Multi-agent systems for simulating spatial decision behaviors and land-use dynamics

Science in China, Series D: Earth Sciences

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1184-1194

  Liu, Xiaoping ^a   Li, Xia ^a   Anthony, Gar On Yeh ^b  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Cities; Complex systems; Land use; Multi agent systems

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; URBAN PLANNING;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA; MACRO-SPATIAL PATTERNS;

LAND USE;

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; DECISION ANALYSIS; LAND USE CHANGE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN PLANNING;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU;

EID: 33846484261     PISSN: 10069313     EISSN: 18622801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-006-1184-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Verburg P H, Veldkamp A, Bouma J. Land use change under conditions of high Population Pressure: The case of java Glob. Environ Change, 1999, 9(4): 303-312
2. De Koing G H J, Verburg P H, Veldkamp A, et al. Multi-scale modeling of land use change dynamics in Ecuador. Agr Sys, 1999, 61: 77-93
3. Bacon P J, Cain J D, Howard D C. Belief network models of land manager decisions and land use change. J Environ Manage, 2002, 65(1): 1-23
4. Riebsame W E, Parton W J, Galvin K A, et al. Integrated modeling of land use and cover change. Bioscience, 1994, 44(5): 350-356
5. Dawn C P, Steven M, Jansen M A, et al. Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review, 2002
6. Mertens B, Lambin E F. Spatial modeling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Appl Geogr, 1997, 17(2): 143-162
7. Sklar F H, Costanza R. The development of dynamic spatial models for landscape ecology: A Review and Prognosis. New York, 1991, 239-288
8. Muller D, Zeller M. Land use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: A spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agr Econ, 2002, 27(3): 333-354
9. Couclelis H. From cellular automata to urban models: New principles for model development and implementation. Environ Planning B, 1997, 24: 165-174
10. Batty M, Xie Y. From cells to cities. Environ Planning B, 1994, 21: 531-548
11. Li X, Yeh A G O. Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land use changes using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 2002, 16(4): 323-343
12. Torrens P M, O'sullivan D. Cellular automata and urban simulation: Where do we go from here? Environ and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2001, 28: 163-168
13. Benenson I, Omer I, Hatna E. Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics: The case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv. Environ Planning B, 2002, 29: 491-512
14. Chebeane H, Echalier F. Towards the use of a multi-agents event based design to improve reactivity of production systems. Comput Ind Eng, 1999, 37: 9-13
15. Sanders L, Pumain D, Mathian H, et al. SIMPOP: A multiagent system for the study of urbanism. Environ and Planning B, 1997, 24: 287-305
16. Webster C J, Wu F. Coarse Spatial Pricing and Self-organizing Cities. Urban Studies, 2001, 38: 2037-2054
17. Brown D G, Page S E, Riolo R L, et al. Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environ Model Softw, 2003, 19(12): 1097-1109
18. Benenson I. Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1998, 22(1): 25-42
19. Ligtenberg A, Bregt A K, Lammeren R V. Multi-actor-based land use modeling: Spatial planning using agents. Landscape Urban Plan, 2001, 56: 21-33
20. Otter H S, Veen A, Vriend H J. Abloom: Location behavior, spatial patterns, and agent-based modeling. J Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2001, 4(4): 1-21
21. Quigley J M. Housing demand in the short run: Analysis of polytomous choice. Explor Econ Res, 1976, (3): 76-102
22. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarembka P, ed. New York: Academic Press, 1974. 105-142
23. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location in spatial interaction theory and planning models. In: Karlqvist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, et al. eds. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, Amsterdam, 1978. 75-96
24. Bradley T E, Payne J E. The response of real estate investment trust returns to macroeconomic shocks. J Bus Res, 2005, 58(3): 293-300
25. Xu J. Mathematical Method in Modern Geography. Beijing: China Education & Culture Publishing Company, 2002
26. Li X, Yeh A G O. Knowledge discovery for geographical cellular automata. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci, 2005, 48(10): 1758-1767
27. Wu F. Calibration of stochastic cellular automata: The application to rural-urban land conversions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 2002, 16(8): 795-818