Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 523, Issue , 2015, Pages 147-159

  Orth, Rene ^a   Staudinger, Maria ^b   Seneviratne, Sonia I ^a   Seibert, Jan ^b   Zappa, Massimiliano ^c  

^a Land Climate Dynamics Group   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Hydrological model comparison; Runoff validation; Simple conceptual model as benchmark; Soil moisture validation

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT; HYDROLOGY; MOISTURE; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS;

COMPUTATIONAL POWER; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DIFFERENT TIME SCALE; HYDROLOGICAL CONDITION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL VARIABLES; SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT; WATER BALANCE MODELS;

CLIMATE MODELS;

DROUGHT; FLOW MODELING; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; TIMESCALE; WATER BUDGET;

SWITZERLAND;

HEPATITIS B VIRUS;

EID: 84922309690     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andreassian V., et al. Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 13:1757-1764.
2. Bergström, S., 1976. Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. SMHI Report, RHO 7.
3. Bergström, S., 1995. The HBV model. Computer models of watershed hydrology, pp. 443-476.
4. Beven K. Changing ideas in hydrology - the case of physically-based models. J. Hydrol. 1989, 105(1-2):157-172.
5. Bosshard T., Carambia M., Goergen K., Kotlarski S., Krahe P., Zappa M., SchSr C. Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49(3):1523-1536.
6. Budyko M.I. Climate and Life 1974, Academic Press.
7. Donohue R.J., Roderick M.L., McVicar T.R. On the importance of including vegetation dynamics in Budyko's hydrological model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11(2):983-995.
8. Gent P.R., et al. The community climate system model version 4. J. Climate 2011, 24(19):4973-4991.
9. Gurtz J., Baltensweiler A., Lang H. Spatially distributed hydrotope-based modelling of evapotranspiration and runoff in mountainous basins. Hydrol. Processes 1999, 13:2751-2768.
10. Gurtz J., Zappa M., Jasper K., Lang H., Verbunt M., Badoux A., Vitvar T. A comparative study in modeling runoff and its components in two mountainous catchments. Hydrol. Processes 2003, 17(2):297-311.
11. Holländer H.M., et al. Comparative predictions of discharge from an artificial catchment (Chicken Creek) using sparse data. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2009, 13:2069-2094.
12. IPCC, 2013. The physical science basis. . http://https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/.
13. Kirchner J. Catchments as simple dynamical systems: catchment characterization, rainfall-runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(W02):429.
14. Kobierska F., Jonas T., Zappa M., Bavay M., Magnusson J., Bernasconi S.M. Future runoff from a partly glacierized watershed in Central Switzerland: a 2 model approach. Adv. Water Res. 2013, 55:204-214.
15. Koboltschnig G.R., Schoener W., Holzmann H., Zappa M. Contribution of glacier melt to stream runoff under extreme climate conditions in the summer of 2003. Hydrol. Processes 2009, 23:1010-1018.
16. Koster R.D., Mahanama S. Land surface controls on hydroclimatic means and variability. J. Hydrometeorol. 2012, 13:1604-1620.
17. Krause P., Boyle D.P., Bäse F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 2005, 5:89-97.
18. Lindström G., Johansson B., Persson M., Gardelin M., Bergström S. Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 1997, 201:272-288.
19. Mittelbach H., Seneviratne S.I. A new perspective on the spatio-temporal variability of soil moisture: temporal dynamics versus time invariant contributions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:2169-2179.
20. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
21. Orth R., Seneviratne S.I. Propagation of soil moisture memory to streamflow and evapotranspiration. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2013, 17:3895-3911. 10.5194/hess-17-3895-2013.
22. Orth R., Seneviratne S.I. Predictability of soil moisture and streamflow on sub-seasonal timescales: a case study. J. Geophys. Res. 2013, 118(19):10.963-10.979. 10.1002/jgrd.50846.
23. Orth R., Koster R.D., Seneviratne S.I. Inferring soil moisture memory from streamflow observations. J. Hydrometeorol. 2013, 14:1773-1790. 10.1175/JHM-D-12-099.1.
24. Perrin C., Michel C., Andreassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242(3-4):275-301.
25. Perrin C., Dilks C., Barlund I., Payan J.L., Andreassian V. Use of simple rainfall-runoff models as a baseline for the benchmarking of the hydrological component of complex catchment models. Archiv. Hydrobiol. Large Rivers Suppl. 2006, 17(102):75-96.
26. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing 1992, Cambridge University Press, pp. 617-620.
27. Schaefli B., Gupta H.V. Do Nash values have value?. Hydrol. Processes 2007, 21(15):2075-2080.
28. Schattan, P., Zappa, M., Lischke, H., Bernhard, L., Thnrig, E., Diekkrnger, B., 2013. An approach for transient consideration of forest change in hydrological impact studies. Climate and Land Surface Changes in Hydrology, Proceedings of H01, IAHS-IAPSO-IASPEI Assembly, IAHS Publ. 359, pp. 311-319.
29. Schlosser C.A., Slater A.G., robock A., Vinnikov A.J.P.K.Y., Henderson-Sellers A., Speranskaya N.A., Mitchell K. Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS Phase 2(d). Monthly Weather Rev. 2000, 128:301-321.
30. Seibert J. Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 1999, 98:279-293.
31. Seibert J., Vis M. Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16:3315-3325.
32. Seneviratne S.I., et al. The Rietholzbach research site: analysis of 32-year hydroclimatological time series and 2003 drought at a Swiss pre-alpine catchment. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48(W06):526.
33. Viviroli D., Zappa M., Gurtz J., Weingartner R. An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre- and post-processing-tools. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:1209-1222.
34. Viviroli D., Zappa M., Schwanbeck J., Gurtz J., Weingartner R. Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland - Part I: modelling framework and calibration results. J. Hydrol. 2009, 377:191-207.
35. Viviroli D., Mittelbach H., Gurtz J., Weingartner R. Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland - Part II: parameter regionalization and flood estimation results. J. Hydrol. 2009, 377:208-225.
36. Zappa M. Objective quantitative spatial verification of distributed snow cover simulations - an experiment for entire Switzerland. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2008, 53(1):179-191.
37. Zappa M., Gurtz J. Simulation of soil moisture and evapotranspiration in a soil profile during the 1999 MAP-Riviera Campaign. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 7:903-919.
38. Zappa M., Kan C. Extreme heat and runoff extremes in the Swiss Alps. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 7:375-389.
39. Zappa M., Pos F., Strasser U., Warmerdam P., Gurtz J. Seasonal water balance of an Alpine catchment as evaluated by different methods for spatially distributed snowmelt modelling. Nord Hydrol. 2003, 34(3):179-202.
40. Zappa, M., Bernhard, L., Fundel, F., Jörg-Hess, S., 2012. Vorhersage und Szenarien von Schnee- und Wasserressourcen im Alpenraum. Forum fnr Wissen, pp. 19-27.