Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1050-1058

  Holden, Richard ^a   Brown, Roger ^b   Scanlon, Matthew ^c   Karsh, Ben Tzion ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAR CODED MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NURSE; NURSE ATTITUDE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICATION SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL;

EID: 84867677860     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000754     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Institute of Medicine. Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
2. Kopp BJ, Erstad BL, Allen ME, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: direct observation approach for detection. Crit Care Med 2006;34:415-25.
3. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events - implications for prevention. JAMA 1995;274:29-34.
4. Walsh KE, Kaushal R, Chessare JB. How to avoid pediatric medication errors: a user's guide to the literature. Arch Dis Childhood 2005;90:698-702.
5. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA 1995;274:35-43.
6. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Patient safety: improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526-34.
7. Oren E, Shaffer ER, Guglielmo BJ. Impact of emerging technologies on medication errors and adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003;60:1447-58.
8. Bates DW. Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals. Br Med J 2000;320:780-91.
9. Wright AA, Katz IT. Bar coding for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2005;353:329-31.
10. Pedersen CA, Gumpper KF. ASHP national survey on informatics: assessment of the adoption and use of pharmacy informatics in U.S. hospitalsd2007. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:2244-64.
11. Karsh B, Wetterneck T, Holden RJ, et al. Bar coding in medication administration. In: Yih Y, ed. Handbook of Healthcare Delivery Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011:47-1-47-17.
12. Poon EG, Cina JL, Churchill W, et al. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:426-34.
13. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. Effect of bar-code technology on the safety of medication administration. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1698-707.
14. Sakowski J, Newman JM, Dozier K. Severity of medication administration errors detected by a bar-code medication administration system. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:1661-6.
15. Helmons PJ, Wargel LN, Daniels CE. Effect of bar-code-assisted medication administration on medication administration errors and accuracy in multiple patient care areas. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009;66:1202-10.
16. Paoletti RD, Suess TM, Lesko MG, et al. Using bar-code technology and medication observation methodology for safer medication administration. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:536-43.
17. Devaraj S, Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Manag Sci 2003;49:273-89.
18. Holden RJ. What stands in the way of technology-mediated patient safety improvements? A study of facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of electronic health records. J Patient Saf 2011;7:193-203.
19. Holden RJ, Karsh B. A theoretical model of health information technology usage behavior with implications for patient safety. Behav Inf Technol 2009;28:21-38.
20. Melas CD, Zampetakis LA, Dimopoulou A, et al. Modeling the acceptance of clinical information systems among hospital medical staff: an extended TAM model. J Biomed Inform 2011;44:553-64.
21. Holden RJ, Brown RL, Alper SJ, et al. That's nice, but what does IT do? Evaluating the impact of bar coded medication administration by measuring changes in the process of care. Int J Ind Ergon 2011;41:370-9.
22. Gooder V. Nurses' perceptions of a (BCMA) bar-coded medication administration system: a case-control study. Online J Nurs Inform 2011:15. http://ojni.org/issues/? p=703
23. Nanji KC, Cina J, Patel N, et al. Overcoming barriers to the implementation of a pharmacy bar code scanning system for medication dispensing: a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:645-50.
24. Koppel R, Wetterneck TB, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:408-23.
25. Vogelsmeier AA, Halbesleben JRB, Scott-Cawiezzel JR. Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:114-19.
26. Miller DF, Fortier CR, Garrison KL. Bar code medication administration technology: characterization of high-alert medication triggers and clinician workarounds. Ann Pharmacother 2010;45:162-8.
27. Patterson ES, Cook RI, Render ML. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:540-53.
28. Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, et al. Compliance with intended use of bar code medication administration in acute and long-term care: an observational study. Hum Factors 2006;48:15-22.
29. Alper SJ, Holden RJ, Scanlon MC, et al. Violation Prevalence after Introduction of a Bar Coded Medication Administration System. Strasbourg, France: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Healthcare Systems Ergonomics and Patient Safety, 2008.
30. Carayon P, Wetterneck TB, Hundt AS, et al. Evaluation of nurse interaction with bar code medication administration technology in the work environment. J Patient Saf 2007;3:34-42.
31. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010;43:159-72.
32. Drolet BC, Lorenzi NM. Translational research: understanding the continuum from bench to bedside. Translational Res 2011;157:1-5.
33. Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, et al. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:82-90.
34. Beasley JW, Holden RJ, Sullivan F. Electronic health records: research into design and implementation. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:604-5.
35. Vest JR. More than just a question of technology: factors related to hospitals' adoption and implementation of health information exchange. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:797-806.
36. Leviss J. H.I.T. Or Miss: Lessons Learned from Health Information Technology Implementations. Chicago, IL: AHIMA Press, 2010.
37. Kitzmiller RR, Anderson RA, McDaniel RR. Making sense of health information technology implementation: a qualitative study protocol. Implementation Sci 2010;5:95.
38. Kaplan B, Harris-Salamone KD. Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16:291-9.
39. Lorenzi NM, Novak LL, Weiss JB, et al. Crossing the implementation chasm: a proposal for bold action. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:290-6.
40. Karsh BT. Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to promote patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:388-94.
41. Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:102-11.
42. Ash J, Anderson NR, Traczy-Hornoch P. People and organizational issues in research systems implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:283-9.
43. Coch L, French JRP Jr. Overcoming resistance to change. Hum Relations 1948;1:512-32.
44. Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics. In: Cartwright D, ed. Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and B. Others Publishers, 1951:188-237.
45. Frambach RT, Schillewaert N. Organizational innovation adoptionda multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. J Business Res 2002;55:163-76.
46. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q 1989;13:319-40.
47. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 2000;46:186-204.
48. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003;27:425-78.
49. Venkatesh V, Speier C, Morris MG. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis Sci 2002;33:297-316.
50. Mirvis PH, Sales AL, Hackett EJ. The implementation and adoption of new technology in organizations - the impact on work, people, and culture. Hum Resource Manag 1991;30:113-39.
51. Lewis LK, Seibold DR. Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Acad Manag Rev 1993;18:322-54.
52. Harrison DA, Mykytyn PP, Riemenschneider CK. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: theory and empirical tests. Inf Syst Res 1997;8:171-95.
53. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edn. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
54. Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci 2008;39:273-315.
55. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:650-72.
56. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of 2 theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989;35:982-1003.
57. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, et al. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quart 2008;32:483-502.
58. Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, et al. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur J Inf Syst 2002;11:283-95.
59. DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 1992;3:60-95.
60. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J MIS 2003;19:9-30.
61. Wixom BH, Todd PA. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf Syst Res 2005;16:85-102.
62. Holden RJ. Social and personal normative influences on healthcare professionals to use information technology: towards a more robust social ergonomics. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2011
63. Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X. Just what the doctor ordered: a revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Manoa, HI: Computer Society Press, 2011.
64. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2000;83:33-60.
65. Bailey JE, Pearson SW. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manag Sci 1983;29:530-45.
66. Carayon P. Chronic effects of job control, supervisor social support, and work pressure on office stress. In: Sauter SL, Murphy LR, eds. Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress. Washington, DC: APA Press, 1995:357-70.
67. Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart 2000;24:115-39.
68. Presser S, Blair J. Survey pretesting: do different methods produce different results? In: Marsden P, ed. Sociology Methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1994:73-104.
69. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al. Survey Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2004.
70. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool For Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
71. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart 1995;19:213-36.
72. Petter S, DeLone WH, McLean ER. Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur J Inf Syst 2008;17:236-63.
73. Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart 2005;29:461-91.
74. Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ 2006;174:1573-8.
75. Simon SR, Soran CS, Kaushal R, et al. Physicians' use of key functions in electronic health records from 2005 to 2007: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:465-70.
76. Timmons S. Nurses resisting information technology. Nurs Inq 2003;10: 257-69.
77. Spil TAM, Schuring RW, Michel-Verkerke MB. Electronic prescription system: do the professionals use it? Int J Healthc Technol Manag 2004;6:32-55.
78. Sittig DF, Wright A, Osheroff JA, et al. Grand challenges in clinical decision support. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:387-92.
79. Aarts J, Doorewaard H, Berg M. Understanding implementation: the case of a computerized physician order entry system in a large Dutch university medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:207-16.
80. Schumacher RM, Lowry SZ. NIST guide to the process approach for improving the usability of electronic health records. Washington, DC: NIST, 2010.
81. Saleem JJ, Patterson ES, Militello L, et al. Impact of clinical reminder redesign on learnability, efficiency, usability, and workload for ambulatory clinic nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:632-40.
82. Fairbanks RJ, Caplan SH, Bishop PA, et al. Usability study of two common defibrillators reveal hazards. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:424-32.
83. Gosbee J, Klancher J, Arnecke B, et al. The role of usability testing in healthcare organizations. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc 45th Annu Meet 2001;45:1308-11.
84. Wixon D, Wilson C. The usability engineering framework for product design and evaluation. In: Helander M, Landauer TK, Prabhu P, eds. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1997:653-88.
85. Rubin JR. Handbook of Usability Testing. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
86. IOM. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems For Better Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2011.
87. Holden RJ. Social and personal normative influences on healthcare professionals to use information technology: towards a more robust social ergonomics. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 2012. Published Online First: 28 March 2011. doi:10.1080/ 1463922X.2010.549249
88. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
89. Carayon P, Cartmill R, Blosky MA, et al. ICU nurses' acceptance of electronic health records. J Am Inform Assoc 2011;18:812-19.
90. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press, 1988.
91. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211.
92. Triandis HC. Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1977.
93. Holden RJ. Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:71-80.
94. Zheng K, Fear K, Chaffee BW, et al. Development and validation of a survey instrument for assessing prescribers' perception of computerized drugedrug interaction alerts. J Am Inform Assoc 2011;18(Suppl 1):i51-61.