Science Achievement Gaps Begin Very Early, Persist, and Are Largely Explained by Modifiable Factors

Educational Researcher

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 18-35

  Morgan, Paul L ^a   Farkas, George ^b   Hillemeier, Marianne M ^a   Maczuga, Steve ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement gaps; at risk students; early childhood; growth trajectories; hierarchical linear modeling; longitudinal; minorities; poverty; racial ethnic minorities; regression analyses; science achievement; science education; secondary data analysis; socioeconomic status; survey research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84959323115     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X16633182     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. N.L.AllenJ.E.CarlsonC.A.Zelenak (1999). The NAEP 1996 technical report (NCES 1999-452). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
2. E.M.Anderman (1998). The middle school experience: Effects of the math and science achievement of adolescents with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 128–138. doi:10.1177/002221949803100203
3. Ann E. Casey Foundation. (2012). Kids Count data snapshot on children living in American’s high-poverty communities. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Initiatives/KIDS%20COUNT/D/DataSnapshotonHighPovertyCommunities/KIDSCOUNTDataSnapshot_HighPovertyCommunities.pdf
4. L.ArcherJ.DewittJ.OsborneJ.DillionB.WillisB.Wong (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94, 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399
5. Y.ArdashevaT.R.TretterM.Kinny (2012). English language learners and academic achievement: Revisiting the threshold hypothesis. Language Learning, 62, 769–812. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00652.x
6. V.R.BacharachA.A.BaumeisterR.M.Furr (2003). Racial and gender science achievement gaps in secondary education. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164, 115–126. doi:10.1080/00221320309597507.
7. V.A.BaliR.M.Alvarez (2004). The race gap in school achievement scores: Longitudinal evidence from a racially diverse school district. Policy Studies Journal, 32, 393–415. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00072.x
8. B.BatistaS.Matthews (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 359–370.
9. J.BensonG.Borman (2010). Family, neighborhood, and school settings across seasons: When do socioeconomic context and racial composition matter for the reading achievement growth of young children?Teachers College Record, 112, 1338–1390.
10. M.BerendsR.Penaloza (2010). Increasing racial isolation and test score gaps in mathematics: A 30-year perspective. Teachers College Record, 112, 978–1007.
11. C.Blair (2002). School readiness: Integrating cognition and emotion in a neurobiological conceptualization of children’s functioning at school entry. American Psychologist, 57, 111–127. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.2.111
12. R.K.Blank (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap?Science Education, 97, 830–847. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9537-6
13. K.BodovskiI.Nahum-ShaniR.Walsh (2013). School climate and students’ early mathematics learning: Another search for context effects. American Journal of Education, 119, 209–234.
14. G.BormanM.Dowling (2010). Schools and inequality: A multilevel analysis of Coleman’s equality of educational opportunity data. Teachers College Record, 112, 1201–1246.
15. R.H.BradleyR.F.Corwyn (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
16. A.S.BrykP.B.SebringE.AllensworthS.LuppescuJ.Q.Easton (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. J.P.ByrnesD.C.Miller (2007). The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: An opportunity–propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 599–629. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.09.002
18. C.E.CameronK.J.GrimmJ.S.SteeleL.Castro-SchiloD.W.Grissmer (2015). Nonlinear Gompertz curve models of achievement gaps in mathematics and reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 789–804. doi:10.1037/edu0000009
19. E.U.CascioD.W.Schanzenbach (2013). The impacts of expanding access to high-quality preschool education. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/about/projects/bpea/papers/2013/fall-cascio-preschool-education
20. M.Chatterji (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 489–507. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.489
21. R.Crosnoe (2012). Studying the immigrant paradox in the Mexican-origin population. In (Eds.), The immigrant paradox in children and adolescents: Is becoming American a developmental risk? (pp. 61–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13094-003
22. A.E.CunninghamK.E.Stanovich (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability ten years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.934
23. E.DelenO.Bulut (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 311–317.
24. D.B.DowneyP.T.von HippelB.A.Broh (2004). Are schools the great equalizer? Cognitive inequality during the summer months and the school year. American Sociological Review, 69, 613–635.
25. G.J.DuncanC.J.DowsettA.ClaessensK.MagnusonA.C.HustonP.KlebanovC.. Japel (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012- 1649.43.6.1428
26. J.S.EcclesA.WigfieldU.Schiefele (1998). Motivation to succeed. In (Series Ed.), (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1018–1095). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. G.W.Evans (2005). Reframing the achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 582–589.
28. G.W.EvansJ.Rosenbaum (2008). Self-regulation and the income-achievement gap. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 504–514.
29. H.FengG.Cartledge (1996). Social skill assessment of inner city Asian, African, and European American students. School Psychology Review, 25, 228–239.
30. J.E.Fiel (2013). Decomposing school resegregation: Social closure, racial imbalance, and racial isolation. American Sociological Review, 78, 828–848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0003122413496252
31. A.Flores (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap?High School Journal, 91, 29–42.
32. W.A.FosterM.Miller (2007). Development of the literacy achievement gap: A longitudinal study of kindergarten through third grade. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 173–181. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2007/018)
33. R.G.FryerS.D.Levitt (2004). Understanding the Black–White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 447–464.
34. M.J.FurlongM.Karno (1995). Review of the Social Skills Rating System. In (Eds.), Twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 697–969). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
35. E.GouldL.MishelH.Shierholz (2013). Already more than a lost decade: Income and poverty trends continue to paint a bleak picture. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/lost-decade-income-poverty-trends-continue/
36. F.M.GreshamS.N.Elliot (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
37. W.C.GustinL.Corazza (1994). Mathematical and verbal reasoning as predictors of science achievement. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 16, 160–162. doi:10.1080/02783199409553564
38. B.HartT.R.Risley (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
39. M.M.HillemeierP.L.MorganG.FarkasS.Maczuga (2013). Quality disparities in child care for at-risk children: Comparing Head Start and non–Head Start settings. Maternal and Child Health, 17, 180–188.
40. F.L.HuangT.R.MoonR.Boren (2014). Are the reading rich getting richer? Testing for the presence of the Matthew effect. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 30, 95–115. doi:10.1080/10573569.2013.789784
41. K.K.JonesJ.P.Byrnes (2006). Characteristics of students who benefit from high quality mathematics instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 328–343. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.10.002
42. N.C.JordanD.KaplanC.RamineniM.N.Locuniak (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939
43. S.KempertH.SaalbachI.Hardy (2011). Cognitive benefits and costs of bilingualism in elementary school students: The case of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 547–561. doi:10.1037/a0023619
44. G.Ladson-Billings (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35, 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X035007003
45. J.-S.LeeN.K.Bowen (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 193–218.
46. O.LeeR.A.DeaktorJ.E.HartP.CuevasC.Enders (2005). An instructional intervention’s impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 857–887. doi:10.1002/tea.20071
47. U.LeppänenP.NiemiK.AunolaJ.Nurmi (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 72–93. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.1.5
48. I.LiE.OnagaP.-S.ShenH.-H.Chiou (2009). Temperament characteristics and science achievement: A longitudinal study of elementary students in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Achievement, 31, 1175–1185.
49. X.LiuM.Whitford (2011). Opportunities-to-learn at home: Profiles of students with and without reaching science proficiency. Journal of Science Education Technology, 20, 375–387. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9259-y
50. X.MaJ.L.M.Wilkins (2002). The development of science achievement in middle and high school: Individual differences and school effects. Evaluation Review, 26, 395–417. doi:10.1177/0193841X02026004003
51. J.Maerten-RiveraN.MyersO.LeeR.Penfield (2010). Student and school predictors of high-stakes assessment in science. Science Education, 94, 937–962. doi:10.1002/sce.20408
52. K.A.MagnusonC.RuhmJ.Waldfogel (2007). The persistence of preschool effects: Do subsequent classroom experiences matter?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 18–38. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.10.002
53. M.McClellandA.AcockF.Morrison (2006). The impact of kindergarten learning-related skills on academic trajectories at the end of elementary school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 471–490. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.003
54. D.B.McCoachA.A.O’ConnellS.M.ReisH.A.Levitt (2006). Growing readers: A hierarchical linear model of children’s reading growth during the first 2 years of school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 14–28. doi:10.1037/0022- 0663.98.1.14
55. D.C.McCoyA.L.RoyG.M.Sirkman (2013). Neighborhood crime and school climate as predictors of elementary school academic quality: A cross-lagged panel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 52, 128–140.
56. R.A.MickelsonM.C.BottiaR.Lambert (2013). Effects of school racial composition on K–12 mathematics outcomes: A metaregression analysis. Review of Educational Research, 83, 121–158. doi:10.3102/0034654312475322
57. P.L.MorganG.FarkasM.M.HillemeierC.HammerS.Maczuga (2015). 24-month-old children with larger oral vocabularies display greater academic and behavioral functioning at kindergarten entry. Child Development, 86, 1351–1370. doi:10.1111/cdev.12398
58. P.L.MorganG.FarkasP.S.TufisR.S.Sperling (2008). Are reading and behavioral problems risk factors for each other?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 417–436. doi:10.1177/0022219408321123
59. P.L.MorganG.FarkasQ.Wu (2009) Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321. doi:10.1177/0022219408331037
60. P.L.MorganG.FarkasQ.Wu (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 472–488. doi:10.1177/0022219411414010
61. L.MorsyR.Rothstein (2015). Five social disadvantages that depress student performance: Why schools alone can’t close achievement gaps. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://s2.epi.org/files/pdf/86987.pdf
62. P.A.MullerF.K.StageJ.Kinzie (2001). Science achievement growth trajectories: Understanding factors related to gender and racial-ethnic differences in precollege science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 981–1012. doi:10.3102/00028312038004981
63. M.NajarianJ.M.PollackA.G.Sorongon (2009). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K): Psychometric report for the eighth grade (NCES 2009–002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
64. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
65. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011) Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
66. O.NormanC.R.AultB.BentzL.Meskimen (2001). The Black–White “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge to urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1101–1114. doi:10.1002/tea.10004
67. T.O’ReillyD.S.McNamara (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 161–196. doi:10.3102/0002831206298171
68. J.Osborne (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
69. J.M.PollackS.Atkins-BurnettM.NajarianD.A.Rock (2005). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS–K): Psychometric report for the fifth grade (NCES 2006–036).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
70. S.L.PongJ.DronkersG.Hampden-Thompson (2003). Family policies and children’s school achievement in single- versus two-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 681–699. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00681.x
71. A.ProtopapasG.D.SideridisA.MouzakiP.G.Simos (2011). Matthew effects in reading comprehension: Myth or reality?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 402–420. doi:10.1177/0022219411417568
72. T.E.RaghunathanJ.M.LepkowskiJ.Van HoewykP.Solenberger (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27, 85–95.
73. G.B.RamaniR.S.Siegler (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375–394. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2007.01131.x
74. S.W.RaudenbushA.S.Bryk (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75. S.F.Reardon (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
76. S.F.ReardonK.Bischoff (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1092–1153. doi:10.1086/657114
77. S.F.ReardonC.Galindo (2009). The Hispanic–White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 853–891. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333184
78. A.J.ReynoldsH.J.Walberg (1992). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 371–382. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.371
79. L.A.Ricciardelli (1992). Bilingualism and cognitive-development in relation to threshold theory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 301–316. doi:10.1007/BF01067515
80. D.A.RockJ.M.Pollack (2002). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K): Psychometric report for kindergarten through first grade. Working Paper Series. Jessup, MD: ED Pubs.
81. M.SackesK.C.TrundleR.L.BellA.A.O’Connell (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 217–235. doi:10.1002/tea.20395
82. H.S.Scarborough (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 68, 115–136. doi:10.1007/s11881-998- 0006-5
83. J.D.SingerJ.B.Willett (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
84. L.E.SkibbeK.J.GrimmT.Stanton-ChapmanL.M.JusticeK.L.PenceR.P.Bowles (2008). Reading trajectories of children with language difficulties from preschool through fifth grade. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 475–486. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0016)
85. D.SlykhuisJ.Park (2006). Correlates of achievement with online and classroom-based MBL physics activities. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25, 147–163.
86. K.E.Stanovich (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
87. E.B.Stewart (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school- and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40, 179–204.
88. S.Strand (2014). School effects and ethnic, gender, and socio-economic gaps in educational achievement at age 11. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 223–245. doi:10.1080/03054985.2014.891980
89. K.Sylva (2014). The role of families and pre-school in educational disadvantage. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 680–695.
90. L.TachG.Farkas (2006). Learning-related behaviors, cognitive skills, and ability grouping when schooling begins. Social Science Research, 35, 1048–1079. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.08.001
91. W.F.TateB.D.JonesE.Thorne-WallingtonM.C.Hogrebe (2012). Science and the city: Thinking geospatially about opportunity to learn. Urban Education, 47, 399–433. doi:10.1177/0042085911429974
92. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012a). Children below poverty level by race and Hispanic origin. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s0712.pdf
93. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012b). Most children younger than age 1 are minorities. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-90.html
94. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). National Assessment of Education Progress, science 2011, national results. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/science_2011/
95. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance (NCES 2000–469). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main1999/2000469.pdf
96. C.Von Secker (2004). Science achievement in social contexts: Analysis from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Journal of Educational Research, 98, 67–78. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.2.67-78
97. C.Von SeckerR.W.Lissitz. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110–1126. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10%3C1110::AID-TEA4%3E3.0.CO;2-T
98. H.J.WalbergS.Tsai (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312020003359
99. A.H.WangF.ShenJ.P.Byrnes (2013). Does the opportunity-propensity framework predict the early mathematics skills of low-income pre-kindergarten children?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 259–270. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.04.004
100. J.WangJ.R.Staver (2001). Examining relationships between factors of science education and student career aspiration. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 312–319. doi:10.1080/00220670109598767
101. J.A.WelshR.L.NixC.BlairK.L.BiermanK.E.Nelson (2010). The development of cognitive skills and gains in academic school readiness for children from low-income families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 43–53.
102. R.W.WoodcockK.S.McGrewJ.K.Werder (1994). Woodcock-McGrew-Werder Mini-Battery of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
103. D.J.YoungA.J.ReynoldsH.J.Walberg (1996). Science achievement and educational productivity. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 272–278. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941328