A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance

Information Systems Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 85-102

  Wixom, Barbara H ^a   Todd, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Information quality; Information systems success; System quality; Technology acceptance model; Theory of reasoned action; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA WAREHOUSES; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION QUALITY; INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUCCESS; SYSTEM QUALITY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; THEORY OF REASONED ACTION; USER SATISFACTION;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 18944367029     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1050.0042     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Agarwal, R., J. Prasad. 1997. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. 28(3) 557-582.
2. Ajzen, I. 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Rev. Psych. 52 27-58.
3. Ajzen, I., M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4. Ajzen, I., M. Fishbein. In press. The influence of attitudes on behavior. D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, M. P. Zanna, eds. Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude Change: Basic Principles. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Bailey, J. E., S. W. Pearson. 1983. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. 29(5) 530-545.
6. Barclay, D., C. Higgins, R. Thompson. 1995. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling, personal computing adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. 2(2) 285-309.
7. Baroudi, J., W. Orlikowski. 1988. A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and notes on use. J. MIS 4(4) 44-59.
8. Benbasat, I., R. Zmud. 2003. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's Coir properties. MIS Quart, 27(2) 183-194.
9. Chin, W. W. 1998. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1) vii-xvi.
10. Chip, W. W., T. A. Frye. 1996. PLS Graph. 2.91.03.04. Department of Decision and Information Systems, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
11. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3) 319-339.
12. Davis, F. 1993. User acceptance of information technology: Systems characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impact. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. 38 475-487.
13. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8) 982-1003.
14. DeLone, W. H., E. R. McLean. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1) 60-95.
15. Doll, W. J., G. Torkzadeh. 1988. The measure of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. 12(2) 259-274.
16. Eagly, A. H., S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
17. Eckerson, W. W. 2002. Data quality and the bottom lone. The Data Warehousing Institute Report Series. 101 Communications, LLC.
18. Fazio, R. H., M. A. Olson. 2003. Attitudes: Foundation, function and consequences. M. A. Hogg, J. Cooper, eds. The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology. Sage, London, UK.
19. Fishbein, M., I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
20. Fornell, C., D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18 39-50.
21. Galletta, D. F., A. L. Lederer. 1989. Some cautions on the measurement of user information satisfaction. Decision Sci. 20(3) 419-439.
22. Gefen, D., D. Straub. 1997. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quart. 21(4) 389-400.
23. Goodhue, D. L. 1988. IS attitudes: Toward theoretical and definitional clarity. Database Adv. Inform. Systems 19(3/4) 6-15.
24. Haddock, G., M. P. Zanna. 1999. Cognition, affect, and the prediction of social attitudes. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone, eds. Eur. Rev. Soc. Attitudes 10 75-99.
25. Hartwick, J., H. Barki. 1994. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. 40(4) 440-465.
26. Hong, W., J. Thong, W.-M. Wong, K.-Y. Tam. 2001/2002. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and systems characteristics. J. MIS 18(3) 97-124.
27. Igbaria, M., T. Guimaraes, G. B. Davis. 1995. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. J. MIS 11(4) 87-115.
28. Ives, B., M. H. Olson, J. J. Baroudi. 1983. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Comm. ACM 26(10) 785-793.
29. Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, N. L. Chervany. 1999. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. 23(2) 183-213.
30. Kraus, 1995. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21 58-75.
31. Lim, K. H., I. Benbasat. 2000. The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quart. 24(3) 449-471.
32. Lohmoller, Jan-Bernd. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
33. Mathieson, K., E. Peacock, W. W. Chin. 2001. Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. Database Adv. Inform. Systems 32(3) 86-113.
34. Melone, N. 1990. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sci. 36(1) 76-91.
35. Moore, G., I. Benbasat. 1991. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting and information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3) 192-222.
36. Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Orlikowski, W. J., C. S. Iacono. 2001. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research - A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 2(12) 121-134.
38. Plouffe, C. R., J. Hulland, M. Vandenbosch. 2001. Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions: Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2) 208-222.
39. Seddon, P. 1997. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3) 240-253.
40. Szajna, B. 1996. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Sci. 42(1) 85-92.
41. Taylor, S., P. A. Todd. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. 6(2) 144-176.
42. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris. 2000. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. 24 115-139.
43. Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, F. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3) 425-478.
44. Wold, H., K. Joreskog. 1982. Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.