Crossmodal correspondences: Four challenges

Multisensory Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1-3, 2016, Pages 29-48

  Deroy, Ophelia ^a   Spence, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crossmodal correspondences; Metaphors; Multisensory interactions; Sound symbolism; Unity assumption

Indexed keywords

CROSS-MODAL; MATCHINGS; MENTAL IMAGERY; METAPHORS; MULTISENSORY INTERACTION; PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE; SENSORY MODALITY; UNITY ASSUMPTION;

ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ASSOCIATION; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; HUMANS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84959895648     PISSN: 22134794     EISSN: 22134808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002488     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Adeli, M., Rouat, J. and Molotchnikoff, S. (2014). Audiovisual correspondence between musical timbre and visual shapes, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 352.
2. Alais, D. and Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration, Curr. Biol. 14, 257-262.
3. Albertazzi, L., Malfatti, M., Canal, L. and Micciolo, R. (2015). The hue of angles - was Kandinsky right? Art Percept. 3, 81-92.
4. Alexander, K. R. and Shansky, M. S. (1976). Influence of hue, value, and chroma on the perceived heaviness of colors, Percept. Psychophys. 19, 72-74.
5. Altieri, N., and Stevenson, R. A., Wallace, M. T. and Wenger, M. J. (2013). Learning to associate auditory and visual stimuli: behavioral and neural mechanisms, Brain Topogr. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0333-7.
6. Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H. and Thierry, G. (2015). Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants, Cortex 63, 196-205.
7. Athanasopoulos, G. and Moran, N. (2013). Cross-cultural representations of musical shape, Empir. Musicol. Rev. 8, 185-199.
8. Baudelaire, C. (1857). Les Fleurs du mal[Flowers of Evil]. Poulet-Malassis, Paris, France.
9. Berkeley, G. (1709/1975). An essay toward a new theory of vision, in: Philosophical Works, M. R. Ayers (Ed.), pp. 1-59. Dent, London, UK.
10. Botvinick, M. and Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see, Nature 391(6669), 756.
11. Bremner, A., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. and Spence, C. (2013). Bouba and Kiki in Namibia? A remote culture makes similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners, Cognition 126, 165-172.
12. Brunel, L., Carvalho, P. and Goldstone, R. L. (in press). It does belong together: cross-modal correspondences influence cross-modal integration during perceptual learning, Front. Psychol. 6, 358. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00358.
13. Calvert, G., Spence, C. and Stein, B. E. (Eds) (2004). The Handbook of Multisensory Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
14. Chen, L. (2013). Synaesthetic correspondence between auditory clips and colors: an empirical study, in: Intelligent Science and Intelligent Data Engineering, Second Sino-Foreign Interchange Workshop, IScIDE 2011, Xi'an, China, October 23-25, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, pp. 507-513. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
15. Chen, Y.-C. and Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal semantic priming by naturalistic sounds and spoken words enhances visual sensitivity, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 1554-1568.
16. Chen, N., Tanaka, K. and Watanabe, K. (2015). Color-shape associations revealed with implicit association tests, PLoS ONE 10, e0116954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116954.
17. Chiou, R. and Rich, A. N. (2012). Cross-modality correspondence between pitch and spatial location modulates attentional orienting, Perception 41, 339-353.
18. Clark, A. (1993). Sensory Qualities. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Cohen, N. E. (1934). Equivalence of brightness across modalities, Am. J. Psychol. 46, 117-119.
20. Connell, L., Cai, Z. G. and Holler, J. (2013). Do you see what I'm singing? Visuospatial movement biases pitch perception, Brain Cogn. 81, 124-130.
21. Connolly, K. (2014). Multisensory perception as an associative learning process, Front. Psychol. 5, 1095. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01095.
22. Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2012). A fruity note: crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes, Chem. Sens. 37, 151-158.
23. Crisinel, A.-S., Cosser, S., King, S., Jones, R., Petrie, J. and Spence, C. (2012). A bittersweet symphony: systematically modulating the taste of food by changing the sonic properties of the soundtrack playing in the background, Food Qual. Pref. 24, 201-204.
24. Deroy, O. (2014). The unity assumption and the many unities of consciousness, in: Sensory Integration and the Unity of Consciousness, D. Bennett and C. Hill (Eds), pp. 105-124. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
25. Deroy, O. and Spence, C. (2013a). Are we all born synaesthetic? Examining the neonatal synaesthesia hypothesis, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 1240-1253.
26. Deroy, O. and Spence, C. (2013b). Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so), Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 643-664.
27. Deroy, O. and Spence, C. (submitted). The role of vision in crossmodal matchings.
28. Deroy, O. and Valentin, D. (2011). Tasting shapes: investigating the sensory basis of crossmodal correspondences, Chemosens. Percept. 4, 80-90.
29. Deroy, O., Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2013). Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20, 878-896.
30. Doehrmann, O. and Naumer, M. J. (2008). Semantics and the multisensory brain: how meaning modulates processes of audio-visual integration, Brain Res. 1242, 136-150.
31. Dolscheid, S., Hunnius, S., Casasanto, D. and Majid, A. (2014). Prelinguistic infants are sensitive to space-pitch associations found across cultures, Psychol. Sci. 25, 1256-1261.
32. Duck, M. J. (1988). Newton and Goethe on colour: physical and physiological considerations, Ann. Sci. 45, 507-519.
33. Eitan, Z. (2013a). How pitch and loudness shape musical space and motion: new findings and persisting questions, in: The Psychology of Music in Multimedia, S. L. Tan, A. Cohen, S. Lipscomb and R. Kendall (Eds), pp. 161-187. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
34. Eitan, Z. (2013b). Which is more? Pitch height, parametric scales, and the intricacies of cross-domain magnitude relationships, in: Musical I: Essays in Honor of Eugene Narmour, L. Brenstein and A. Rozin (Eds), pp. 131-148. Pendragon Press, Hillsdale, NY, USA.
35. Eitan, Z. (2013c). Musical objects, cross-domain correspondences, and cultural choice: commentary on "Cross-cultural representations of musical shape" by George Athanasopoulos and Nikki Moran, Empir. Musicol. Rev. 8, 204-207.
36. Eitan, Z., Schupak, A., Gotler, A. and Marks, L. E. (2014). Lower pitch is larger, yet falling pitches shrink: interaction of pitch change and size change in speeded discrimination, Exp. Psychol. 61, 273-284.
37. Eitan, Z., Timmers, R. and Adler, M. (in press). The mapping of musical shapes to multiple dimensions, in: Music and Shape, D. Leech-Wilkinson and H. Prior (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
38. Ernst, M. O. and Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept, Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 162-169.
39. Evans, K. K. and Treisman, A. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features, J. Vis. 10(6), 1-12.
40. Faragó, T., Pongrácz, P., Miklósi, Á., Huber, L., Virányi, Z. and Range, F. (2010). Dogs' expectation about signalers' body size by virtue of their growls, PLoS ONE 5, e15175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015175.
41. Fernández-Prieto, I., Vera-Constán, F., García-Morera, J. and Navarra, J. (2012). Spatial recoding of sound: pitch-varying auditory cues modulate up/down visual spatial attention, See. Perceiv. 25, 150-151.
42. Forceville, C. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research, in: Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven and F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (Eds), pp. 379-402. Mouton de Gruyter, New York, NY, USA.
43. Gallace, A. and Spence, C. (2006). Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size, Percept. Psychophys. 68, 1191-1203.
44. Garrett, C. (1984). Swedenborg and the mystical enlightenment in late eighteenth-century England, J. Hist. Ideas 45, 67-81.
45. Ghazanfar, A. A. and Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 278-285.
46. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.
47. Guerdoux, E., Trouillet, R. and Brouillet, D. (2014). Olfactory-visual congruence effects stable across ages: yellow is warmer when it is pleasantly lemony, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 1280-1286.
48. Hanson-Vaux, G., Crisinel, A.-S. and Spence, C. (2013). Smelling shapes: crossmodal correspondences between odors and shapes, Chem. Sens. 38, 161-166.
49. Haverkamp, M. (2014). Synesthetic Design: Handbook for a Multi-Sensory Approach. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
50. Hedger, S. C., and Nusbaum, H. C., Lescop, O., Wallisch, P. and Hoeckner, B. (2013). Music can elicit a visual motion aftereffect, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 1039-1047.
51. Held, R., Ostrovsky, Y., de Gelder, B., Gandhi, T., Ganesh, S., Mathur, U. and Sinha, P. (2011). The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt, Nat. Neurosci. 14, 551-553.
52. Helmholtz, H. (1878/1971). The facts of perception, in: Selected Writings of Hermann Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT, USA.
53. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. and Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61-135.
54. Henschke, J. U., Noesselt, T., Scheich, H. and Budinger, E. (2014). Possible anatomical pathways for short-latency multisensory integration processes in primary sensory cortices, Brain Struct. Funct. 219, 1-23.
55. Ho, H. N., Van Doorn, G. H., Kawabe, T., Watanabe, J. and Spence, C. (2014). Colour-temperature correspondences: when reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour, PLoS ONE 9, e91854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091854.
56. Imai, M. and Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369(1651), 2013-0298.
57. Jeschonek, S., Pauen, S. and Babocsai, L. (2013). Cross-modal mapping of visual and acoustic displays in infants: the effect of dynamic and static components, Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 10, 337-358.
58. Johnson, M. and Lakoff, G. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
59. Klapetek, A., Ngo, M. K. and Spence, C. (2012). Do crossmodal correspondences enhance the facilitatory effect of auditory cues on visual search? Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 1154-1167.
60. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt Psychology. Liveright, New York, NY, USA.
61. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Liveright, New York, NY, USA.
62. Kohn, D. and Eitan, Z. (2009). Musical parameters and children's movement responses, in: Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, J. Louhivuori, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio, T. Himberg and P. S. Eerola (Eds), pp. 233-241. ESCOM 2009, Jyväskylä, Finland.
63. Koriat, A. (1975). Phonetic symbolism and feeling of knowing, Mem. Cogn. 3, 545-548.
64. Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one's answers: the consensuality principle, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34, 945-959.
65. Kovic, V., Plunkett, K. and Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain, Cognition 114, 19-28.
66. Langlois, T., Schloss, K. and Palmer, S. (2013). Music-color associations to simple melodies in synesthetes and non-synesthetes, J. Vis. 13, 1325.
67. Laurienti, P. J., and Kraft, R. A., Maldjian, J. A., Burdette, J. H. and Wallace, M. T. (2004). Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance, Exp. Brain Res. 158, 405-414.
68. Liang, M., Mouraux, A., Hu, L. and Iannetti, G. D. (2013). Primary sensory cortices contain distinguishable spatial patterns of activity for each sense, Nat. Commun. 4, 1979.
69. Ludwig, V. U., Adachi, I. and Matzuzawa, T. (2011). Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20661-20665.
70. Maes, P. J. and Leman, M. (2013). The influence of body movements on children's perception of music with an ambiguous expressive character, PLoS ONE 8, e54682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054682.
71. Marks, L. E. (1974). On associations of light and sound: the mediation of brightness, pitch, and loudness, Am. J. Psychol. 87, 173-188.
72. Marks, L. E. (1978). The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.
73. Marks, L. E. (1982). Bright sneezes and dark coughs, loud sunlight and soft moonlight, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8, 177-193.
74. Marks, L. E. (1996). On perceptual metaphors, Metaphor Symb. 11, 39-66.
75. Marks, L. (2004). Crossmodal interactions in speeded classifications, in: The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, G. Calvert, C. Spence and B. E. Stein (Eds), pp. 85-105. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
76. Martino, G. and Marks, L. E. (1999). Perceptual and linguistic interactions in speeded classification: tests of the semantic coding hypothesis, Perception 28, 903-924.
77. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices, Nature 264(5588), 746-748.
78. Meier, B. P. and Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: associations between affect and vertical position, Psychol. Sci. 15, 243-247.
79. Melara, R. D. (1989). Dimensional interaction between color and pitch, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 69-79.
80. Melara, R. D. and Marks, L. E. (1990). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions, Mem. Cogn. 18, 477-495.
81. Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto, Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 221-237.
82. Monroe, M. (1926). The apparent weight of color and correlated phenomena, Am. J. Psychol. 36, 192-206.
83. Morton, E. (1994). Sound symbolism and its role in non-human vertebrate communication, in: Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. Ohala (Eds), pp. 348-365. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
84. Newton, I. (1675/1757). Hypothesis explaining the properties of light, in: History of the Royal Society, Vol. III, T. Birch (Ed.), pp. 247-305. A. Millar, London, UK.
85. Orchard-Mills, E., Alais, D. and Van der Burg, E. (2013a). Amplitude-modulated auditory stimuli influence selection of visual spatial frequencies, J. Vis. 13, 6. doi: 10.1167/13.3.6.
86. Orchard-Mills, E., Alais, D. and Van der Burg, E. (2013b). Cross-modal associations between vision, touch and audition influence visual search through top-down attention, not bottom-up capture, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 75, 1892-1905.
87. Palmer, S. E., and Schloss, K. B., Xu, Z. and Prado-León, L. R. (2013). Music-color associations are mediated by emotion, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8836-8841.
88. Parise, C. V. and Spence, C. (2009). When birds of a feather flock together: synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes, PLoS ONE 4, e5664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005664.
89. Parise, C. V., Knorre, K. and Ernst, M. O. (2014). Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6104-6108.
90. Pesic, P. (2006). Isaac Newton and the mystery of the major sixth: a transcription of his manuscript 'Of Musick' with commentary, Interdiscipl. Sci. Rev. 31, 291-306.
91. Ramachandran, V. S. and Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia - a window into perception, thought and language, J. Conscious. Stud. 8, 3-34.
92. Revill, K. P., and Namy, L. L., DeFife, L. C. and Nygaard, L. C. (2014). Cross-linguistic sound symbolism and crossmodal correspondence: evidence from fMRI and DTI, Brain Lang. 128, 18-24.
93. Roach, N. W., Heron, J. and McGraw, P. V. (2006). Resolving multisensory conflict: a strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration, Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2159-2168.
94. Rouw, R., Case, L., Gosavi, R. and Ramachandran, V. (2014). Color associations for days and letters across different languages, Front. Psychol. 5, 369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00369.
95. Sadaghiani, S., Maier, J. X. and Noppeney, U. (2009). Natural, metaphoric, and linguistic auditory direction signals have distinct influences on visual motion processing, J. Neurosci. 29, 6490-6499.
96. Schutz, M. and Lipscomb, S. (2007). Hearing gestures, seeing music: vision influences perceived tone duration, Perception 36, 888-892.
97. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B. and Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception, Nature 385(6614), 308.
98. Seo, H.-S., Arshamian, A., Schemmer, K., Scheer, I., Sander, T., Ritter, G. and Hummel, T. (2010). Cross-modal integration between odors and abstract symbols, Neurosci. Lett. 478, 175-178.
99. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y. and Shimojo, S. (2000). Illusions. What you see is what you hear, Nature 408(6814), 788.
100. Shayan, S., Ozturk, O. and Sicoli, M. A. (2011). The thickness of pitch: crossmodal metaphors in Farsi, Turkish, and Zapotec, Sens. Soc. 6, 96-105.
101. Simner, J., Ward, J., Lanz, M., Jansari, A., Noonan, K., Glover, L. and Oakley, D. A. (2005). Non-random associations of graphemes to colours in synaesthetic and non-synaesthetic populations, Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 1069-1085.
102. Spence, C. (2007). Audiovisual multisensory integration, Acoust. Sci. Technol. 28, 61-70.
103. Spence, C. (2010). Multisensory integration: solving the crossmodal binding problem. Comment on "Crossmodal influences on visual perception" by Shams & Kim, Physics of Life Rev. 7, 285-286.
104. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 971-995.
105. Spence, C. (2013). Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integratiON; Evaluating the spatial rule, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1296, 31-49.
106. Spence, C. and Deroy, O. (2013a). How automatic are crossmodal correspondences? Conscious. Cogn. 22, 245-260.
107. Spence, C. and Deroy, O. (2013b). Crossmodal mental imagery, in: Multisensory Imagery, S. Lacey and R. Lawson (Eds), pp. 157-183. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
108. Spence, C. and Driver, J. (Eds) (2004). Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
109. Spence, C. and Ngo, M. (2012). Assessing the shape symbolism of the taste, flavour, and texture of foods and beverages, Flavour 1, 12.
110. Stein, B. E. (Ed.) (2012). The New Handbook of Multisensory Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
111. Stein, B. E. and Meredith, M. A. (1993). The Merging of the Senses. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
112. Stevens, J. C. and Marks, L. E. (1965). Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 54, 407-411.
113. Sweeny, T. D., Guzman-Martinez, E., Ortega, L., Grabowecky, M. and Suzuki, S. (2012). Sounds exaggerate visual shape, Cognition 124, 194-200.
114. Takeshima, Y. and Gyoba, J. (2013). Changing pitch of sounds alters perceived visual motion trajectory, Multisens. Res. 26, 317-332.
115. Tomasik-Krótki, J. and Strojny, J. (2008). Scaling of sensory impressions, J. Sens. Stud. 23, 251-266.
116. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 171-178.
117. Vatakis, A., Ghazanfar, A. and Spence, C. (2008). Facilitation of multisensory integration by the 'unity assumption': is speech special? J. Vis. 8, 1-11.
118. Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., Marmolejo-Ramos, F. and Spence, C. (2014). Predictive packaging design: tasting shapes, typographies, names, and sounds, Food Qual. Pref. 34, 88-95.
119. Velasco, C., and Woods, A. T., Deroy, O. and Spence, C. (2015). Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape, Food Qual. Pref. 41, 151-158.
120. Von Hornbostel, E. M. (1931). Über Geruchshelligkeit[On smell brightness], Pflügers Arch. gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere 227, 517-538.
121. Von Hornbostel, E. M. (1950). The unity of the senses, in: A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, W. D. Ellis (Ed.), pp. 210-216. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
122. Walker, P. (2012). Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74, 1792-1809.
123. Wan, X., and Woods, A. T., Van den Bosch, J., Mckenzie, K. J., Velasco, C. and Spence, C. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between tastes and visual features, Front. Psychol. Cogn. 5, 1365.
124. Welch, R. B. and Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy, Psychol. Bull. 88, 638-667.
125. Welch, R. B. and Warren, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions, in: Handbook of Perception and Performance. Vol. 1. Sensory Processes and Perception, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. P. Thomas (Eds), pp. 25-1-25-36. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
126. Werning, M., Fleischhauer, J. and Beseoglu, H. (2006). The cognitive accessibility of synaesthetic metaphor, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2365-2370. Québec City, QC, Canada.
127. Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task, Brain Lang. 93, 10-19.
128. Wheatley, J. (1973). Putting colour into marketing, Marketing 67, 24-29.
129. Woods, A. T., Spence, C., Butcher, N. and Deroy, O. (2013). Fast lemons and sour boulders: testing the semantic hypothesis of crossmodal correspondences using an internet-based testing methodology, i-Perception 4, 365-369.
130. Yu, N. (2003). Synesthetic metaphor: a cognitive perspective, J. Lit. Semantics 32, 19-34.