A question driven socio-hydrological modeling process

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 8289-8335

  Garcia, M ^a   Portney, K ^b   Islam, S ^a,c  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DEMAND ANALYSIS; HUMAN ACTIVITY; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; OSCILLATION; POLICY MAKING; WATER STRESS; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84956967141     PISSN: 18122108     EISSN: 18122116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-12-8289-2015     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Arocha, J. F., Patel, V. L., and Patel, Y. C.: Hypothesis generation and the coordination of theory and evidence in novice diagnostic reasoning, Med. Decis. Making, 13, 198-211, 1993.
2. Baldassare, M. and Katz, C.: The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices, Environ. Behav., 24, 602-616, 1992.
3. BBC Research: Public Opinions, Attitudes, and Awareness Regarding Water in Colorado, Final Report Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, available at: http://www.bbcresearch.com/images/Final-Report-072213-web.pdf (last access: 1 July 2015), 2013.
4. Beven, K.: Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment, P. Roy. Soc. A, 458, 2465-2484, doi:10.1098/rspa.2002.0986, 2002.
5. Blöschl, G. and Sivapalan, M.: Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review, Hydrol. Process., 9, 251-290, doi:10.1002/hyp.3360090305, 1995.
6. Bower, B. T., Hufschmidt, M. M., and Reedy, W. W.: Operating procedures: their role in the design of water-resources systems by simulation analyses, in: Design of Water-Resource Systems, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 443-458, 1962.
7. Campbell, H. E., Johnson, R. M., and Larson, E. H.: Prices, devices, people, or rules: the relative effectiveness of policy instruments in water conservation, Rev. Policy Res., 21, 637-662, 2004.
8. Cancelliere, A., Ancarani, A., and Rossi, G.: Susceptibility of water supply reservoirs to drought conditions, J. Hydrol. Eng., 3, 140-148, 1998.
9. Chong, H. and Sunding, D.: Water markets and trading, Annu. Rev. Env. Resour., 31, 239-264, doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100323, 2006.
10. Denver Water: Long-range Planning, available at: http://www.denverwater.org/SupplyPlanning/Planning/ (last access: 1 July 2015), 2015.
11. Di Baldassarre, G., Viglione, A., Carr, G., Kuil, L., Salinas, J. L., and Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3295-3303, doi:10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013, 2013.
12. Draper, A. J. and Lund, J. R.: Optimal hedging and carryover storage value, J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE, 130, 83-87, 2004.
13. Elshafei, Y., Sivapalan, M., Tonts, M., and Hipsey, M. R.: A prototype framework for models of socio-hydrology: identification of key feedback loops and parameterisation approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2141-2166, doi:10.5194/hess-18-2141-2014, 2014.
14. Falkenmark, M.: Water and mankind - complex system of mutual interaction, Ambio, 6, 3-9, 1977.
15. Fielding, K. S., Russell, S., Spinks, A., and Mankad, A.: Determinants of household water conservation: the role of demographic, infrastructure, behavior, and psychosocial variables, Water Resour. Res., 48, W10510, doi:10.1029/2012WR012398, 2012.
16. Forrester, J. W.: Policies, decisions, and information sources for modeling, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 59, 42-63, 1992.
17. Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., and Wilson, M.: Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample, Pers. Indiv. Differ., 37, 1597-1613, 2004.
18. Gal, S.: Optimal management of a multireservoir water supply system, Water. Resour. Res., 15, 737-749, 1979.
19. Geller, E. S., Erickson, J. B., and Buttram, B. A.: Attempts to promote residential water conservation with educational, behavioral and engineering strategies, Popul. Environ., 6, 96-112, 1983.
20. Giacomoni, M. H., Kanta, L., and Zechman, E. M.: Complex adaptive systems approach to simulate the sustainability of water resources and urbanization, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 139, 554-564, 2013.
21. Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., and Loucks, D. P.: Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system evaluation, Water Resour. Res., 18, 14-20, 1982.
22. Hale, R. L., Armstrong, A., Baker, M. A., Bedingfield, S., Betts, D., Buahin, C., Buchert, M., Crowl, T., Dupont, R. R., Ehleringer, J.R, Endter-Wada, J., Flint, C., Grant, J., Hinners, S., Jeffery, S., Jackson-Smith, D., Jones, A. S., Licon, C., and Null, S. E.: iSAW: integrating structure, actors, and water to study socio-hydro-ecological systems, Earth's Future, 110-132, doi:10.1002/2014EF000295, 2015.
23. Hinkel, J., Schleuter, M., and Cox, M.: A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases, Ecol. Soc., 20, 32, doi:10.5751/ES-07023-200132, 2015.
24. Hughes, S., Pincetl, S., and Boone, C.: Triple exposure: regulatory, climatic, and political drivers of water management changes in the city of Los Angeles, Cities, 32, 51-59, doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.007, 2013.
25. Inman, D. and Jeffrey, P.: A review of residential water conservation tool performance and influences on implementation effectiveness, Urban Water J., 3, 127-143, 2006.
26. ISTPP: National Public Water Survey, Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy, Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, 2013.
27. Jones, B. D. and Baumgartner, F. R.: The Politics of Attention, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2005.
28. Kandasamy, J., Sounthararajah, D., Sivabalan, P., Chanan, A., Vigneswaran, S., and Sivapalan, M.: Socio-hydrologic drivers of the pendulum swing between agricultural development and environmental health: a case study from Murrumbidgee River basin, Australia, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1027-1041, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1027-2014, 2014.
29. Kanta, L. and Zechman, E.: Complex adaptive systems framework to assess supply-side and demand-side management for urban water resources, J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE, 140, 75-85, 2013.
30. Kenney, D. S., Goemans, C., Klein, R., Lowrey, J., and Reidy, K.: Residential water demand management: lessons from Aurora, Colorado, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 44, 192-207, 2008.
31. LADWP - Los Angeles Department of Water and Power: Urban Water Management Plan 2010, Los Angeles, CA, 2010.
32. Liu, Y., Tian, F., Hu, H., and Sivapalan, M.: Socio-hydrologic perspectives of the co-evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji-Tire model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1289-1303, doi:10.5194/hess-18-1289-2014, 2014.
33. Mankad, A. and Tapsuwan, S.: Review of socio-economic drivers of community acceptance and adoption of decentralised water systems, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 380-91, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.037, 2011.
34. Micklin, P.: The aral sea disaster, Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc., 35, 47-72, doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140120, 2007.
35. Mini, C., Hogue, T. S., and Pincetl, S.: Patterns and controlling factors of residential water use in Los Angeles, California, Water Policy, 16, 1-16, doi:10.2166/wp.2014.029, 2014.
36. MWRA - Massachusetts Water Resources Authority: Summary of MWRA Demand Management Program, available at: http://www.mwra.state.ma.us/harbor/pdf/demandreport03.pdf (last access: 1 July 2015), 2003.
37. Olmstead, S. M. and Stavins, R. N.: Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation, Water Resour. Res., 45, W04301, doi:10.1029/2008WR007227, 2009.
38. Ostrom, E.: A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 15181-15187, 2007.
39. Ostrom, E.: Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, Policy Stud. J., 39, 7-27, 2011.
40. Pahl-Wostl, C., Holtz, G., Kastens, B., and Knieper, C.: Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework, Environ. Sci. Policy, 13, 571-581, 2010.
41. Schlüter, M., Hinkel, J., Bots, P., and Arlinghaus, R.: Application of the SES framework for model-based analysis of the dynamics of social-ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 19, 36, doi:10.5751/ES-05782-190136, 2014.
42. Schuetze, T. and Santiago-Fandiño, V.: Quantitative assessment of water use efficiency in urban and domestic buildings, Water, 5, 1172-1193, 2013.
43. Shih, J. and Revelle, C.: Water-supply operations during drought: continuous hedging rule, J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE, 120, 613-629, 1994.
44. Simon, H. A.: Theories of bounded rationality, Decis. Organizat., 1, 161-176, 1972.
45. Sivapalan, M., Bloschl, G., Zhang, L., and Vertessy, R.: Downward approach to hydrological prediction, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2101-2111, doi:10.1002/hyp.1425, 2003.
46. Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., and Blöschl, G.: Socio-hydrology: a new science of people and water, Hydrol. Process., 26, 1270-1276, 2011.
47. SNWA - Southern Nevada Water Authority: Water Resources Management Plan, available at: http://www.snwa.com/assets/pdf/wr-plan.pdf (last access: 1 July 2015), 2009.
48. Srinivasan, V., Gorelick, S. M., and Goulder, L.: Sustainable urban water supply in south India: desalination, efficiency improvement, or rainwater harvesting?, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10504, doi:10.1029/2009WR008698, 2010.
49. Srinivasan, V.: Reimagining the past - use of counterfactual trajectories in sociohydrological modelling: the case of Chennai, India, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 785-801, doi:10.5194/hess-19-785-2015, 2015.
50. Stave, K. A.: A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada, J. Environ. Manage., 67, 303-313, doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00205-0, 2003.
51. Sterman, J.: Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000.
52. Thompson, S. E., Sivapalan, M., Harman, C. J., Srinivasan, V., Hipsey, M. R., Reed, P., Montanari, A., and Blöschl, G.: Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5013-5039, doi:10.5194/hess-17-5013-2013, 2013.
53. Tong, S. T. and Chen, W.: Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality, J. Environ. Manage., 66, 377-393, 2002.
54. Troy, T. J., Konar, M., Srinivasan, V., and Thompson, S.: Moving sociohydrology forward: a synthesis across studies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 3319-3348, doi:10.5194/hessd-12-3319-2015, 2015.
55. Turral, H.: Hydro-Logic? Reform in Water Resources Management in Developed Countries with Major Agricultural Water Use - Lessons for Developing Nations, Overseas Development Institute, London, 1998.
56. Vahmani, P. and Hogue, T. S.: Incorporating an urban irrigation module into the Noah Land surface model coupled with an urban canopy model, J. Hydrometeorol., 15, 1440-1456, 2014.
57. Vörösmarty, C. J., McIntyre, P. B., Gessner, M. O., Dudgeon, D., Prusevich, A., Green, P., Glidden, S., Bunn, S. E., Sullivan, C. A., Lierman, C. R., and Davies, P. M.: Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity, Nature, 467, 555-561, doi:10.1038/nature09549, 2010.
58. Wagener, T., Sivapalan, M., Troch, P. A., McGlynn, B. L., Harman, C. J., Gupta, H. V., and Wilson, J. S.: The future of hydrology: an evolving science for a changing world, Water Resour. Res, 46, W05301, doi:10.1029/2009WR008906, 2010.
59. Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J., and Beven, K. J.: Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modeling, in: Modeling Change in Environmental Systems, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 101-132, 1993.
60. Willis, R. M., Stewart, R. A., Panuwatwanich, K., Williams, P. R., and Hollingsworth, A. L.: Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption, J. Environ. Manage., 92, 1996-2009, 2011.
61. Wissmar, R. C., Timm, R. K., and Logsdon, M. G.: Effects of changing forest and impervious land covers on discharge characteristics of watersheds, Environ. Manage., 34, 91-98, 2004.
62. You, J. Y. and Cai, X.: Hedging rule for reservoir operations: 1. A theoretical analysis, Water Resour. Res., 44, 1-9, 2008.
63. Young, P.: Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale, Hydrol. Process., 17, 2195-2217, doi:10.1002/hyp.1328, 2003.
64. Zilberman, D., Dinar, A., MacDougall, N., Khanna, M., Brown, C., and Castillo, F.: Individual and institutional responses to the drought: the case of California agriculture, ERS Staff Paper, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1992.