The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 135, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 36-69

  Koriat, Asher ^a   Ma'ayan, Hilit ^a   Nussinson, Ravit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Judgments of learning; Metacognition; Monitoring, control; Subjective experience

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CONTROL; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; EXERCISE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SELF EVALUATION;

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CUES; EMOTIONS; EXERTION; FEEDBACK; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33244475787     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Adams, J. K., & Adams, P. A. (1961). Realism of confidence judgments. Psychological Review, 68, 33-45.
2. Adelmann, P. K., & Zajonc, R. B. (1989). Facial efference and the experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 249-280.
3. Allport, A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In D. E. Meyer & S. M. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126-131.
5. Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344-349.
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., & Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287-313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610-632.
11. Begg, I., Martin, L. A., & Needham, D. R. (1992). Memory monitoring: How useful is self-knowledge about memory? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195-218.
12. Bem, D. J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 199-218.
13. Bem, D. J. (1966). Inducing belief in false confessions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 707-710.
14. Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
15. Benjamin, A. S., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309-338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
17. Bless, H., & Forgas, J. P. (Eds.). (2000). The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
18. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227-287.
19. Breznitz, S., & Ben-Dov, G. (1991). Norms for word associations in Hebrew. Unpublished manuscript, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
20. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Brunswick, E. (1956). Perception and representative design in psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
23. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Castel, A. D., Benjamin, A. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (2002). The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1078-1085.
25. Chandler, C. C. (1994). Studying related pictures can reduce accuracy, but increase confidence, in a modified recognition test. Memory & Cognition, 22, 273-280.
26. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Costermans, J., Lories, G., & Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 142-150.
28. Dent, E. B. (2003). The interactional model: An alternative to the direct cause and effect construct for mutually causal organizational phenomena. Foundations of Science, 8, 295-314.
29. Duclos, S. E., Laird, J. D., Schneider, E., Sexter, M., Stern, L., & Van Lighten, O. (1989). Emotion-specific effects of facial expressions and postures on emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 100-108.
30. Dunlosky, J., & Connor, L. T. (1997). Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 25, 691-700.
31. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker (Ed.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
33. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98, 37-56.
34. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788.
35. Flanagan, O. (1992). Consciousness reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000). Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews, 31, 357-363.
37. Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 505-525.
38. Gruneberg, M. M., & Monks, J. (1974). "Feeling of knowing" and cued recall. Acta Psychologica, 38, 257-265.
39. Gruneberg, M. M., Monks, J., & Sykes, R. N. (1977). Some methodological problems with feelings of knowing studies. Acta Psychologica, 41, 365-371.
40. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208-216.
41. Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring processes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685-691.
42. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 22-34.
43. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2002). On predicting the future states of awareness for recognition of unrecallable items. Memory & Cognition, 30, 60-66.
44. Hyland, M. E. (1988). Motivational control theory: An integrative frame-work. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 642-651.
45. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
46. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
47. Jacoby, L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 18, pp. 1-47). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
49. Jacoby, L. L., Jennings, J. M., & Hay, J. F. (1996). Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled processes: Implications for diagnosis and rehabilitation of memory deficits. In D. J. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M. K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research theory in context (Vol. 1, pp. 161-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 314-336.
51. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist, 47, 802-809.
52. Jacoby, L. L., Ste-Marie, D., & Toth, J. P. (1993). Redefined automaticity: Unconscious influences, awareness and control. In L. Weiskrantz & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 261-282). New York: Clarendon Press.
53. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
54. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
55. James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205.
56. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137-154.
57. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58. Kelley, C. M. (1999). Subjective experience as a basis of "objective" judgments: Effects of past experience on judgments of difficulty. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 515-536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157-175.
60. Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Subjective reports and process dissociation: Fluency, knowing, and feeling. Acta Psychologica, 98, 127-140.
61. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24.
62. Kelley, C. M., & Rhodes, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense ofexperience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 41, pp. 293-320). New York: Academic Press.
63. King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 329-343.
64. Koriat, A. (1983). The subjective monitoring of mastery during study. Unpublished report, Israel Academy of Science.
65. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
66. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
67. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
68. Koriat, A. (1998). Metamemory: The feeling of knowing and its vagaries. In M. Sabourin, F. I. M. Craik, & M. Robert (Eds.), Advances in psychological science (Vol. 2, pp. 461-469). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
69. Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149-171.
70. Koriat, A. (2002). Metacognition research: An interim report. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 261-286). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
71. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
72. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 483-502). New York: Guilford Press.
73. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34-53.
74. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning and Memory, 6, 107-118.
75. Koriat, A., & Ma'ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478-492.
76. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma'ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
77. Laird, J. D., & Bresler, C. (1992). The process of emotional feeling: A self-perception theory. In M. Clark (Ed.), Emotion: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 223-234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. Leippe, M. R. (1980). Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-274.
80. Le Ny, J. F., Denhiere, G., & Le Taillanter, D. (1972). Regulation of study-time and interstimulus similarity in self-paced learning conditions. Acta Psychologica, 36, 280-289.
81. Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756-766.
82. Mandler, G. (2002). Consciousness recovered: Psychological functions and origins of conscious thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Marcel, A. J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.
84. Marcel, A. J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197-237.
85. Marcel, A. J. (1986). Consciousness and processing: Choosing and testing a null hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 40-41.
86. Marcel, A. J., & Bisiach, E. (Eds.). (1988). Consciousness in contemporary science. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
87. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., & Guttentag, R. (2001). Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? Memory & Cognition, 29, 222-233.
88. Mazzoni, G., & Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 47-60.
89. Mazzoni, G., Cornoldi, C., & Marchitelli, G. (1990). Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation? Memory & Cognition, 18, 196-204.
90. Mazzoni, G., & Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
91. McClelland, A. G. R., & Bolger, F. (1994). The calibration of subjective probability: Theories and models 1980-94. In G. Wright (Ed.), Subjective probability (pp. 453-482). Chichester, England: Wiley.
92. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 100-110.
93. Metcalfe, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349-363.
94. Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003). The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 530-542.
95. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851-864.
96. Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
97. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
98. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257-260.
99. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
100. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
101. Nelson, T. O., Graf, A., Dunlosky, J., Marlatt, A., Walker, D., & Luce, K. (1998). Effect of acute alcohol intoxication on recall and on judgments of learning during the acquisition of new information. In G. Mazzoni (Ed.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 161-180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676-686.
103. Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Landwehr, R., & Narens, L. (1986). A comparison of three predictors of an individual's memory performance: The individual's feeling of knowing versus the normative feeling of knowing versus base-rate item difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 279-287.
104. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125-141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
105. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53-69.
107. Nhouyvanisvong, A., & Reder, L. M. (1998). Rapid feeling-of-knowing: A strategy selection mechanism. In V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, & B. Dardenne (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 35-52). London: Sage.
108. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
109. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
110. Pelegrina, S., Bajo, M. T., & Justicia, F. (1999). Allocation of time in self-paced memory tasks: The role of practice, instructions, and individual differences in optimizing performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 401-429.
111. Pelegrina, S., Bajo, M. T., & Justicia, F. (2000). Differential allocation of study time: Incomplete compensation for the difficulty of the materials. Memory, 8, 377-392.
112. Perlmuter, L. C., & Monty, R. A. (1977). The importance of perceived control: Fact or fantasy? American Scientist, 65, 759-765.
113. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1979). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London: H. K. Lewis.
115. Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-138.
116. Reder, L. M. (1988). Strategic control of retrieval strategies. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 22, pp. 227-259). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
117. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
118. Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Herndon, F. (1997). Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 416-425.
119. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
120. Schacter, D. L. (1989). On the relations between memory and consciousness: Dissociable interactions and conscious experience. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 355-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
121. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074-1083.
122. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 93-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Schwartz, B. L., & Smith, S. M. (1997). The retrieval of related information influences tip-of-the-tongue states. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 68-86.
124. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
125. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
126. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York: Guilford Press.
127. Shallice, T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and non-conscious cognitive processing (pp. 396-420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
128. Sheffer, L. (2003). The reliability and structure of metacognitive skills and their relationship to cognitive performance. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
129. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221.
130. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage model. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116-1129.
131. Son, L. K., & Schwartz, B. L. (2002). The relation between metacognitive monitoring and control. In T. J. Perfect & B. S. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 15-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
132. Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 211-220.
133. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
134. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
135. Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037.
136. Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 673-679.
137. Vernon, D., & Usher, M. (2003). Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre- and postretrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 339-346.
138. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 211-264). New York: Academic Press.
139. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2003). On the construction of behavior and subjective experience: The production and evaluation of performance. In C. J. Marsolek & J. S. Bowers (Eds.), Rethinking implicit memory (pp. 239-260). London: Oxford University Press.
140. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., & Belli, R. F. (1998). The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science, 9, 124-126.
141. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T. A., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), Psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
142. Zacks, R. T. (1969). Invariance of total learning time under different conditions of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 441-447.
143. Zajonc, R. B. (1985, April 5). Emotion and facial efference: A theory reclaimed. Science, 228, 15-21.
144. Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 41-44.