Habits and beliefs that guide self-regulated learning: Do they varywith mindset

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 140-152

  Yan, Veronica X ^a   Thai, Khanh Phuong ^a   Bjork, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Metacognition; Mindset; Self regulated learning; Study strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911808024     PISSN: 22113681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form ametacognition nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219-235.
2. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of mem-ory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journalof Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
3. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor marketsfor experimental research: Amazon.com's mechanical turk. Political Analysis,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
4. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training ofhuman beings. In J. Metcalfe, & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowingabout knowing (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulusfluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processesto cognitive processes: Essays in Honor of William E. Estes (Vol. 2) (pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligencepredict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study andan intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.
7. Cepeda, N. J., Pasher, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practicein verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychology Bullietin,132, 354-380.
8. Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories ofpersonality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30.
9. Dempster, F. N. (1988). The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply theresults of psychological research. American Psychologist, 43, 627-634.
10. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improv-ing students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directionsfrom cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the PublicInterest, 14, 4-58.
11. Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation,cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returningto school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 43-59.
12. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and develop-ment. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis/Psychology Press.
13. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In D.Schunk, & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory,research, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541-553.
15. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,19, 126-134.
16. Hong, Y.-Y., Chiu, C.-Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories,attributions, and coping: A meaningful system approach. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
17. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Metacognitive strategies instudent learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?Memory, 17, 471-479.
18. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self regulated study.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219-224.
19. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Optimizing self-regulated study: The benefits andcosts of dropping flashcards. Memory, 16, 125-136.
20. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhancesubsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory andCognition, 35, 989-998.
21. Mangels, J. A., Butterfield, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why do beliefsabout intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neurosciencemodel. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75-86.
22. Miele, D. B., & Molden, D. (2010). Naive theories of intelligence and the role ofprocessing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychol-ogy: General, 139, 535-557.
23. Miele, D. B., Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). Children's naïve theories ofintelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child Development, 84,1879-1886.
24. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children'smotivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,33-52.
25. Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies inphysical education classes. Educational Psychology, 23, 141-157.
26. Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning com-ponents of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 33-40.
27. Rhodewalt, F. (1994). Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual dif-ferences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories.Journal of Personality, 62, 67-85.
28. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic researchand implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1, 181-210.
29. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memorytests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
30. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
31. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and humanmemory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342-353.
32. Susser, J. A., & McCabe, J. (2013). From the lab to the dorm room: Metacognitiveawareness and use of spaced study. Instructional Science, 41, 345-363.
33. Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A. C., & Palmer, D. P. (1987). Learning and study strategiesinventory. Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing.
34. Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know andwhen you think that you know but you don't. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 41-44.