Genotype-phenotype mapping in a post-GWAS world

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 421-426

  Nuzhdin, Sergey V ^a   Friesen, Maren L ^a   McIntyre, Lauren M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allele specific expression; Cis regulatory polymorphism; Gene regulatory network; Genotype to phenotype map; Quantitative variation; Trans effect

Indexed keywords

YOLK PROTEIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DROSOPHILA; FLOWERING; FLY; GENE FUNCTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOTYPE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; SEX DETERMINATION PROCESS; SHORT SURVEY; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING;

ANIMALS; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

EID: 84865154374     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.06.003     Document Type: Short Survey

References (50)

1. Zhu J., et al. Stitching together multiple data dimensions reveals interacting metabolomic and transcriptomic networks that modulate cell regulation. PLoS Biol. 2010, 10:e1001301.
2. Schadt E., et al. Mapping the genetic architecture of gene expression in human liver. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e107.
3. Cooper G.M., Shendure J. Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:628-640.
4. Yan H., et al. Allelic variation in human gene expression. Science 2002, 297:1143.
5. Serre D., et al. Differential allelic expression in the human genome: a robust approach to identify genetic and epigenetic cis-acting mechanisms regulating gene expression. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000006.
6. Emilsson V., et al. Genetics of gene expression and its effect on disease. Nature 2008, 452:423-428.
7. Pickrell J.K., et al. Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature 2010, 464:768-772.
8. Genissel A., et al. Cis and trans regulatory effects contribute to natural variation in transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 251:101-110.
9. Main B.J., et al. Allele-specific expression assays using Solexa. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:422.
10. Graze R.M., et al. Regulatory divergence in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, a genome-wide analysis of allele-specific expression. Genetics 2009, 183:547-561.
11. Graze R.M., et al. Allelic imbalance in Drosophila hybrid heads: exons, isoforms and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1521-1532.
12. Wittkopp P.J., et al. Evolutionary changes in cis and trans gene regulation. Nature 2004, 430:85-88.
13. Wittkopp P.J., et al. Intraspecific polymorphism to interspecific divergence: genetics of pigmentation in Drosophila. Science 2009, 326:540-544.
14. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits 1998, Sunderland.
15. Tu Z., et al. An integrative approach for causal gene identification and gene regulatory pathway inference. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:489-496.
16. Nuzhdin S.V., et al. Natural genetic variation in transcriptome reflects network structure inferred with major effect mutations: insulin/TOR and associated phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:124.
17. Li Y., et al. Critical reasoning on causal inference in genome-wide linkage and association studies. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:493-498.
18. Tarone A.M., et al. Genetic variation in the Yolk protein expression network of Drosophila melanogaster: sex-biased negative correlations with longevity. Heredity 2012, 10.1038/hdy.2012.34.
19. Cline T.W., Meyer B.J. Vive la difference: males vs females in flies vs worms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1996, 30:637-702.
20. Kozak M. Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene 1999, 234:187-208.
21. McIntyre L.M., et al. Sex-specific expression of alternative transcripts in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2006, 7:R79.
22. Tarone A.M., et al. Genetic variation for expression of the sex determination pathway genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 2005, 86:31-40.
23. Burtis K.C., et al. The Doublesex proteins of Drosophila melanogaster bind directly to a sex-specific yolk protein gene enhancer. EMBO J. 1991, 10:2577-2582.
24. Cooper M., et al. The GP problem: quantifying gene-to-phenotype relationships. In Silico Biol. 2002, 2:151-164.
25. Koduru P., et al. A multiobjective evolutionary-simplex hybrid approach for the optimization of differential equation models of gene networks IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 2008, 12:572-590.
26. Sinclair T.R., Seligman N.G. Crop modeling, from infancy to maturity. Agron. J. 1996, 88:698-704.
27. Hammer G.L., et al. On systems thinking, systems biology and the in silico plant. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134:909-911.
28. Welch S.M., et al. A genetic neural network model of flowering time control in Arabidopsis thaliana. Agron. J. 2003, 95:71-81.
29. Welch S.M., et al. Flowering time control: gene network modeling and the link to quantitative genetics. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2005, 56:919-936.
30. Welch S.M., et al. Merging genomic control networks with soil-plant-atmosphere-continuum (SPAC) models. Agric. Syst. 2005, 86:243-274.
31. Ravasz E., et al. Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 2002, 297:1551-1555.
32. Locke J.C.W., et al. Modelling genetic networks with noisy and varied experimental data: the circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 234:383-393.
33. Locke J.C.W., et al. Extension of a genetic network model by iterative experimentation and mathematical analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2005, 1:1.
34. Liu Y., et al. Evolutionary pattern of the regulatory network for flower development: Insights gained from a comparison of two Arabidopsis species. J. Syst. Evol. 2011, 49:528-538.
35. Chaibub Neto E., et al. Inferring causal phenotype networks from segregating populations. Genetics 2008, 179:1089-1100.
36. Chaibub Neto E., et al. Causal graphical models in systems genetics: a unified framework for joint inference of causal network and genetic architecture for correlated phenotypes. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2010, 4:320-339.
37. Bing N., Hoeschele I. Genetical genomics analysis of a yeast segregant population for transcription network inference. Genetics 2005, 170:533-542.
38. Wright S. The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 1934, 5:161-215.
39. Hatcher L.A. Step by Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling 1994, SAS Institute.
40. Liu B., et al. Gene network inference via structural equation modeling in genetical genomics experiments. Genetics 2008, 178:1763-1776.
41. Joreskog K., Yang F. Non-linear Structural Equation Models: The Kenny-Judd Model with Interaction Effects. Advanced structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications 1996, SAGE Publications.
42. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables 1989, Wiley.
43. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications 1995, SAGE Publications. R.H. Hoyle (Ed.).
44. Kaplan, D. (2000) Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences series 10, SAGE Publications.
45. Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2007, 42:815-824.
46. Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88:588-600.
47. Testing Structural Equation Models 1993, SAGE Publications. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
48. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 1998, 3:424-453.
49. Srikanth A., Schmid M. Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68:2013-2037.
50. Yaish M.W., et al. The role of epigenetic processes in controlling flowering time in plants exposed to stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3727-3735.