Task-Based Teaching and Testing

The Handbook of Language Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 578-594

  Norris, John M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Communicative language teaching (CLT); Global interest in TBLT and fostering language learning; Pedagogic task work; Pedagogic task work and target task performance; Task and language use and language learning in holistic terms; Task input phase initiating teaching sequence; Task based language teaching (TBLT) approach to second or foreign language education; Task based teaching; Task based testing; TBLT comprehensive alternative to status quo

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955041926     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444315783.ch30     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 23-46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centred assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. In N. Bird et al. (eds.), Language and learning: Papers presented at the Annual International Language in Education Conference (Hong Kong, 1993) (pp. 73-94). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Department.
3. Byrnes, H. (2002).The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculumLanguage Testing 19, 419-37.
4. Byrnes, H., Crane, C., Maxim, H., & Sprang, K. (2006).Taking text to task: Issues and choices in curriculum constructionITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 152, 85-109.
5. Carless, D. (2004).Issues in teachers' re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schoolsTESOL Quarterly 38, 639-62.
6. Carless, D. (2007).The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Per-spectives from Hong KongSystem 35, 4, 595-608.
7. Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., Kim, Y., et al. (2005). A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In M. H. Long (ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 225-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cresswell, J. & Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Cronbach, L. & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry of education. New York: Macmillan.
11. Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.) (1993a). Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12. Crookes, G. & Gass, S. (eds.) (1993b). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
13. Cureton, E. E. (1951). Validity. In E. F. Lingquist (ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 621-94). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
14. Curriculum Development Council (2002).English language education: Key learning area cur riculum guide (primary 1-secondary 3). Hong Kong SAR, China: Government Printer.
15. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan/Collier.
16. Ellis, R. (2003).Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Flowerdew, L. (2005).Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: The "what", the "how", and the "why?"Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4, 135-47.
18. González-Lloret, M. (2003).Designing task-based call to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldasLanguage Learning & Technology 7, 86-104.
19. Gysen, S. & Van Avermaet, P. (2005).Issues in functional language performance assessment: The case of the Certificate Dutch as a Foreign LanguageLanguage Assessment Quarterly 2, 51-68.
20. Izumi, S. (2003).EFL education in Japan from the perspective of second language acquisition researchSophia Linguistica 50, 3-14.
21. James, W. (1899/1958). Talks to teachers. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
22. Kane, M. T. (2001).Current concerns in validity theoryJournal of Educational Measurement 38, 319-42.
23. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
24. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Krashen, S. & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
26. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Leaver, B. L. & Willis, J. R. (eds.) (2004). Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and programs. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
28. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77-99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
29. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (eds.), Foreign language research in cross cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Long, M. H. (2005a.Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Long, M. H. & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
32. Long, M. H. & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597-603). London: Routledge.
33. Long, M. H. & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Markee, N. (1996).Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
35. Norris, J. M. (2008.Validity evaluation in language assessment. New York: Peter Lang.
36. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000).Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysisLanguage Learning 50, 417-528.
37. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 716-61). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (eds.), Re searching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 119-34).Harlow, UK: Longman.
39. Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (eds.) (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
40. Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77-109). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
41. Ortega, L. & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005).Longitudinal research in SLA: Recent trends and future directionsAnnual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 26-45.
42. ohnM. Norris
43. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Reid, W. J. (1997.Research on task-centered practiceSocial Work Research 21, 3, 132-7.
45. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognition and second language syllabus design: Atriadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Samuda, V. & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Skehan, P. (1996).A framework for the implementation of task-based instructionApplied Linguistics 17, 38-62.
48. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Sternberg R.J. (2003).What is an "expert student?"Educational Researcher 32, 8, 5-9.
50. Van Avermaet, P. & Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In K. Van den Branden (ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 17-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Van den Branden, K. (2006). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden (ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 217-73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Van Gorp, K. & Bogaert, N. (2006). Developing language tasks for primary and secondary education. In K. Van den Branden (ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 76-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Virjo, I., Holmberg-Mattila, D., & Mattila, K. (2001).Task-based learning (TBL) in undergraduate medical educationMedical Teacher 23, 1, 55-8.
54. Watanabe, Y., Konoeda, K., & Mochizuki, N. (2007). Task-based critical pedagogy in JHS EFL. Paper presented at the JALT International Conference on Language Teaching and Learning, Tokyo, Japan.
55. Widdowson, H. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. A taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curriculum development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Dewey, J. (1933)How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Henry Holt.
59. Estaire, S. & Zanón, J. (1994)Planning classwork: A task-based approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Long, M. H. (ed.) (2005b)Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Norris, J. M. (2002). Interpretations, intended uses and designs in task-based language assessmentLanguage Testing 19, 4, 337-46.
62. Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., & Yoshioka, J. (1998)Designing second language performance assessment. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
63. Swain M.Lapkin S.Sternberg, R. J. (2003).What is an "expert student?"Educational Researcher 32, 8, 5-9.
64. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: A Canadian case study Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
65. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.
66. Wright, T. (2000).No more pencils. No more books? Arguing for the use of experiential learning in post secondary environmental studies classroomsElectronic Green Journal, Dec 2000, n.p.