Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 650-660

  Pai, Fan Yun ^a   Huang, Kai I ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Healthcare information system; Information system success model; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; HEALTH CARE INFORMATION SYSTEM; HEALTH-CARE SYSTEM; HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY; HOSPITAL NURSE; INFORMATION QUALITY; INFORMATION SYSTEM SUCCESS MODEL; MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS; PERCEIVED EASE-OF-USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS; RAPID DEVELOPMENT; SEM; SYSTEM QUALITY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM); THREE DIMENSIONS;

HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION USE; MEDICAL COMPUTING; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

EID: 79952693803     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-years update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19(4):9-30.
2. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 2000, 46(2):186-204.
3. Chang M., Lin J.S., Chang Y.M., Lee T.T. Applications of nursing information systems: Sharing the experience of implementation in a hospital. J. Nurs. 2008, 55(3):75-80.
4. Raghupathi W., Tan J. Strategic uses of information technology in health care: A state-of-the-art survey. Top Health Manage 1999, 20(1):1-15.
5. Hsiao J.L., Chang I.C. An empirical study of establishing nursing care plan systems. J. Inf. Manage. 2005, 12(2):27-43.
6. Choe J.M. The relationship among performance of accounting information systems: influence factors, and evolution level of information systems. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 1996, 12(4):215-239.
7. Li T.Z., Wang R.H., Hsu S.S., Chen L.F., Chang H.Y. Information technology and nursing: Using PDAs in clinical nursing care. J. Nurs. 1998, 45(1):69-76.
8. Lai H.L., Chen L. Nurse satisfaction with the clinical use of personal digital assistant. TZU CHI Med. J. 2003, 15(2):97-103.
9. Dillon T.W., Lending D., Crews T.R., Blankenship R. Nursing self-efficacy of an integrated clinical and administrative information system, CIN: Computers. Inform. Nurs. 2003, 21(4):198-205.
10. Tsai Y.J., Wu S., Chiang B.C. Exploring factors affecting the performance of hospital information systems. J. Inf. Manage. 2004, 11(2):191-210.
11. Mehmert P.A., Dickel C.A., Mckeighen R.J. Computerizing nursing diagnosis. Nurs. Manage. 1989, 20(7):24-30.
12. R.L., Simpson C.A. Administrative application of information technology for nursing managers. Essentials of nursing informatics 2005, McGraw Hill, Boston. V.K. Saba, K.A. McCormick (Eds.).
13. Hortman P.A., Thompson C.B. Evaluation of user interface satisfaction of a clinical outcomes database. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2005, 23(6):301-307.
14. Lee T.T., Yeh C.H., Ho L.H. Application of a computerized nursing care plan system in one hospital: Experiences of ICU nurses in Taiwan. J. Adv. Nurs. 2002, 39(1):61-67.
15. Lising M., Kennedy C. An multi method approach to evaluating critical care information systems. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2005, 23(1):27-37.
16. Lee T.T., Lee T.Y., Lin K.C., Chang P.C. Factors affecting the use of nursing information systems in Taiwan. J. Clin. Nurs. 2005, 50(2):170-178.
17. Alquraini H., Alhashem A.M., Shah M.A., Chowdhury R.I. Factors influencing nurse's attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systemsin Kuwaiti hospitals. J. Adv. Nurs. 2007, 57(4):375-378.
18. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
19. Ajzen I. From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior 1985, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. J. Huhl, J. Bechmann (Eds.).
20. Ajzen I. Attitude structure & behavior. Attitude structure and function 1989, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. A.R. Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler, A.G. Greenwald (Eds.).
21. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13(3):319-340.
22. Kwon O., Wen Y. An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26(2):254-263.
23. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two. Manage. Sci. 1989, 35(8):982-1003.
24. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., Wong W.M., Tam K.Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and systems characteristics. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2002, 18(3):97-124.
25. Lewis W., Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V. Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q. 2003, 27(4):657-678.
26. Hasan B., Ahmed M.U. Effects of interface style on user perceptions and behavioral intention to use computer systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23(6):3025-3037.
27. Hsu C.L., Lu H.P. Consumer behavior in online game communities: A motivational factor perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23(3):1642-1659.
28. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Q. 1997, 2(13):279-305.
29. Jackson C., Chow S., Leitch R. Toward and understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decis. Sci. 1997, 31(2):291-311.
30. Lucas H.C., Spitler V.K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decis. Sci. 1999, 30(2):291-311.
31. Luarn P., Lin H.H. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2005, 21(6):873-891.
32. Lee S., Kim B.G. Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25(1):191-201.
33. DeLone W.H., McLean E.R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3(1):60-95.
34. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1949, University of Illinois Pres. London, IL.
35. Mason R.O. Measuring information output: A communication system approach. Inf. Manage. 1978, 1(5):219-234.
36. Pitt L.F., Watson R.T., Kavan C.B. Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 1995, 19(2):173-188.
37. McGill T., Hobbs V., Klobas J. User-developed applications and information systems success: A test of DeLone and McLean model. Inf. Resour. Manage. J. 2003, 16(1):24-45.
38. Ahn T., Ruy S., Han I. The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2004, 3(4):405-420.
39. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 22(14):1111-1132.
40. Chou J.H. Using DeLone and McLean model to analyze determinants of portal sites success. J. Inf. Manage. Concepts Syst. Appl. 2006, 8(1):109-132.
41. Gefen D., Keil M. The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: An extension of the technology acceptance model. DATA BASE Adv. Inf. Syst. 1998, 29(2):35-49.
42. Zhang X., Prybutok V.R. An empirical study of online shopping: A service perspective. Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manage. 2004, 5(1):1-13.
43. Chiou Y.W., Fang G.D. A study of web portal user behavior. Web J. Chin. Manage. Rev. 2005, 8(1):43-60.
44. Hung S.Y., Liang T.P., Chang C.M. A meta-analysis of empirical research using TAM. J. Inf. Manage. 2005, 12(4):211-234.
45. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 1991, 2(3):173-191.
46. Tsai C.H., Chih W.H., Hsu W.L. Using tam to study the personal motivations and social context factors influence the acceptance of knowledge management systems-based on high technology firms' samples. Electron. Commer. Stud. 2007, 5(1):81-108.
47. Lee W.I., Chao P.J. The research of information Technology Acceptance Model of electronic patient record system in health care industry's employees-An example of central and southern Taiwan. Health Manage. 2004, 5(2):243-269.
48. Chen Y.C., Shang R.N., Ho T.Y., Hesieh S.C. The behavioral intention to use e systems for employees in public utility company: Analysis based on TAM and TTF. J. E Bus. 2008, 10(1):305-327.
49. Berdie D.R. Reassessing the Value of High Response Rates to Mail Surveys. Mark. Res. 1994, 1(3):52-64.
50. Krejcie R.V., Morgan D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30(1):607-610.
51. Kaiser H.F. An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika 1974, 39(1):31-36.
52. Bagozzi R.P., Yi Y. On the evaluation for structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 23(4):272-277.
53. Byrne B.M. Structural equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SMPLIS 1998, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
54. Hairs J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis 1998, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 5th ed.