The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum

Language Testing

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 419-437

  Byrnes, Heidi ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990341696     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0265532202lt238oa     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. 1986: The problem of the text in linguistics, philology, and the human sciences. An experiment in philosophical analysis. In Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., editors, Speech genres and other late essays: M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: The University of Texas Press, 103-131.
2. Brindley, G. 2000: Task difficulty and task generalisability in competency-based writing assessment. In Brindley, G., editor, Studies in immigrant English language assessment, Volume 1. Sydney: Macquarie University: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, 125-157.
3. Bygate, M. 2001: Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M., editors, Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow, England: Longman, 23-48.
4. Byrnes, H. 2000: Languages across the curriculum - intradepartmental curriculum construction: issues and options. In Kecht, M. R. and von Hammerstein, K., editors, Languages across the curriculum: interdisciplinary structures and internationalized education. Columbus, OH: National East Asian Languages Resource Center at The Ohio State University, 151-175.
5. Byrnes, H. 2001: Reconsidering graduate students” education as teachers: it takes a department ! Modern Language Journal 85, 512-530.
6. Christie, F. 1999: Genre theory and ESL teaching: a systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly 33, 759-763.
7. Developing multiple literacies 2000: Developing multiple literacies: a curriculum renewal project of the German Department at Georgetown University, 1997-2000. Available on the internet: www.georgetown.edu/departments/german (accessed 9th August 2002).
8. Doughty, C. and Long, M. H. 2002: Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language education. Paper presented at the conference Distance learning of the less commonly taught languages, Arlington, VA, February. Available at www.langinnovate.msu.edu/doughtyFlongFoutline.html (accessed May 2002).
9. Gee, J. P. 1998: What is literacy? In Zamel, V. and Spack, R., editors, Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across languages and cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 51-59.
10. Halliday, M. A. K. 1985: An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
11. Halliday, M. A. K. 1993: Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5, 93-116.
12. Hasan, R. and Martin, J. R., editors, 1989: Language development: learning language, learning culture. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Markee, N. 1997: Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. The New London Group 1996: A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66, 60-92.
15. Norris, J. M. 2000: Purposeful language assessment. English Teaching Forum 38, 18-23.
16. Ricoeur, P. 1981: The model of the text: meaningful action considered as text. In Ricoeur, P., edited and translated by Thompson, J.B., Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197-221.
17. Segalowitz, N. 2000: Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In Riggenbach, H., editor, Perspectives on fluency. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 200-219.
18. Shohamy, E. 1998: Evaluation of learning outcomes in second language acquisition: a multiplism perspective. In Byrnes, H., editor, Learning foreign and second languages: perspectives on research and scholarship. New York: MLA, 238-261.