Convergence of approaches toward reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins

Water Resources Research

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Wagener, Thorsten ^a   Montanari, Alberto ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGIC MODELING; QUANTITATIVE LINKS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION; UNGAUGED BASINS; UNGAUGED WATERSHED; WATERSHED MODELING; WATERSHED MODELS;

FORECASTING; WATERSHEDS;

LANDFORMS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; GAUGE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

EID: 79958786812     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2010WR009469     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Abdulla, F. A., and D. P. Lettenmaier (1997), Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 197, 230-257, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03262-3. (Pubitemid 27335612)
2. Ajami, N. K., Q. Duan, and S. Sorooshian (2007), An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction, Water Resour. Res., 43, W01403, doi:10.1029/2005WR004745. (Pubitemid 46364281)
3. Archfield, S. A., and R. M. Vogel (2010), Map correlation method: Selection of a reference streamgage to estimate daily streamflow at ungaged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10513, doi:10.1029/2009WR008481.
4. Atkinson, S. E., R. A. Woods, and M. Sivapalan (2002), Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1314, doi:10.1029/2002WR001487.
5. Bárdossy, A. (2007), Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 703-710, doi:10.5194/ hess-11-703-2007. (Pubitemid 46134825)
6. Beighley, R. E., T. Dunne, and J. M. Melack (2005), Understanding and modeling basin hydrology: Interpreting the hydrogeological signature, Hydrol. Processes, 19, 1333-1353, doi:10.1002/hyp.5567. (Pubitemid 40587225)
7. Beven, K. J. (2000), Uniqueness of places and process representations in hydrological modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 203-213, doi:10.5194/ hess-4-203-2000.
8. Beven, K. J. (2006), A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18-36, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007.
9. Beven, K. J. (2007), Towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: Uncertainty, data and modelling as a learning process, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 460-467, doi:10.5194/hess-11-460-2007.
10. Beven, K. J. (2008), Environmental Modelling: An Uncertain Future?, Routledge, London.
11. Beven, K. J., and A. M. Binley (1992), The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Processes, 6, 279-298, doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305.
12. Beven, K. J., P. J. Smith, and J. E. Freer (2008), So just why would a modeler choose to be incoherent?, J. Hydrol., 354, 15-32, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2008.02.007.
13. Blöschl, G., and A. Montanari (2010), Climate change impacts-Throwing the dice?, Hydrol. Processes, 24, 374-381.
14. Box, G. E. P., and G. C. Tiao (1973), Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
15. Brath, A., A. Castellarin, and A. Montanari (2003), Assessing the reliability of regional depth-duration-frequency equations for gaged and ungaged sites, Water Resour. Res., 39(12), 1367, doi:10.1029/2003WR002399.
16. Brutsaert, W. (2005), Hydrology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
17. Bulygina, N., N. McIntyre, and H. S. Wheater (2009), Conditioning rainfallrunoff model parameters for ungauged catchments and land management impacts analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 893-904, doi:10.5194/hess- 13-893-2009.
18. Bulygina, N., N. McIntyre, and H. Wheater (2011), Bayesian conditioning of a rainfall-runoff model for predicting flows in ungaged catchments and under land use changes, Water Resour. Res., 47, W02503, doi:10.1029/ 2010WR009240.
19. Butts, M. B., J. T. Payne, M.Kristensen, and H. Madsen (2004),An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 298, 242-266, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol. 2004.03.042. (Pubitemid 39098776)
20. Buytaert, W., and K. Beven (2009), Regionalization as a learning process, Water Resour. Res., 45, W11419, doi:10.1029/2008WR007359.
21. Castellarin, A., R. M. Vogel, and A. Brath (2004), A stochastic index flow model of flow duration curves, Water Resour. Res., 40, W03104, doi:10.1029/2003WR002524.
22. Castiglioni, S., L. Lombardi, E. Toth, A. Castellarin, and A. Montanari (2010), Calibration of rainfall-runoff models in ungauged basins: A regional maximum likelihood approach, Adv. Water Resour., 33, 1235-1242, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.04.009.
23. Clark, M. P., A. G. Slater, D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, T. Wagener, and L. E. Hay (2008), Framework for understanding structural errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B02, doi:10.1029/2007WR006735.
24. Detenbeck, N. E., V. J. Brady,D. L. Taylor,V. M. Snarski, and S. L. Batterman (2005), Relationship of stream flow regime in the western Lake Superior basin to watershed type characteristics, J. Hydrol., 309, 258-276, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.11.024. (Pubitemid 40778324)
25. Di Baldassarre, G., and A. Montanari (2009), Uncertainty in river discharge observations: A quantitative analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 913-921, doi:10.5194/hess-13-913-2009.
26. Di Baldassarre, G., G. Schumann, and P. D. Bates (2009), A technique for the calibration of hydraulic models using uncertain satellite observations of flood extent, J. Hydrol., 367, 276-282, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.020.
27. Farmer, D., M. Sivapalan, and C. Jothityangkoon (2003), Climate, soil, and vegetation controls upon the variability of water balance in temperate and semiarid landscapes: Downward approach to water balance analysis, Water Resour. Res., 39(2), 1035, doi:10.1029/2001WR000328.
28. Fernandez, W., R.M. Vogel, and A. Sankarasubramanian (2000), Regional calibration of a watershed model, Hydrol. Sci. J., 45(5), 689-707, doi:10.1080/ 02626660009492371.
29. Gerrits, A. M. J., H. H. G. Savenije, E. J. M. Veling, and L. Pfister (2009), Analytical derivation of the Budyko curve based on rainfall characteristics and a simple evaporation model, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04403, doi:10.1029/2008WR007308.
30. Gupta, H. V., T. Wagener, and Y. Liu (2008), Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Processes, 22, 3802-3813, doi:10.1002/hyp.6989.
31. Hughes, D. A., E. Kapangaziwiri, and T. Sawunyama (2010), Hydrological model uncertainty assessment in southern Africa, J. Hydrol., 387, 221-232, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.010.
32. Hundecha, Y., T. Ouarda, and A. Bárdossy (2008), Regional estimation of parameters of a rainfall-runoff model at ungauged watersheds using the "spatial" structures of the parameters within a canonical physiographic-climatic space, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01427, doi:10.1029/2006WR005439. (Pubitemid 351304152)
33. Kapangaziwiri, E., and D. A. Hughes (2008), Towards revised physically based parameter estimation methods for the Pitman monthly rainfall-runoff model, Water SA, 34(2), 183-191.
34. Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2006a), Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03407, doi:10.1029/2005WR004368.
35. Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2006b), Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Application, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03408, doi:10.1029/2005WR004376.
36. Koren, V., M. Smith, and Q. Duan (2003), Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfallrunoff models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol. 6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 239-254, AGU, Washington, D. C.
37. Koutsoyiannis, D. (2010), HESS opinions "A randomwalk on water," Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 585-601, doi:10.5194/hess-14-585- 2010.
38. Kuczera, G., and E. Parent (1998), Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The Metropolis algorithm, J. Hydrol., 211, 69-85, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X. (Pubitemid 29014557)
39. Leavesley, G. H., L. E. Hay, R. J. Viger, and S. L. Markstrom (2003), Use of a priori parameter estimation methods to constrain calibration of distributed- parameter models, in Calibration of Watershed Models, Water Sci. Appl., vol. 6, edited by Q. Duan et al., pp. 255-266, AGU, Washington, D. C.
40. Lima, C. H. R., and U. Lall (2010), Spatial scaling in a changing climate: A hierarchical Bayesian model for non-stationary multi-site annual maximum and monthly streamflow, J. Hydrol., 383, 307-318, doi:10.1016/ j.jhydrol.2009.12.045.
41. Liu, Y., and H. V. Gupta (2007), Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07401, doi:10.1029/2006WR005756. (Pubitemid 350194456)
42. Liu, Y., J. Freer, K. Beven, and P. Matgen (2009), Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: Extending observation error, J. Hydrol., 367, 93-103, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.016.
43. Mantovan, P., and E. Todini (2006), Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 330, 368-381, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.046. (Pubitemid 44528546)
44. Marshall, L. A., D. J. Nott, and A. Sharma (2007), Towards dynamic catchment modelling: A Bayesian hierarchical mixtures of experts framework, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 847-861, doi:10.1002/hyp.6294. (Pubitemid 46510578)
45. McIntyre, N., H. Lee, H. S. Wheater, A. Young, and T. Wagener (2005), Ensemble prediction of runoff in ungauged watersheds, Water Resour. Res., 41, W12434, doi:10.1029/2005WR004289. (Pubitemid 43151131)
46. McMillan, H., J. E. Freer, F. Pappenberger, T. Krueger, and M. P. Clark (2010), Impacts of uncertain flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions in a mobile-bed river, Hydrol. Processes, 24, 1270-1284.
47. Merz, B., and G. Bloschl (2004), Regionalisation of catchment model parameters, J. Hydrol., 287, 95-123, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028. (Pubitemid 38300324)
48. Merz, R., and G. Blöschl (2008a), Flood frequency hydrology: 1. Temporal, spatial, and causal expansion of information, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08432, doi:10.1029/2007WR006744.
49. Merz, R., and G. Blöschl (2008b), Flood frequency hydrology: 2. Combining data evidence, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08433, doi:10.1029/ 2007WR006745.
50. Montanari, A. (2005), Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08406, doi:10.1029/ 2004WR003826.
51. Montanari, A. (2011), Uncertainty of hydrological predictions, in Treatise of Water Science, vol. 2, The Science of Hydrology, edited by P. A. Wilderer, pp. 459-478, Elsevier, Amsterdam, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444- 53199-5.00045-2.
52. Montanari, A., and E. Toth (2007), Calibration of hydrological models in the spectral domain: An opportunity for ungauged basins?, Water Resour. Res., 43, W05434, doi:10.1029/2006WR005184. (Pubitemid 46998235)
53. Montanari, A., C. A. Shoemaker and N. van de Giesen (2009), Introduction to special section on uncertainty assessment in surface and subsurface hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B00, doi:10.1029/2009WR008471.
54. Nadeau, T.-L., and M. C. Rains (2007), Hydrological connectivity between headwater streams and downstream waters: How science can inform policy, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(1), 118-133, doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688. 2007.00010.x.
55. National Research Council (NRC) (2004), Assessing the National Streamflow Information Program, Natl. Acad., Washington, D. C.
56. Oudin, L., V. Andréassian, C. Perrin, C. Michel, and N. Le Moine (2008), Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03413, doi:10.1029/2007WR006240. (Pubitemid 351628543)
57. Pallard, B., A. Castellarin, and A. Montanari (2009), A look at the links between drainage density and flood statistics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1019-1029, doi:10.5194/hess-13-1019-2009.
58. Palmer, M. A. (2010), Water resources: Beyond infrastructure, Nature, 467, 534-535.
59. Parada, L. M., and X. Liang (2010), A novel approach to infer streamflow signals for ungauged basins, Adv. Water Resour., 33, 372-386, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.01.003.
60. Parajka, J., R. Merz, and G. Blöschl (2005), A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 157-171, doi:10.5194/hess-9-157-2005. (Pubitemid 41555703)
61. Poff, N. L., B. P. Bledsoe, and C. O. Cuhaciyan (2006), Hydrologic variation with land use across the contiguous United States: Geomorphic and ecological consequences for stream ecosystems, Geomorphology, 79, 264-285, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.032. (Pubitemid 44356406)
62. Poff, N. L., et al. (2010), The Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards, Freshwater Biol., 55, 147-170, doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2427.2009.02204.x.
63. Post, D. A., and A. J. Jakeman (1996), Relationships between physical attributes and hydrologic response characteristics in small Australian mountain ash catchments, Hydrol. Processes, 10, 877-892, doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6〈877::AID-HYP377〉3.0.CO;2-T.
64. Post, D. A., J. A. Jones, and G. E. Grant (1998), An improved methodology for predicting the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments, Environ. Modell. Software, 13, 395-403, doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(98) 00044-9. (Pubitemid 29000492)
65. Reichl, J., A. Western, N. McIntyre, and F. Chiew (2009), Optimization of a similarity measure for estimating ungauged streamflow, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10423, doi:10.1029/2008WR007248.
66. Sanborn, S. C., and B. P. Bledsoe (2006), Predicting streamflow regime metrics for ungauged streams in Colorado, Washington, and Oregon, J. Hydrol., 325, 241-261, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.018. (Pubitemid 43849760)
67. Sefton, C. E. M., and S. M. Howarth (1998), Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales, J. Hydrol., 211, 1-16, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694 (98)00163-2. (Pubitemid 29014552)
68. Sefton, C. E. M., P. G. Whitehead, A. Eatherall, I. G. Littlewood, and A. J. Jakeman (1995), Dynamic response characteristics of the Plynlimon catchments and preliminary analysis of relationships to physical catchment descriptors, Environmetrics, 6, 465-472, doi:10.1002/env.3170060508. (Pubitemid 26475081)
69. Seibert, J. (1999), Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfallrunoff model, Agric. For. Meteorol., 98-99, 279-293, doi:10.1016/ S0168-1923(99)00105-7. (Pubitemid 30071119)
70. Seibert, J., and K. J. Beven (2009), Gauging the ungauged basin: How many discharge measurements are needed?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 883-892, doi:10.5194/hess-13-883-2009.
71. Seibert, J., and J. J. McDonnell (2002), On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 38(11), 1241, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR000978.
72. Sivapalan, M. (2003), Prediction in ungauged basins: A grand challenge for theoretical hydrology, Hydrol. Processes, 17, 3163-3170, doi:10.1002/ hyp.5155.
73. Sivapalan, M., et al. (2003), IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48(6), 857-880, doi:10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421. (Pubitemid 37529254)
74. Skøien, J. O., and G. Blöschl (2007), Spatiotemporal topological kriging of runoff time series, Water Resour. Res., 43, W09419, doi:10.1029/ 2006WR005760.
75. Skøien, J. O., R. Merz, and G. Blöschl (2006), Top-kriging-Geostatistics on stream networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 277-287, doi:10.5194/ hess-10-277-2006.
76. Spate, J. M., B. F. W. Croke, and J. P. Norton (2004), A proposed rulediscovery scheme for regionalization of rainfall-runoff characteristics in New South Wales, Australia, paper presented at 2nd Biennial Meeting, Int. Environ. Modell. and Software Soc., Manno, Switzerland.
77. Stedinger, J., and G. Tasker (1985), Regional hydrologic analysis: 1. Ordinary, weighted, and generalized least squares compared, Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 1421-1432, doi:10.1029/WR021i009p01421.
78. Stedinger, J. R., R. M. Vogel, S. U. Lee, and R. Batchelder (2008), Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B06, doi:10.1029/ 2008WR006822.
79. Stokstad, E. (1999), Scarcity of rain, stream gages threatens forecasts, Science, 285, 1199-1200, doi:10.1126/science.285.5431.1199. (Pubitemid 29398586)
80. Tague, C., and G. Grant (2004), A geological framework for interpreting the low flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River basin, Oregon, Water Resour. Res., 40, W04303, doi:10.1029/2003WR002629.
81. Tetzlaff, D., J. Seibert, and C. Soulsby (2009), Inter-catchment comparison to assess the influence of topography and soils on catchment transit times in a geomorphic province; the Cairngorm mountains, Scotland, Hydrol. Processes, 23, 1874-1886, doi:10.1002/hyp.7318.
82. van Werkhoven, K., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and Y. Tang (2009), Sensitivityguided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models, Adv. Water Resour., 32, 1154-1169, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002.
83. Vicens, G., I. Rodriguez-Iturbe, and J. Schaake Jr. (1975),ABayesian framework for the use of regional information in hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 11(3), 405-414, doi:10.1029/WR011i003p00405.
84. Vogel, R. M. (2006), Regional calibration of watershed models, in Watershed Models, edited by V. P. Singh and D. K. Frevert, pp. 47-71, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
85. Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian (2003), A shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters, Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1201, doi:10.1029/2002WR001642.
86. Wagener, T. (2007), Can we model the hydrologic implications of environmental change?, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 3233-3236, doi:10.1002/hyp.6873. (Pubitemid 350111660)
87. Wagener, T., and H. S. Wheater (2006), Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty, J. Hydrol., 320, 132-154, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.015.
88. Wagener, T., H. S. Wheater, and H. V. Gupta (2004), Rainfall-Runoff Modeling in Gauged and Ungauged Basins, Imp. Coll. Press, London, doi:10.1142/9781860945397.
89. Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, P. Troch, and R. Woods (2007), Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity, Geogr. Compass, 1, 901-931, doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x.
90. Winsemius, H. C., B. Schaefli, A. Montanari, and H. H. G. Savenije (2009), On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins:Aframework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information, Water Resour. Res., 45, W12422, doi:10.1029/2009WR007706.
91. Yadav, M., T. Wagener, and H. V. Gupta (2007), Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior, Adv. Water Resour., 30, 1756-1774, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.01.005. (Pubitemid 46712120)
92. Yilmaz, K. K., H. V. Gupta, and T. Wagener (2008),Aprocess-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 44, W09417, doi:10.1029/ 2007WR006716.
93. Younger, P. M., J. E. Freer, and K. J. Beven (2009), Detecting the effects of spatial variability of rainfall on hydrological modelling within an uncertainty analysis framework, Hydrol. Processes, 23, 1988-2003, doi:10.1002/hyp.7341.
94. Zhang, Z., T. Wagener, P. Reed, and R. Bushan (2008), Ensemble streamflow predictions in ungauged basins combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multiobjective optimization, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B04, doi:10.1029/2008WR006833.