The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students

The Sociolinguistic Competence of Immersion Students

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-224

  Mougeon, Raymond ^a   Nadasdi, Terry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949445323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (221)

1. Adamson, H. (1988) Variation Theory and Second Language Acquisition. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
2. Adamson, H. and Regan, V. (1991) The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language: A preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition13 (1), 1–22.
3. Allen, P., Cummins, J., Harley, B. and Swain, M. (1987) Development of Bilingual Profi ciency Project. Toronto: OISE, University of Toronto.
4. Andersen, R.W. (1981) New Dimensions in Second Language Acquisition Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
5. Armstrong, N. (1996) Variable deletion of French /l/: Linguistic, social and stylistic factors. Journal of French Language Studies6, 1–21.
6. Armstrong, N. (2001) Social and Stylistic Variation in Spoken French: A Comparative Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
7. Ashby, W. (1981) The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language57 (3), 674–687.
8. Ashby, W. (1984) The elision of /l/in French clitic pronouns and articles. In E. Pulgram (ed.) Romanitas: Studies in Romance Linguistics(pp. 1–16). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9. Ashby, W. (2001) Un nouveau regard sur la chute du ne en français parlé tourangeau: s’agit-il d’un changement en cours? Journal of French Language Studies11 (1), 1–22.
10. Auger, J. (2002) French immersion in Montreal: Pedagogical norm and functional competence. In S. Gass, K. Bardovi-Harlig, S. Sieloff Magnan and J. Walz (eds) Pedagogical Norms for Second and Foreign Language Learning and Teaching(pp. 81–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11. Bachman, L.F. (1987) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Barlow, M. (1998) MonoConc Pro (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
13. Barron, A. (2003) Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
14. Bartning, I. (1997) L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère: tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée. Acquisi tion et Interaction en Langue Étrangère9, 9–50.
15. Bayley, R. (1996) Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In R. Bayley and D. Preston (eds) Second LanguageAcquisition and Linguistic Variation(pp. 97–120). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Bayley, R. and Regan, V. (2004) Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics8 (3), 393–338.
17. Beebe, L. (1988) Issues in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Newbury House.
18. Bienvenue, R. (1983) French Immersion: Recruitment Factors. Winnipeg: Institute for social and economic research, University of Manitoba.
19. Bienvenue, R. (1986) Participation in an educational innovation: Enrollments in French immersion programs. Canadian Journal of Sociology11 (4), 363–377.
20. Blishen, B., Carroll, W. and Moore, C. (1987) The 1981 socioeconomic index for occupations in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology24 (4), 465–488.
21. Blondeau, H. (2001) Real time changes in the paradigm of personal pronouns in Montreal French. Journal of Sociolinguistics5 (4), 453–474.
22. Blondeau, H. (2006). La trajectoire du futur chez une cohorte de Montréalais francophones entre 1971 et 1995. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics9 (2), 73–98.
23. Blondeau, H. and Nagy, N. (1998) Double marquage du sujet dans le français parlé par les jeunes anglo-montréalais. In J. Jensen and G. Van Herk (eds) Actes duCongrès Annuel de l’Association Canadienne de Linguistique (pp. 59 70). Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa.
24. Blondeau, H., Nagy, N., Sankoff, G. and Thibault, P. (2002) La couleur locale du français L2 des Anglo-Montréalais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 17, 73–100.
25. Blondeau, H., Fonollosa, M-O., Gagnon, L., Lefevbre, N., Poirier, D. and Thibault, P. (1995) Aspects of L2 competence in a bilingual setting. Paper presented at NWAV 24. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, October 14–18. (Handout and tables).
26. Bonami, O. (2002) A syntax-semantics interface for tense and aspect in French. In F. Van Eynde, L. Hellan and D. Beerman (eds) The Proceedings of the HPSG’01Conference(pp. 31–50). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
27. Boutet, J. (1986) La référence à la personne en français parlé: le cas de on. Langage et société38, 19–50.
28. Brown, H.D. (1987) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Calvé, P. (1991) Vingt-cinq ans d’immersion au Canada 1965–1990. Études de Linguistique Appliquée82, 7–23.
30. Canale, M. (1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards and R.W. Schmidt (eds) Language and Communication (pp. 2–27). New York: Longman.
31. Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics1 (1), 1–47.
32. Carroll, S. (1999) Input and SLA: Adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning49 (1): 37–92.
33. Celce-Murcia, M.A., Dörnyei, Z. and Thurrell, S. (1995) Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifi cation. Issues inApplied Linguistics6, 5–35.
34. Chaudenson, R., Mougeon, R. and Beniak, É. (1993) Vers une approche panlectale de la variation du français. Paris: Didier Érudition.
35. Chaudenson, R., Valli, A. and Véronique, D. (1986) The dynamics of linguistic systems and the acquisition of French as a second language. Studies in SecondLanguage Acquisition8, 277–292.
36. Corder, S.P. (1981) Error Analysis in Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Coveney, A. (1996) Variability in Spoken French: A Sociolinguistic Study of Interrogation and Negation. Exeter: Elm Bank.
38. Coveney, A. (2000) Vestiges of nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences22 (4), 447–481.
39. Critchley, S. (1994) Discourse variety in contemporary French language: A pedagogical approach. In J.A. Coleman and R. Crawshaw (eds) Discourse Varietyin Contemporary French: Descriptive and Pedagogical Approaches(pp. 203–236). London: Association for French Language Studies and Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
40. Cuq, J-P. (1994) Cadre théorique et modalités d’insertion de la variété linguistique dans l’enseignement du français langue étrangère et seconde. In J.A. Coleman and R. Crawshaw (eds) Discourse Variety in Contemporary French: Descriptive andPedagogical Approaches(pp. 19–34). London: Association for French Language Studies and Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
41. Day, E. and Shapson, S. (1991) Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. LanguageLearning41 (1), 25–58.
42. Deshaies, D. (1991) Contribution à l’analyse du français québécois: Étude des pronoms personnels. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliquée10 (3), 11–40.
43. Deshaies, D. and Laforge, E. (1981) Le futur simple et le futur périphrastique dans le français parlé dans la ville de Québec. Langues et linguistique7, 23–37.
44. Deshaies, D., Martin, C. and Noël, D. (1981) Régularisation et analogie dans le système verbal en français parlé dans la ville de Québec. In D. Sankoff (ed.) Variation Omnibus(pp. 411–418). Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.
45. Deslauriers, L. and Gagnon, N. (1995) Capsules. Manuels 5A, 5B. Montréal: Modulo.
46. Deslauriers, L. and Gagnon, N. (1997) Capsules. Manuels 6A, 6B. Montréal: Modulo.
47. Dessureault-Dober, D. (1974) Étude sociolinguistique de ça fait que: Coordonnant logique et marqueur d’interaction. Master’s thesis, Université de Montréal.
48. Dewaele, J-M. (1992) L’omission du ne dans deux styles oraux d’interlangue française. Journal of Applied Linguistics7 (1), 3–17.
49. Dewaele, J-M. (1998) Lexical inventions: French interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics19 (4), 471–490.
50. Dewaele, J-M. (1999) Word order variation in French interrogatives. International Review of Applied Linguistics125 126, 161–180.
51. Dewaele, J-M. (2002) Using sociostylistic variants in advanced French interlanguage. EUROSLA YearbookII, 205 226.
52. Dewaele, J-M. (2004a) The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in French as a foreign language: An overview. Journal of French Language Studies14 (3), 301–319.
53. Dewaele, J-M. (2004b) Retention or omission of the ne in advanced French interlanguage: The variable effect of extralinguistic factors. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8 (3), 433–450.
54. Dewaele, J-M. (2004c) Variation, chaos et sytème en interlangue français. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère17, 143–167.
55. Dewaele, J-M. (2004d) Colloquial vocabulary in the speech of native and nonnative speakers: The effects of profi ciency and personality. In P. Bogaards and B. Laufer (eds) Learning Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisitionand Testing(pp. 127–153). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
56. Dewaele, J-M. and Regan, V. (2001) The use of colloquial words in advanced French interlanguage. In S. Foster Cohen and A. Nizegorodcew (eds) EUROSLAYearbook1(pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
57. Dewaele, J-M. and Regan, V. (2002) Maîtriser la norme sociolinguistique en interlangue française: le cas de l’omission variable de ne. Journal of French LanguageStudies12 (2), 123–148.
58. DiCesare, D. (in progress) Non acquisition de la préposition chez et de sa variante à la maison par des élèves ontariens d’immersion française en 9e et 12e année. MA thesis, York University, Toronto.
59. Dickerson, L. (1974) Internal and external patterning of phonological variability in the speech of Japanese learners of English: Toward a theory of second language acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
60. Dicks, J. (2001) The French Immersion and English Programs in New Brunswick School Districts 17 and 18 (Final Report). Fredericton, NB: Second Language EducationCentre, University of New Brunswick.
61. Dion, N. and Blondeau, H. (2005) Variability and future temporal reference: The French of Anglo-Montrealers. Paper presented at NWAV 32, Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania.
62. Downes, W. (1998) Language and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Ellis, R. (1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition9 (1), 1–20.
64. Ellis, R. (1999) Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics20 (4), 460–480.
65. Emirkanian, L. and Sankoff, D. (1985) Le futur simple et le futur périphrastique dans le français parlé. In M. Lemieux and H. Cedergren (eds) Les tendancesdynamiques du français parlé à Montréal(Vol. 2, pp. 189–204). Quebec City: Government of Quebec.
66. Gadet, F. (1992) Le français populaire. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
67. Gass, S. and Selinker, L. (2001) Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. London: Erlbaum.
68. Gatbonton, E. (1978) Patterned phonetic variability in second language speech: A gradual diffusion model. The Canadian Modern Language Review34 (3), 335–347.
69. Genesee, F. (1987) Learning through Two Languages: Studies of Immersion and Bilingual Children. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
70. Genesee, F. (1990) Beyond bilingualism: Sociocultural studies in immersion. In B. Flemming and M. Whitla (eds) So you Want your Child to Learn French! (pp. 96–107). Ottawa: Canadian Parents for French.
71. Genesee, F., Polich, E. and Stanley, M.H. (1977) An experimental French immersion program at the secondary school level – 1969–1974. The Canadian ModernLanguage Review33 (3), 318–332.
72. Goldfi ne, C. (1987) Negation in French L2 learners. Linguistics 23 (1), 49–77. Grevisse, M. (1988) Le Bon Usage. Paris-Gembloux: Duculot.
73. Hallion, S. (2000) Étude du français parlé au manitoba. PhD dissertation: Université de Provence (Aix-Marseille I).
74. Hansen, A.B. (1994) Étude du E caduc – stabilisation en cours et variation lexicale. Journal of French Language Studies4 (1), 25–54.
75. Harley, B. (1979) French gender ‘rules’ in the speech of English-dominant, Frenchdominant and monolingual French speaking children. Working Papers inBilingualism19, 129–156.
76. Harley, B. (1982) Age-related differences in the acquisition of the French verb system by anglophone students in French immersion programs. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
77. Harley, B. (1984) How good is their French? Language and Society10, 55–60.
78. Harley, B. (1989a) Transfer in the written composition of French immersion students. In H. Dechert and M. Raupach (eds) Transfer in Language Production(pp. 3–19). Norwood: Ablex.
79. Harley, B. (1989b) Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics10 (3), 331–359.
80. Harley, B. (1992) Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies2 (2), 159–183.
81. Harley, B. and King, M.L. (1989) Verb lexis in the written compositions of young L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition11 (4), 415–436.
82. Hart, D. and Lapkin, S. (1998) Issues of social-class bias in access to French immersion education. In S. Lapkin (ed.) French Second Language Education in Canada:Empirical Studies(pp. 324–350). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
83. Hart, D., Lapkin, S. and Swain, M. (1989) Final Report to the Calgary Board of Education: The Evaluation of Continuing Bilingual and Late Immersion Programs at the Secondary Level. Toronto: Modern Language Centre, OISE.
84. Hart, D., Lapkin, S., Swain, M. and Howard, J. (1991) French Immersion at the Secondary/Post-Secondary Interface: Toward a National Study (Report submitted tothe Department of the Secretary of State). Toronto: Modern Language Centre, OISE.
85. Hart, D., Lapkin, S. and Howard, J. (1994) Attrition from French Immersion Programs in a Northern Ontario City: ‘Push’ and ‘Pull’ Factors in Two Area Boards. Report toCanadian Heritage. Toronto: Modern Language Centre, OISE.
86. Hashimoto, H. (1994) Language acquisition of an exchange student within the homestay environment. Journal of Asian Pacifi c Communication4 (4), 209–224.
87. Hickey, T. (2001). Mixing beginners and native speakers in minority language immersion: Who is immersing whom? The Canadian Modern Language Review 57 (3), 443–474.
88. Houston, A. (1985) Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (-ing). PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
89. Howard, M. (2005) L’acquisition de la liaison en français langue seconde: Une analyse quantitative d’apprenants avancés en milieu guidé et en milieu naturel. Corela, Numéros spéciaux, Colloque AFLS.
90. Howard, M., Lemée, I. and Regan, V. (2006) The L2 acquisition of a phonological variable: The case of /l/deletion in French. Journal of French Language Studies 16 (1), 1–24.
91. Huebner, T. (1983) Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
92. Huebner, T. (1985) System and variability in interlanguage syntax. LanguageLearning35 (1), 141–163.
93. Jeanjean, C. (1988) Le futur simple et le futur périphrastique. Étude distributionnelle. In C. Blanche-Benveniste, A. Cheurel and M. Gross (eds) Grammaire ethistoire de la grammaire, hommage à la mémoire de Jean Stéfanini(pp. 235–257). Aix en Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.
94. Kenemer, V. (1982) Le français populaire and French as a Second Language: A Comparative Study of Language Simplifi cation. Quebec City: CIRB.
95. King, R. and Nadasdi, T. (2003) Back to the future in Acadian French. Journal of French Language Studies13 (3), 23–337.
96. King, R., Martineau, F. and Mougeon, R. (2009) First person plural pronominal reference in urban varieties of European French: A diachronic sociolinguistic study. York University: Unpublished manuscript.
97. Kinginger, C. (2008) Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. Modern Language Journal92 (1), 1–124.
98. Knaus, V. and Nadasdi, T. (2001) Être ou ne pas être en immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review58 (2), 287–306.
99. Laberge, S. (1977) Étude de la variation des pronoms défi nis et indéfi nis dans la français parlé à Montréal. PhD dissertation, Université de Montréal.
100. Labov, W. (1966) The Social Stratifi cation of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
101. Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
102. Labov, W. (1990) The intersection of gender and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change11 (2), 205–254.
103. Lambert, W.E. and Tucker, G.R. (1972) Bilingual Education of Children. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
104. Lapkin, S. and Swain, M. (2000) Task outcomes: A focus on immersion students’ use of pronominal verbs in their writing. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (1–2), 7–22.
105. Lapkin, S., Hart, D. and Swain, M. (1995) A Canadian interprovincial exchange: Evaluating the linguistic impact of a three-month stay in Quebec. In B.F. Freed (ed.) Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context (pp. 67 94). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
106. Le Dorze, P. and Morin, N. (1994) Portes ouvertes sur notre pays. Manuel 3A, 3B. Montreal: Guérin.
107. Le Goffi c, P. and Lab, F. (2001) Le présent . Cahiers Chronos7, 77–98.
108. Le Nouveau Petit Robert (1996) Dictionnaire de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaires le Robert.
109. Le Petit Larousse (1993) Dictionnaire encyclopédique. Paris: Larousse.
110. Lealess, A. (2005) En français, il faut qu’on parle bien: Assessing native-like profi -ciency in L2 French. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.
111. Lesage, R. and Gagnon, S. (1992) Futur simple et futur périphrastique dans la presse québécoise. In A. Crochetière, J-C. Boulanger and C. Ouellon (eds) Actesdu XVème Congrès international des linguistes(pp. 367–370). Quebec city: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
112. Lindholm-Leary, K. (2001) Dual Language Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
113. Lynch, A. (2002) On the notion of ‘nativeness’: Incomplete acquisition and linguistic variation in a bilingual city. Paper presented at NWAV 31, Stanford University, California, October 10–13.
114. Lyster, R. (1994a) The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics15 (3), 263–287.
115. Lyster, R. (1994b) La négociation de la forme: stratégie analytique en classe d’immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review50 (3), 446–465.
116. Lyster, R. (1996) Question forms, conditionals, and second-person pronouns used by adolescent native speakers across two levels of formality in written and spoken French. Modern Language Journal80 (2), 165–182.
117. Lyster, R. (1998) Form in immersion classroom: in and out of focus. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics1 (1–2), 53–82.
118. Lyster, R. (2007) Learning and Teaching Languages through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
119. Lyster, R. and Rebuffot, J. (2002) Acquisition des pronoms d’allocution en classe de français immersif. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère17, 51–72.
120. MacFarlane, A. and Wesche, M. (1995) Immersion outcomes: Beyond language profi ciency. The Canadian Modern Language Review51 (2), 250–274.
121. Major, R.C. (1999) Gender marking in second language phonology. Paper presented at NWAV 28, University of Toronto and York University, October.
122. Major, R.C. (2004) Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology. Language Variation and Change16 (2), 169–188.
123. Mannesy, G. and Wald, P. (1984) Le français en Afrique Noire: tel qu’on le parle, tel qu’on le dit. Paris: L’Harmattan.
124. Marriott, H. (1995) The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In B. Freed (ed.) Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context (pp. 197–227). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
125. Martel, P. (1984) Les variantes lexicales sont-elles sociolinguistiquement intéressantes? Sociolinguistique des langues romanes. In Actes du XVIIe Congrèsinternational de linguistique et philologie romanes(pp. 183–193). Aixen-Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.
126. Martineau, F. and Mougeon, R. (2005) Vais, vas, m’as in spoken Quebec and Metropolitan French: A Diachronic and Dialectal Perspective. Paper presented atthe Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages, University of Texas atAustin, February 24–27.
127. Massicotte, F. (1986) Les expressions de la restriction en français de Montréal. In D. Sankoff (ed.) Diversity and Diachrony(pp. 325–332). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
128. Matsumara, S. (2001) Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialisation. Language Learning51, 635–679.
129. McLaughlin, D. and Niedre, J. (1998) Pont vers le futur. Manuel de français 2. Montreal: Guérin.
130. Morin, Y.Ch. (1978) The status of mute ‘e’. Studies in French Linguistics1 (2), 29–40.
131. Mougeon, R. (1996) Recherche sur les origines de la variation vas, m’as, vais en français québécois. In T. Lavoie (ed.) Français du Canada – Français de France (pp. 60–77). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
132. Mougeon, R. (1998) French outside New Brunswick and Quebec. In J. Edwards (ed.) Language in Canada(pp. 226–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Mougeon, R. and Beniak, E. (1991) Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction: The Case of French in Ontario. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
134. Mougeon, R. and Beniak, E. (1995) Le non-accord en nombre entre sujet et verbe en français ontarien: Un cas de simplifi cation? Présence Francophone46, 53–65.
135. Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (1997) Sociolinguistic Variation in French Immersion Students’ Speech. Paper presented at the 28th annual conference of the CanadianAssociation of Applied Linguistics, Memorial University, St. John’s, NF, 2–4 June.
136. Mougeon, R. and Nadasdi, T. (1998) Sociolinguistic discontinuity in minority language communities. Language74 (1), 40–55.
137. Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2001) Variation in the spoken French of Ontario French immersion students: The case of juste versus seulement versus rien que.Modern Language Journal85 (3), 398–415.
138. Mougeon, R., Beniak, É. and Coté, N. (1981) Variation géographique en franÇais ontarien: RÔle du maintien de la langue maternelle. Journal of the AtlanticProvinces Linguistic Association3, 64–82.
139. Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T., Rehner, K. and Uritescu, D. (2002) The sharing of Constraints in Minority Speech Communities. Paper presented at NWAV 31, Stanford University, October 10–13.
140. Mougeon, R., Haillon-Bres, S., Papen, R. and Bigot, D. (2008) M’as tout vous dire comment ça se passe à l’ouest du Québec. Paper presented at the international conference, Les français d’ici II, University of Ottawa, May 22–25.
141. Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T. and Rehner, K. (2009) Évolution de l’usage des conjonctions et locutions de consequence par les adolescents franco-ontariens de Hawkesbury et Pembroke (1978–2005). In F. Martineau, R. Mougeon, T. Nadasdi and M. Tremblay (eds) Les français d’ici: etudes linguistiques et sociolinguistiquessur la variation du français au Québec et en Ontario(pp. 145–184). Toronto: Éditions du GREF.
142. Nadasdi, T. (2001) Agreeing to disagree: Variable subject-verb agreement in immersion French. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics4 (1), 78–101.
143. Nadasdi, T. and McKinnie, M. (2003) Living and working in immersion French. Journal of French Language Studies13 (1), 47–61.
144. Nadasdi, T., Uritescu, D., Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2001) A sociolinguistic analysis of phonetic variation in the spoken French of Franco-Ontarian and immersion students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, Laval University, May 24–26.
145. Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2003) Emploi du futur dans le français parlé des élèves d’immersion française. Journal of French Language Studies13 (2), 195–219.
146. Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2004) Expression de la notion de ‘véhicule automobile’ dans le parler des adolescents francophones de l’Ontario. Francophonies d’Amérique17, 91–106.
147. Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2005) Learning to speak everyday (Canadian) French. The Canadian Modern Language Review61 (4), 543–563.
148. Nagy, N. and Blondeau, H. (1998) Double subject marking in L2 Montreal French. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics6, 93–108.
149. Nagy, N., Moisset, C. and Sankoff, G. (1996) On the acquisition of variable phonology in L2. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics3 (1), 111–126.
150. Nagy, N., Blondeau, H. and Auger, J. (2003) Second language acquisition and ‘real’ French: An investigation of subject doubling in the French of Montreal Anglophones. Language Variation and Change15 (1), 73–103.
151. North York Board of Education (1986) Report to the Director’s Committee on French as a Second Language Programs. North York: North York Board of Education.
152. O’Connor Di Vito, N. (1991) Incorporating native speaker norms in secondlanguage materials. Applied Linguistics12 (4), 383–396.
153. Offord, M. (1994) Teaching varieties and register. In J.A. Coleman and R. Crawshaw (eds) Discourse Variety in Contemporary French: Descriptive and PedagogicalApproaches(pp. 185–202). London: Association for French Language Studies and Centre for Information on Language Teaching.
154. Olson, P. and Burns, G. (1983) Politics, class, and happenstance: French immersion in a Canadian context. Interchange14 (3), 1–16.
155. Ontario Ministry of Education (2000) The Ontario Curriculum Grades 11 and 12: French as a Second Language – Core, Extended, and Immersion French. Toronto:Queen’s Printer.
156. Parkin, M., Morrison, F. and Watkin, G. (1987) French immersion research relevant to decisions in Ontario. Review and Evaluation Bulletins, No. 1. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 473).
157. Picard, M. (1991) La loi des trois consonnes et la chute du cheva en québécois. Revue québécoise de linguistique20 (2), 35–49.
158. Poplack, S. (1989) The care and handling of a megacorpus: The Ottawa–Hull French project. In R. Fasold and D. Schiffrin (eds) Language Change and Variation (pp. 411–451). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
159. Poplack, S. and Walker, D. (1986) Going through (L) in Canadian French. In D. Sankoff (ed.) Diversity and Diachrony(pp. 173–198). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
160. Poplack, S. and Turpin, D. (1999) Does the FUTUR have a future in (Canadian) French? Probus11 (1), 134–164.
161. Poplack, S. and St-Amand, A. (2007) A real-time window on 19th-century vernacular French: The Récits du français québécois d’autrefois. Language in Society36 (5), 707–734.
162. Rand, D. and Sankoff, D. (1990) Goldvarb Version 2: A Variable Rule Application for the Macintosh. Montreal: Centre de Recherches Mathématiques, Université deMontréal.
163. Rebuffot, J. (1993) Le point sur l’immersion au Canada. Anjou, QC: Centre Educatif et Culturel Inc.
164. Regan, V. (1995) The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In B.F. Freed (ed.) SecondLanguage Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context (pp. 245 267). Amsterdam:Benjamins.
165. Regan, V. (1996) Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In R. Bayley and D.R. Preston (eds) Second LanguageAcquisition and Linguistic Variation(pp. 177–201). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
166. Regan, V. (2004) The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching42 (4), 335–348.
167. Regan, V. (2005) From speech community back to classroom: What variation analysis can tell us about the role of context in the acquisition of French as a foreign language. In J-M. Dewaele (ed.) Focus on French as a Foreign Language.Multidisciplinary Perspectives(pp. 191–209). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
168. Regan, V., Howard, M. and Lemee, I. (2009) The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Study Abroad Context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
169. Rehner, K. (1998) Variation in the spoken French of grade 9 and 12 students from extended French programs in the greater Toronto area: Negative particle ne, expressions of restriction and markers of consequence. MA thesis, York University, Toronto.
170. Rehner, K. (2002) The development of aspects of linguistic and discourse competence by advanced second language learners of French. PhD dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto.
171. Rehner, K. (2004) Developing Aspects of Second Language Discourse Competence. Munich: Lincom Europa.
172. Rehner, K. and Mougeon, R. (1999) Variation in the spoken French of immersion students: To ne or not to ne, that is the sociolinguistic question. The CanadianModern Language Review56 (1), 124–154.
173. Rehner, K. and Mougeon, R. (2003) The effect of educational input on the development of sociolinguistic competence by French immersion students: The case of expressions of consequence in spoken French. Journal of Educational Thought 37 (3), 259–281.
174. Rehner, K., Mougeon, R. and Nadasdi, T. (2003) The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FSL learners: The case of nous versus on in immersion French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition25 (1), 127–156.
175. Rhodes, N., Christian, D. and Barfi eld. S. (1997) Innovations in immersion: The Key School two-way model. In R.K. Johnson and M. Swain (eds) ImmersionEducation: International Perspectives(pp. 265–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
176. Roy Nicolet, L. and Jean-Côté, M. (1994) Portes ouvertes sur notre pays. Manuel 1A, 1B. Montreal: Guérin.
177. Sandy, S. (1997) L’emploi variable de la particule négative ne dans le parler des Franco-Ontariens adolescents. MA thesis, York University, Toronto.
178. Sankoff, G. (1997) Deux champs sémantiques chez les anglophones et les francophones de Montréal. In J. Auger and Y. Rose (eds) Exploration du lexique(pp. 133–146). Quebec City: CIRAL.
179. Sankoff, G. and Cedergren, H. (1976) Les contraintes linguistiques et socials de l’élision de /l/chez les Montréalais. In M. Boudreault and F. Mohren (eds) Actes du XIIIe congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes (pp. 1101–1117). Quebec City: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
180. Sankoff, G. and Vincent, D. (1977) L’emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Le Français Moderne45, 243–256.
181. Sankoff, G. and Thibault, P. (1980) The alternation between the auxiliaries avoir and être in Montreal French. In G. Sankoff (ed.) The Social Life of Language(pp.311–345). Philadelphia: University of Pennyslvania Press.
182. Sankoff, G. and Vincent, D. (1980) The productive use of ne in spoken Montreal French. In G. Sankoff (ed.) The Social Life of Language(pp. 295–310). Philadelphia: University of Pennyslvania Press.
183. Sankoff, D., Sankoff, G., Laberge, S. and Topham, M. (1976) Méthodes d’échantillonnage et utilization de l’ordinateur dans l’étude de la variation grammaticale. Cahier de linguistique6, 85–125.
184. Sankoff, D., Thibault, P. and Bérubé, H. (1978) Semantic fi eld variablity. In D. Sankoff (ed.) Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods(pp. 23–43). New York: Academic Press.
185. Sankoff, G., Thibault, P., Nagy, N., Blondeau, H., Fonollosa, M-O. and Gagnon, L. (1997) Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change9 (2), 191–217.
186. Savignon, S.J. (1983) Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Texts and Contexts in Second Language Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
187. Savignon, S.J. (1997) Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Texts and Contexts in Second Language Learning(2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
188. Sax, K. (2003) Acquisition of stylistic variation by American learners of French. PhD dissertation, University of Indiana, Ann Arbor, MI, UMI Dissertation Services.
189. Segalowitz, N. (1976) Communicative incompetence and the non-fl uent bilingual. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science8 (2), 121–131.
190. Segalowitz, N. (1977) Bilingualism and social behaviour. In W.H. Coons, D. Taylor and M-A. Tremblay (eds) The Individual, Language and Society in Canada (pp. 179–195). Ottawa: The Canada Council.
191. Siegal, M. (1995) Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. In B. Freed (ed.) Second Language Acquisition in a Study AbroadContext(pp. 225–244). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
192. Söll, L. (1969) Zur Konkurrenz von ‘Futur simple’ und ‘Futur proche’ im modernen Französisch. Vox Romanica28 (2), 274–284.
193. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1990) Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and later French Immersion students. In R.C. Scarcella, E.S. Anderson and
194. S.D. Krashen (eds) Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language(pp. 41–54). New York: Newbury House.
195. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2005) The evolving sociopolitical context of immersioneducation in Canada: Some implications for program development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics15 (1), 169–186.
196. Tarone, E. (1988) Variation in Interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.
197. Tarone, E. (1990) On variation in interlanguage: A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics11 (4), 392–400.
198. Tarone, E. and Swain, M. (1995) A sociolinguistic perspective on second language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal79 (2), 166–178.
199. Tennant, J. (1995) Variation morphophonologique dans le français parlé des ado lescents de North Bay (Ontario). PhD dissertation: University of Toronto.
200. Thibault, P. and Daveluy, M. (1989) Quelques traces du passage du temps dans le parler des Montréalais, 1971 1984. Language Variation and Change1 (1), 19–45.
201. Thibault, P. and Vincent, D. (1990) Un corpus de français parlé. Montréal 84: historique, méthodes et perspectives de recherche. Quebec City: Department of Languages andLinguistics, Laval University.
202. Thomas, A. (2000) Étudiants de FLS, français familier: Infl uence sur la prononciation. Paper presented at the meeting of Association for French Language Studies, Laval University, Quebec City, August 24–27.
203. Thomas, A. (2002a) L’acquisition du morphème ne au niveau avancé du FLS. In C. Tatillon and A. Baudot (eds) La linguistique fonctionnelle au tournant dusiècle: actes du 24e colloque international de linguistique fonctionnelle(pp. 327–334). Toronto: GREF.
204. Thomas, A. (2002b) La variation phonétique en français langue seconde au niveau universitaire avancé. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère17, 101–122.
205. Trévise, A. and Noyau, C. (1984) Adult Spanish speakers and the acquisition of French negation forms: Individual variation and linguistic awareness. In
206. R. Andersen (ed.) Second Languages: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective(pp 165–189). Rowley: Newbury House.
207. Trudgill, P. (1974) The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
208. Uritescu, D., Mougeon, R. and Handouleh, Y. (2002) Le comportement du schwa dans le français parlé par les élèves des programs d’immersion française. In C. Tatilon and A. Baudot (eds) La linguistique fonctionnelle au tournant du siècle: actes du vingt-quatrième Colloque international de linguistique fonction nelle (pp. 335–346). Toronto: GREF.
209. Uritescu, D., Mougeon, R., Rehner, K. and Nadasdi, T. (2004) Acquisition of the internal and external constraints of variable schwa deletion by French immersion students. International Review of Applied Linguistics42 (4), 349–364.
210. Valdman, A. (1998) La notion de norme pédagogique dans l’enseignement du français langue étrangère. In M. Bilger, K. van den Eynde and F. Gadet (eds) analyse linguistique et approches de l’oral: recueil d’études offert en hommage à ClaireBlanche-Benveniste(Vol. 10, pp. 177–188). Paris: Peeters Leuven.
211. Valdman, A. (2003) The acquisition of sociostylistic and sociopragmatic variation by instructed second language learners: The elaboration of pedagogical norms. In C. Blyth (ed.) The Sociolinguistics of Foreign Language Classrooms: Contributionsof the Native, Near-Native, and Non-Native Speaker(pp. 57–78). Boston: Thomson/Heinle.
212. Valdman, A., Pons, C., Scullen, M. and Jourdain, S. (2002) Chez nous. Branché sur le monde francophone. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
213. Van der Keilen, M. (1995) Use of French, attitudes and motivations of French immersion students. The Canadian Modern Language Review51 (2), 287–304.
214. Vincent, D., Laforest, M. and Martel, G. (1995) Le corpus de Montréal 1995: Adaptation de la méthode d’enquête sociolinguistique pour l’analyse conversationnelle. Dialangue6, 29–46.
215. Walter, H. (1977) La phonologie du Français. Paris: PUF.
216. Walter, H. (1990) Une voyelle qui ne veut pas mourir. In J.N. Green and W. Ayres- Bennett (eds) Variation and Change in French. Essays Presented to Rebecca Posner onthe Occasion of her 60th Birthday(pp. 27–36). London: Routledge.
217. Wesche, M., Morrison, F., Pawley, C. and Ready, D. (1986) Post-Secondary Follow-Up of Former Immersion Students in the Ottawa Area. Ottawa: Centre for SecondLanguage Learning, University of Ottawa.
218. Wolfram, W., Carter, P. and Moriello, B. (2004) Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics8 (3), 339–358.
219. Willis, L. (2000) Etre ou ne plus être: Auxiliary alternation in Ottawa–Hull French. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.
220. Young, R. (1988) Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10 (3), 281 302.
221. Young, R. and Bayley, R. (1996) VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley and D.R. Preston (eds) Second Language Acquisitionand Linguistic Variation(pp. 253–306). Amsterdam: Benjamins.