Land market interactions between heterogeneous agents in a heterogeneous Landscape - Tracing the macro-scale effects of individual trade-offs between environmental amenities and disamenities

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 431-457

  Filatova, Tatiana ^a   Van Der Veen, Anne ^b   Parker, Dawn C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350136503     PISSN: 00083976     EISSN: 17447976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01164.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
2. Anas, A. 1990. Taste heterogeneity and urban spatial structure - the logit model and monocentric theory reconciled. Journal of Urban Economics 28 (3 318 335.
3. Arthur, B. 2006. Out-of-equilibrium economics and agent-based modeling. In Handbook of Computational Economics, Volume II, Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by L. Tesfatsion and K. L. Judd, pp. 1551 1564. Amsterdam : Elsevier B.V.
4. Arthur, W. B., S. N. Durlauf and D. Lane. 1997. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, vol. XXVII. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
5. Axtell, R. 2005. The complexity of exchange. Economic Journal 115 (504 F193 210.
6. Balmann, A. 1997. Farm-based modelling of regional structural change: A cellular automata approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics 24 : 85 108.
7. Bell, K. P. and E. G. Irwin. 2002. Spatially explicit micro-level modelling of land use change at the rural-urban interface. Agricultural Economics 27 (3 217 232.
8. Bin, O., J. B. Kruse and C. E. Landry. 2008. Flood hazards, insurance rates, and amenities: Evidence from the coastal housing market. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 75 (1 63 82.
9. Caruso, G., D. Peeters, J. Cavailhès and M. Rounsevell. 2007. Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata microeconomic model. Regional Science and Urban Economics 37 (5 542 567.
10. Chivers, J. and N. E. Flores. 2002. Market failure in information: The national flood insurance program. Land Economics 78 (4 515 521.
11. Epple, D. and G. J. Platt. 1998. Equilibrium and local redistribution in an urban economy when households differ in both preferences and incomes. Journal of Urban Economics 43 (1 23 51.
12. Filatova, T., D. Parker and A. Van Der Veen. 2009. Agent-based urban land markets: Agents pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12 (1 3. Home page on-line. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/3.html (accessed September 12, 2009).
13. Filatova, T., D. C. Parker and A. Van Der Veen. 2007. Agent-based land markets: Heterogeneous agents, land prices and urban land use change. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA'07), edited by F. Amblard, pp. 263 277. Toulouse, France : IRIT Editions.
14. Filatova, T., A. Van Der Veen and D. Parker. 2008a. Introducing preference heterogeneity into a monocentric urban model: An agent-based land market model. In Second World Congress on Social Simulation. Fairfax, VA.
15. Filatova, T., A. Van Der Veen and A. Voinov. 2008b. An agent-based model for exploring land market mechanisms for coastal zone management. In Proceedings of the iEMSs Fourth Biennial Meeting: International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. II, edited by M. Snchez-Marr, J. Bjar, J. Comas, A. Rizzoli and G. Guariso, pp. 792 800. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain : International Environmental Modelling and Software Society.
16. Haining, R. 1993. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
17. Happe, K., K. Kellermann and A. Balmann. 2006. Agent-based analysis of agricultural policies: An illustration of the agricultural policy simulator agripolis, its adaptation and behavior. Ecology and Society 11 (1 49 online http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art49/ (accessed September 12, 2009).
18. Henderson, J. V. and J.-F. Thisse. 1999. On the pricing strategy of a land developer. Journal of Urban Economics 45 : 1 16.
19. Irwin, E. G. and N. Bockstael. 2004. Land use externalities, open space preservation, and urban sprawl. Regional Science and Urban Economics 34 : 705 725.
20. Kaiser, G., S. Reese, H. Sterr and H.-J. Markau. 2004. Comrisk subproject 3: Public perception of coastal flood defence and participation in coastal flood defence planning. Final report. Kiel: Schleswig-Holstein State Ministry of the Interior & North Sea Regional Programme of the EU.
21. Kirman, A. and N. Vriend. 2001. Evolving market structure: An ace model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 : 459 502.
22. Kirman, A. P. 1992. Whom or what does the representative individual represent Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (2 117 136.
23. Krutilla, J. V. 1966. An economic approach to coping with flood damage. Water Resources Research 2 (2 183 190.
24. Krywkow, J., T. Filatova and A. Van Der Veen. 2008. Flood risk perceptions in the Dutch province of Zeeland: Does the public still support current policies In Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice, edited by P. Samuels, S. Huntington, W. Allsop and J. Harrop, pp. 1513 1521. London : Taylor and Francis Group.
25. LeBaron, B. 2006. Agent-based computational finance. In Handbook of Computational Economics Volume II, Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by L. Tesfatsion and K. L. Judd, pp. 1187 1233. Amsterdam : Elsevier B.V.
26. Lynch, L. and S. Lovell. 2003. Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land preservation programs. Land Economics 79 (2 259 276.
27. MacDonald, D. N., J. C. Murdoch and H. L. White. 1987. Uncertain hazards, insurance, and consumer choice: Evidence from housing markets. Land Economics 63 (4 361 371.
28. Marks, R. 2006. Market design using agent-based models. In Handbook of Computational Economics Volume II, Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by L. Tesfatsion and K. L. Judd, pp. 1339 1380. Amsterdam : Elsevier B.V.
29. Parker, D. C. 2007. Revealing "space" in spatial externalities: Edge-effect externalities and spatial incentives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54 (1 84 99.
30. Parker, D. C. and T. Filatova. 2008. A conceptual design for a bilateral agent-based land market with heterogeneous economic agents. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32 : 454 463.
31. Parker, D. C., T. Berger and S. M. Manson. 2002. Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. In LUCC Report Series No. 6; Report and Review of an International Workshop October 4-7, 2001, pp. 1 140. University of California.
32. Poelmann, C. 2005. Advies van de commissie bescherming en ontwikkeling van buitendijks gebied in kustplaatsen. Haarlem : Rijkswaterstaat.
33. Polhill, J. G., D. Parker and N. M. Gotts. 2008. Effects of land markets on competition between innovators and imitators in land use: Results from fearlus-elmm. In Social Simulation Technologies: Advances and New Discoveries, edited by C. Hernandez, K. Troitzsch and B. Edmonds, pp. 81 97. Hershey, PA : Information Science Reference.
34. Rijkswaterstaat. 2002. Towards an Integrated Coastal Zone Policy - Policy agenda for the coast. The Hague, the Netherlands : Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat Rijkswaterstaat, Direct Dutch Publications BV.
35. Tatano, H., K. Yamaguchi and N. Okada. 2004. Risk perception, location choice and land-use patterns under disaster risk: long-term consequences of information provision in a spatial economy. In Modelling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters, edited by Y. Okuyama and S. Chang, pp. 163 181. Berlin : Springer.
36. Terpstra, T. and J. M. Gutteling. 2008. Households perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. Water Resources Development 24 (4 551 561.
37. Tesfatsion, L. 2006. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In Handbook of Computational Economics Volume II, Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by L. Tesfatsion and K. L. Judd, pp. 831 880. Amsterdam : Elsevier B.V.
38. Tesfatsion, L. and K. L. Judd. 2006. Handbook of Computational Economics Volume II: Agent-Based Computational Economics. Amsterdam : Elsevier B.V.
39. Varian, H. R. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. New York : W. W. Norton.
40. VLIZ. 2005. Europese duurzaamheidsindicatoren voor kustgebieden in nederland:een eerste inventarisatie. Tech. rep., Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee. Oostende, Belgium.
41. Voinov, A. 2008. Systems Science and Modeling for Ecological Economics. London : Academic Press.
42. von Thunen, J. H. 1826/1966. Isolated State: An English Edition of Der Isolierte Staat. Oxford : Pergamon Press.
43. Wilensky, U. 1999. Netlogo, http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.
44. Wu, J. 2001. Environmental amenities and the spatial pattern of urban sprawl. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (3 691 697 (accessed January 25, 2009).
45. Wu, J., R. Adams and A. Plantinga. 2004. Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: Residential development in portland, oregon. Land Economics 80 (1 19 32.