A domain-centric solution to functional genomics via dcGO Predictor

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL.3, 2013, Pages

  Fang, Hai ^a   Gough, Julian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTION PREDICTION; FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; FUNCTIONAL ONTOLOGIES; FUNCTIONAL SIGNALS; INDIVIDUAL PROTEINS; NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING;

GENES; MAMMALS;

PROTEINS;

MAMMALIA;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENE; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

GENES; GENOME; GENOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879313512     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S3-S9     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11(1):31-46. 10.1038/nrg2626, 19997069.
2. Ledford H. Big science: The cancer genome challenge. Nature 2010, 464(7291):972-974. 10.1038/464972a, 20393534.
3. Reeves GA, Talavera D, Thornton JM. Genome and proteome annotation: organization, interpretation and integration. J R Soc Interface 2009, 6(31):129-147. 10.1098/rsif.2008.0341, 2658791, 19019817.
4. Hawkins T, Chitale M, Kihara D. New paradigm in protein function prediction for large scale omics analysis. Mol Biosyst 2008, 4(3):223-231. 10.1039/b718229e, 18437265.
5. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(Database):D419-425. 2238974, 18000004.
6. Rentzsch R, Orengo CA. Protein function prediction--the power of multiplicity. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27(4):210-219. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.01.002, 19251332.
7. Friedberg I. Automated protein function prediction--the genomic challenge. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7(3):225-242. 10.1093/bib/bbl004, 16772267.
8. Malmstrom L, Riffle M, Strauss CE, Chivian D, Davis TN, Bonneau R, Baker D. Superfamily assignments for the yeast proteome through integration of structure prediction with the gene ontology. PLoS Biol 2007, 5(4):e76. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050076, 1828141, 17373854.
9. Drew K, Winters P, Butterfoss GL, Berstis V, Uplinger K, Armstrong J, Riffle M, Schweighofer E, Bovermann B, Goodlett DR, et al. The Proteome Folding Project: proteome-scale prediction of structure and function. Genome Res 2011, 21(11):1981-1994. 10.1101/gr.121475.111, 3205581, 21824995.
10. Velankar S, Best C, Beuth B, Boutselakis CH, Cobley N, Sousa Da Silva AW, Dimitropoulos D, Golovin A, Hirshberg M, John M, et al. PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38(Database):D308-317. 10.1093/nar/gkp916, 2808887, 19858099.
11. Punta M, Ofran Y. The rough guide to in silico function prediction, or how to use sequence and structure information to predict protein function. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(10):e1000160. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000160, 2518264, 18974821.
12. Lee D, Redfern O, Orengo C. Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8(12):995-1005. 10.1038/nrm2281, 18037900.
13. Madera M, Vogel C, Kummerfeld SK, Chothia C, Gough J. The SUPERFAMILY database in 2004: additions and improvements. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Database):D235-239. 308851, 14681402.
14. Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol 2001, 313(4):903-919. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5080, 11697912.
15. Wilson D, Madera M, Vogel C, Chothia C, Gough J. The SUPERFAMILY database in 2007: families and functions. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35(Database):D308-313. 10.1093/nar/gkl910, 1669749, 17098927.
16. de Lima Morais DA, Fang H, Rackham OJ, Wilson D, Pethica R, Chothia C, Gough J. SUPERFAMILY 1.75 including a domain-centric gene ontology method. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database):D427-434.
17. Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 39(Database):D214-219.
18. Chothia C, Gough J. Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution. Biochem J 2009, 419(1):15-28. 10.1042/BJ20090122, 19272021.
19. Vogel C, Berzuini C, Bashton M, Gough J, Teichmann SA. Supra-domains: evolutionary units larger than single protein domains. J Mol Biol 2004, 336(3):809-823. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.026, 15095989.
20. Automated Function Prediction: Critical Assessment of Function Annotations (CAFA). , http://biofunctionprediction.org
21. SUPERFAMILY database of sturctural and functional protein annotatioins for all completely sequenced organisms. , http://supfam.org
22. Gene Ontology Annotation (UniProt-GOA) Database. , http://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/
23. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate - a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological 1995, 57(1):289-300.
24. Biological Process (BP): stem cell maintenance. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/cgi-bin/dcgo.cgi?go=0019827
25. Fang H, Gough J. dcGO: database of domain-centric ontologies on functions, phenotypes, diseases and more. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/dcGO/
26. Triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) superfamily. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/cgi-bin/dcscop.cgi?sunid=51351
27. Molecular Function (MF): serine-type peptidase activity. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/cgi-bin/dcgo.cgi?go=0008236
28. Wilson D, Pethica R, Zhou Y, Talbot C, Vogel C, Madera M, Chothia C, Gough J. SUPERFAMILY--sophisticated comparative genomics, data mining, visualization and phylogeny. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37(Database):D380-386. 10.1093/nar/gkn762, 2686452, 19036790.
29. Pethica R, Barker G, Kovacs T, Gough J. TreeVector: scalable, interactive, phylogenetic trees for the web. PLoS One 2010, 5(1):e8934. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008934, 2812488, 20126613.
30. Pena-Castillo L, Tasan M, Myers CL, Lee H, Joshi T, Zhang C, Guan Y, Leone M, Pagnani A, Kim WK, et al. A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence. Genome Biol 2008, 9(Suppl 1):S2. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s2, 2559986, 18834493.
31. Kourmpetis YA, van Dijk AD, van Ham RC, ter Braak CJ. Genome-wide computational function prediction of Arabidopsis proteins by integration of multiple data sources. Plant Physiol 2011, 155(1):271-281. 10.1104/pp.110.162164, 3075770, 21098674.
32. Troyanskaya OG, Dolinski K, Owen AB, Altman RB, Botstein D. A Bayesian framework for combining heterogeneous data sources for gene function prediction (in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(14):8348-8353. 10.1073/pnas.0832373100, 166232, 12826619.
33. Nariai N, Kolaczyk ED, Kasif S. Probabilistic protein function prediction from heterogeneous genome-wide data. PLoS One 2007, 2(3):e337. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000337, 1828618, 17396164.
34. dcGO Predictor. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/cgi-bin/dcpredictormain.cgi
35. Hunter S, Jones P, Mitchell A, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bateman A, Bernard T, Binns D, Bork P, Burge S, et al. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(D1):D306-D312. 10.1093/nar/gkr948, 3245097, 22096229.
36. Davis MJ, Sehgal MS, Ragan MA. Automatic, context-specific generation of Gene Ontology slims. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:498. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-498, 3098080, 20929524.
37. Fang H, Wang K, Zhang J. Transcriptome and proteome analyses of drug interactions with natural products. Curr Drug Metab 2008, 9(10):1038-1048. 10.2174/138920008786927802, 19075620.
38. Fang H, Yang Y, Li C, Fu S, Yang Z, Jin G, Wang K, Zhang J, Jin Y. Transcriptome analysis of early organogenesis in human embryos. Dev Cell 2010, 19(1):174-184. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.014, 20643359.
39. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102(43):15545-15550. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102, 1239896, 16199517.
40. Sherman BT, Huang da W, Tan Q, Guo Y, Bour S, Liu D, Stephens R, Baseler MW, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. DAVID Knowledgebase: a gene-centered database integrating heterogeneous gene annotation resources to facilitate high-throughput gene functional analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:426. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-426, 2186358, 17980028.
41. Denoeud F, Henriet S, Mungpakdee S, Aury JM, Da Silva C, Brinkmann H, Mikhaleva J, Olsen LC, Jubin C, Canestro C, et al. Plasticity of animal genome architecture unmasked by rapid evolution of a pelagic tunicate. Science 2010, 330(6009):1381-1385. 10.1126/science.1194167, 21097902.
42. Chavali S, Morais DA, Gough J, Babu MM. Evolution of eukaryotic genome architecture: Insights from the study of a rapidly evolving metazoan, Oikopleura dioica: Non-adaptive forces such as elevated mutation rates may influence the evolution of genome architecture. Bioessays 2011, 33(8):592-601. 10.1002/bies.201100034, 21681984.
43. Michod RE. Evolution of individuality during the transition from unicellular to multicellular life. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104(Suppl 1):8613-8618. 1876437, 17494748.
44. Sebe-Pedros A, de Mendoza A, Lang BF, Degnan BM, Ruiz-Trillo I. Unexpected repertoire of metazoan transcription factors in the unicellular holozoan Capsaspora owczarzaki. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28(3):1241-1254. 10.1093/molbev/msq309, 21087945.
45. King N, Westbrook MJ, Young SL, Kuo A, Abedin M, Chapman J, Fairclough S, Hellsten U, Isogai Y, Letunic I, et al. The genome of the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis and the origin of metazoans. Nature 2008, 451(7180):783-788. 10.1038/nature06617, 2562698, 18273011.
46. Ruiz-Trillo I, Burger G, Holland PW, King N, Lang BF, Roger AJ, Gray MW. The origins of multicellularity: a multi-taxon genome initiative. Trends Genet 2007, 23(3):113-118. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.01.005, 17275133.
47. Manning G, Young SL, Miller WT, Zhai Y. The protist, Monosiga brevicollis, has a tyrosine kinase signaling network more elaborate and diverse than found in any known metazoan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(28):9674-9679. 10.1073/pnas.0801314105, 2453073, 18621719.
48. Conejo M, Bertin M, Pomponi SA, Ellington WR. The early evolution of the phosphagen kinases--insights from choanoflagellate and poriferan arginine kinases. J Mol Evol 2008, 66(1):11-20. 10.1007/s00239-007-9058-0, 18064398.
49. Lim WA, Pawson T. Phosphotyrosine signaling: evolving a new cellular communication system. Cell 2010, 142(5):661-667. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.023, 2950826, 20813250.
50. Lavrov DV. Key transitions in animal evolution: a mitochondrial DNA perspective. Integr Comp Biol 2007, 47(5):734-743. 10.1093/icb/icm045, 21669754.
51. dcGO Enrichment. , http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/cgi-bin/dcenrichment.cgi
52. Parikesit AA, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Evolution and Quantitative Comparison of Genome-Wide Protein Domain Distributions. Genes 2011, 2(4):912-924.
53. Rogers MF, Ben-Hur A. The use of gene ontology evidence codes in preventing classifier assessment bias. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(9):1173-1177. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp122, 19254922.
54. Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Inform 2009, 23(1):205-211.
55. Basu MK, Carmel L, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. Genome Res 2008, 18(3):449-461. 10.1101/gr.6943508, 2259109, 18230802.
56. Fang H, Gough J. dcGO: database of domain-centric ontologies on functions, phenotypes, diseases and more. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, (41):D536-544.