Two-stage evaluation of the impact of a nursing information system in Taiwan

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 698-707

  Lee, Ting Ting ^a   Mills, Mary Etta ^b   Bausell, Barker ^b   Lu, Ming Hui ^c,d  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c MACKAY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d NURSING AND MANAGEMENT COLLEGE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Computerized nursing care plan; Evaluation; Nursing information system; Technology

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; NURSING; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PLANNING; STAGES; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNOLOGY;

COMPUTER SKILLS; COMPUTERIZED NURSING CARE PLAN; CRITICAL FACTORS; DATA COMPARISONS; EDUCATION PROGRAMS; EVALUATION; HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; NURSING CARE; NURSING INFORMATION SYSTEM; POST-IMPLEMENTATION; STAFF TRAINING; SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITIES; SYSTEM INSTALLATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TWO STAGES;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NURSING INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TAIWAN;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; HUMANS; NURSES; NURSING INFORMATICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TAIWAN;

EID: 48949087617     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Handly M., Grubb S., Keefe N., and Martin K. Essential activities for implementing a clinical information system in public health nursing. J. Nurs. Adm. 33 1 (2003) 14-16
2. Knoedler J. IT integration transforms the care continuum. Nurs. Manage. 34 Suppl. 8 (2003) 10
3. Dienemann J., and Van de Castle B. The impact of healthcare informatics on the organization. J. Nurs. Adm. 33 11 (2003) 557-562
4. Hamilton A., Coyle G., and Heinen M. Applied technology rounds out e-documentation. Nurs. Manage. 35 9 (2004) 44-47
5. Cohen S. Technology's important, but nursing's irreplaceable. Nurs. Manage. 35 12 (2004) 12
6. Kirkley D., and Rewick D. Evaluating clinical information systems. J. Nurs. Adm. 33 12 (2003) 643-651
7. Moody L.E., Slocumb E., Berg B., and Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 22 6 (2004) 337-344
8. van der Meijden M.J., Tange H.J., Troost J., and Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 3 (2003) 235-243
9. Korst L.M., Eusebio-Angeja A.C., Chamorro T., Aydin C.E., and Gregory K.D. Nursing documentation time during implementation of an electronic medical record. J. Nurs. Adm. 33 1 (2003) 24-30
10. Lising M., and Kennedy C. A multimethod approach to evaluating critical care information systems. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 23 1 (2005) 27-37
11. Bosma R.J., Rood E., Oudemansvan S., Van der Spoel J.I., Wester J.P.J., and Zandstra D.F. Intensive care information system reduces documentation time of the nurses after cardiothoracic surgery. Intensive Care Med. 29 1 (2003) 83-90
12. Smith K., Smith V., Krugman M., and Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 23 3 (2005) 132-138
13. Lee T., Yeh C., and Ho L. Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. J. Adv. Nurs. 39 1 (2002) 61-67
14. Darbyshire P. "Rage against the machine?" Nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. J. Clin. Nurs. 13 1 (2004) 17-25
15. Hunt E.C., Sproat S.B., and Kitzmiller R.R. The Nursing Informatics Implementation Guide (2004), Springer, New York
16. Lewin K. Field theory in social science (1951), Harper & Row, New York
17. Bozak M.G. Using Lewin's force field analysis in implementing a nursing information system. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 21 2 (2003) 80-85
18. Lee T. Adopting a personal digital assistant system: application of Lewin's change theory. J. Adv. Nurs. 55 4 (2006) 487-496
19. Alpay L., and Russell A. Information technology training in primary care: the nurses' voice. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 20 4 (2002) 136-142
20. Ammenwerth E., Mansmann U., Iller C., and Eichstadter R. Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 1 (2003) 69-84
21. Hughes R.A. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. J. Adv. Nurs. 42 4 (2003) 340-346
22. Jenkins D. Protecting patient privacy in the age of instant access. Clin. Nurse. Spec. 16 4 (2002) 178-179
23. Gallapher P.M. Maintain privacy with electronic charting. Nurs. Manage. 35 2 (2004) 16-17
24. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. (2005), Free Press, New York
25. Lee T. Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model. Appl. Nurs. Res. 17 4 (2004) 231-238
26. Dillon T.W., Blankenship R., and Crews T. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 23 3 (2005) 139-145
27. Lee T., Lee T., Lin K., and Chang P. Factors affecting the use of nursing information systems in Taiwan. J. Adv. Nurs. 50 2 (2005) 170-178
28. Husting P.M., and Cintron L. Healthcare information systems: education lessons learned. J. Nurses Staff Dev. 19 5 (2003) 253-257
29. Bartholomew K., and Curtis K. High-tech, high-touch: why wait?. Nurs. Manage. 35 9 (2004) 48-54
30. Langowski C. The times they are a changing: effects of online nursing documentation systems. Qual. Manage. Health Care 14 2 (2005) 121-125
31. Hortman P.A., and Thompson C.B. Evaluation of user interface satisfaction of a clinical outcomes database. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 23 6 (2005) 301-307
32. Poissant L., Pereira J., Tamblyn R., and Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 5 (2005) 505-516
33. Lee T. Evaluation of computerized nursing care plan: instrument development. J. Prof. Nurs. 20 4 (2004) 230-238
34. Lee T. Nurses' concerns about using information systems: analysis of comments on a computerized nursing care plan system in Taiwan. J. Clin. Nurs. 14 3 (2005) 344-353
35. Lee T. Nurses' perceptions of their documentation experiences in a computerized nursing care planning system. J. Clin. Nurs. 15 11 (2006) 1376-1382
36. Duffy M.E., and Jacobsen B.S. Univariate descriptive statistics. In: Munro B.H. (Ed). Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 5th ed. (2005), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 33-72
37. Kumar R. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (1996), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA