Building with a scaffold: Emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 255-262

  Ideker, Trey ^a   Lauffenburger, Douglas ^b  

^a WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; METABOLISM; SCAFFOLDS;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

DNA; PROTEIN;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

BIOLOGY; COMPUTER MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0037716676     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00115-X     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Altschul S.F., et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:1990;403-410.
2. Guarente L. Synthetic enhancement in gene interaction: a genetic tool come of age. Trends Genet. 9:1993;362-366.
3. Karp P.D. Pathway databases: a case study in computational symbolic theories. Science. 293:2001;2040-2044.
4. Hucka M., et al. The ERATO systems biology workbench: enabling interaction and exchange between software tools for computational biology. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 1:2002;450-461.
5. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 340:1989;245-246.
6. Uetz P., et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
7. Gavin A.C., et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 415:2002;141-147.
8. Ho Y., et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 415:2002;180-183.
9. Rain J.C., et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature. 409:2001;211-215.
10. Walhout A.J., et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science. 287:2000;116-122.
11. Bader G.D., et al. BIND - the biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;242-245.
12. Xenarios I., Eisenberg D. Protein interaction databases. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:2001;334-339.
13. Deane C.M., et al. Protein interactions: two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 1:2002;349-356.
14. Lee T.I., et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 298:2002;799-804.
15. MacBeath G., Schreiber S.L. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science. 289:2000;1760-1763.
16. Zhu H., et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science. 293:2001;2101-2105.
17. Haab B.B., et al. Protein microarrays for highly parallel detection and quantitation of specific proteins and antibodies in complex solutions. Genome Biol. 2:2001;. research0004.1-00041.13.
18. DeRisi J.L., et al. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science. 278:1997;680-686.
19. Gygi S.P., et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:1999;994-999.
20. Zhou H., et al. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;375-378.
21. Griffin J.L., et al. Choline containing metabolites during cell transfection: an insight into magnetic resonance spectroscopy detectable changes. FEBS Lett. 509:2001;263-266.
22. Nicholson J.K., et al. Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1:2002;153-161.
23. Wingender E., et al. The TRANSFAC system on gene expression regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2001;281-283.
24. Karp P.D., et al. The MetaCyc database. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;59-61.
25. Jansen R., et al. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12:2002;37-46.
26. Ideker T., et al. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 18:(Suppl.):2002;S233-S240.
27. Hanisch D., et al. Co-clustering of biological networks and gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 18:(Suppl.):2002;S145-S154.
28. Pe'er D., et al. Minreg: inferring an active regulator set. Bioinformatics. 18:(Suppl.):2002;S258-S267.
29. Jenssen T.K., et al. A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 28:2001;21-28.
30. Matthews L.R., et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or 'interologs'. Genome Res. 11:2001;2120-2126.
31. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. (in press).
32. Karp P.D., et al. The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics. 18:(Suppl.):2002;S225-S232.
33. Sarkar C.A., et al. Rational cytokine design for increased lifetime and enhanced potency using pH-activated 'histidine switching'. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:2002;908-913.
34. Shvartsman S.Y., et al. Modeling and computational analysis of EGF receptor-mediated cell communication in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 129:2002;2577-2589.
35. Bhalla U.S., et al. MAP kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling network. Science. 297:2002;1018-1023.
36. Schoeberl B., et al. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:2002;370-375.
37. Golze U. VLSI Chip Design with the Hardware Description Language VERILOG: an Introduction Based on a Large RISC Processor Design. 1996;Springer-Verlag.
38. Banzhaf W. Computer-Aided Circuit Analysis Using Pspice. 1992;Prentice-Hall.
39. Friedman N., et al. Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. J. Comput. Biol. 7:2000;601-620.
40. Hartemink A.J., et al. Using graphical models and genomic expression data to statistically validate models of genetic regulatory networks. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 1:2001;422-433.
41. Sachs K., et al. Bayesian network approach to cell signaling pathway modeling. Sci. STKE. 148:2002;E38. http://www.stke.org/cgi/content/full/sigtrans;2002/148/pe38.
42. Huang S., Ingber D.E. Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. Exp. Cell Res. 261:2000;91-103.
43. Ronen M., et al. Assigning numbers to the arrows: parameterizing a gene regulation network by using accurate expression kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;10555-10560.
44. Ideker T., et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analysis of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science. 292:2001;929-934.
45. Palecek S.P., et al. Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness. Nature. 385:1997;537-540.
46. DiMilla P.A., et al. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 60:1991;15-37.
47. Flanagan A., et al. A Revolution in R&D: How Genomics and Genetics are Transforming the Biopharmaceutical Industry. 2001;Boston Consulting Group.