. NASSP Bulletin, 84(617), 77–85.
15. Ladson-Billings, G., (1994). Dreamkeepers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Lee, P. W., (1999). In their own voices: An ethnographic study of low achieving students within the context of school reform. Urban Education, 34(2), 214–244.
17. Lee, J., & Spires, H., (2009). What students think about technology and academic engagement in school: Implications for middle grades teaching and learning. AACEJ, 17, 61–81.
18. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y., (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 97–122.
19. Lincoln, Y., (1995). In search of student voice. Theory into Practice, 34(2), 88–93.
20. McLaren, P., (1994). Life in schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.
21. Oliver, K. M., & Corn, J. O., (2008). Student-reported differences in technology use and skills after the implementation of one-to-one computing. Educational Media International, 45, 215–229.
22. Pennuel, W., (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329–348.
23. Richardson, L., (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N., Denzin & Y., Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.
24. Shoaf, L. M., & Shoaf, M. G., (2006). The hidden advantages of focus group interviews in educational settings. Journal of School Public Relations, 27, 342–354.
25. Storz, M., (1998). Constructing understandings of race: Tales from an urban professional development school’s foundations course (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University).
26. van’t Hooft, M., Swan, K., Cook, D., & Lin, Y., (2007). What is ubiquitous computing? In van’t Hooft, M., & Swan, K., (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible technology, visible impact (pp. 3–18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Warschauer, M., (2007). Information literacy in the laptop classroom. Teachers College Record, 109, 2511–2540.
28. Weiser, M., Gold, R., & Brown, J. S., (1999). The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980’s. IBM Systems Journal, 38(4), 693–696.
29. Welman, J. C., & Kruger, S. J., (1999). Research methodology for the business and administrative sciences. Johannesburg, South Africa: Heinemann.
30. Zucker, A., (2007). A framework for studying 1:1 computing initiatives. In M., van’t Hooft & K., Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible technology, visible impact (pp. 147–165). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.