A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains

Perception

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1186-1192

  Walker, Laura ^a   Walker, Peter ^a   Francis, Brian ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Connotative meaning; Cross sensory correspondences; Kendall tau distance; Rating scales; Semantic

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864536975     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p7149     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bates D M, 2010 "lme4: Mixed-effects modelling with R", June 2010 draft (http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/lMMwR/lrgprt.pdf)
2. Bates N, Maechler M, Bolker B, 2012, Package 'lme4', Version 0.99999911-0 (http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/)
3. Collier W G, Hubbard, T L, 2001 "Judgements of happiness, brightness, speed and tempo change of auditory stimuli varying in pitch and tempo" Psychomusicology 17 36-55
4. Crisinel A-S, Spence C, 2010 "As bitter as a trombone: Synesthetic correspondences in nonsynesthethes between tastes/flavors and musical notes" Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72 1994-2002
5. Eitan E, Timmers R, 2010 "Beethoven's last piano sonata and those who follow crocodiles: Crossdomain mappings of auditory pitch in a musical context" Cognition 114 405-422
6. Evans K K, Treisman A, 2010 "Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features" Journal of Vision 10 1-12
7. Fagin R, Kumar R, Mahdian M, Sivakumar D, Vee E, 2006 "Comparing partial rankings" SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 20 628-648
8. Gallace A, Spence C, 2006 "Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size" Perception & Psychophysics 68 1191-1203
9. Hubbard T L, 1996 "Synesthesia-like mappings of lightness, pitch, and melodic interval" American Journal of Psychology 109 219-238
10. Judd C M, Westfall J, Kenny D A, 2012 "Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105 54-68
11. Karwoski T F, Odbert H S, Osgood C E, 1942 "Studies in synesthetic thinking: II. The role of form in visual responses to music" Journal of General Psychology 26 199-222
12. Kemp S E, Gilbert A N, 1997 "Odor intensity and color lightness are correlated sensory dimensions" American Journal of Psychology 110 35-46
13. Marks L E, 1978 The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations among the modalities (New York: Academic Press)
14. Martino G, Marks L E, 2001 "Synaesthesia: Strong and weak" Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 61-65
15. Occelli V, Spence C, Zampini M, 2009 "Compatibility effects between sound frequency and tactile elevation" NeuroReport 20 793-797
16. Parise C, Spence C, 2009 " 'When birds of a feather flock together': Synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes" PLoS ONE 4(5) e5664, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005664
17. R Development Core Team, 2011 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; http://www.R-project.org/)
18. Rusconi E, Kwan B, Giordano B L, Umiltà C, Butterworth B, 2006 "Spatial representations of pitch height: The SMARC effect" Cognition 99 113-129
19. Spence C, 2011 "Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review" Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73 971-995
20. Walker P, Smith S, 1984 "Stroop interference based on the synaesthetic qualities of auditory pitch" Perception 13 75-81