Corrigendum to ‘The sound of size’ crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study [NeuroImage 59/1(2012) 663–672] (S1053811911007683) (10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.095));The sound of size. Crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study

NeuroImage

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 663-672

  Bien, Nina ^a   ten Oever, Sanne ^a   Goebel, Rainer ^a   Sack, Alexander T ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Crossmodal; ERP; Parietal cortex; Synesthesia spectrum; TMS

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SPATIAL LOCALIZATION TASK; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSMODAL BINDING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY SYSTEM; SYNESTHESIA; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 80054097097     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.006     Document Type: Erratum

References (46)

1. Beeli G., Esslen M., et al. Time course of neural activity correlated with colored-hearing synesthesia. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:379-385.
2. Brang D., Rouw R., et al. Similarly shaped letters evoke similar colors in grapheme-color synesthesia. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1355-1358.
3. Calvert G.A. Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex 2001, 11:1110-1123.
4. Calvert G.A., Campbell R., et al. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10:649-657.
5. Calvert G.A., Hansen P.C., et al. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect. NeuroImage 2001, 14:427-438.
6. Cohen Kadosh R., Henik A. Can synaesthesia research inform cognitive science?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:177-184.
7. Cohen Kadosh R., Henik A., et al. Small is bright and big is dark in synaesthesia. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R834-R835.
8. Cohen Kadosh R., Brodsky W., et al. Mental representation: what can pitch tell us about the distance effect?. Cortex 2008, 44:470-477.
9. Cohen Kadosh R., Henik A., et al. Induced cross-modal synaesthetic experience without abnormal neuronal connections. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:258-265.
10. Dehaene S., Bossini S., et al. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1993, 122:371-396.
11. Dixon M.J., Smilek D., et al. Not all synaesthetes are created equal: projector versus associator synaesthetes. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:335-343.
12. Driver J. Enhancement of selective listening by illusory mislocation of speech sounds due to lip-reading. Nature 1996, 381:66-68.
13. Eagleman D.M. The objectification of overlearned sequences: a new view of spatial sequence synesthesia. Cortex 2009, 45:1266-1277.
14. Eagleman D.M. A large-scale analysis of synesthesia reveals clustering of subtypes and influence of grapheme shape on color associations. Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego 2010.
15. Esterman M., Verstynen T., et al. Coming unbound: disrupting automatic integration of synesthetic color and graphemes by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right parietal lobe. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2006, 18:1570-1576.
16. Fischer M.H., Castel A.D., et al. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:555-556.
17. Grossenbacher P.G., Lovelace C.T. Mechanisms of synesthesia: cognitive and physiological constraints. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:36-41.
18. Hilgetag C.C., Theoret H., et al. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:953-957.
19. Huang Y.Z., Edwards M.J., et al. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45:201-206.
20. Hubbard E.M., Ramachandran V.S. Neurocognitive mechanisms of synesthesia. Neuron 2005, 48:509-520.
21. Hubbard E.M., Arman A.C., et al. Individual differences among grapheme-color synesthetes: brain-behavior correlations. Neuron 2005, 45:975-985.
22. Kim C. Cross-linguistic approaches to color-graphemic synesthesia. Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego 2010.
23. Martino G., Marks L.E. Synesthesia: strong and weak. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 10:61.
24. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264:746-748.
25. Meredith M.A., Stein B.E. Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J. Neurophysiol. 1986, 56:640-662.
26. Mondloch C.J., Maurer D. Do small white balls squeak? Pitch-object correspondences in young children. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:133-136.
27. Muggleton N., Tsakanikos E., et al. Disruption of synaesthesia following TMS of the right posterior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1582-1585.
28. Mulvenna C.M., Walsh V. Synaesthesia: supernormal integration?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:350-352.
29. Nikolic D. Is synesthesia actually ideaesthesia?: the role of concepts in the phenomenon 2010, Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA.
30. Parise C., Spence C. Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 442:257-261.
31. Parise C.V., Spence C. 'When birds of a feather flock together': synesthetic correspondences modulate audiovisual integration in non-synesthetes. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5664.
32. Rich A.N., Bradshaw J.L., et al. A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations. Cognition 2005, 98:53-84.
33. Romei V., Murray M.M., et al. Preperceptual and stimulus-selective enhancement of low-level human visual cortex excitability by sounds. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1799-1805.
34. Rouw R., Scholte H.S. Increased structural connectivity in grapheme-color synesthesia. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:792-797.
35. Rouw R., Scholte H.S. Neural basis of individual differences in synesthetic experiences. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:6205-6213.
36. Sagiv N., Ward J. Crossmodal interactions: lessons from synesthesia. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 155:259-271.
37. Simner J., Mulvenna C., et al. Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception 2006, 35:1024-1033.
38. Spector F., Maurer D. The colour of Os: naturally biased associations between shape and colour. Percept. Lond. 2008, 37:841.
39. Stein B.E., Stanford T.R., et al. Challenges in quantifying multisensory integration: alternative criteria, models, and inverse effectiveness. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 198:113-126.
40. Suzuki Y., Takeshima H. Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:918-1933.
41. van Atteveldt N., Formisano E., et al. Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron 2004, 43:271-282.
42. Vogel E.K., Luck S.J. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:190-203.
43. Wallace M.T., Wilkinson L.K., et al. Representation and integration of multiple sensory inputs in primate superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 76:1246-1266.
44. Ward J., Huckstep B., et al. Sound-colour synaesthesia: to what extent does it use cross-modal mechanisms common to us all?. Cortex 2006, 42:264-280.
45. Weiss P.H., Zilles K., et al. When visual perception causes feeling: enhanced cross-modal processing in grapheme-color synesthesia. NeuroImage 2005, 28:859-868.
46. Werner S., Noppeney U. Distinct functional contributions of primary sensory and association areas to audiovisual integration in object categorization. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:2662-2675.