Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 52, Issue , 2016, Pages 17-26

  Velasco, Carlos ^a,b,c   Woods, Andy T ^b,c   Petit, Olivia ^a,d   Cheok, Adrian D ^a,d   Spence, Charles ^b,c  

^a Imagineering Institute   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Flying Fish Research   (United Kingdom)

^d CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crossmodal correspondences; Food; Packaging; Shape; Taste

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961707820     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.005     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Allen M.W., Gupta R., Monnier A. The interactive effect of cultural symbols and human values on taste evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 35:294-308.
2. Ampuero O., Vila N. Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2006, 23:100-112.
3. Arboleda A.M., Arce-Lopera C. Quantitative analysis of product categorization in soft drinks using bottle silhouettes. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 45:1-10.
4. Bar M., Neta M. Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2191-2200.
5. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Miller I.J. PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior 1994, 56:1165-1171.
6. Becker L., Van Rompay T.J.L., Schifferstein H.N.J., Galetzka M. Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:17-23.
7. Bien N., ten Oever S., Goebel R., Sack A.T. The sound of size: Crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG, and psychophysics study. NeuroImage 2012, 59:663-672.
8. Birch L.L. Development of food preferences. Annual Review of Nutrition 1999, 19:41-62.
9. Bremner A.J., Caparos S., Davidoff J., de Fockert J., Linnell K.J., Spence C. "Bouba" and "Kiki" in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition 2013, 126:165-172.
10. Brown S., Gao X., Tisdelle L., Eickhoff S.B., Liotti M. Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. NeuroImage 2011, 58:250-258.
11. Carbon C.C. The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica 2010, 134:233-244.
12. Carbon C.C. Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. i-Perception 2011, 2:708.
13. Cavanaugh L.A., MacInnis D.J., Weiss A.M. Perceptual dimensions differentiate emotions. Cognition and Emotion 2015, 1-16. (ahead-of-print).
14. Cheskin L. How to predict what people will buy 1957, Liveright, New York, NY.
15. Cheskin L. Research design and analysis in the testing of symbols. Handbook of Package Design Research 1981, 211-220. Wiley Interscience, New York, NY. W. Stern (Ed.).
16. Chikazoe J., Lee D.H., Kriegeskorte N., Anderson A.K. Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nature Neuroscience 2014, 17:1114-1122.
17. Collier G.L. Affective synesthesia: Extracting emotion space from simple perceptual stimuli. Motivation and Emotion 1996, 20:1-32.
18. Crilly N., Moultrie J., Clarkson P.J. Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies 2004, 25:547-577.
19. Crisinel A.-S., Spence C. The impact of pleasantness ratings on crossmodal associations between food samples and musical notes. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 24:136-140.
20. Cytowic R.E., Wood F.B. Synesthesia: II. Psychophysical relations in the synesthesia of geometrically shaped taste and colored hearing. Brain and Cognition 1982, 1:36-49.
21. Deroy O., Crisinel A.-S., Spence C. Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: Odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2013, 20:878-896.
22. Deroy O., Spence C. Crossmodal correspondences: Four challenges. Multisensory Research 2016, 29:29-48.
23. Deroy O., Valentin D. Tasting liquid shapes: Investigating the sensory basis of cross-modal correspondences. Chemosensory Perception 2011, 4:80-90.
24. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
25. Fairhurst M., Pritchard D., Ospina D., Deroy O. Bouba-Kiki in the plate: Combining crossmodal correspondences to change flavour experience. Flavour 2015, 4:22.
26. Fenko A., Lotterman H., Galetzka M. What's in a name? The effects of sound symbolism and package shape on consumer responses to food products. Food Quality and Preference 2016, 51:100-108.
27. Gal, D., Wheeler, S.C., & Shiv, B. (2007, unpublished manuscript). Cross-modal influences on gustatory perception. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030197.
28. Gallace A., Boschin E., Spence C. On the taste of "Bouba" and "Kiki": An exploration of word-food associations in neurologically normal participants. Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 2:34-46.
29. Ghoshal T., Boatwright P., Malika M. Curvature from all angles: An integrative review and implications for product design. The psychology of design: Creating consumer appeal 2015, 91-105. Routledge, New York, NY. R. Batra, C. Seifert, D. Brei (Eds.).
30. Gregan-Paxton J., John D.R. Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. Journal of Consumer Research 1997, 24:266-284.
31. Hanson-Vaux G., Crisinel A.-S., Spence C. Smelling shapes: Crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes. Chemical Senses 2013, 38:161-166.
32. Haverkamp M. Synesthetic design 2014, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
33. Hekkert P. Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science 2006, 48:157-172.
34. Humphreys G.W., Forde E.M. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:453-476.
35. Jankovic D. Evaluative model of cross-modal correspondences. Journal of Vision 2010, 10:859.
36. Jankovic D. Evaluative similarity hypothesis of crossmodal correspondences: A developmental view. Seeing and Perceiving 2012, 25:127.
37. Jankovic D., Stevanov J. Similarities in affective processing and aesthetic preference of visual, auditory and gustatory stimuli. i-Perception 2011, 2:951.
38. Köhler W. Gestalt psychology 1929, Liveright, New York, NY.
39. Liang P., Roy S., Chen M.L., Zhang G.H. Visual influence of shapes and semantic familiarity on human sweet sensitivity. Behavioural Brain Research 2013, 253:42-47.
40. Littel S., Orth U.R. Effects of package visuals and haptics on brand evaluations. European Journal of Marketing 2013, 47:198-217.
41. Lyman B. Representation of complex emotional and abstract meanings by simple forms. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1979, 49:839-842.
42. Maga J.A. Influence of color on taste thresholds. Chemical Senses and Flavor 1974, 1:115-119.
43. Mandler G.P. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Affect and cognition. The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition 1982, 3-36. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.S. Clark, S.T. Fiske (Eds.).
44. Marks L.E. The unity of the senses: Interrelations among the modalities 1978, Academic Press, New York, NY.
45. Marks L.E. On cross-modal similarity: the perceptual structure of pitch, loudness, and brightness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:586-602.
46. Marks L.E. On perceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol 1996, 11:39-66.
47. Marks L.E. Weak synaesthesia in perception and language. The Oxford handbook of synaesthesia 2013, 761-789. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. J. Simner, E. Hubbard (Eds.).
48. Martino G., Marks L.E. Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: Tests of the semantic coding hypothesis. Perception 1999, 28:903-924.
49. Martino G., Marks L.E. Synesthesia: Strong and weak. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2001, 10:61-65.
50. Meyers-Levy J., Tybout A.M. Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16:39-54.
51. Moreau C.P., Markman A.B., Lehmann D.R. "What is it?" Categorization flexibility and consumers' responses to really new products. Journal of Consumer Research 2001, 27:489-498.
52. Munar E., Gómez-Puerto G., Call J., Nadal M. Common visual preference for curved contours in humans and great apes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0141106.
53. Ngo M.K., Misra R., Spence C. Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:567-572.
54. Ngo M.K., Spence C. Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that consumers associate with different kinds of chocolate. Journal of Sensory Studies 2011, 26:421-428.
55. Ngo M.K., Velasco C., Salgado A., Boehm E., O'Neill D., Spence C. Assessing crossmodal correspondences in exotic fruit juices: The case of shape and sound symbolism. Food Quality and Preference 2013, 28:361-369.
56. Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. The measurement of meaning 1957, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
57. Overbeeke C.J., Peters M.E. The taste of desserts' packages. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1991, 73:575-583.
58. Palmer S.E., Schloss K.B., Sammartino J. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology 2013, 64:77-107.
59. Parise C.V., Knorre K., Ernst M.O. Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 2014, 111:6104-6108.
60. Parise C., Spence C. Audiovisual cross-modal correspondences in the general population. The Oxford handbook of synaesthesia 2013, 790-815. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. J. Simner, E. Hubbard (Eds.).
61. Piqueras-Fiszman B., Alcaide J., Roura E., Spence C. Is it the plate or is it the food? Assessing the influence of the color (black or white) and shape of the plate on the perception of the food placed on it. Food Quality & Preference 2012, 24:205-208.
62. Pollard P. Human reasoning: Some possible effects of availability. Cognition 1982, 12:65-96.
63. Prescott J. Multisensory processes in flavour perception and their influence on food choice. Current Opinion in Food Science 2015, 3:47-52.
64. Prince G.W. The contour: A packaging vision seen through Coke-bottle lenses. Beverage World 1994, 113:1-2.
65. Ramachandran V.S., Hubbard E.M. Synaesthesia - a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2001, 8:3-34.
66. Rozin P. "Taste-smell confusions" and the duality of the olfactory sense. Perception, & Psychophysics 1982, 31:397-401.
67. Salgado-Montejo A., Alvarado J.A., Velasco C., Salgado C.J., Hasse K., Spence C. The sweetest thing: The influence of angularity, symmetry, and the number of elements on shape-valence and shape-taste matches. Frontiers in Psychology 2015, 6:1382.
68. Satpute A., Kang J., Bickart K., Yardley H., Wager T., Barrett L.F. Involvement of sensory regions in affective experience: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 2015, 6:1860.
69. Schifferstein H.N.J., Tanudjaja I. Visualizing fragrances through colors: The mediating role of emotions. Perception 2004, 33:1249-1266.
70. Simner J., Cuskley C., Kirby S. What sound does that taste? Cross-modal mappings across gustation and audition. Perception 2010, 39:553-569.
71. Smets G.J.F., Overbeeke C.J. Expressing tastes in packages. Design Studies 1995, 16:349-365.
72. Smets G., Overbeeke K., Gaver W. Form-giving: Expressing the nonobvious. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1994, 79-84. ACM, New York, NY.
73. Spence C. Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2011, 73:971-995.
74. Spence C. Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2012, 22:37-54.
75. Spence C. Multisensory flavour perception. Cell 2015, 161:24-35.
76. Spence C., Deroy O. Tasting shapes: A review of four hypotheses. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 2013, 10:207-238.
77. Spence C., Gallace A. Tasting shapes and words. Food Quality & Preference 2011, 22:290-295.
78. Spence C., Ngo M.K. Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages. Flavour 2012, 1:12.
79. Spence C., Ngo M., Percival B., Smith B. Crossmodal correspondences: Assessing the shape symbolism of foods having a complex flavour profile. Food Quality & Preference 2013, 28:206-212.
80. Spence C., Piqueras-Fiszman B. The multisensory packaging of beverages. Food packaging: Procedures, management and trends 2012, 187-233. Nova Publishers, Hauppauge, NY. M.G. Kontominas (Ed.).
81. Spence C., Smith B., Auvray M. Confusing tastes and flavours. Perception and its modalities 2015, 247-274. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. D. Stokes, M. Matthen, S. Biggs (Eds.).
82. Spence C., Wan X., Woods A., Velasco C., Deng J., Youssef J., et al. On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal correspondences between colours and basic tastes. Flavour 2015, 4:23.
83. Stayman D.M., Alden D.L., Smith K.H. Some effects of schematic processing on consumer expectations and disconfirmation judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19:240-255.
84. Steiner J.E., Glaser D., Hawilo M.E., Berridge K.C. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: Affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:53-74.
85. Stewart P., Goss E. Plate shape and colour interact to influence taste and quality judgments. Flavour 2013, 2:27.
86. Stuckey B. Taste what you're missing: The passionate eater's guide to why good food tastes good 2012, Free Press, London, UK.
87. Velasco C., Salgado-Montejo A., Marmolejo-Ramos F., Spence C. Predictive packaging design: Tasting shapes, typographies, names, and sounds. Food Quality and Preference 2014, 34:88-95.
88. Velasco C., Wan X., Knoeferle K., Zhou X., Salgado-Montejo A., Spence C. Searching for flavor labels in food products: The influence of color-flavor congruence and association strength. Frontiers in Psychology 2015, 6:301.
89. Velasco C., Woods A., Deroy O., Spence C. Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 41:151-158.
90. Velasco C., Woods A.T., Hyndman S., Spence C. The taste of typeface. i-Perception 2015, 6:1-10.
91. Velasco C., Woods A., Liu J., Spence C. Assessing the role of taste intensity and hedonics in taste/shape correspondences. Multisensory Research 2016, 29:209-221.
92. Velasco C., Woods A.T., Marks L.E., Cheok A.D., Spence C. The semantic basis of taste/shape associations. PeerJ 2016, 4:e1644.
93. Walker, P. (in press). Cross-sensory correspondences: A theoretical framework and their relevance to music. Psychomusicology.
94. Walker P., Bremner J.G., Mason U., Spring J., Mattock K., Slater A., et al. Preverbal infants' sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science 2010, 21:21-25.
95. Walker L., Walker P., Francis B. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. Perception 2012, 41:1186-1192.
96. Wan C., Woods A.T., Salgado-Montejo A., Velasco C., Spence C. Assessing the expectations associated with pharmaceutical pill colour and shape. Food Quality and Preference 2015, 45:171-182.
97. Wan X., Woods A.T., van den Bosch J., McKenzie K.J., Velasco C., Spence C. Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features. Frontiers in Psychology 2014, 5:1365.
98. Westerman S.J., Gardner P.H., Sutherland E.J., White T., Jordan K., Watts D. Product design: Preference for rounded versus angular design elements. Psychology & Marketing 2012, 29:595-605.
99. Winkielman P., Schwarz N., Fazendeiro T., Reber R. The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion 2003, 189-217. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.).
100. Woods A.T., Spence C., Butcher N., Deroy O. Fast lemons and sour boulders: Testing crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodology. i-Perception 2013, 4(6):365-379.
101. Yeomans M.R., Tepper B.J., Rietzschel J., Prescott J. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: Role of taste genetics and anatomy. Physiology & Behavior 2007, 91:264-273.
102. Zhang D. A cross-cultural exploration of children's preferences of package design: The US and China. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 2014, 26:391-404.