Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 216-227

  Hsieh, J J Po An ^a   Wang, Wei ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Extended use; Infusion; IS continuance model; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547594972     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000663     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ADAM F and O'DOHERTY P (2003) ERP projects: good or bad for SMEs. In Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness (SHANKS G, SEDDON PB and WILLCOCKS P, Eds), pp 275-298, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
2. AL-MUDIMIGH A, ZAIRI M and MASHARI MA (2001) ERP software implementation: an integrative framework. European Journal of Information Systems 10(4), 216-226.
3. BAGCHI S, KANUNGO S and DASGUPTA S (2003) Modeling use of enterprise resource planning systems: a path analytic study. European Journal of Information Systems 12(2), 142-158.
4. BENBASAT I and ZMUD RW (2003) The Identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 183-194.
5. BHATTACHERJEE A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25(3), 351-370.
6. BOUDREAU MC (2003) Learning to use ERP technology: a causal model. Paper presented at the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03).
7. BRISLIN RW, LONNER W and THORNDIKE RM (1973) Cross-Culture Research Method. Wiley, New York.
8. BROWN S, MASSEY A, MONTOYA-WEISS M and BURKMAN J (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems 11(4), 283-295.
9. BROWNE MW and CUDECK R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (BOLLEN PA and LONG JS, Eds), pp 136-162, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
10. CHIN WW and MARCOLIN BL (2001) The future of diffusion research. The DATA BASE for Advances In Information Systems 32(3), 8-12.
11. COOPER RB and ZMUD RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technology diffusion approach. Management Science 36(2), 123-139.
12. DAVENPORT TH (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise System. Harvard Business Review 76(4), 121-131.
13. DAVIS FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(September), 318-340.
14. DAVIS FD, BAGOZZI RP and WARSHAW PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8), 982-1003.
15. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60-95.
16. ENRICHT M, SCOTT E and CHANG KM (2005) Regional Powerhouse: The Greater Pearl River Delta and the Rise of China. San Lian Shu Dian, Hong Kong.
17. FORNELL C and LARCKER DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(February), 39-50.
18. GALLIVAN MJ (2001) Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32(3), 51-85.
19. GATTIKER TF and GOODHUE DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 559-585.
20. GULLA JA (2004) Understanding requirements in enterprise systems projects. Paper presented at the 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Kyoto, Japan.
21. HARTWICK J and BARKI H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 40(4), 440-465.
22. HU L and BENTLER PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria vs new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1-55.
23. IGBARIA M, ZINATELU N, CRAGG P and CAVAYE ALM (1997) Personal Computing acceptance factors In small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21(3), 279-302.
24. JASPERSON JS, CARTER PE and ZMUD RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 525-557.
25. KARAHANNA E (1999) Symbolic adoption of information technology. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Decision Sciences International Conference, Athens, Greece.
26. KARAHANNA E, STRAUB DW and CHERVANY NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23(2), 183-213.
27. KAWAMOTO D (2004) Rebound seen for resource management, http:// news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5214414.html Viewed on 10 December 2005).
28. KAY J and THOMAS RC (1995) Studying long-term system use. Communication of the ACM 38(7), 61-69.
29. KIM SS and MALHOTRA NK (2005) Predicting system usage from intention and past use: scale issues in the predictors. Decision Sciences 36(1), 187-196.
30. KO DG, KIRSCH LJ and KING WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise systems implementations. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 59-85.
31. LEGRIS P, INGHAM J and COLLERETTE P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40, 191-204.
32. LIPPERT SK and FORMAN H (2005) Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(3), 363-381.
33. LUCAS HC and SPITLER VK (1999) Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences 30(2), 291-311.
34. MATHIESON K (1991) Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2(3), 173-191.
35. MOORE JBI (2002) Information technology infusion: a motivation approach. PhD Thesis, The Florida State University, USA.
36. NAH FFH, TAN X and TEH SH (2004) An empirical investigation on end-users' acceptance of enterprise systems. Information Resources Management Journal 17 (3), 32-53.
37. NUNNALLY JC (1994) Psychometric Theory (3rd Edn). McGraw-Hill, New York.
38. PARTHASARATHY M and BHATTACHERJEE A (1998) Understanding post-adoption behavior in the context of online services. Information Systems Research 9(4), 362-379.
39. PINE BJI and GILMORE JH (1999) The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
40. POZZEBON M (2002) Combining a structuration approach with a behavioral-based model to investigate ERP usage. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Long Beach, CA.
41. RAI A, LANG SS and WELKER RB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research 13(1), 50-69.
42. RAWSTORNE P, JAYASURIYA R and CAPUTI P (1998) An integrative model of information systems use in mandatory environments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland.
43. ROBEY D, ROSS JW and BOUDREAU M (2002) Learning to Implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1), 17-46.
44. ROSS JW and WEILL P (2002) Six IT decisions your IT people shouldn't make. Harvard Business Review 80(11), 84-91.
45. SAGA VL and ZMUD RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. In Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (LEVINE L, Ed.), pp 67-86, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
46. SCHWARZ A (2003) Defining information technology acceptance: a human-centered, management-oriented perspective. PhD Thesis, University of Houston-University Park, USA.
47. SEDDON P and KIEW M (1994) A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of is success. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems.
48. SEDDON PB, SHANKS G and WILLCOCKS LP (2003) Introduction: ERP - the quiet revolution?. In Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness (SHANKS G, SEDDON PB and WILLCOCKS LP, Eds), pp 1-16, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
49. SILVER MS (1991) Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. MIS Quarterly 15(1), 105-122.
50. STRAUB D, LIMAYEM M and KARAHANNA- EVARISTO E (1995) Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Management Science 41(8), 1328-1342.
51. TAYLOR S and TODD P (1995) Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly 19(4), 561-570.
52. VENKATESH V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research 11(4), 342-365.
53. VENKATESH V and DAVIS FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46(2), 186-204.
54. VENKATESH V, MORRIS MG, DAVIS GB and DAVIS FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
55. WILLCOCKS LP and SYKES R (2000) The role of CIO and IT function in ERP. Communication of the ACM 43(4), 32-38.