Erratum to: When Confidence Is Not a Signal of Knowing: How Students’ Experiences and Beliefs About Processing Fluency Can Lead to Miscalibrated Confidence (Educ Psychol Rev, 2015, Doi 10.1007/s10648-015-9313-7);When Confidence Is Not a Signal of Knowing: How Students’ Experiences and Beliefs About Processing Fluency Can Lead to Miscalibrated Confidence

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 567-586

  Finn, Bridgid ^a   Tauber, Sarah K ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beliefs; Calibration; Confidence; Fluency; Metacognition; Overconfidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948585075     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9331-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (166)

1. Arnold, L., Willoughby, T. L., & Calkins, E. V. (1985). Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education: a longitudinal perspective. Academic Medicine, 60(1), 21–28.
2. Begg, I. M., Martin, L. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: how useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 195–218.
3. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(1), 55–68.
4. Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 41(6), 897–903.
5. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23(3), 329–345.
6. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: the Loyola symposium (pp. 124–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
8. Blake, M. (1973). Prediction of recognition when recall fails: exploring the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 311–319.
9. Blaxton, T. A. (1995). A process-based view of memory. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1(01), 112–114.
10. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545.
11. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12(2), 103–128.
12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: mind, brain, experience and school (expandedth ed.). DC: National Academy Press, Washington.
13. Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 13–25.
14. Brewer, W. F. (1992). Phenomenal experience in laboratory and autobiographical memory tasks. In R. Conway & H. Spinnler (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on autobiographical memory (pp. 31-51). Netherlands: Springer.
15. Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: domain general or domain specific? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 415–449.
16. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & MacDonald, H. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 238–247.
17. Carpenter, S. K., Wilford, M. M., Kornell, N., & Mullaney, K. M. (2013). Appearances can be deceiving: Instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1350–1356.
18. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354.
19. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55.
20. Chevalier, A., Gibbons, S., Thorpe, A., Snell, M., & Hoskins, S. (2009). Students’ academic self-perception. Economics of Education Review, 28(6), 716–727.
21. Dartmouth University. (2015). Improving Concentration, Memory, and Motivation. Retrieved from: http://www.dartmouth.edu/~acskills/success/study.html.
22. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: a case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627–634.
23. Dunlosky, J., & Ariel, R. (2011). 4 self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, 54, 103.
24. Dunlosky, J., & Hartwig, M. K. (2012). Study strategies of college students: are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126–134.
25. Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271–280.
26. Dunlosky, J., & Tauber, S. K. (2013). Understanding people’s metacognitive judgments: an isomechanism framework and its implications for applied and theoretical research. In T. Perfect & S. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of applied memory. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
27. Dunlosky, J., Mueller, M., & Tauber, S. K. (2015). The contribution of subjective fluency and theories of memory to people’s judgments of memory. In Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in human memory: Papers in honour of Larry L. Jacoby (pp. pp. 46–64). New York: New York: Psychology Press.
28. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press.
29. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
30. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
31. Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11, 367–380.
32. Eccles-Parsons, J. S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivations (pp. 75–121). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman & Co.
33. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709.
34. Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: a semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(5), 540–551.
35. Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S46–S54.
36. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430.
37. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 238.
38. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 19–34.
39. Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Overconfidence in children's multi-trial judgments of learning. Learning and Instruction, 32, 1–9.
40. Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
42. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16(4), 309–313.
43. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: an intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662.
44. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541.
45. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 160.
46. Hackett, G. (1985). The role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: a path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47–56.
47. Hanczakowski, M., Zawadzka, K., Pasek, T., & Higham, P. A. (2013). Calibration of metacognitive judgments: insights from the underconfidence-with-practice effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 429–444.
48. Hansford, B. C., & Hattie, J. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142.
49. Hartwig, M., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126–134.
50. Helmke, A. (1989). Incentive value of success and failure in school: developmental trends and impact on academic achievement. In F. Halisch & J. Hl. L. van den Bercken (Eds.), International Perspectives on Achievement and Task Motivation (pp. 225-237). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
51. Hertwig, R., Herzog, S. M., Schooler, L. J., & Reimer, T. (2008). Fluency heuristic: a model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1191.
52. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 22–34.
53. Hofer, B. K. (1999). Instructional context in the college mathematics classroom: epistemological beliefs and student motivation. The Journal of Staff, Program & Organization Development, 16, 73–82.
54. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.
55. Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 577–581.
56. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
57. Jacoby, L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: memory, perception, and concept learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 18, 1–47.
58. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(3), 306.
59. Jacoby, L. L., & Hollingshead, A. (1990). Toward a generate/recognize model of performance on direct and indirect tests of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(4), 433–454.
60. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1997). An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollection: telling effects of repetition. Psychology and Aging, 12(2), 352.
61. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3.
62. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697.
63. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk (pp. 263–291). Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society.
64. Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 524.
65. Karpicke, J. D. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 469.
66. Kato, T. (1985). Semantic-memory sources of episodic retrieval failure. Memory & Cognition, 13(5), 442–452.
67. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 157–175.
68. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(1), 1–24.
69. Kelley, C. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: attributions in memory and judgment. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 293–320.
70. Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48, 169–183.
71. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609–639. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609.
72. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: a cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
73. Koriat, A. (2008). When confidence in a choice is independent of which choice is made. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 997–1001.
74. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 34.
75. Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 478–492.
76. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 107.
77. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(2), 147.
78. Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36.
79. Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Adiv, S., Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2014). The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning: a developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 386–403.
80. Kornell, N. (2009). Optimizing learning using flashcards: spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1297–1317.
81. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224.
82. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories is spacing the “enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19(6), 585–592.
83. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 449.
84. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17(5), 493–501.
85. Kornell, N., Castel, A. D., Eich, T. S., & Bjork, R. A. (2010). Spacing as a friend of both memory and induction in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 498–503.
86. Kreutzer, M. A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J. H. (1975). An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40, 1–60. doi:10.2307/1165955.
87. Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The" below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 221.
88. Larrick, R. P. (2004). Debiasing. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 316–337). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
89. Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Test‐enhanced learning in medical education. Medical Education, 42(10), 959–966.
90. Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355–365.
91. Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Eyewitness suggestibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 86–89.
93. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(2), 197–211.
94. Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J., & Merriman, W. E. (2009). Persistent overconfidence despite practice: the role of task experience in preschoolers’ recall predictions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 152–166.
95. Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174–179. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.1.174.
96. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 530.
97. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 851.
98. Miele, D. B., & Molden, D. C. (2010). Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(3), 535.
99. Miele, D. B., Finn, B., & Molden, D. C. (2011). Does easily learned mean easily remembered? It depends on your beliefs about intelligence. Psychological Science, 22(3), 320–324.
100. Miele, D. B., Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). Children's naive theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child Development, 84(6), 1879–1886.
101. Mihalca, L., Mengelkamp, C., Schnotz, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Completion problems can reduce the illusions of understanding in a computer-based learning environment on genetics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 157–171.
102. Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502.
103. Morehead, K., Rhodes, M. G., DeLozier, S. (2015). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory.,1–15
104. Mueller, M. L., Tauber, S. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 378–384.
105. Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12.
106. Nelson, T.O. & Narens, L. (1990) Metamemory: a theoretical framework and some new findings. In G H Bower (Ed). The psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-I73) San Diego Academic Press.
107. Nist, S. L., & Holschuh, J. P. (2005). Practical applications of the research on epistemological beliefs. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 35(2), 84–92.
108. Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347–356.
109. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 139–156.
110. Oppenheimer, D. M., & Frank, M. C. (2008). A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition, 106(3), 1178–1194.
111. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
112. Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M. (2004). College student epistemological perspectives across knowledge domains: a proposed grounded theory. Higher Education, 47(3), 311–335.
113. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
114. Paunesku, D., Walton, G.M., Romero, C., Smith, E.N., Yeager, D.S. & Dweck, C.S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 0956797615571017.
115. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
116. Pulford, B. D., & Colman, A. M. (1997). Overconfidence: feedback and item difficulty effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(1), 125–133.
117. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1113–1129.
118. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435–451.
119. Reder, L., & Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–78). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
120. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615.
121. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
122. Rogers, C. S., Jacoby, L. L., & Sommers, M. S. (2012). Frequent false hearing by older adults: the role of age differences in metacognition. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 33.
123. Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1992). Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Review, 33(2), 7–17.
124. Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (2004). Integrating temporal biases the interplay of focal thoughts and accessibility experiences. Psychological Science, 15(7), 474–481.
125. Schacter, D. L., & Worling, J. R. (1985). Attribute information and the feeling-of-knowing. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 39(3), 467.
126. Schneider, W. (1998). Performance prediction in young children: effects of skill, metacognition and wishful thinking. Developmental Science, 1(2), 291–297.
127. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press.
128. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
129. Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., & Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan's classification of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 44(3), 347–366.
130. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 296–303.
131. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simmons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.
132. Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 491–517.
133. Shin, H., Bjorklund, D. F., & Beck, E. F. (2007). The adaptive nature of children’s overestimation in a strategic memory task. Cognitive Development, 22, 197–212. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.001.
134. Siegel, R. G., Galassi, J. P., & Ware, W. B. (1985). A comparison of two models for predicting mathematics performance: social learning versus math aptitude-anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 531–538.
135. Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2001). Metacognition in motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(4), 907.
136. Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (2000). An update on strategic learning: it's more than textbook reading strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43, 528–541.
137. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. doi:10.1080/00220670209596607.
138. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3.
139. Son, L. K. (2005). Metacognitive control: children's short-term versus long-term study strategies. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 347–364.
140. Son, L. K. (2010). Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 255.
141. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 204.
142. Stanford University. (2008). Top 11 study skills. Retrieved from: http://web.stanford.edu/dept/CTL/Student/studyskills/top11.pdf.
143. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(05), 701–717.
144. Stipek, D. J., Roberts, T. A., & Sanborn, M. E. (1984). Preschool-age children's performance expectations for themselves and another child as a function of the incentive value of success and the salience of past performance. Child Development, 55, 1983–1989.
145. Suengas, A. G., & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 377.
146. Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2012). Multiple bases for young and older adults’ judgments of learning in multitrial learning. Psychology and Aging, 27, 474–483.
147. Texas A&M University. (2015). Self help learning. Retrieved from: http://scs.tamu.edu/?q=node/95.
148. The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. (n.d.). Avoiding study traps. Retrieved from: https://campushealth.unc.edu/health-topics/academic-success/study-skills-college.
149. The University of Pennsylvania. (2015). Creating better processes. Retrieved from: http://www.vpul.upenn.edu/lrc/lr/creatingbetterprocesses.php.
150. Thiede, K. W. (1999). The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multi-trial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 662–667.
151. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 1024.
152. Thorpe, A., Snell, M., Hoskins, S., & Bryant, J. (2007). False uniqueness: the self‐perception of New entrants to higher education in the UK and its implications for access—a pilot Study1. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(1), 3–22.
153. Toppino, T. C. (1991). The spacing effect in young children’s free recall: support for automatic-process explanations. Memory & Cognition, 19(2), 159–167.
154. Toppino, T. C. (1993). The spacing effect in preschool children’s free recall of pictures and words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(1), 27–30.
155. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
156. Undorf, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2014). The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: a closer look at the contribution of processing fluency. Memory & Cognition, 70, 1–12.
157. Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17(4), 339–345.
158. Virginia Tech. (2015). Study skills information. Retrieved from: http://www.ucc.vt.edu/academic_support_students/study_skills_information/.
159. Wahlheim, C. N., Finn, B., & Jacoby, L. L. (2012). Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 703–716.
160. Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experiences versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105–1113.
161. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310.
162. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 124–126.
163. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
164. Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568–579.
165. Yan, V. X., Thai, K. P., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Habits and beliefs that guide self-regulated learning: do they vary with mindset? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 140–152.
166. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25(6), 747–763.