Some current trends in applied linguistics: Towards a generic view

AILA Review

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 6-22

  Bygate, Martin ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

A generic view; Applied Linguistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944495882     PISSN: 14610213     EISSN: 15705595     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/aila.17.04byg     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adolphs, S. and N. Schmitt. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics 24(4): 425-438.
2. Altenberg, B. and S. Granger. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 173-194.
3. Ashkehave, I. and J. Swales (2001). Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 195-212.
4. Berger, J. (1979). Pig Earth. London: Writers and Readers Publishers' Cooperative.
5. Biber, D. , S. Conrad and R. Reppen (1994). Corpus-based approaches to issues in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 15(2): 169-189.
6. Block, D. (1998). Tale of a language learner. Language Teaching Research 2(2): 148-176.
7. Bogaards, P. (2000). Testing L2 vocabulary knowledge at a high level: the case of the Euralex French Tests. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 490-516.
8. Borg, S. (2001). The research journal: a tool for promoting and understanding researcher development. Language Teaching Research 5(2): 156-177.
9. Breen, M. , B. Hird, M. Milton, R. Oliver and A. Thwaite. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 22(4): 470-501.
10. Brumfit, C. J. (1997). How Applied Linguistics is the same as any other science. Internatinal Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1): 86-94.
11. Brumfit, C. J. (2001). Individual freedom in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Bygate, M. (2000). Introduction. Special Issue: Tasks in Language Pedagogy. Language Teaching Research. 4/3: 185-192.
13. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
14. Cameron, D. , E. Fraser, P. Harvey, B. Rampton and K. Richardson. (1992). Researching language: issues of power and method. London: Routledge.
15. Cameron, L. & G. Low (eds) (1999). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Cook, G. (2001) 'The philospher pulled the lower jaw of the hen. ' Ludicrous invented sentences in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 22(3): 366-387.
17. Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford Introductions to Language Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Cook, V. (2002). The functions of invented sentences: A reply to Guy Cook. Applied Linguistics 23(2): 262-269.
19. Coulthard, R. M. (2003). Norm and creativity in language use- at what point does linguistic similarity suggest plagiarism? Talk given to the Language Research Network, University of Leeds, May (2003).
20. Crystal, D. (2003). Final frontiers in applied linguistics. In Srikant Sarangi, S & T. van Leeuwen (eds), Applied Linguistics & Communities of Practice. British Studies in Applied Linguistics. Volume 18. London: Continuum.
21. Davies, A. (1999). An introduction to applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
22. Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23. Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 91-126.
24. Ellis, N. C. 2001. Memory for language. In P. Robinson (ed). Cognition and Second language instruction. Cambridge: CUP. 33-68.
25. Flowerdew, J. and T. Dudley-Evans (2002). Genre analysis of editorial letters to international journal contributors. Applied Linguistics 23(4): 463-489.
26. Foster, P. , A. Tonkyn and G. Wigglesworth (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Lingustics 21(3): 354-375.
27. Gass, S. M. & A. Mackey (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Gibbons, J. (2001). Revising the language of New South Wales police procedures: Applied Linguistics in Action. Applied Linguistics 22 (4): 439-469.
29. Grabe, W. & R. Kaplan (eds) (1992). Introduction to applied linguistics. Reading, Mass; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
30. Hird, B. , A. Thwaite, M. Breen, M. Milton and R. Oliver. (2000). Teaching English as a second language to children and adults: variations in practices. Language Teaching Research 4(1): 3-32.
31. Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: George Allen & Unwin.
32. Hoey, M. (1993). The case for the exchange complex. In M. Hoey (ed. ), Data, description, discourse. Papers on the English Language in honour of John McH Sinclair. London: Harper Collins.
33. Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Hunston, S. & G. Francis. (2000). Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Jarvis, I. and M. Robinson (1997). Analysing educational discourse: An exploratory study of teacher response and support to pupils' learning. Applied Linguistics 18(2): 212-228.
36. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics 23(1): 83-103.
37. Kiely, R. (2001). Classroom evaluation- values, interests and teacher development. Language Teaching Research 5(3): 241-262.
38. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18(2): 141-165.
39. Lightbown, P. M. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 21(3): 431-462.
40. Lindstromberg, S. (2001). Preposition entries in UK monolingual learners' dictionaries: Problems and possible solutions. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 79-103.
41. Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 241-265.
42. Low, G. (1999). What respondents do with questionnaires: Accounting for incongruity and fluidity. Applied Linguistics. 20(4): 503-533.
43. Lynch, T. and J. Maclean. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom learning. Language Teaching Research Special Issue: Tasks in Language Pedagogy 4(3):251-274.
44. Matras, Y. (1999). The pragmatics of codification in a stateless language. Applied Linguistics 20(4): 481-502.
45. Meara, P. (2004). Modeling vocabulary loss. Applied Linguistics 25(2): 137-155.
46. Meara, P. forthcoming. Lexical frequency profiles: a Monte Carlo analysis. Applied Linguistics.
47. Meara, P. , P. M. Lightbown and R. H. Halter. (1997). Classrooms as lexical environments. Language Teaching Research 1(1): 28-47.
48. Mitchell, R. (2000). Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Applied Linguistics 21(3): 281-303.
49. Mitchell, R. and C. Martin. (1997). Rote learning, creativity and 'understanding' in classroom foreign language teaching. Language Teaching Research 1(1):1-27.
50. Pavlenko, A. (2001). Language learning memoirs as a gendered narrative. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 213-240.
51. Roberts, C. , E. Davies and T. Jupp. (1992). Language and discrimination. Harlow: Longman.
52. Roberts, J. (1999). Personal Construct Psychology as a framework for research into teacher and learner thinking. Language Teaching Research 3(2): 117-145.
53. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 27-57.
54. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
55. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationship between form and meaning during task performance: the role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (eds) Researching pedagogical tasks: second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.
56. Sarangi, S. & C. N. Candlin (eds) (2003). Special Issue. Researching the discourse of workplace practice. Applied Linguistics 24(3).
57. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When 'others' initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2): 205-243.
58. Skehan, P. & P. Foster. (1999). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Learning 49(1): 93-120.
59. Solan, L. M. & P. M. Tiersma (forthcoming) Author Identification in American Courts. Applied Linguistics.
60. Stubbs, M. (2001). Texts, corpora, and problems of interpretation: a response to Widdowson. Applied Linguistics 22(2): 149-172.
61. Swain, M. and S. Lapkin. (2000). Task-based second language learning: the uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research Special Issue: Tasks in Language Pedagogy 4(3): 251-274.
62. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 58-78.
64. Towell, R. and P. Tomlinson. (1999). Language curriculum development research at university level. Language Teaching Research 3(1): 1-32.
65. Wang, K. and P. Nation (2004). Word Meaning in Academic English: Homography in the Academic Word List. Applied Linguistics 25(3).
66. Widdowson, H. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3-25.
67. Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics 21(2): 244-267.
68. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 463-489.
69. Yuan, F. and R. Ellis. (2003). The effectgs of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 1-27.
70. Zuengler, J. and J. Mori (eds) (2002). Special Issue: Microanalyses of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics. 23(3).