Integrated Science and Mathematics Professional Development Programs

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 102, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 359-370

  Basista, Beth ^a   Mathews, Susann ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645260371     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18219.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York : Oxford University Press.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York : Oxford University Press.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1996). Summary comparison of content between National Science Education Standards and Benchmarks for Science Literacy and Science for All Americans. Washington, DC : Author.
4. Anderson, C., & Smith, E. (1987). Teaching science. In V. Richardson-Keohler (Ed.), Educators' handbook: A research perspective (pp. 84–111). New York : Longman.
5. Arons, A. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
6. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Basista, B. (1998a). Foundations in problem solving and science literacy. New York : John Wiley and Sons.
8. Basista, B. (1998b). Concepts and applications in physics. Plymouth, MI : Hayden-McNeil Companies, Inc.
9. Battista, M. T. (1994). Teacher beliefs and the reform movement in mathematics education. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(2), 462–470.
10. Berlin, D. (1994). The integration of science and mathematics education: Highlights from the NSF/ SSMA Wingspread conference plenary papers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 32–35.
11. Borko, H., & Putman, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teachers' knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35–65). New York : Teachers College Press.
12. Bredderman, T. (1982). Elementary school science process programs: A meta-analysis of evaluation studies. (Final Report of NSF-RISE Grant No. SED 18717).
13. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms, Alexandria, VA : ASCD.
14. Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education. New York : Teachers College Press.
15. Carlsen, S. C. (1993). Teacher knowledge and discourse controls: Qualitative evidence from novice biology teachers' classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), 471–481.
16. The Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications. (1998a). Mathematics: Modeling our world. Cincinnati, OH : South-Western Educational Publishing.
17. The Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications. (1998b). Wildlife. Mathematics: Modeling our world, Teacher's Resources. (pp. 611–612). Cincinnati, OH : South-Western Educational Publishing.
18. Czerniak, C., Weber, W., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421–430.
19. Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226–230.
20. De Mesquita, P. B., & Drake, J. C. (1994). Educational reform and self-efficacy beliefs of teachers implementing nongraded primary school programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(3), 291–302.
21. Dobey, D. C., & Schafer, L. E. (1984). The effects of knowledge on elementary science inquiry teaching. Science Education, 68(1), 39–51.
22. Enochs, L., Smith, P., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202.
23. Feazel, C. T., & Aram, R. B. (1990). Teaching the teachers: A regional approach to nationwide problems in pre-college science education. Journal of Geological Education, 38, 219–222.
24. Flora, D. B., & Panter, A. T. (1999). Technical Report: Analysis of the psychometric structure the LSC surveys. Chapel Hill, NC : University of North Carolina.
25. Gardner, H., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for understanding within and across the disciplines. Educational Leadership, 51, 14–18.
26. Green, L. C. (1991). Science-centered curriculum in elementary school. Educational Leadership, 48, 42–46.
27. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66 (1), 64–74.
28. Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993.
29. Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Menlo Park, CA : Addison-Wesley.
30. Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 199–218). Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic.
31. Horizon Research Inc. (1997). Local systemic change through teacher enhancement questionnaire. Chapel Hill, NC : Author.
32. Horizon Research Inc. (2000). 1996-1999 Definitions of teacher and principal composites. Chapel Hill, NC : Author.
33. Huntley, M.A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320–327.
34. The Learning Team, Inc., KTCA, & University of Florida (1996). Awareness kit for the national science education standards: Administrators' workshop manual. Washington, DC : Annenburg/CPB.
35. Lehman, J. (1994). Integrating science and mathematics: Perceptions of preservice and practicing elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(2), 58–64.
36. Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212–215.
37. Mason, T. C. (1996). Integrated curricula: Potential and problems. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 263–270.
38. McDermott, L. C. (1996). Physics by inquiry (Volumes 1 & 2). New York : John Wiley & Sons.
39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
41. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
42. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
43. National Research Council. (1997). Science for all children: A guide to improving elementary science education in your district. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
44. Ohio Department of Education. (1999). Teacher education and licensure standards [Online]. Available: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/Teaching/Profession/Teacher/Certification_Licensure/licensure.asp.
45. Perkes, V. A. (1975). Relationships between a teacher's background and sensed adequacy to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), 85–88.
46. Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, M.G., & Staver, J. R. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283–315.
47. Renner, J.W., & Lawson, A.E. (1973). Promoting intellectual development through science teaching. The Physics Teacher, 11(5), 273–276.
48. Sandman, B. (1988). Report on the mid-California science improvement program. Los Altos, CA : The Packard Foundation.
49. Stalheim-Smith, A., & Scharmann, L. C. (1996). General biology: Creating a positive learning environment for elementary education majors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 7(3), 169–178.
50. State Board of Education. (1994a). Science: Ohio's model competency-based program. Columbus, OH : Author.
51. State Board of Education. (1994b). Model competency-based mathematics program. Columbus, OH : Author.
52. Stoddart, T., Connell, M., Stofflett, R., & Peck, D. (1993). Reconstructing elementary teacher candidates' understanding of mathematics and science content. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 229–241.
53. Tilgner, P.J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74(4), 421–431.
54. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment, authenticity, context, and validity. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41–47.