Socio-hydrological modelling: A review asking "why, what and how?"

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 443-478

  Blair, P ^a   Buytaert, W ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HYDROLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCES;

BACKGROUND INFORMATION; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELLERS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING; HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM; INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; WATERRESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; HOLISTIC APPROACH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LITERATURE REVIEW; MODEL TEST; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESEARCH WORK; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 84956993053     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-20-443-2016     Document Type: Article

References (225)

1. Acevedo, M., Baird Callicott, J., Monticino, M., Lyons, D., Palomino, J., Rosales, J., Delgado, L., Ablan, M., Davila, J., Tonella, G., Ramírez, H., and Vilanova, E.: Models of natural and human dynamics in forest landscapes: Crosssite and cross-cultural synthesis, Geoforum, 39, 846-866, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.008, 2008.
2. Adger, W.: Evolution of economy and environment: an application to land use in lowland Vietnam, Ecol. Econ., 31, 365-379, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00056-7, 1999.
3. Agha Kouchak, A., Feldman, D., Hoerling, M., Huxman, T., and Lund, J.: Water and Climate: Recognize anthropogenic drought, Nature, 524, 409-411, 2015.
4. Akter, S., Quentin Grafton, R., and Merritt, W. S.: Integrated hydroecological and economic modeling of environmental flows: Macquarie Marshes, Australia, Agricult. Water Manage., 145, 98-109, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.005, 2014.
5. An, L.: Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models, Ecol. Model., 229, 25-36, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010, 2012.
6. An, L., Linderman, M., and Qi, J.: Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: an agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration, Ann. Assoc. Am Geograph., 95, 54-79, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00450.x, 2005.
7. Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E.: A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective, Ecol. Soc., 9, 1-18, 2004.
8. Archer, M. S.: Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 184, 1995.
9. Arkesteijn, L. and Pande, S.: On hydrological model complexity, its geometrical interpretations and prediction uncertainty, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7048-7063, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20529, 2013.
10. Arthur, W. B.: Complexity and the Economy, Science, 284, 107-109, doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.107, 1999.
11. Barreteau, O., Bousquet, F., Millier, C., and Weber, J.: Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to study irrigated system viability: Application to case studies in the Senegal River Valley, Agricult. Syst., 80, 255-275, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2003.07.005, 2004.
12. Barton, D. N., Kuikka, S., Varis, O., Uusitalo, L., Henriksen, H. J., Borsuk, M., de la Hera, A., Farmani, R., Johnson, S., and Linnell, J. D. C.: Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management, Int. Environ. Assess. Manage., 8, 418-429, doi:10.1002/ieam.1327, 2012.
13. Becu, N., Perez, P., Walker, A., Barreteau, O., and Le Page, C.: Agent based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand, Ecol. Model., 170, 319-331, doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00236-9, 2003.
14. Berkes, F.: Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking, Nat. Hazards, 41, 283-295, doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7, 2007.
15. Beven, K.: Changing Ideas in Hydrology - the Case of Physically-Based Models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172, 1989.
16. Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., and Brock, W. A.: Turning back from the brink: detecting an impending regime shift in time to avert it, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 826-831, doi:10.1073/pnas.0811729106, 2009.
17. Blomquist, W. and Schlager, E.: Political Pitfalls of Integrated Watershed Management, Soc. Nat. Resour., 18, 37-41, doi:10.1080/08941920590894435, 2005.
18. Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale Issues in Hydrological Modelling: a Review, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251-290, 1995.
19. Boelens, R.: Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlands, Geoforum, 57, 234-247, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.008, 2013.
20. Bohensky, E.: Learning dilemmas in a social-ecological system: An agent-based modeling exploration, JASSS, 17, doi:10.18564/jasss.2448, 2014.
21. Bourblanc, M. and Blanchon, D.: The challenges of rescaling South African water resources management: Catchment Management Agencies and interbasin transfers, J. Hydrol., 519, 2381-2391, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.001, 2013.
22. Bousquet, F. and Le Page, C.: Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review, Ecol. Model., 176, 313-332, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011, 2004.
23. Carey, M., Baraer, M., Mark, B. G., French, A., Bury, J., Young, K. R., and McKenzie, J. M.: Toward hydro-social modeling: Merging human variables and the social sciences with climateglacier runoff models (Santa River, Peru), J. Hydrol., 518, 60-70, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.006, 2014.
24. Chu, D., Strand, R., and Fjelland, R.: Theories of Complexity: Common Denominators of Complex Systems, Complexity, 8, 19-30, doi:10.1002/cplx.10059, 2003.
25. Cotter, M., Berkhoff, K., Gibreel, T., Ghorbani, A., Golbon, R., Nuppenau, E.-A., and Sauerborn, J.: Designing a sustainable land use scenario based on a combination of ecological assessments and economic optimization, Ecol. Ind., 36, 779-787, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.017, 2014.
26. Couclelis, H.: Why I no longer work with Agents, Tech. rep., Centre for Spatially Integrated Social Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, http://www.csiss.org/events/other/agent-based/papers/couclelis.pdf (last access: 13 October 2014), 2001.
27. Crépin, A.-S.: Using fast and slow processes to manage resources with thresholds, Environ. Resour. Econ., 36, 191-213, doi:10.1007/s10640-006-9029-8, 2007.
28. Crook, J. H.: Social organisation and the environment: Aspects of contemporary social ethology, Animal Behav., 18, 197-209, 1970.
29. Crutzen, P. J.: Geology of mankind, Nature, 415, p. 23, doi:10.1038/415023a, 2002.
30. Crutzen, P. J. and Stoermer, E. F.: The 'Anthropocene', IGBP Global Change Newsletter, 17-18, http://www.igbp.net/publications/globalchangemagazine/globalchangemagazine/globalchangenewslettersno4159.5. 5831d9ad13275d51c098000309.html (last access: 14 March 2015), 2000.
31. Dakos, V., Carpenter, S. R., Nes, E. H. V., and Scheffer, M.: Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B, 370, 20130263, doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0263, 2015.
32. Deadman, P., Robinson, D., Moran, E., and Brondizio, E.: Colonist household decisionmaking and land-use change in the Amazon Rainforest: an agent-based simulation, Enviro N. Plan., 31, 693-709, doi:10.1068/b3098, 2004.
33. Destouni, G., Jaramillo, F., and Prieto, C.: Hydroclimatic shifts driven by human water use for food and energy production, Nature Clim. Change, 3, 213-217, doi:10.1038/nclimate1719, 2012.
34. Di Baldassarre, G., Kooy, M., Kemerink, J. S., and Brandimarte, L.: Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human-water systems, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3235-3244, doi:10.5194/hess-17-3235-2013, 2013a.
35. Di Baldassarre, G., Viglione, A., Carr, G., Kuil, L., Salinas, J. L., and Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: conceptualising humanflood interactions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3295-3303, doi:10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013, 2013b.
36. Di Baldassarre, G., Brandimarte, L., and Beven, K.: The seventh facet of uncertainty: wrong assumptions, unknowns and surprises in the dynamics of human-water systems, Hydrol. Sci. J., doi:10.1080/02626667.2015.1091460, 2015a.
37. Di Baldassarre, G., Viglione, A., Carr, G., Kuil, L., Yan, K., Brandimarte, L., and Blöschl, G.: Debates-Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4770-4781, doi:10.1002/2014WR016416, 2015b.
38. Dinar, S.: Physical and political impacts: Complex river boundaries at risk, Nature Clim. Change, 4, 955-956, doi:10.1038/nclimate2421, 2014.
39. Dooge, J.: Linear theory of hydrologic systems: Technical Bulletin No. 1468, Tech. rep., Agricultural Research Service - United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= iVgTfUhBi2gC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Linear+Theory+of+ Hydrologic+Systems&ots=dvGbEATLVP&sig=A5G0et-9hcEK7L08Z3nJT3CemrA (last access: 17 December 2014) 1973.
40. Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E. D. G., and Reed, M. S.: Anticipating vulnerability to climate change in dryland pastoral systems: Using dynamic systems models for the Kalahari, Ecol. Soc., 15, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art17/ (last access: 24 March 2015) 2010.
41. D'Odorico, P., Bhattachan, A., Davis, K. F., Ravi, S., and Runyan, C. W.: Global desertification: Drivers and feedbacks, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 326-344, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.013, 2013.
42. Ehret, U., Gupta, H. V., Sivapalan, M., Weijs, S. V., Schymanski, S. J., Blöschl, G., Gelfan, A. N., Harman, C., Kleidon, A., Bogaard, T. A., Wang, D., Wagener, T., Scherer, U., Zehe, E., Bierkens, M. F. P., Di Baldassarre, G., Parajka, J., van Beek, L. P. H., van Griensven, A., Westhoff, M. C., and Winsemius, H. C.: Advancing catchment hydrology to deal with predictions under change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 649-671, doi:10.5194/hess-18-649-2014, 2014.
43. Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Filatova, T., Rook, J., and Jakeman, A. J.: A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: From cognitive maps to agent-based models, J. Environ. Manage., 151, 500-516, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.028, 2015.
44. Elshafei, Y., Sivapalan, M., Tonts, M., and Hipsey, M. R.: A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2141-2166, doi:10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014, 2014.
45. Epstein, G. and Vogt, J. M.: Missing ecology: integrating ecological perspectives with the social-ecological system framework, International J. Commons, 7, 432-453, 2013.
46. Ertsen, M. W., Murphy, J. T., Purdue, L. E., and Zhu, T.: A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step - human agency, hydrological processes and time in socio-hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1369-1382, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1369-2014, 2014.
47. Evans, T. P. and Kelley, H.: Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change., Journal of environmental management, 72, 57-72, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.02.008, 2004.
48. Evans, T. P. and Kelley, H.: Assessing the transition from deforestation to forest regrowth with an agent-based model of land cover change for south-central Indiana (USA), Geoforum, 39, 819-832, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.010, 2008.
49. Evans, T. P., Sun, W., and Kelley, H.: Spatially explicit experiments for the exploration of land-use decisionmaking dynamics, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 20, 1013-1037, doi:10.1080/13658810600830764, 2006.
50. Fabre, J., Ruelland, D., Dezetter, A., and Grouillet, B.: Simulating past changes in the balance between water demand and availability and assessing their main drivers at the river basin scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1263-1285, doi:10.5194/hess-19-1263-2015, 2015.
51. Falkenmark, M.:Water and Mankind: A Complex System of Mutual Interaction, Ambio, 6, 3-9, 1977.
52. Falkenmark, M.: Main Problems of Water Use and Transfer of Technology, Geo Journal, 3, 435-443, 1979.
53. Falkenmark, M.: Freshwater as shared between society and ecosystems: from divided approaches to integrated challenges., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lnd., 358, 2037-49, doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1386, 2003.
54. Falkenmark, M.: Ecohydrosolidarity-towards better balancing of humans and nature, Waterfront, 4-5, 2009.
55. Falkenmark, M.: What's new in water, what's not, and what to do now, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., 10, 107-109, doi:10.1007/s11157-011-9238-7, 2011.
56. Falkenmark, M. and Folke, C.: The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: towards hydrosolidarity, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 1-10, doi:10.5194/hess-6-1-2002, 2002.
57. Falter, D., Schröter, K., Dung, N. V., Vorogushyn, S., Kreibich, H., Hundecha, Y., Apel, H., and Merz, B.: Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain, J. Hydrol., 524, 182-193, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.021, 2015.
58. Falvo, D. J.: On modeling Balinese water temple networks as complex adaptive systems, Human Ecol., 28, 641-649, 2000.
59. Fernald, A., Tidwell, V., Rivera, J., Rodríguez, S., Guldan, S., Steele, C., Ochoa, C., Hurd, B., Ortiz, M., Boykin, K., and Cibils, A.: Modeling sustainability of water, environment, livelihood, and culture in traditional irrigation communities and their linked watersheds, Sustainability, 4, 2998-3022, doi:10.3390/su4112998, 2012.
60. Fernald, A., Guldan, S., Boykin, K., Cibils, A., Gonzales, M., Hurd, B., Lopez, S., Ochoa, C., Ortiz, M., Rivera, J., Rodriguez, S., and Steele, C.: Linked hydrologic and social systems that support resilience of traditional irrigation communities, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 293-307, doi:10.5194/hess-19-293-2015, 2015.
61. Filatova, T., van der Veen, A., and Parker, D. C.: Land Market Interactions between Heterogeneous Agents in a Heterogeneous Landscape-Tracing the Macro-Scale Effects of Individual Trade-Offs between Environmental Amenities and Disamenities, Canad. J. Agr. Econ., 57, 431-457, doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01164.x, 2009.
62. Fish, R. D., Ioris, A. A. R., and Watson, N. M.: Integrating water and agricultural management: collaborative governance for a complex policy problem., Sci. Total Eenviron., 408, 5623-5630, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.010, 2010.
63. Folke, C.: Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for socialecological systems analyses, Global Environ. Change, 16, 253-267, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002, 2006.
64. Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., and Walker, B.: Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability, Ecol. Soc., 15, 2010.
65. Foster, J.: From simplistic to complex systems in economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 873-892, doi:10.1093/cje/bei083, 2005.
66. Fraser, E. D., Simelton, E., Termansen, M., Gosling, S. N., and South, A.: "Vulnerability hotspots: Integrating socioeconomic and hydrological models to identify where cereal production may decline in the future due to climate change induced drought, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 170, 195-205, doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.04.008, 2013.
67. Garcia, M., Portney, K., and Islam, S.: A question driven sociohydrological modeling process, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 8289-8335, doi:10.5194/hessd-12-8289-2015, 2015.
68. Garmestani, A. S.: Sustainability science: accounting for nonlinear dynamics in policy and social-ecological systems, Clean Technol. Environ. Pol., 16, 731-738, doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0682-7, 2013.
69. Gibon, A., Sheeren, D., Monteil, C., Ladet, S., and Balent, G.: Modelling and simulating change in reforesting mountain landscapes using a social-ecological framework, Landsc. Ecol., 25, 267-285, doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9438-5, 2010.
70. Gober, P. and Wheater, H. S.: Socio-hydrology and the sciencepolicy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1413-1422, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1413-2014, 2014.
71. Gober, P. and Wheater, H. S.: Debates-Perspectives on sociohydrology: Modeling flood risk as a public policy problem, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4782-4788, doi:10.1002/2015WR016945, 2015.
72. Gordon, L. J., Peterson, G. D., and Bennett, E. M.: Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises., Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 211-219, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.011, 2008.
73. Grames, J., Prskawetz, A., Grass, D., and Blöschl, G.: Modelling the interaction between flooding events and economic growth, Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci., 369, 3-6, doi:10.5194/piahs-369-3-2015, 2015.
74. Grimm, V., Frank, K., Jeltsch, F., Brandl, R., Uchmaski, J., and Wissel, C.: Pattern-oriented modelling in population ecology, Sci. Total Environ., 183, 151-166, doi:10.1016/0048-9697(95)04966-5, 1996.
75. Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., Thulke, H.-H., Weiner, J., Wiegand, T., and DeAngelis, D. L.: Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology, Science, 310, 987-91, doi:10.1126/science.1116681, 005.
76. Haasnoot, M. and Middelkoop, H.: A history of futures: A review of scenario use in water policy studies in the Netherlands, Environ. Sci. Pol., 19-20, 108-120, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.002, 2012.
77. Haddeland, I., Heinke, J., Biemans, H., Eisner, S., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Konzmann, M., Ludwig, F., Masaki, Y., Schewe, J., Stacke, T., Tessler, Z. D., Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.: Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 3251-3256, doi:10.1073/pnas.1222475110, 2014.
78. Hadfield, L. and Seaton, R.: A co-evolutionary model of change in environmental management, Futures, 31, 577-592, doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00015-4, 1999.
79. Hardin, G.: The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, 162, 1243-1248, doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243, 1968.
80. Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rosenberg, D. E., Medellín-Azuara, J., Lund, J. R., and Howitt, R. E.: Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects, J. Hydrol., 375, 627-643, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.037, 2009.
81. Harte, J.: Toward a Synthesis of the Newtonian and Darwinian Worldviews, Phys. Today, 55, 29-34, doi:10.1063/1.1522164, 2002.
82. Hodgson, G. M.: Darwinism and institutional economics, J. Econ. Iss., 37, 85-97, 2003.
83. Hoekstra, A. and Hung, P.: Virtual Water Trade: A Quantificatinon of Virtual Water Flows Between Nations in Relation to International Crop Trade, Tech. Rep. 11, UNESCO, IHE Delft, Delft, http://www.waterfootprint.org/Reports/Report12.pdf (last access: 27 March 2015), 2002.
84. Holling, C.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4, 1-23, 1973.
85. Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P., Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H., Hughes, D., Hut, R., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P. A., Uhlenbrook, S., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H., Woods, R., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)-a review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1198-1255, doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183, 2013.
86. Hu, Y., Garcia-Cabrejo, O., Cai, X., Valocchi, A. J., and DuPont, B.: Global sensitivity analysis for large-scale socio-hydrological models using Hadoop, Environ. Model. Softw., 73, 231-243, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.015, 2015.
87. Hughes, T. P., Linares, C., Dakos, V., van de Leemput, I. A., and van Nes, E. H.: Living dangerously on borrowed time during slow, unrecognized regime shifts, Trends Ecol. Evol., 28, 149-155, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.022, 2013.
88. Huigen, M. G. A.: Multiactor modeling of settling decisions and behavior in the San Mariano watershed, the Philippines: a first application with the Mame Luke framework, Ecol. Soc., 11, 2006.
89. Hurford, A. P., Huskova, I., and Harou, J. J.: Using many-objective trade-off analysis to help dams promote economic development, protect the poor and enhance ecological health, Environ. Sci. Pol., 38, 72-86, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.003, 2014.
90. Iwamura, T., Lambin, E. F., Silvius, K. M., Luzar, J. B., and Fragoso, J. M.: Agent-based modeling of hunting and subsistence agriculture on indigenous lands: Understanding interactions between social and ecological systems, Environ. Model. Softw., 58, 109-127, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.03.008, 2014.
91. Janssen, M. A. and Ostrom, E.: Governing social-ecological systems, in: Handbook of computational economics, edited by: Tesfatsion, L. and Judd, K., chap. 30, 1466-1502, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, doi:10.1016/S1574-0021(05)02030-7, 2006.
92. Jeffrey, P. and McIntosh, B. S.: Description, diagnosis, prescription: a critique of the application of co-evolutionary models to natural resource management, Environ. Conserv., 33, 281-293, doi:10.1017/S0376892906003444, 2006.
93. Jellinek, S., Rumpff, L., Driscoll, D. A., Parris, K. M., and Wintle, B. A.: Modelling the benefits of habitat restoration in socio-ecological systems, Biol. Conserv., 169, 60-67, doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.023, 2014.
94. Kain, J.-H., Kärrman, E., and Söderberg, H.: Multi-criteria decision aids for sustainable water management, Proc. ICE-Eng. Sustain., 160, 87-93, doi:10.1680/ensu.2007.160.2.87, 2007.
95. Kallis, G.: When is it coevolution?, Ecol. Econ., 62, 1-6, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.016, 2007.
96. Kallis, G.: Coevolution in water resource development, Ecol. Econ., 69, 796-809, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.025, 2010.
97. Kandasamy, J., Sounthararajah, D., Sivabalan, P., Chanan, A., Vigneswaran, S., and Sivapalan, M.: Socio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1027-1041, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1027-2014, 2014.
98. Karoly, D. J.: Climate change: Human-induced rainfall changes, Nature Geosci., 7, 551-552, doi:10.1038/ngeo2207, 2014.
99. Kelly (Letcher), R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R., Rizzoli, A. E., van Delden, H., and Voinov, A. A.: Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management, Environ. Model. Softw., 47, 159-181, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005, 2013.
100. Kumar, P.: Typology of hydrologic predictability, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00H05, doi:10.1029/2010WR009769, 2011.
101. Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., and Wiesner, K.: What is a complex system?, Eur. J. Phil. Sci., 3, 33-67, doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0056-8, 2013.
102. Lane, S. N.: Acting, predicting and intervening in a sociohydrological world, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 927-952, doi:10.5194/hess-18-927-2014, 2014.
103. Lansing, J. S.: Complex Adaptive Systems, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 183-204, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440, 2003.
104. Lansing, J. S. and Kremer, J. N.: Emergent Properties of Balinese Water Temple Networks: Coadaptation on a Rugged Fitness Landscape, Am. Anthropol., 95, 97-114, doi:10.1525/aa.1993.95.1.02a00050, 1993.
105. Lansing, J. S., Cox, M. P., Downey, S. S., Janssen, M. A., and Schoenfelder, J. W.: A robust budding model of Balinese water temple networks, World Archaeol., 41, 112-133, doi:10.1080/00438240802668198, 2009.
106. Lempert, R.: Agent-based modeling as organizational and public policy simulators., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, Suppl 3, 7195-7196, doi:10.1073/pnas.072079399, 2002.
107. Letcher, R. A., Croke, B. F. W., and Jakeman, A. J.: Integrated assessment modelling for water resource allocation and management: A generalised conceptual framework, Environ. Model. Softw., 22, 733-742, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.014, 2007.
108. Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., Crépin, A.-S., Norberg, J., de Zeeuw, A., Folke, C., Hughes, T., Arrow, K., Barrett, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Kautsky, N., Mäler, K.-G., Polasky, S., Troell, M., Vincent, J. R., and Walker, B.: Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications, Environ. Develop. Econ., 18, 111-132, doi:10.1017/S1355770X12000460, 2012.
109. Liao, K.-H.: From flood control to flood adaptation: a case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington, Nat. Hazards, 71, 723-750, doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0923-4, 2013.
110. Liebman, J. C.: Some Simple-Minded Observations on the Role of Optimization in Public Systems Decision-Making, Interfaces, 6, 102-108, 1976.
111. Linton, J. and Budds, J.: The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water, Geoforum, 57, 170-180, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008, 2013.
112. Liu, D., Tian, F., Lin, M., and Sivapalan, M.: A conceptual sociohydrological model of the co-evolution of humans and water: case study of the Tarim River basin, western China, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1035-1054, doi:10.5194/hess-19-1035-2015, 2015a.
113. Liu, H., Benoit, G., Liu, T., Liu, Y., and Guo, H.: An integrated system dynamics model developed for managing lake water quality at the watershed scale, J. Environ. Manage., 155, 11-23, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.046, 2015b.
114. Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., and Taylor, W. W.: Complexity of coupled human and natural systems, Science, 317, 1513-1516, doi:10.1126/science.1144004, 2007a.
115. Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., Ostrom, E., Pell, A. N., Lubchenco, J., Taylor, W. W., Ouyang, Z., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., and Provencher, W.: Coupled Human and Natural Systems, AMBIO, 36, 639-649, doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:CHANS]2.0.CO;2, 2007b.
116. Liu, X., Li, X., and Anthony, G.-O. Y.:Multi-agent systems for simulating spatial decision behaviors and land-use dynamics, Sci. China Ser. D-Earth Sci., 49, 1184-1194, doi:10.1007/s11430-006-1184-9, 2006.
117. Liu, Y., Tian, F., Hu, H., and Sivapalan, M.: Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji-Tire model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289-1303, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014.
118. Lorenzoni, I.: A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment - Part II: A scenario-based case study in East Anglia (UK), Global Environ. Change, 10, 145-155, doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00016-9, 2000.
119. Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., Hulme, M., Kerry Turner, R., and O'Riordan, T.: A co-evolutionary approach to climate change impact assessment: Part I. Integrating socio-economic and climate change scenarios, Global Environ. Change, 10, 57-68, doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00012-1, 2000.
120. Loucks, D. P.: Debates-Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Simulating hydrologic-human interactions, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4789-4794, doi:10.1002/2015WR017002, 2015.
121. Ludy, J. and Kondolf, G. M.: Flood risk perception in lands protected by 100-year levees, Nat. Hazards, 61, 829-842, doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6, 2012.
122. Lumbroso, D. M. and Vinet, F.: A comparison of the causes, effects and aftermaths of the coastal flooding of England in 1953 and France in 2010, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 2321-2333, doi:10.5194/nhess-11-2321-2011, 2011.
123. Macal, C. M. and North, M. J.: Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation, J. Simul., 4, 151-162, doi:10.1057/jos.2010.3, 2010.
124. Madani, K. and Hooshyar, M.: A game theory-reinforcement learning (GT-RL) method to develop optimal operation policies for multi-operator reservoir systems, J. Hydrol., 519, 732-742, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.061, 2014.
125. Magliocca, N. R.: Induced coupling: an approach to modeling and managing complex human-landscape interactions, Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., 25, 655-661, doi:10.1002/sres.938, 2009.
126. Magliocca, N. R. and Ellis, E. C.: Using Pattern-oriented Modeling (POM) to Cope with Uncertainty in Multi-scale Agentbased Models of Land Change, Trans. GIS, 17, 883-900, doi:10.1111/tgis.12012, 2013.
127. Malanson, G.: Considering complexity, Ann. Assoc. Am Geograph., 89, 746-753, 1999.
128. Manson, S. M.: Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory, Geoforum, 32, 405-414, doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00035-X, 2001.
129. Manson, S. M.: Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human-environment systems, Geoforum, 39, 776-788, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.010, 2008.
130. Manson, S. M. and Evans, T.: Agent-based modeling of deforestation in southern Yucatan, Mexico, and reforestation in the Midwest United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104, 20678-20683, doi:10.1073/pnas.0705802104, 2007.
131. Marshall, G. R. and Stafford Smith, D. M.: Natural resources governance for the drylands of the Murray?Darling Basin, Rangeland J., 32, 267, doi:10.1071/RJ10020, 2013.
132. Matthews, R.: The People and Landscape Model (PALM): Towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models, Ecol. Model., 194, 329-343, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.032, 2006.
133. McClain, M. E., Chícharo, L., Fohrer, N., Gaviño Novillo, M., Windhorst, W., and Zalewski, M.: Training hydrologists to be ecohydrologists and play a leading role in environmental problem solving, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1685-1696, doi:10.5194/hess-16-1685-2012, 2012.
134. McDonnell, R. A.: Circulations and transformations of energy and water in Abu Dhabi's hydrosocial cycle, Geoforum, 57, 225-233, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.11.009, 2013.
135. Medellín-Azuara, J., Howitt, R. E., and Harou, J. J.: Predicting farmer responses to water pricing, rationing and subsidies assuming profit maximizing investment in irrigation technology, Agricult. Water Manage., 108, 73-82, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.017, 2012.
136. Merz, B., Vorogushyn, S., Lall, U., Viglione, A., and Blöschl, G.: Charting unknown waters - On the role of surprise in flood risk assessment and management, Water Resour. Res., 51, 6399-6416, doi:10.1002/2015WR017464, 2015.
137. Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Zbigniew, W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity Is Dead: Whither Water Management ?, Science, 319, 573-574, 2008.
138. Mirchi, A., Madani, K., Watkins, D., and Ahmad, S.: Synthesis of System Dynamics Tools for Holistic Conceptualization of Water Resources Problems, Water Resour. Manage., 26, 2421-2442, doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0024-2, 2012.
139. Mirchi, A., Watkins, D. J., Huckins, C., Madani, K., and Hjorth, P.: Water resources management in a homgenizing world: averting the growth and underinvestment trajectory, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7515-7526, doi:10.1002/2013WR015128. Received, 2014.
140. Molle, F.: Scales and power in river basin management: The Chao Phraya River in Thailand, Geograph. J., 173, 358-373, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00255.x, 2007.
141. Mollinga, P. P.: Canal irrigation and the hydrosocial cycle, Geoforum, 57, 192-204, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.011, 2014.
142. Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G., Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev, V.: "Panta Rhei-Everything Flows: Change in hydrology and society-The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013-2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256-1275, doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.809088, 2013.
143. Monticino, M., Acevedo, M., Callicott, B., Cogdill, T., and Lindquist, C.: Coupled human and natural systems: A multiagent-based approach, Environ. Model. Softw., 22, 656-663, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.017, 2007.
144. Murray-Rust, D., Rieser, V., Robinson, D. T., Miličič, V., and Rounsevell, M.: Agent-based modelling of land use dynamics and residential quality of life for future scenarios, Environ. Model. Softw., 46, 75-89, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.02.011, 2013.
145. Nautiyal, S. and Kaechele, H.: Natural resource management in a protected area of the Indian Himalayas: a modeling approach for anthropogenic interactions on ecosystem., Environ. Monitor. Assess., 153, 253-71, doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0353-z, 2009.
146. Nicholson, A. E. and Flores, M. J.: Combining state and transition models with dynamic Bayesian networks, Ecol. Model., 222, 555-566, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.010, 2011.
147. Norgaard, R. B.: Sociosystem and ecosystem coevolution in the Amazon, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 254, 238-254, 1981.
148. Norgaard, R. B.: Coevolutionary development potential, Land Econ., 60, 160-173, 1984.
149. Norgaard, R. B.: Beyond Materialism: A Coevolutionary Reinterpretation of the Environmental Crisis, Rev. Social Econ., 53, 475-492, doi:10.1080/00346769500000014, 1995.
150. O'Connell, P. E. and O'Donnell, G.: Towards modelling flood protection investment as a coupled human and natural system, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 155-171, doi:10.5194/hess-18-155-2014, 2014.
151. Odongo, V. O., Mulatu, D. W., Muthoni, F. K., van Oel, P. R., Meins, F. M., van der Tol, C., Skidmore, A. K., Groen, T. A., Becht, R., Onyando, J. O., and van der Veen, A.: Coupling socio-economic factors and eco-hydrological processes using a cascade-modeling approach, J. Hydrol., 518, 49-59, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.012, 2014.
152. Orth, R., Staudinger, M., Seneviratne, S. I., Seibert, J., and Zappa, M.: Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models, J. Hydrol., 523, 147-159, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044, 2015.
153. Ostrom, E.: A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 15 181-7, doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104, 2007.
154. Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems., Science, 325, 419-422, doi:10.1126/science.1172133, 2009.
155. Öztürk, M., Copty, N. K., and Saysel, A. K.: Modeling the impact of land use change on the hydrology of a rural watershed, J. Hydrol., 497, 97-109, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.022, 2013.
156. Paalvast, P. and van der Velde, G.: Long term anthropogenic changes and ecosystem service consequences in the northern part of the complex Rhine-Meuse estuarine system, Ocean Coast. Manage., 92, 50-64, doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.02.005, 2014.
157. Pandey, V. P., Babel, M. S., Shrestha, S., and Kazama, F.: A framework to assess adaptive capacity of the water resources system in Nepalese river basins, Ecol. Ind., 11, 480-488, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.07.003, 2011.
158. Parker, D. C., Maguire, D., Goodchild, M., and Batty, M.: Integrating of Geographic Information Systems and Use: Prospects and Challenges, in: GIS, Spatial Analysis and Modeling, chap. 19, 403-422, ESRI Press, Redlands, CA, 2005.
159. Parveen, S., Winiger, M., Schmidt, S., and Nüsser, M.: Irrigation in Upper Hunza: evolution of socio-hydrological interactions in the Karakoram, northern Pakistan, Erdkunde, 69, 69-85, doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2015.01.05, 2015.
160. Pataki, D. E., Boone, C. G., Hogue, T. S., Jenerette, G. D., McFadden, J. P., and Pincetl, S.: Socio-ecohydrology and the urban water challenge, Ecohydrology, 4, 341-347, doi:10.1002/eco.209, 2011.
161. Pechlivanidis, I. G. and Jackson, B. M.: Catchment Scale hydrological modelling: a review of model types, calibration approaches and uncertainty analysis methods in the context of recent developments in technology, Global NEST J., 13, 193-214, 2011.
162. Peel, M. C. and Blöschl, G.: Hydrological modelling in a changing world, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 35, 249-261, doi:10.1177/0309133311402550, 2011.
163. Perdigão, R. A. P. and Blöschl, G.: Spatiotemporal flood sensitivity to annual precipitation: Evidence for landscapeclimate coevolution, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5492-5509, doi:10.1002/2014WR015365. Received, 2014.
164. Postel, S. L.: Foreword-Sharing the benefits of water, Hydrol. Sci. J., 56, 529-530, doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.578380, 2011.
165. Purnomo, H., Mendoza, G. A., Prabhu, R., and Yasmi, Y.: Developing multi-stakeholder forest management scenarios: a multiagent system simulation approach applied in Indonesia, Forest Pol. Econ., 7, 475-491, doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2003.08.004, 2005.
166. Railsback, S.: Getting Results: The Pattern-oriented Approach to Analyzing Natural Systems With Individual-Based Models, Nat. Resour. Model., 14, 465-475, 2001.
167. Rammel, C. and van den Bergh, J. C.: Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising, Ecol. Econ., 47, 121-133, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00193-9, 2003.
168. Rammel, C., Stagl, S., and Wilfing, H.: Managing complex adaptive systems - A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management, Ecol. Econ., 63, 9-21, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.014, 2007.
169. Ratna Reddy, V. and Syme, G. J.: Social sciences and hydrology: An introduction, J. Hydrol., 518, 1-4, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.022, 2014.
170. Reed, P. and Kasprzyk, J.: Water Resources Management: The Myth, the Wicked, and the Future, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 135, 411-413, 2009.
171. Ren, L., Wang, M., Li, C., and Zhang, W.: Impacts of human activity on river runoff in the northern area of China, J. Hydrol., 261, 204-217, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00008-2, 2002.
172. Reyer, C. P. O., Brouwers, N., Rammig, A., Brook, B. W., Epila, J., Grant, R. F., Holmgren, M., Langerwisch, F., Leuzinger, S., Medlyn, B., Pfeifer, M., Verbeeck, H., and Villela, D. M.: Forest Resilience and tipping points at different spatio-temporal scales: approaches and challenges, J. Ecol., 103, 5-15, doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12337, 2015.
173. Rittel, H. and Webber, M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sci., 4, 155-169, 1973.
174. Roberts, C., Stallman, D., and Bieri, J.: Modeling complex human-environment interactions: the Grand Canyon river trip simulator, Ecol. Model., 153, 181-196, doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00509-9, 2002.
175. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Ecohydrology : A hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3-9, 2000.
176. Rosenberg, D. E. and Madani, K.: Water Resources Systems Analysis: A Bright Past and a Challenging but Promising Future, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 140, 407-409, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000414, 2014.
177. Runyan, C. W., D'Odorico, P., and Lawrence, D.: Physical and biological feedbacks of deforestation, Rev. Geophys., 50, 1-32, doi:10.1029/2012RG000394.1.INTRODUCTION, 2012.
178. Sandker, M., Campbell, B. M., Ruiz-Pérez, M., Sayer, J. A., Cowling, R., Kassa, H., and Knight, A. T.: The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development, Ecol. Soc., 15, 2010.
179. Savenije, H. H. G., Hoekstra, A. Y., and van der Zaag, P.: Evolving water science in the Anthropocene, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 319-332, doi:10.5194/hess-18-319-2014, 2014.
180. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Lenton, T. M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Dakos, V., van de Koppel, J., van de Leemput, I. A., Levin, S. A., van Nes, E. H., Pascual, M., and Vandermeer, J.: Anticipating critical transitions, Science, 338, 344-348, doi:10.1126/science.1225244, 2012.
181. Schlüter, M.: New Horizons for Managing the Environment: A Review of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems Modeling, Nat. Resour. Model., 25, 219-272, 2012.
182. Schlüter, M. and Pahl-Wostl, C.: Mechanisms of resilience in common-pool resource management systems: an agent-based model of water use in a river basin, Ecol. Soc., 12, 2007.
183. Showqi, I., Rashid, I., and Romshoo, S. A.: Land use land cover dynamics as a function of changing demography and hydrology, Geo Journal, 79, 297-307, doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9494-x, 2013.
184. Simelton, E., Fraser, E. D., Termansen, M., Forster, P. M., and Dougill, A. J.: Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961-2001), Environ. Sci. Pol., 12, 438-452, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.005, 2009.
185. Sivakumar, B.: Socio-hydrology: not a new science, but a recycled and re-worded hydrosociology, Hydrol. Process., 26, 3788-3790, doi:10.1002/hyp.9511, 2012.
186. Sivapalan, M.: Debates-Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Changing water systems and the tyranny of small problems - Socio-hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4795-4805, doi:10.1002/2015WR017080, 2015.
187. Sivapalan, M. and Blöschl, G.: Time scale interactions and the coevolution of humans and water, Water Resour. Res., 51, 6988-7022, doi:10.1002/2015WR017896, 2015.
188. Sivapalan, M., Blöschl, G., Zhang, L., and Vertessy, R.: Downward approach to hydrological prediction, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2101-2111, doi:10.1002/hyp.1425, 2003.
189. Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., and Blöschl, G.: Sociohydrology: A new science of people and water, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1270-1276, doi:10.1002/hyp.8426, 2012.
190. Sivapalan, M., Konar, M., and Srinivasan, V.: Socio-hydrology: Use-inspired water sustainability science for the Anthropocene Earth's Future, Earth's Future, 2, 225-230, doi:10.1002/2013EF000164. Received, 2014.
191. Srinivasan, V.: Reimagining the past - use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: the case of Chennai, India, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 785-801, doi:10.5194/hess-19-785-2015, 2015.
192. Srinivasan, V.: Reimagining the past - use of counterfactual trajectories in socio-hydrological modelling: the case of Chennai, India, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 785-801, doi:10.5194/hess-19-785-2015, 2015.
193. Srinivasan, V., Lambin, E. F., Gorelick, S. M., Thompson, B. H., and Rozelle, S.: The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta-analysis of coupled human-water studies, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10516, doi:10.1029/2011WR011087, 2012.
194. Srinivasan, V., Seto, K. C., Emerson, R., and Gorelick, S. M.: The impact of urbanization on water vulnerability: A coupled human-environment system approach for Chennai, India, Global Environ. Change, 23, 229-239, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.002, 2013.
195. Srinivasan, V., Thompson, S., Madhyastha, K., Penny, G., Jeremiah, K., and Lele, S.: Why is the Arkavathy River drying? A multiplehypothesis approach in a data-scarce region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1905-1917, doi:10.5194/hess-19-1905-2015, 2015.
196. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., and McNeill, J. R.: The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature, AMBIO, 36, 614-621, doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2, 2007.
197. Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., and McNeill, J.: The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives, Phil. Trans A, 369, 842-867, doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0327, 2011.
198. Swyngedouw, E.: The Political Economy and Political Ecology of the Hydro-Social Cycle, J. Contemp. Water Res. Edu., 142, 56-60, doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2009.00054.x, 2009.
199. Thompson, S. E., Sivapalan, M., Harman, C. J., Srinivasan, V., Hipsey, M. R., Reed, P., Montanari, A., and Blöschl, G.: Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5013-5039, doi:10.5194/hess-17-5013-2013, 2013.
200. Troy, T. J., Konar, M., Srinivasan, V., and Thompson, S.: Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3667-3679, doi:10.5194/hess-19-3667-2015, 2015a.
201. Troy, T. J., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., and Evans, T. P.: Debates-Perspectives on socio-hydrology: Socio-hydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation, Water Resour. Res., 51, 4806-4814, doi:10.1002/2015WR017046, 2015b.
202. Underdal, A.: Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance, Global Environ. Change, 20, 386-393, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.005, 2010.
203. Valbuena, D., Verburg, P. H., Bregt, A. K., and Ligtenberg, A.: An agent-based approach to model land-use change at a regional scale, Landsc. Ecol., 25, 185-199, doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9380-6, 2009.
204. Valbuena, D., Bregt, A. K., McAlpine, C., Verburg, P. H., and Seabrook, L.: An agent-based approach to explore the effect of voluntary mechanisms on land use change: a case in rural Queensland, Australia, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 2615-2625, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.041, 2010.
205. van Dam, A. A., Kipkemboi, J., Rahman, M. M., and Gettel, G. M.: Linking Hydrology, Ecosystem Function, and Livelihood Outcomes in African Papyrus Wetlands Using a Bayesian Network Model, Wetlands, 33, 381-397, doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0395-z, 2013.
206. Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. and Gowdy, J. M.: Evolutionary theories in environmental and resource economics: approaches and applications, Environ. Resour., 17, 37-57, 2000.
207. van Emmerik, T. H. M., Li, Z., Sivapalan, M., Pande, S., Kandasamy, J., Savenije, H. H. G., Chanan, A., and Vigneswaran, S.: Socio-hydrologic modeling to understand and mediate the competition for water between agriculture development and environmental health: Murrumbidgee River Basin, Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4239-4259, doi:10.5194/hess-18-4239-2014, 2014.
208. Veldkamp, A. and Verburg, P. H.: Modelling land use change and environmental impact, J. Environ. Manage., 72, 1-3, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.04.004, 2004.
209. Viglione, A., Di Baldassarre, G., Brandimarte, L., Kuil, L., Carr, G., Salinas, J. L., Scolobig, A., and Blöschl, G.: Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk - Roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust, J. Hydrol., 518, 71-82, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.018, 2014.
210. Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P. H., Wanders, N., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Human water consumption intensifies hydrological drought worldwide, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 034036, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034036, 2013.
211. Wagener, T. and Montanari, A.: Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1-8, doi:10.1029/2010WR009469, 2011.
212. Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J., Gupta, H. V., Kumar, P., Rao, P. S. C., Basu, N. B., and Wilson, J. S.: The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05 301, doi:10.1029/2009WR008906, 2010.
213. Wanders, N. and Wada, Y.: Human and climate impacts on the 21st century hydrological drought, J. Hydrol., 526, 208-220, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.047, 2015.
214. Wang, S. and Huang, G.: An integrated approach for water resources decision making under interactive and compound uncertainties, Omega, 44, 32-40, doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.003, 2014.
215. Welsh, W. D., Vaze, J., Dutta, D., Rassam, D., Rahman, J. M., Jolly, I. D., Wallbrink, P., Podger, G. M., Bethune, M., Hardy, M. J., Teng, J., and Lerat, J.: An integrated modelling framework for regulated river systems, Environ. Model. Softw., 39, 81-102, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.022, 2013.
216. Wheater, H. S.: Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling., Philos. Transactions A, 360, 1409-1431, doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1007, 2002.
217. White, G. F.: Human adjustment to floods, Doctoral thesis, The University of Chicago, http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search. do?recordID=US201300257437 (last access: 14 October 2014), 1945.
218. Wiegand, T., Jeltsch, F., Hanski, I., and Grimm, V.: Using patternoriented modeling for revealing hidden information: a key for reconciling ecological theory and application, Oikos, 65, 209-222, 2003.
219. Wilson, N. J.: Indigenous water governance: Insights from the hydrosocial relations of the Koyukon Athabascan village of Ruby, Alaska, Geoforum, 57, 1-11, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.005, 2014.
220. Winder, N., McIntosh, B. S., and Jeffrey, P.: The origin, diagnostic attributes and practical application of co-evolutionary theory, Ecol. Econ., 54, 347-361, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.017, 2005.
221. Zeitoun, M.: Global environmental justice and international transboundary waters: An initial exploration, Geograph. J., 179, 141-149, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00487.x, 2013.
222. Zeitoun, M. and Allan, J. A.: Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis, Water Pol., 10, 3-12, doi:10.2166/wp.2008.203, 2008.
223. Zeitoun, M. and Mirumachi, N.: Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation, Int. Environ. Agreem.-P., 8, 297-316, doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5, 2008.
224. Zeitoun, M. and Warner, J.: Hydro-hegemony - A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts, Water Pol., 8, 435-460, doi:10.2166/wp.2006.054, 2006.
225. Zlinszky, A. and Timár, G.: Historic maps as a data source for socio-hydrology: A case study of the Lake Balaton wetland system, Hungary, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4589-4606, doi:10.5194/hess-17-4589-2013, 2013.