Trans-Omics: How To Reconstruct Biochemical Networks Across Multiple 'Omic' Layers

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 276-290

  Yugi, Katsuyuki ^a,b   Kubota, Hiroyuki ^b,c   Hatano, Atsushi ^a   Kuroda, Shinya ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Metabolome; Omic data; Proteome; Trans ome wide association study (trans OWAS); Trans omics

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; DATA INTEGRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEINS;

BIOCHEMICAL INTERACTIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION; METABOLOMES; OMIC DATA; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; TRANS-OME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY (TRANS-OWAS); TRANS-OMICS; TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

CARBON; INSULIN; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

ALLOSTERISM; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOMICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HEPATOMA CELL; HEREDITY; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; LINKAGE ANALYSIS; METABOLIC REGULATION; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; TRANS OMICS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; BIOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS;

EID: 84956858710     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.12.013     Document Type: Review

References (135)

1. Brazhnik P., et al. Gene networks: how to put the function in genomics. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20:467-472.
2. Nielsen J., Oliver S. The next wave in metabolome analysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23:544-546.
3. Bentley D.R., et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 2008, 456:53-59.
4. Nagalakshmi U., et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 2008, 320:1344-1349.
5. Cloonan N., et al. Stem cell transcriptome profiling via massive-scale mRNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:613-619.
6. Kharchenko P.V., et al. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1351-1359.
7. Adli M., Bernstein B.E. Whole-genome chromatin profiling from limited numbers of cells using nano-ChIP-seq. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6:1656-1668.
8. Yasuoka Y., et al. Occupancy of tissue-specific cis-regulatory modules by Otx2 and TLE/Groucho for embryonic head specification. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4322.
9. Ross P.L., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
10. Ishihama Y., et al. Quantitative mouse brain proteomics using culture-derived isotope tags as internal standards. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:617-621.
11. Olsen J.V., et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127:635-648.
12. Matsumoto M., et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of tyrosine-phosphorylation induced by T-cell receptor or B-cell receptor activation reveals new signaling pathways. Proteomics 2009, 9:3549-3563.
13. Humphrey S.J., et al. Dynamic adipocyte phosphoproteome reveals that Akt directly regulates mTORC2. Cell Metab. 2013, 17:1009-1020.
14. Yi T., et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals system-wide signaling pathways downstream of SDF-1/CXCR4 in breast cancer stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:E2182-E2190.
15. Shehzad Z., et al. A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies. Neuroimage 2014, 93:74-94.
16. Emdal K.B., et al. Temporal proteomics of NGF-TrkA signaling identifies an inhibitory role for the E3 ligase Cbl-b in neuroblastoma cell differentiation. Sci. Signal. 2015, 8:ra40.
17. Ong S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
18. Stahl-Zeng J., et al. High sensitivity detection of plasma proteins by multiple reaction monitoring of N-glycosites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6:1809-1817.
19. Fiehn O., et al. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:1157-1161.
20. Bennett B.D., et al. Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5:593-599.
21. Tajima Y., et al. Lipidomic analysis of brain tissues and plasma in a mouse model expressing mutated human amyloid precursor protein/tau for Alzheimer's disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2013, 12:68.
22. Soga T., et al. Simultaneous determination of anionic intermediates for Bacillus subtilis metabolic pathways by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74:2233-2239.
23. Soga T. Differential metabolomics reveals ophthalmic acid as an oxidative stress biomarker indicating hepatic glutathione consumption. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:16768-16776.
24. Soga T., et al. Metabolomic profiling of anionic metabolites by capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81:6165-6174.
25. Bamba T., et al. High throughput and exhaustive analysis of diverse lipids by using supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry for metabolomics. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 105:460-469.
26. Li M., et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:2117-2122.
27. Dona A.C., et al. Precision high-throughput proton NMR spectroscopy of human urine, serum, and plasma for large-scale metabolic phenotyping. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86:9887-9894.
28. Goossens A., et al. A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:8595-8600.
29. Hirai M.Y., et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:10205-10210.
30. Joyce A.R., Palsson B.O. The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:198-210.
31. Ishii N., et al. Multiple high-throughput analyses monitor the response of E. coli to perturbations. Science 2007, 316:593-597.
32. Palsson B., Zengler K. The challenges of integrating multi-omic data sets. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6:787-789.
33. Gerosa L., Sauer U. Regulation and control of metabolic fluxes in microbes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22:566-575.
34. Buescher J.M., et al. Global network reorganization during dynamic adaptations of Bacillus subtilis metabolism. Science 2012, 335:1099-1103.
35. Oliveira A.P., et al. Regulation of yeast central metabolism by enzyme phosphorylation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8:623.
36. Link H., et al. Systematic identification of allosteric protein-metabolite interactions that control enzyme activity in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:357-361.
37. Yugi K., et al. Reconstruction of insulin signal flow from phosphoproteome and metabolome data. Cell Rep. 2014, 8:1171-1183.
38. Wu Y., et al. Multilayered genetic and omics dissection of mitochondrial activity in a mouse reference population. Cell 2014, 158:1415-1430.
39. Davis M.A., et al. A dietary-wide association study (DWAS) of environmental metal exposure in US children and adults. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e104768.
40. Rakyan V.K., et al. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:529-541.
41. Oliveira A.P., et al. Dynamic phosphoproteomics reveals TORC1-dependent regulation of yeast nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis. Sci. Signal. 2015, 8:rs4.
42. Oliveira A.P., et al. Inferring causal metabolic signals that regulate the dynamic TORC1-dependent transcriptome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2015, 11:802.
43. Ideker T., Lauffenburger D. Building with a scaffold: emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21:255-262.
44. Janes K.A., Yaffe M.B. Data-driven modelling of signal-transduction networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:820-828.
45. Janes K.A., Lauffenburger D.A. Models of signalling networks - what cell biologists can gain from them and give to them. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126:1913-1921.
46. Imam S., et al. Data-driven integration of genome-scale regulatory and metabolic network models. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6:409.
47. Schulz J.C., et al. Large-scale functional analysis of the roles of phosphorylation in yeast metabolic pathways. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7:rs6.
48. Kersey P.J., et al. The International Protein Index: an integrated database for proteomics experiments. Proteomics 2004, 4:1985-1988.
49. IUPAC-IUBMB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN) and Nomenclature Committee of IUBMB (NC-IUBMB), newsletter 1999. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 264:607-609. IUBMB.
50. Kasprzyk A. BioMart: driving a paradigm change in biological data management. Database 2011, 2011:bar049.
51. Huang da W., et al. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:44-57.
52. Huang da W., et al. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Unit 13. 11. A.D. Baxevanis (Ed.).
53. Mudunuri U., et al. bioDBnet: the biological database network. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:555-556.
54. Weintz G., et al. The phosphoproteome of toll-like receptor-activated macrophages. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:371.
55. Gerstein M.B., et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature 2012, 489:91-100.
56. Amit I., et al. Unbiased reconstruction of a mammalian transcriptional network mediating pathogen responses. Science 2009, 326:257-263.
57. Suzuki H., et al. The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:553-562.
58. Liao J.C., et al. Network component analysis: reconstruction of regulatory signals in biological systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:15522-15527.
59. Kao K.C., et al. Transcriptome-based determination of multiple transcription regulator activities in Escherichia coli by using network component analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:641-646.
60. Terada A., et al. Statistical significance of combinatorial regulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:12996-13001.
61. Kim H.D., et al. Transcriptional regulatory circuits: predicting numbers from alphabets. Science 2009, 325:429-432.
62. Iyer M.K., et al. The landscape of long noncoding RNAs in the human transcriptome. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47:199-208.
63. Katoh Y., et al. Methionine adenosyltransferase II serves as a transcriptional corepressor of Maf oncoprotein. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:554-566.
64. Shyh-Chang N., et al. Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation. Science 2013, 339:222-226.
65. Obenauer J.C., et al. Scansite 2.0: Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:3635-3641.
66. Blom N., et al. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 2004, 4:1633-1649.
67. Xue Y., et al. GPS 2.0, a tool to predict kinase-specific phosphorylation sites in hierarchy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7:1598-1608.
68. Miller M.L., et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci. Signal. 2008, 1:ra2.
69. Horn H., et al. KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:603-604.
70. Gnad F., et al. PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D253-D260.
71. Song C., et al. Systematic analysis of protein phosphorylation networks from phosphoproteomic data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11:1070-1083.
72. Linding R., et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 2007, 129:1415-1426.
73. Lee T.Y., et al. RegPhos: a system to explore the protein kinase-substrate phosphorylation network in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D777-D787.
74. Huang K.Y., et al. RegPhos 2.0: an updated resource to explore protein kinase-substrate phosphorylation networks in mammals. Database 2014, 2014:bau034.
75. Dinkel H., et al. Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites - update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D261-D267.
76. Hornbeck P.V., et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:D261-D270.
77. Hu J., et al. PhosphoNetworks: a database for human phosphorylation networks. Bioinformatics 2014, 30:141-142.
78. Bandyopadhyay S., et al. A human MAP kinase interactome. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:801-805.
79. Franceschini A., et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D808-D815.
80. Cagney G. Interaction networks: lessons from large-scale studies in yeast. Proteomics 2009, 9:4799-4811.
81. Vidal M., et al. Interactome networks and human disease. Cell 2011, 144:986-998.
82. Rao V.S., et al. Protein-protein interaction detection: methods and analysis. Int. J. Proteomics 2014, 2014:147648.
83. Westermarck J., et al. Identification of protein interactions involved in cellular signaling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12:1752-1763.
84. Shannon P., et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13:2498-2504.
85. Gehlenborg N., et al. Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:S56-S68.
86. Scheer M., et al. BRENDA, the enzyme information system in 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D670-D676.
87. Chang A., et al. BRENDA in 2015: exciting developments in its 25th year of existence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:D439-D446.
88. Huang Z., et al. ASD: a comprehensive database of allosteric proteins and modulators. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D663-D669.
89. Huang Z., et al. ASD v2.0: updated content and novel features focusing on allosteric regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D510-D516.
90. Li X., et al. Extensive in vivo metabolite-protein interactions revealed by large-scale systematic analyses. Cell 2010, 143:639-650.
91. Gallego O., et al. A systematic screen for protein-lipid interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:430.
92. Feng Y., et al. Global analysis of protein structural changes in complex proteomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:1036-1044.
93. Uetz P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000, 403:623-627.
94. Walhout A.J., et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 2000, 287:116-122.
95. Ito T., et al. Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: a comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:1143-1147.
96. Ito T., et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98:4569-4574.
97. Liu E.T. Integrative biology - a strategy for systems biomedicine. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:64-68.
98. Antony P.M., et al. From systems biology to systems biomedicine. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:604-608.
99. Fitzgerald J.B., et al. Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2:458-466.
100. Kitano H. A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6:202-210.
101. Galas D.J., Hood L. Systems biology and emerging technologies will catalyze the transition from reactive medicine to predictive, personalized, preventive and participatory (P4) medicine. Interdiscip. Biol. Central 2009, 1:6.
102. Auffray C., et al. Predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine: back to the future. Genome Med. 2010, 2:57.
103. Bloss C.S., et al. Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genetics Med. 2010, 12:556-566.
104. Whitcomb D.C. What is personalized medicine and what should it replace?. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 9:418-424.
105. Chapman S.J., Hill A.V.S. Human genetic susceptibility to infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:175-188.
106. Stranger B.E., et al. Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics. Genetics 2011, 187:367-383.
107. Aberg K.A., et al. Methylome-wide association study of schizophrenia: identifying blood biomarker signatures of environmental insults. JAMA Psychiatry 2014, 71:255-264.
108. Wayengera M. On the general theory of the origins of retroviruses. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2010, 7:5.
109. Holmes E., et al. Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure. Nature 2008, 453:396-400.
110. Cantoria M.J., et al. Contextual inhibition of fatty acid synthesis by metformin involves glucose-derived acetyl-CoA and cholesterol in pancreatic tumor cells. Metabolomics 2014, 10:91-104.
111. Qin J., et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490:55-60.
112. Tzoulaki I., et al. A nutrient-wide association study on blood pressure. Circulation 2012, 126:2456-2464.
113. Patel C.J., et al. An environment-wide association study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e10746.
114. Pendergrass S.A., et al. Phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) for detection of pleiotropy within the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Network. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003087.
115. Brem R.B., et al. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 2002, 296:752-755.
116. Goring H.H., et al. Discovery of expression QTLs using large-scale transcriptional profiling in human lymphocytes. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:1208-1216.
117. Foss E.J., et al. Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:1369-1375.
118. Picotti P., et al. A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature 2013, 494:266-270.
119. Dumas M.E., et al. Direct quantitative trait locus mapping of mammalian metabolic phenotypes in diabetic and normoglycemic rat models. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:666-672.
120. Illig T., et al. A genome-wide perspective of genetic variation in human metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:137-141.
121. Kebede M.A., Attie A.D. Insights into obesity and diabetes at the intersection of mouse and human genetics. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 25:493-501.
122. Wen W., et al. Metabolome-based genome-wide association study of maize kernel leads to novel biochemical insights. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3438.
123. Riedelsheimer C., et al. Genome-wide association mapping of leaf metabolic profiles for dissecting complex traits in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:8872-8877.
124. Wang K., et al. Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:843-854.
125. Hara K., et al. Genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 452:213-220.
126. Nuzhdin S.V., et al. Genotype-phenotype mapping in a post-GWAS world. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:421-426.
127. Califano A., et al. Leveraging models of cell regulation and GWAS data in integrative network-based association studies. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44:841-847.
128. Dobrin R., et al. Multi-tissue coexpression networks reveal unexpected subnetworks associated with disease. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:R55.
129. Andreux P.A., et al. Systems genetics of metabolism: the use of the BXD murine reference panel for multiscalar integration of traits. Cell 2012, 150:1287-1299.
130. Chen R., et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 2012, 148:1293-1307.
131. Gillet L.C., et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. O111.016717.
132. Wisniewski J.R., et al. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:359-362.
133. Kochanowski K., et al. Posttranslational regulation of microbial metabolism. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 27:10-17.
134. Kusano M., et al. Metabolomic approaches toward understanding nitrogen metabolism in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:1439-1453.
135. Manning G., et al. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298:1912-1934.