Theorizing language development at the intersection of ‘task’ and L2 writing Reconsidering complexity

Task-Based Language Teaching

Volumn 7, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-103

  Byrnes, Heidi ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941187500     PISSN: 1877346X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/tblt.7.04byr     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), M.M. Bakhtin. Speech genres and other late essays (pp. 60–102). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bygate, M. (2004). Some trends in applied linguistics: Towards a generic view. AILA Review, 17, 6–22. DOI: 10.1075/aila.17.04byg
3. Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437.
4. Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20, 50–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.005
5. Byrnes, H. (2011). Beyond writing as language learning or content learning: Construing foreign language writing as meaning-making. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 133–157). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.11byr
6. Byrnes, H. (2012). Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A systemic functional linguistic approach. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 191–219). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078303.191
7. Byrnes, H. (2013a). Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking. An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. Plenary presented at the Fifth International Conference on Task-based Language Teaching. Banff, Canada, October 4.
8. Byrnes, H. (2013b). Positioning writing as meaning-making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.004
9. Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H.H., & Sprang, K.A. (2006). Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum construction. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 85–110.
10. Byrnes, H., Maxim, H.H., & Norris, J.M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94, Supplement s-1.
11. Christie, F. (2012). Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62 (Supplement 1). DOI: 10.5860/choice.50-1596
12. Christie, F., & Martin, J.R. (Eds.). (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Continuum.
13. Cook, V. (2008). Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for second language acquisition research? In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding second language process (pp. 16–26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14. Cumming, A. (1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. DOI: 10.1177/0741088390007004003
15. Cumming, A. (2009). The contribution of studies of foreign language writing to research, theories and policies. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 209–231). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16. Cumming, A. (2011). Preface. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. ix–xii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-375670-1.10020-2
17. de Bot, K. (Guest Ed.). (2008). Second language development as a dynamic process. Modern Language Journal, 92, 166–283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00712.x
18. de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a Dynamic Systems Theory perspective. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.29.01deb
19. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
20. Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics—Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558–589.
21. Hall, J.K., Cheng, A., & Carlson, M.T. (2006). Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of language knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 220–240. DOI: 10.1093/applin/aml013
22. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. DOI: 10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
23. Halliday, M.A.K. (1996). On grammar and grammatics. In R. Hasan, C. Cloran, & D.G. Butt (Eds.), Functionaldescriptions:Theoryinpractice(pp.1–38).Amsterdam:JohnBenjamins.DOI:10.1075/cilt.121.03hal
24. Halliday, M.A.K. (2007). On the concept of "educational linguistics" (1990). In J.J. Webster (Ed.), Language and education (pp. 354–367). London: Continuum.
25. Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
26. Halliday, M.A.K. (revised by C.M.I.M. Matthiessen) (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.
27. Heller, M. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101–114. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951
28. Hood, S. (2008). Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change. Linguistics and Education, 19, 351–365. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.003
29. Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230274662
30. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
31. Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research, and pedagogy. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.05hyl
32. Johns, A.M. (2011). The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 56–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.003
33. Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. Modern Language Journal, 98, 286–301. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x
34. Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29, 645–672. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amn022
35. Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00793_5.x
37. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203930250
38. Liardét, C. (2013). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ deployment of grammatical metaphor: Learning to make academically valued meanings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 161–178.
39. Long, M.H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language development (pp. 77–99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
40. Long, M.H. (1990). Task, group, and task-group interactions. In S. Anivan (Ed.), Language teaching methodology for the nineties (pp. 31–50). Singapore: SAEMEO Regional Language Centre.
41. Manchón, R.M. (2009a). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 1–19). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
42. Manchón, R.M. (Ed.). (2009b). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
43. Manchón, R.M. (Ed.). (2011a). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31
44. Manchón, R.M. (2011b). Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 3–14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.03man
45. Manchón, R.M. (2011c). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.07man
46. Manchón, R.M. (Ed.) (2012a). L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078303
47. Manchón, R.M. (2012b). Multiple perspectives in the study of L2 writing development: An introduction. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 1–16). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078303.1
48. Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E.A. Soler & M.P.S. Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0_6
49. Manchón, R.M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.13man
50. Manchón, R.M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–124). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
51. Martin, J.R. (1991). Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1, 99–162. DOI: 10.1080/10350339109360331
52. Martin, J.R. (2007). Constructing knowledge: A functional linguistic perspective. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives (pp. 34–64). London: Continuum.
53. Martin, J.R. (2012). Writing and genre studies. In C. Chapelle (Gen. Ed.), Encyclopaedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1297
54. Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
55. Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
56. Martin, J.R., & White, P.R.R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2007). The ‘architecture’ of language according to systemic functional theory: Developments since the 1970s. In R. Hasan, C.M.I.M. Matthiessen, & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Vol. 2 (pp. 505–561). London: Equinox.
58. Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2009). Meaning in the making: Meaning potential emerging from acts of meaning. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 206–229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00541.x
59. Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010)). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 61–81. DOI: 10.4207/pa.2010.abs8
60. Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In M.H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Cambridge: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444315783.ch30
61. Norris, J.M., & Manchón, R.M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221–244). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078303.221
62. Norris, J.M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amp044
63. Ortega, L. (2009). Studying writing across English as a foreign language contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 232–255). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
64. Ortega, L. (2011). Reflections on the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of second language writing. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 237–250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.16ort
65. Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). Theorizing advancedness. Setting up the longitudinal research agenda. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 281–299). London: Routledge.
66. Ortega, L., & Carson, J.G. (2010). Multicompetence, social context, and L2 writing research praxis. In T. Silva & P.K. Matsuda (Eds.), Practicing theory in second language writing (pp. 48–71). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
67. Robinson, P. (2011a). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
68. Robinson, P. (Guest Ed.). (2011b). Task-based language learning. Language Learning, 61, Supplement 1, 1–226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x
69. Robinson, P. (2011c). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61, S-1, 1–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x
70. Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H. (2013). Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.009
71. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccp007
72. Schleppegrell, M.J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Schmidt, R.W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-21591-4_6
74. Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200–219). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
75. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203851357
76. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1177/003368829802900209
77. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis. Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–481). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
79. Tardy, C.M. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 79–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.003
80. Tardy, C.M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.004
81. Tardy, C.M. (2012). A rhetorical genre theory perspective on L2 writing development. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 164–189). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9781934078303.165
82. Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 164–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In K. van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J.M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 2–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
84. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J.P. Lantolf & M.E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultual theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London: Equinox.