Nursing satisfaction and attitudes with computerized software implementation: A quasi-experimental study

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 245-250

  Smith, Denise ^a   Morris, Angelia ^a   Janke, Jill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized documentation; Computerized software implementation; Nursing attitudes; Nursing satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79955602711     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dcfa     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bozak M. Using Lewin's force field analysis in implementing a nursing information system. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(2):80-85.
2. Fraenkel D, Cowie M, Daley P. Quality benefits of an intensive care clinical information system. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(1):120-125. (Pubitemid 36151160)
3. Nahm R, Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(5):220-229.
4. Stronge J, Brodt A. Assessment of nurses' attitudes toward computerization. Comput Nurs. 1985;3(4):154-158.
5. Baringer J. Trying to excel. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(4):207-208.
6. Burkes M. Identifying and relating nurses' attitudes toward computer use. Comput Nurs. 1991;9(5):190-201.
7. Bongartz C. Computer-oriented patient care: a comparison of nurses' attitudes and perceptions. Comput Nurs. 1988;6(5):204-210.
8. McLane S. Designing an EMR planning process based on staff attitudes toward and opinions about computers in healthcare. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(2):85-92. (Pubitemid 40522579)
9. Moody L, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Designing an EMRplanning process based on staff attitudes toward and opinions about computers in healthcare. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337-344.
10. Jayasuriya R, Caputi P. Computer attitude and computer anxiety in nursing: validation of an instrument using an Australian sample. Comput Nurs. 1996;14(6):340-345. (Pubitemid 126766079)
11. Dillon T, McDowell D, Salimian F, Conklin D. Perceived ease of use and usefulness of bedside-computer systems. Comput Nurs. 1998;16(3):151-156. (Pubitemid 128731967)
12. Dillon T, Blankenship R, Crews T. Nursing attitudes and images of electronic patient record systems. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(3):139-145. (Pubitemid 40806638)
13. Smith K, Smith V, Krugman M, Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput Inform Nurs. 2005;23(3):132-138. (Pubitemid 40806637)
14. Brodt A, Stronge J. Nurses' attitudes toward computerization in a mid-western community hospital. Comput Nurs. 1986;4(2):82-86.
15. Sultana N. Nurses' attitudes towards computerization in clinical practice. J Adv Nurs. 1990;15:696-702.
16. McBride S,Nagle L. Attitudes toward computers: a test of construct validity. Comput Nurs. 1996;14(3):164-170.
17. Gardner R, Lundsgaarde H. Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(6):428-438.
18. Kirkley D, Stein M. Nurses and clinical technology: sources of resistance and strategies for acceptance. Nurs Econ. 2004;22(4):216-222.
19. Stricklin M, Bierer S, Struk C. Home care nurses' attitudes toward computers: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Stronge and Brodt instrument. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21(2):103-111.
20. Stockton A, Verhey M. A psychometric examination of the Stronge-Brodt nurses' attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Comput Nurs. 1995;13(3):109-113.