Diversity in protein domain superfamilies

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 40-49

  Das, Sayoni ^a   Dawson, Natalie L ^a   Orengo, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING AFFINITY; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME BINDING; GENE FUSION; HUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; REVIEW; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CLASSIFICATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84943513626     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: 18790380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.09.005     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Altenhoff A.M., Studer R.A., Robinson-Rechavi M., Dessimoz C. Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002514.
2. Todd A.E., Orengo C.A., Thornton J.M. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001, 307:1113-1143.
3. Mi H., Muruganujan A., Thomas P.D. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D377-D386.
4. Pedruzzi I., Rivoire C., Auchincloss A.H., Coudert E., Keller G., De Castro E., Baratin D., Cuche B.A., Bougueleret L., Poux S., et al. HAMAP in 2013, new developments in the protein family classification and annotation system. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D584-D589.
5. Haft D.H., Selengut J.D., White O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:371-373.
6. Akiva E., Brown S., Almonacid D.E., Barber A.E., Custer A.F., Hicks M.A., Huang C.C., Lauck F., Mashiyama S.T., Meng E.C., et al. The structure-function linkage database. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 42:D521-D530.
7. Finn R.D., Bateman A., Clements J., Coggill P., Eberhardt R.Y., Eddy S.R., Heger A., Hetherington K., Holm L., Mistry J., et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D222-D230.
8. Letunic I., Doerks T., Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D257-D260.
9. Attwood T.K., Coletta A., Muirhead G., Pavlopoulou A., Philippou P.B., Popov I., Romá-Mateo C., Theodosiou A., Mitchell A.L. The PRINTS database: a fine-grained protein sequence annotation and analysis resource-its status in 2012. Database 2012, 2012:bas019.
10. Hunter S., Jones P., Mitchell A., Apweiler R., Attwood T.K., Bateman A., Bernard T., Binns D., Bork P., Burge S., et al. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D306-D312.
11. Marchler-Bauer A., Zheng C., Chitsaz F., Derbyshire M.K., Geer L.Y., Geer R.C., Gonzales N.R., Gwadz M., Hurwitz D.I., Lanczycki C.J., et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:D348-D352.
12. Sillitoe I., Lewis T.E., Cuff A., Das S., Ashford P., Dawson N.L., Furnham N., Laskowski R.A., Lee D., Lees J.G., et al. CATH: comprehensive structural and functional annotations for genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43:D376-D381.
13. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chandonia J.-M., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T.J.P., Chothia C., Murzin A.G. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 36:D419-D425.
14. Cheng H., Schaeffer R.D., Liao Y., Kinch L.N., Pei J., Shi S., Kim B.-H., Grishin N.V. ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10:e1003926.
15. Ponting C.P., Russell R.R. The natural history of protein domains. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2002, 31:45-71.
16. Afrasiabi C., Samad B., Dineen D., Meacham C., Sjölander K. The PhyloFacts FAT-CAT web server: ortholog identification and function prediction using fast approximate tree classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:W242-W248.
17. Han J.-H., Batey S., Nickson A.A., Teichmann S.A., Clarke J. The folding and evolution of multidomain proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:319-330.
18. Chothia C., Gough J., Vogel C., Teichmann S.A. Evolution of the protein repertoire. Science 2003, 300:1701-1703.
19. Levitt M. Nature of the protein universe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009, 106:11079-11084.
20. Bashton M., Chothia C. The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. Structure 2007, 15:85-99.
21. Lees J.G., Lee D., Studer R.A., Dawson N.L., Sillitoe I., Das S., Yeats C., Dessailly B.H., Rentzsch R., Orengo C.A. Gene3D: multi-domain annotations for protein sequence and comparative genome analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:D240-D245.
22. Das S., Lee D., Sillitoe I., Dawson N., Lees J., Orengo C. Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation. Bioinformatics 2015, btv398.
23. Pleiss J. Systematic analysis of large enzyme families: identification of specificity- and selectivity-determining hotspots. ChemCatChem 2014, 6:944-950.
24. Sirim D., Wagner F., Wang L., Schmid R.D., Pleiss J. The laccase engineering database: a classification and analysis system for laccases and related multicopper oxidases. Database 2011, 2011:bar006.
25. Lenfant N., Hotelier T., Velluet E., Bourne Y., Marchot P., Chatonnet A. ESTHER, the database of the α/β-hydrolase fold superfamily of proteins: tools to explore diversity of functions. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 41:423-429.
26. Gerlt J.A., Babbitt P.C., Jacobson M.P., Almo S.C. Divergent evolution in enolase superfamily: strategies for assigning functions. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:29-34.
27. Mashiyama S.T., Malabanan M.M., Akiva E., Bhosle R., Branch M.C., Hillerich B., Jagessar K., Kim J., Patskovsky Y., Seidel R.D., et al. Large-scale determination of sequence, structure, and function relationships in cytosolic glutathione transferases across the biosphere. PLoS Biol 2014, 12:e1001843.
28. Brown S.D., Babbitt P.C. New insights about enzyme evolution from large-scale studies of sequence and structure relationships. J Biol Chem 2014, 289:30221-30228.
29. Rausell A., Juan D., Pazos F., Valencia A. Protein interactions and ligand binding: from protein subfamilies to functional specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:1995-2000.
30. Chakraborty A., Chakrabarti S. A survey on prediction of specificity-determining sites in proteins. Brief Bioinform 2014, 16:71-88.
31. Kang H.J., Wilkins A.D., Lichtarge O., Wensel T.G. Determinants of endogenous ligand specificity divergence among metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Biol Chem 2015, 290:2870-2878.
32. Rojas A.M., Fuentes G., Rausell A., Valencia A. The Ras protein superfamily: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. J Cell Biol 2012, 196:189-201.
33. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000, 25:25-29.
34. Radivojac P., Clark W.T., Oron T.R., Schnoes A.M., Wittkop T., Sokolov A., Graim K., Funk C., Verspoor K., Ben-Hur A., et al. A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction. Nat Methods 2013, 10:221-227.
35. Dessailly B.H., Redfern O.C., Cuff A.L., Orengo C.a. Detailed analysis of function divergence in a large and diverse domain superfamily: toward a refined protocol of function classification. Structure 2010, 18:1522-1535.
36. Pandya C., Farelli J.D., Dunaway-Mariano D., Allen K.N. Enzyme promiscuity: engine of evolutionary innovation. J Biol Chem 2014, 289:30229-30236.
37. Bridgham J.T., Eick G.N., Larroux C., Deshpande K., Harms M.J., Gauthier M.E.A., Ortlund E.A., Degnan B.M., Thornton J.W. Protein evolution by molecular tinkering: diversification of the nuclear receptor superfamily from a ligand-dependent ancestor. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000497.
38. Zhao Z., Liu H., Luo Y., Zhou S., An L., Wang C., Jin Q., Zhou M., Xu J.-R. Molecular evolution and functional divergence of tubulin superfamily in the fungal tree of life. Sci Rep 2014, 4:6746.
39. Furnham N., Dawson N.L., Rahman S.A., Thornton J.M., Orengo C.A. Large-scale analysis exploring evolution of catalytic machineries and mechanisms in enzyme superfamilies. J Mol Biol 2015, (in revision).
40. Furnham N., Sillitoe I., Holliday G.L., Cuff A.L., Laskowski R.A., Orengo C.A., Thornton J.M. Exploring the evolution of novel enzyme functions within structurally defined protein superfamilies. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8:e1002403.
41. Wichelecki D.J., Balthazor B.M., Chau A.C., Vetting M.W., Fedorov A.A., Fedorov E.V., Lukk T., Patskovsky Y.V., Stead M.B., Hillerich B.S., et al. Discovery of function in the enolase superfamily: d-mannonate and d-gluconate dehydratases in the d-mannonate dehydratase subgroup. Biochemistry 2014, 53:2722-2731.
42. Groninger-Poe F.P., Bouvier J.T., Vetting M.W., Kalyanaraman C., Kumar R., Almo S.C., Jacobson M.P., Gerlt J.A. Evolution of enzymatic activities in the enolase superfamily: galactarate dehydratase III from Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Biochemistry 2014, 53:4192-4203.
43. Martinez Cuesta S., Furnham N., Rahman S.A., Sillitoe I., Thornton J.M. The evolution of enzyme function in the isomerases. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2014, 26:121-130.
44. Casey A.K., Hicks M.A., Johnson J.L., Babbitt P.C., Frantom P.A. Mechanistic and bioinformatic investigation of a conserved active site helix in α-isopropylmalate synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a member of the DRE-TIM metallolyase superfamily. Biochemistry 2014, 53:2915-2925.
45. Sugrue E., Fraser N.J., Hopkins D.H., Carr P.D., Khurana J.L., Oakeshott J.G., Scott C., Jackson C.J. Evolutionary expansion of the amidohydrolase superfamily in bacteria in response to the synthetic compounds molinate and diuron. Appl Environ Microbiol 2015, 81:2612-2624.
46. Ben-David M., Wieczorek G., Elias M., Silman I., Sussman J.L., Tawfik D.S. Catalytic metal ion rearrangements underline promiscuity and evolvability of a metalloenzyme. J Mol Biol 2013, 425:1028-1038.
47. Daumann L.J., McCarthy B.Y., Hadler K.S., Murray T.P., Gahan L.R., Larrabee J.A., Ollis D.L., Schenk G. Promiscuity comes at a price: catalytic versatility vs efficiency in different metal ion derivatives of the potential bioremediator GpdQ. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013, 1834:425-432.
48. Studer R.A., Christin P.A., Williams M.A., Orengo C.A. Stability-activity tradeoffs constrain the adaptive evolution of RubisCO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014, 111:2223-2228.
49. Dellus-Gur E., Toth-Petroczy A., Elias M., Tawfik D.S. What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. J Mol Biol 2013, 425:2609-2621.
50. Tóth-Petróczy Á., Tawfik D.S. The robustness and innovability of protein folds. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2014, 26:131-138.
51. Wittig U., Kania R., Golebiewski M., Rey M., Shi L., Jong L., Algaa E., Weidemann A., Sauer-Danzwith H., Mir S., et al. SABIO-RK-database for biochemical reaction kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:D790-D796.
52. Dessailly B.H., Dawson N.L., Mizuguchi K., Orengo C.A. Functional site plasticity in domain superfamilies. Biochim Biophys Acta - Proteins Proteomics 2012, 1834:874-889.
53. Ojha S., Meng E.C., Babbitt P.C. Evolution of function in the 'two dinucleotide binding domains' flavoproteins. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e121.
54. Reid A.J., Ranea J.A., Orengo C.A. Comparative evolutionary analysis of protein complexes in E. coli and yeast. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:79.
55. Xu C., Min J. Structure and function of WD40 domain proteins. Protein Cell 2011, 2:202-214.
56. Sandhya S., Rani S.S., Pankaj B., Govind M.K., Offmann B., Srinivasan N., Sowdhamini R. Length variations amongst protein domain superfamilies and consequences on structure and function. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4981.
57. Cuff A., Redfern O.C., Greene L., Sillitoe I., Lewis T., Dibley M., Reid A., Pearl F., Dallman T., Todd A., et al. The CATH hierarchy revisited - structural divergence in domain superfamilies and the continuity of fold space. Struct Des 2009, 17:1051-1062.
58. Reeves G.A., Dallman T.J., Redfern O.C., Akpor A., Orengo C.A. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. J Mol Biol 2006, 360:725-741.
59. Galperin M.Y., Koonin E. V: Divergence and convergence in enzyme evolution. J Biol Chem 2012, 287:21-28.
60. Huang H., Pandya C., Liu C., Al-Obaidi N.F., Wang M., Zheng L., Keating S.T., Aono M., Love J.D., Evans B., et al. Panoramic view of a superfamily of phosphatases through substrate profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015, 112:E1974-E1983.
61. He P., Moran G.R. Structural and mechanistic comparisons of the metal-binding members of the vicinal oxygen chelate (VOC) superfamily. J Inorg Biochem 2011, 105:1259-1272.
62. Sadreyev R.I., Kim B.-H., Grishin N.V. Discrete-continuous duality of protein structure space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:321-328.
63. Radó-Trilla N., Arató K., Pegueroles C., Raya A., de la Luna S., Albà M.M. Key role of amino acid repeat expansions in the functional diversification of duplicated transcription factors. Mol Biol Evol 2015, 10.1093/molbev/msv103.
64. Mangeon A., Junqueira R.M., Sachetto-Martins G. Functional diversity of the plant glycine-rich proteins superfamily. Plant Signal Behav 2010, 5:99-104.
65. Buljan M., Bateman A. The evolution of protein domain families. Biochem Soc Trans 2009, 37:751-755.
66. Teichmann S.A., Rison S.C.G., Thornton J.M., Riley M., Gough J., Chothia C. The evolution and structural anatomy of the small molecule metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 2001, 311:693-708.
67. Vogel C., Pleiss J. The modular structure of ThDP-dependent enzymes. Proteins 2014, 82:2523-2537.
68. Copley S.D. An evolutionary biochemist's perspective on promiscuity. Trends Biochem Sci 2015, 40:72-78.
69. Kainulainen V., Korhonen T. Dancing to another tune-adhesive moonlighting proteins in bacteria. Biology (Basel) 2014, 3:178-204.
70. Zou T., Risso V.A., Gavira J.A., Sanchez-Ruiz J.M., Ozkan S.B. Evolution of conformational dynamics determines the conversion of a promiscuous generalist into a specialist enzyme. Mol Biol Evol 2015, 32:132-143.
71. Baier F., Tokuriki N. Connectivity between catalytic landscapes of the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily. J Mol Biol 2014, 426:2442-2456.
72. Baier F., Chen J., Solomonson M., Strynadka N.C.J., Tokuriki N. Distinct metal isoforms underlie promiscuous activity profiles of metalloenzymes. ACS Chem Biol 2015, 10:1684-1693.
73. Lamb D.C., Waterman M.R. Fifty years of cytochrome P450 research: examples of what we know and do not know. Fifty Years of Cytochrome P450 Research 2014, 43-71. Springer.
74. Steczkiewicz K., Muszewska A., Knizewski L., Rychlewski L., Ginalski K. Sequence, structure and functional diversity of PD-(D/E)XK phosphodiesterase superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:7016-7045.
75. Majorek K.A., Dunin-Horkawicz S., Steczkiewicz K., Muszewska A., Nowotny M., Ginalski K., Bujnicki J.M. The RNase H-like superfamily: new members, comparative structural analysis and evolutionary classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42:4160-4179.
76. Zhao S., Sakai A., Zhang X., Vetting M.W., Kumar R., Hillerich B., San Francisco B., Solbiati J., Steves A., Brown S., et al. Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks. Elife 2014, 3:e03275.
77. Uchiyama T., Miyazaki K., Yaoi K. Characterization of a novel β-glucosidase from a compost microbial metagenome with strong transglycosylation activity. J Biol Chem 2013, 288:18325-18334.
78. Milshteyn A., Schneider J.S., Brady S.F. Mining the metabiome: identifying novel natural products from microbial communities. Chem Biol 2014, 21:1211-1223.
79. Fang H., Gough J. A domain-centric solution to functional genomics via dcGO Predictor. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14:S9.
80. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N.S., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 2003, 13:2498-2504.