An importance-performance analysis of hospital information system attributes: A nurses' perspective

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 86, Issue , 2016, Pages 82-90

  Cohen, Jason F ^a   Coleman, Emma ^a   Kangethe, Matheri J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Data quality; Hospital information system; Importance performance analysis; Information quality; Service quality; System quality; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

HOSPITALS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NURSING; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

DATA QUALITY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; IMPORTANCE-PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION QUALITY; SERVICE QUALITY; SYSTEM QUALITY; USER SATISFACTION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SATISFACTION; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASK PERFORMANCE; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84955306083     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abalo J., Varela J., Manzano V. Importance values for importance-performance analysis: a formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60(2):115-121.
2. Aggelidis V.P., Chatzoglou P.D. Methods for evaluating hospital information systems: a literature review. EuroMed J. Bus. 2008, 3(1):99-118.
3. Amoako-Gyampah K., Salam A.F. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inf. Manage. 2004, 41(6):731-745.
4. Ammenwerth E., Gräber S., Herrmann G., Bürkle T., König J. Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003, 71(2):125-135.
5. Ash J.S., Sittig D.F., Dykstra R., Campbell E., Guappone K. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78:S69-S76.
6. Ayatollahi H., Bath P.A., Goodacre S. Paper-based versus computer-based records in the emergency department: staff preferences, expectations, and concerns. Health Inform. J. 2009, 15(3):199-211.
7. Ayatollahi H., Bath P.A., Goodacre S. Factors influencing the use of IT in the emergency department: a qualitative study. Health Inform. J. 2010, 16(3):189-200.
8. Bacon D.R. A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. Int. J. Market Res. 2003, 45(1):55-72.
9. Bailey J.E., Pearson S.W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 1983, 29(5):530-545.
10. Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001, 351-370.
11. Blumenthal D., Glaser J.P. Information technology comes to medicine. N. Eng. J. Med. 2007, 356(24):2527-2534.
12. Booth R.G. Examining the functionality of the DeLone and McLean information system success model as a framework for synthesis in nursing information and communication technology research. Comput. Inform.Nurs. 2012, 30(6):330-345.
13. Bossen C., Jensen L.G., Udsen F.W. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013, 82(10):940-953.
14. Brown S.A., Massey A.P., Montoya-Weiss M.M., Burkman J.R. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2002, 11(4):283-295.
15. Bush M., Lederer A.L., Li X., Palmisano J., Rao S. The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78(7):446-456.
16. Chang I., Li Y.C., Wu T.Y., Yen D.C. Electronic medical record quality and its impact on user satisfaction-healthcare providers' point of view. Gov. Inf. Q. 2012, 29(2):235-242.
17. Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S., Maglione M., et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144(10):742-752.
18. Chow S.K., Chin W.Y., Lee H.Y., Leung H.C., Tang F.H. Nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital. J. Clin. Nurs. 2012, 21(11-12):1685-1696.
19. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3(1):60-95.
20. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19(4):9-30.
21. Doll W.J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inf. Manage. 1998, 33(4):171-185.
22. Gable G.G., Sedera D., Chan T. Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-impact measurement model. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2008, 9(7):18.
23. Ghahramani N., Lendel I., Haque R., Sawruk K. User satisfaction with computerized order entry system and its effect on workplace level of stress. J. Med. Syst. 2009, 33(3):199-205.
24. Gruber D., Cummings G.G., Leblanc L., Smith D.L. Factors influencing outcomes of clinical information systems implementation: a systematic review. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2009, 27(3):151-163.
25. Gustafsson A., Johnson M.D. Determining attribute importance in a service satisfaction model. J. Serv. Res. 2004, 7(2):124-141.
26. Hair J.F., Ringle C.M., Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19(2):139-152.
27. Häyrinen K., Saranto K., Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(5):291-304.
28. He J. Technology adoption in hospitals-the roles of system integration and technology support. Proceedings of the Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems 2014.
29. Holden R.J., Karsh B.T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inform. 2010, 43(1):159-172.
30. Holden R.J., Brown R.L., Scanlon M.C., Karsh B.T. Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2012, 19(6):1050-1058.
31. Hsieh J.P.A., Wang W. Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2007, 16(3):216-227.
32. Huryk L.A. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J. Nurs. Manag. 2010, 18(5):606-612.
33. Ives B., Olson M.H., Baroudi J.J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Commun. ACM 1983, 26(10):785-793.
34. Jha A.K., DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., Donelan K., et al. Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360(16):1628-1638.
35. Klein K.J., Sorra J.S. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1996, 21(4):1055-1080.
36. Kimiafar K., Sadoughi F., Sheikhtaheri A., Sarbaz M. Prioritizing factors influencing nurses' satisfaction with hospital information systems: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2014, 32(4):174-181.
37. Kossman S.P. Perceptions of impact of electronic health records on nurses' work. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006, 122:337-341.
38. Kossman S.P., Scheidenhelm S.L. Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2008, 26(2):69-77.
39. Lee T.T., Mills M.E., Bausell B., Lu M.H. Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(10):698-707.
40. Lu C.H., Hsiao J.L., Chen R.F. Factors determining nurse acceptance of hospital information systems. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2012, 30(5):257-264.
41. Markus M.L., Axline S., Petrie D., Tanis S.C. Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved. J. Inf. Technol. 2000, 15(4):245-265.
42. Martilla J.A., James J.C. Importance-performance analysis. J. Mark. 1977, 77-79.
43. Matzler K., Fuchs M., Schubert A. Employee satisfaction: does Kano's model apply?. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 2004, 15(9-10):1179-1198.
44. Nah F.F.H., Lau J.L.S., Kuang J. Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Bus. Process Manage. J. 2001, 7(3):285-296.
45. Nelson R.R., Todd P.A., Wixom B.H. Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2005, 21(4):199-235.
46. Ng B.Y., Kankanhalli A. IT impact on individual work: a study in the context of healthcare services. ICIS Proc. 2009, 111.
47. Oroviogoicoechea C., Elliott B., Watson R. Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008, 17(5):567-575.
48. Otieno O.G., Toyama H., Asonuma M., Kanai-Pak M., Naitoh K. Nurses' views on the use, quality and user satisfaction with electronic medical records: questionnaire development. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 60(2):209-219.
49. Pai F.Y., Huang K.I. Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 2011, 78(4):650-660.
50. Patterson E.S., Rogers M.L., Tomolo A.M., Wears R.L., Tsevat J. Comparison of extent of use, information accuracy, and functions for manual and electronic patient status boards. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2010, 79(12):817-823.
51. Petter S., DeLone W., McLean E. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2008, 17(3):236-263.
52. Poissant L., Pereira J., Tamblyn R., Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005, 12(5):505-516.
53. Poon E.G., Blumenthal D., Jaggi T., Honour M.M., Bates D.W., Kaushal R. Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in US hospitals. Health Aff. 2004, 23(4):184-190.
54. Ribière V., LaSalle A.J., Khorramshahgol R., Gousty Y. Hospital information systems quality: a customer satisfaction assessment tool. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences 1999, 10.1109/HICSS.1999.773011.
55. Seddon P.B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 1997, 8(3):240-253.
56. Smith R., Deppa B. Two dimensions of attribute importance. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26(1):28-38.
57. Smith D., Morris A., Janke J. Nursing satisfaction and attitudes with computerized software implementation: a quasi-experimental study. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2011, 29(4):245-250.
58. Suomi R., Raitoharju R. Computer and stress in social and healthcare industries. E-health Systems Diffusion and Use 2006, 61-92. Idea Group.
59. Stevenson J.E., Nilsson G.C., Petersson G.I., Johansson P.E. Nurses' experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: a literature review. Health Inform. J. 2010, 16(1):63-72.
60. Thompson D., Johnston P., Spurr C. The impact of electronic medical records on nursing efficiency. J. Nurs. Adm. 2009, 39(10):444-451.
61. Top M., Gider Ö. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction. J. Med. Syst. 2012, 36(3):1979-1988.
62. Torkzadeh G., Doll W.J. The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. Omega 1999, 27(3):327-339.
63. Van Der Meijden M.J., Tange H.J., Troost J., Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003, 10(3):235-243.
64. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
65. Waneka R., Spetz J. Hospital information technology systems' impact on nurses and nursing care. J. Nurs. Adm. 2010, 40(12):509-514.
66. Wixom B.H., Todd P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 2005, 16(1):85-102.
67. Doll W.J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 1988, 12(2):259-274.