On hydrological model complexity, its geometrical interpretations and prediction uncertainty

Water Resources Research

Volumn 49, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 7048-7063

  Arkesteijn, Liselot ^a   Pande, Saket ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

model complexity; prediction uncertainty

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATION; GEOMETRICAL INTERPRETATION; MATHEMATICAL EXPECTATION; MODEL COMPLEXITY; MODEL SELECTION PROBLEM; PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

ALGORITHMS; FORECASTING; GEOMETRY; HYDROLOGY; MODEL STRUCTURES; REACTOR CORES; SAMPLING;

CLIMATE MODELS;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PREDICTION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RISK FACTOR; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84886137738     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20529     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Boucheron, S., G. Lugosi, and, O. Bousquet, (2004), Concentration inequalities, in Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 3176, edited by, O. Bousquet, U. von Luxburg, and, G. Rä (Pubitemid 39741633)
2. Burnash, R. J. C., (1995), The NWS river forecast system-catchment modelling, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, edited by, V. P. Singh, pp. 311-366, Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colo.
3. Cavanaugh, J. E., and, A. A. Neath, (1999), Generalizing the derivation of the Schwarz information criterion, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 28, 49-66.
4. Clement, T. P., (2011), Complexities in hindcasting models when should we say enough is enough?, Ground Water, 49, 620-629, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584. 2010.00765.x.
5. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and, V. Gupta, (1992), Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 28, 1015-1031.
6. Duan, Q., et al. (2006), The Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX): An overview of science strategy and major results from the second and third workshops, J. Hydrol., 320, 317, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.031.
7. Gelman, A., A. Jakulin, M. G. Pittau, and, Y.-S. Su, (2008), A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression, Ann. Appl. Stat., 2 (4), 1360-1383.
8. Gupta, H. V., and, S. Sorooshian, (1983), Uniqueness and observability of conceptual rainfall-runoff parameters percolation process examined, Water Resour. Res., 19, 269-276.
9. Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, and, P. O. Yapo, (1998), Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34, 751-763. (Pubitemid 28159454)
10. Gupta, H. V., M. P. Clark, J. A. Vrugt, G. Abramowitz, and, M. Ye, (2012), Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy, Water Resour. Res., 48, W08301, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011044.
11. Jakeman, A. J., and, G. M. Hornberger, (1993), How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2637-2649.
12. Kass, R. E., and, A. E. Raftery, (1995), Bayes factors, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 90 (430), 773-795.
13. Kavetski, D., and, M. P. Clark, (2010), The ancient numerical daemons of conceptual hydrological modeling. 2: Impact of time stepping scheme on model analysis and prediction, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10511, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008896.
14. Kumar, P., (2011), Typology of hydrologic predictability, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00H05, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009769.
15. Kundzewicz, C. W., and, A. J. Robson, (2004), Change detection in hydrological records a review of the methodology, Hydrol. Sci., 49 (1), 7-19.
16. Lall, U., B. Rajagopalan, and, D. G. Tarboton, (1996), A nonparametric wet/dry spell model for resampling daily precipitation, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2803-2823, doi: 10.1029/96WR00565. (Pubitemid 26350869)
17. Lee, T., and, T. B. M. J. Ouarda, (2012), Stochastic simulation of nonstationary oscillation hydroclimatic processes using empirical mode decomposition, Water Resour. Res., 48, W02514, doi: 10.1029/2011WR010660.
18. Marquardt, D. W., and, R. D. Snee, (1975), Ridge regression in practise, Am. Stat., 29 (1), 3-20.
19. Mehrotra, R., S. Westra, A. Sharma, and, R. Srikanthan, (2012), Continuous rainfall simulation. 2: A regionalized daily rainfall generation approach, Water Resour. Res., 48, W01536, doi: 10.1029/2011WR010490.
20. Meir, R., (2000), Nonparametric time series prediction through adaptive model selection, Mach. Learning, 39, 534.
21. Moradkhani, H., S. Sorooshian, H. V. Gupta, and, P. R. Houser, (2005), Dual state parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter, Adv. Water Resour., 28 (2), 135-147, doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.09. 002. (Pubitemid 40102390)
22. Pande, S., (2013a), Quantile hydrologic model selection and model structure deficiency assessment: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 49, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20411, in press.
23. Pande, S., (2013b), Quantile hydrologic model selection and model structure deficiency assessment: 2. Applications, Water Resour. Res., 49, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20422, in press.
24. Pande, S., M. McKee, and, L. A. Bastidas, (2009), Complexity-based robust hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10406, doi: 10.1029/2008WR007524.
25. Pande, S., L. A. Bastidas, S. Bhulai, and, M. McKee, (2012), Parameter dependent convergence bounds and complexity measure for a class of conceptual hydrological models, J. Hydroinformatics, 14 (2), 443-463, doi: 10.2166/hydro.2011.005.
26. Parrish, M., H. Moradkhani, and, C. M. DeChant, (2012), Toward reduction of model uncertainty: Integration of Bayesian model averaging and data assimilation, Water Resour. Res., 48, W03519, doi: 10.1029/2011WR011116.
27. Renard, B., D. Kavetski, G. Kuczera, M. Thyer, and, S. W. Franks, (2010), Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008328.
28. Schwarz, G., (1978), Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann. Stat., 6 (2), 461-464.
29. Slate, E. H., (1994), Parameterizations for natural Exponential families with quadratic functions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89 (428), 1471-1482.
30. Tierney, T., and, J. B. Kadane, (1986), Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 81 (393), 82-86.
31. Vapnik, V., (1982), Estimation of Dependencies Based on Empirical Data, Springer, New York.
32. Vapnik, V., (2002), The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, 2nd ed., Springer, New York.
33. Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, B. A. Robinson, J. M. Hyman, and, D. M. Higdon, (2009), Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10, 273-290.
34. Ye, M., Meyer, P. D., and, Neuman, S. P., (2008), On model selection criteria in multimodel analysis, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03428, doi: 10.1029/2008WR006803. (Pubitemid 351649218)
35. Young, P., S. Parkinson, and, M. Lees, (1996), Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam's razor revisited, J. Appl. Stat., 23 (2-3), 165-210.
36. Yu, B., (1994), Rates of convergence for empirical processes of stationary mixing sequences, Ann. Probab., 22, 94-116.